Reaction mass of (1S*, 2R*, 5S*)-2-Isopropenyl-5-methylcyclohexanol and (1S*, 2S*, 5R*)-2-Isopropenyl-5-methylcyclohexanol

Eye irritation

Administrative data

Endpoint:

eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo

Type of information:

experimental study

Adequacy of study:

key study

Study period:

04 - 21 Oct 2016

Reliability:

1 (reliable without restriction)

Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:

guideline study

Data source

Reference

Reference Type:

study report

Title:

Unnamed

Year:

2017

Report date:

2017

Materials and methods

Test guideline

Test guideline 1

Qualifier:

according to guideline

Guideline:

OECD Guideline 437 (Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Test Method for Identifying i) Chemicals Inducing Serious Eye Damage and ii) Chemicals Not Requiring Classification for Eye Irritation or Serious Eye Damage)

Version / remarks:

adopted Jul 2013

Deviations:

no

Test guideline 2

Qualifier:

according to guideline

Guideline:

EU method B.47 (Bovine corneal opacity and permeability test method for identifying ocular corrosives and severe irritants)

Version / remarks:

Commission directive (EC) No 1152/2010/EC

Deviations:

no

GLP compliance:

yes (incl. QA statement)

Remarks:

Hess. Ministerium für Umwelt, Klimaschutz, Landwirtschaft und Verbraucherschutz, Wiesbaden, Germany

Test material

Test material information

Constituent 1

Reference substance name:

Reaction mass of (1S*, 2R*, 5S*)-2-Isopropenyl-5-methylcyclohexanol and (1S*, 2S*, 5R*)-2-Isopropenyl-5-methylcyclohexanol

Molecular formula:

C10H18O

IUPAC Name:

Reaction mass of (1S*, 2R*, 5S*)-2-Isopropenyl-5-methylcyclohexanol and (1S*, 2S*, 5R*)-2-Isopropenyl-5-methylcyclohexanol

Test animals / tissue source

Species:

cattle

Strain:

not specified

Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:

SOURCE OF COLLECTED EYES
- Source: Schlachthof Aschaffenburg, Aschaffenburg, Germany
- Characteristics of donor animals: at least 9 month old
- Storage, temperature and transport conditions of ocular tissue: The isolated eyes were transported in Hank's Buffered Salt Solution (HBSS) at ambient temperature.
- Time interval prior to initiating testing: The corneae were isolated on the same day after delivery of the eyes and directly used in the BCOP test.
- Indication of any existing defects or lesions in ocular tissue samples: All eyes were carefully examined macroscopically for defects. Those presenting defects such as vascularization, pigmentation, opacity and scratches were discarded.

Test system

Vehicle:

unchanged (no vehicle)

Controls:

yes, concurrent positive control

yes, concurrent negative control

Amount / concentration applied:

TEST MATERIAL
- Applied volume: 0.75 mL

POSITIVE SUBSTANCE
- Applied volume: 0.75 mL
- Purity: 99%

NEGATIVE CONTROL
- Applied volume: 0.75 mL

Duration of treatment / exposure:

10 min at 32 ± 1 °C

Duration of post- treatment incubation (in vitro):

2 h

Number of animals or in vitro replicates:

triplicates for each treatment and control groups

Details on study design:

SELECTION AND PREPARATION OF CORNEAS:
The cornea was carefully removed from the eye using scalpel and rounded scissors. A rim of about 2 mm of tissue (sclera) was left for stability and handling of the isolated cornea. Each cornea was mounted in a specially designed cornea holder.

QUALITY CHECK OF THE ISOLATED CORNEAS:
At the end of the equilibration period, the basal opacity was determined (t0). Each cornea with a value of a basal opacity >7 was discarded.

NUMBER OF REPLICATES: 3 corneae per test group
The test was performed twice, but two replicates of the positive control in the 1st experiment did not meet the acceptance criteria of an IVIS > 55. Therefore, only the results of the 2nd experiment are reported, but the raw data of both experiments are archived.

