Registration Dossier

Administrative data

Endpoint:
acute toxicity: oral
Type of information:
other: weight of evidence
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
Justification for type of information:
The weight of Evidence is justified in the attached Justification

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2016
Report Date:
2016

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to
Guideline:
other: OECD 432, OECD 129, ECVAM 139
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes

Test material

Reference
Name:
Unnamed
Type:
Constituent
Test material form:
solid: particulate/powder
Details on test material:
light beige powder

Results and discussion

Effect levels
Key result
Remarks on result:
not determinable due to absence of adverse toxic effects

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
Based on these different information provided in the attached weight of evidence argumentation, the applicant concludes that the substance Oligosaccharides of Caesalipinia Spinosa extract do not show acute oral systemic toxicity. Therefore, no classification for acute oral toxicity is needed.
Executive summary:

Based on these different information provided in the attached weight of evidence argumentation, the applicant concludes that the substance Oligosaccharides of Caesalipinia Spinosa extract do not show acute oral systemic toxicity. Therefore, no classification for acute oral toxicity is needed.