Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 231-180-0 | CAS number: 7440-74-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
General introduction
Directly after introduction of Indium metal powder in aqueous test media, only very low In-concentrations (≤1 μg/L) are detected. This is explained on one hand, by the very limited solubility of In metal and, on the other hand, by the general and immediate precipitation of Indium ions to In(OH)3.
Indeed, as predicted by chemical equilibrium models and confirmed by TD testing, the higher valence (trivalent) metal In has very low solubility in natural waters and/or ecotoxicity testing media, due to the readily formation of hydroxy complexes In(OH)3. As shown for Aluminium, (which has comparable characteristics in water) such hydroxy complexes may contribute to toxicity (Gensemer et al, 2018), e.g. by polymerisation and/or physical precipitation on the gill surface and as such clogging the gill surface and inhibit its function. As a result, toxicity values for In are expressed as "total recoverable Indium", to include both the In3+ ionic fraction and the In(OH)3 fraction. Consequently, ecotoxicity reference values and PNECs for Indium substances are expressed on a "total recoverable In" basis.
PNECs
As a general worst case approach to the assessment of In toxicity, information obtained on soluble In-compounds (usually InCl3) is used for determining PNECs for Indium risk assessment. The In solubilising from these compounds will, upon release in the water, transform into In(OH)3, and the observed toxicity will be a result of the presence of In-ion and In(OH)3 complexes in the "total recoverable" fraction. The general PNECs are used for the assessment of all In substances, including those with very low solubility. Considering the very low release of In-ions from such insoluble substances, it is emphasised that this general approach is very conservative.
Hazard assessment
The acute hazard of In metal is based on the general data, obtained on soluble In substances, that show no acute hazard of In substances in general.
The chronic hazard assessment of In metal is based on a) transformation/dissolution testing and b) chronic ecotoxicity testing on Ceriodaphnia dubia, (which was the most sensitive species identified in the chronic ecotoxicity dataset on soluble In-compounds -see section 6.1.4.) and on the unicellular alga P. subcapitata, which was the most sensitive species in the acute ecotoxicity dataset on InCl3 (see section 6.1.5.).
Transformation/dissolution test results show that the solubility of In metal (powder) is extremely low. Consequently, the chronic aquatic toxicity of In metal powder is also extremely low: NOECs of 100mg In/L were observed for both organisms (highest dose tested). Based on these results on the powder, it is concluded that Indium metal is not chronically toxic for aquatic effects.
For reasons of completeness, the general ecotoxicity data on soluble In-substances are presented below. These data are used for a) the PNECs, and b) for the acute hazard assessment of the In substances, including In metal.
Short-term aquatic toxicity
There were several studies available on short-term aquatic effects of indium substances, mostly on indium trichloride.
Since, like for the other metals, the ecotoxicity of Indium and its compounds is basically related to the effect of the Indium-ion, In3 +, studies
obtained on InCl3 and other soluble In-substances can be read across to the other In-substances. All PNECs derived are expressed as total indium (ion) concentration. They are consequently relevant for all In-substances.
A total of 12 LC/EC50s, from 9 different species, representing 3 trophic levels (1 algae, 6 invertebrate and 2 fish species) is available. Below is a table showing the species in the indium trichloride acute dataset, the respective LC/EC50 values, species group and the references.
Species |
LC/EC50 mg/L |
Endpoints |
Species group |
Reference |
Oreochromis mossambicus |
19.5 |
48-h, mortality |
Fish |
Lin & Wang, 1998 |
Sillago japonica* |
>20.0 |
24-h, mortality |
Fish |
Onikura et al. 2008 |
Brachionus plicatilis* |
24.4 |
24-h, mortality |
Invert. |
Onikura et al. 2008 |
Artemia salina* |
51.0 |
48-h, mortality |
Invert. |
Onikura et al. 2008 |
Artemia salina |
7.1 |
48-h, mortality |
Invert. |
Onikura et al. 2008 |
Americamysis bahia* |
30.5 |
96-h, mortality |
Invert. |
Onikura et al. 2008 |
Daphnia magna |
>455.5 |
48-h, mortality |
Invert. |
Aecom, 2012 |
Daphnia magna |
31.9 |
24-h, mobility |
Invert. |
Zurita et al. 2007 |
Hyalella azteca |
>3.1 |
7-d, mortality |
Invert. |
Borgmann et al. 2005 |
Hyalella azteca** |
>1 |
7-d, mortality |
Invert. |
Borgmann et al. 2005 |
Macrobrachium nipponense |
6.9 |
96-h, mortality |
Invert. |
Yang et al. 2014 |
Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata |
1.6 |
72-h, biomass |
Algae |
Aecom, 2012 |
*Test conducted in marine water; ** soft water.