TREATMENT METHOD:
The cornea holder consists of anterior and posterior compartments, which interface with the epithelial and endothelial sides of the cornea, respectively. The endothelial side of the cornea was positioned against the sealing ring (O-ring) of the posterior part of the holder. The cornea was gently flattened over the O-ring but stretching was avoided. The anterior part of the holder was positioned on the top of the cornea and fixed in place with screws. Both compartments of the holder were filled with incubation medium. The posterior compartment was filled first to return the cornea to its natural convex position. After equilibration for about 1 hour, the anterior compartment received the test substance or the controls on the surface of the corneae. The corneae were incubated in a horizontal position at 32 ± 1 °C in the water-bath for 10 minutes.

REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE:
The test substance was rinsed off from the application side with saline.
- POST-EXPOSURE INCUBATION: 2 h in a vertical position

METHODS FOR MEASURED ENDPOINTS:
- Corneal opacity: Corneal opacity was determined by the amount of light transmission through the cornea via an opacitometer (OP_KiT opacitometer, Electro Design, France).
- Corneal permeability: The passage of sodium fluorescein dye was measured with the aid of a microplate reader (Versamax Molecular Devices) at 490 nm (OD490).

SCORING SYSTEM: In Vitro Irritancy Score (IVIS), IVIS = opacity value + (15 x OD490 value)

DECISION CRITERIA:
Test substance with an IVIS > 55 was regarded as serious eye damage and labelled Category 1 according to CLP/EPS/GHS.
Test substance with an IVIS ≤ 3 was regarded as non-irritant and labelled in no category.
Test substance with an IVIS > 3; ≤ 55: no prediction can be made.

Results and discussion

In vitro

Results

Irritation parameter:

in vitro irritation score

Remarks:

(mean value of 3 corneae)

Run / experiment:

10 min

Value:

2.72

Vehicle controls validity:

not applicable

Negative controls validity:

valid

Positive controls validity:

valid

Other effects / acceptance of results:

With the negative control (saline) neither an increase of opacity nor permeability of the corneae could be observed (mean IVIS = 1.03).
The positive control (2-ethoxyethanol) was tested undiluted and showed clear opacity and distinctive permeability of the corneae (mean IVIS = 101.18) corresponding to a classification as serious eye damaging.
Relative to the negative control, the test substance did not cause an increase of the corneal opacity or permeability (mean IVIS = 2.72).

ACCEPTANCE OF RESULTS:
- Acceptance criteria met for negative control: The negative control resulted in opacity and permeability values that were less than the established upper limits for background opacity and permeability values for bovine corneae treated with the respective negative control.
- Acceptance criteria met for postive control: The positive control resulted in an IVIS which was within two standard deviations of the current historical mean.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Table 2. Results after 10 min incubation period.

Test group	Opacity value = Difference (t130-t0) of Opacity		Permeability at 490 nm (OD490)		IVIS	Mean IVIS
		Mean		Mean
Negative Control	0	0.00	0.086	0.069	1.29	1.03
	0		0.055		0.83
	0		0.065		0.98
Positive Control	83.0*		1.132*		99.99	101.18
	92.0*		1.084*		108.27
	82.0*		0.885*		95.28
Test substance	1.00*		0.110*		2.66	2.72
	1.00*		0.065*		1.98
	3.00*		0.034*		3.52

*: corrected values

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:

other: CLP/EU GHS criteria not met, no classification required according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008

Conclusions:

Under the conditions of the BCOP assay the test substance was not irritating to the eye. Application of the test substance to bovine corneae resulted in a calculated mean IVIS of 2.72.

Executive summary:

The eye irritation potential of the test substance was determined by a bovine corneal opacity and permeability (BCOP) test according to OECD Guideline 437 and in compliance with GLP (2017). Application of the test substance to bovine corneae resulted in a calculated mean IVIS of 2.72. Thus, the test substance is not considered to be irritant to the eye.