The ecotoxicity reference value (erv) (= lowest acute toxicity value) is 1.6 mg In/L.
Chronic aquatic toxicity
For assessing the chronic aquatic toxicity of In metal, results from two specific tests performed on In metal powder were available:
-For Ceriodaphnia dubia, which was the most sensitive species identified in the chronic ecotoxicity dataset on soluble In-compounds, the NOEC was 100mg In/L.
-For the unicellular alga Pseudokircherniella subcapitata, which was the most sensitive species in the acute ecotoxicity dataset on InCl3, the NOEC was 100mg In/L .
The very low toxicity of the In metal could be explained by the very low solubility of the In metal.
Chronic data for the derivation of the chronic erv and PNEC for In substances
The PNEC was derived based on chronic data obtained on soluble In substances. A total of 11 NOEC/EC10s, from 7 different species, representing 3 trophic levels (1 algae, 4 invertebrates and 2 fish species) were used to derive the PNEC. The species used in the PNEC assessment, the respective NOEC/EC10 values, endpoints, species group and the references, all obtained on testing with InCl3, are presented in table below.
Species | NOEC/EC10 µg/L | Endpoint | Species group | Reference |
Oreochromis mossambicus |
1950 |
16-d, length |
Fish |
Lin & Wang, 1998 |
Pimephales promelas |
25000 |
14-d, weight |
Fish |
Aecom, 2012 |
Ceriodaphnia dubia* |
92.92* |
7-d reproduction |
Invert. |
Aecom, 2011a,b,c; Aecom, 2012c,d |
Daphnia magna |
410 |
21-d, reproduction |
Invert. |
Aecom, 2012e |
Strongylocentrotus purpuratus |
825 |
48-h, development |
Invert. |
Nautilus, 2012 |
Mytilus galloprovincialis |
18100 |
48-h, development |
Invert. |
Nautilus, 2012 |
Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata |
366 |
72 -h, biomass |
Algae |
Aecom, 2012g |
*Geometric mean calculated from 5 separate studies.
from the data above, it follows that ythe lowest species NOEC observed for Ceriodaphnia dubia of 93µg In/L is used as ecotoxicity reference value (ERV) for In-substances.
It is noted that for the hazard assessment of In metal, the results of the ecotoxicity tests performed on the most sensitive species from the InCl3 database (C.dubia) and the generally sensitive taxonomic group of the unicellular algae, are used, only (see above) These specific results are used for the hazard assessment and classification of In metal, only.
reference:
Gensemer, R. W., Gondek, J. C., Rodriquez, P. H., Arbildua, J. J., Stubblefield, W. A., Cardwell, A. S.,
Santore, R. C., Ryan, A. C., Adams, W. J. & Nordheim, E. (2018). Evaluating the effects of pH,
hardness, and dissolved organic carbon on the toxicity of aluminum to freshwater aquatic
organisms under circumneutral conditions. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 37, 49-60.
Additional information
There is evidence that higher loading of InCl3 during experiments leads to a shift in pH: addition of In at higher loading (i.e. > 10mg InCl3/L) causes a pH effect, which could influence metal speciation and subsequently the ecotoxicity results.
Acute aquatic toxicity
There were two studies conducted with Daphnia magna as a test species where in a first test pH was adjusted to test conditions and in a second test pH was not adjusted
(Aecom 2012). The study with the unadjusted pH (lower pH shift in the higher In concentrations) had an 8.5 time lower LC50 compared to the adjusted pH test. As the higher In concentrations in the unadjusted pH tests had pH lower than 4.5, the LC50 of the adjusted pH test was used as an appropriate toxicity endpoint for acute freshwater toxicity tests.
Several acute studies did not record the pH. For example, Lin and Hwang (1998) tested the toxicity of InCl3 on 3-day-old larvae of Oreaochromis mossambicus. The LC50 observed on Oreochromis mossambicus is 19519 µg total In/L. Lin and Hwang (1998) did not measure pH. High loading with In in the tests (>15 mg In/L) could result in a pH-drop and subsequently contribute to an observed ecotoxicity. However, even if pH were not recorded the data were still used, as this would represent a ‘worst-case’ scenario (i.e. very conservative dataset). Given that all acute data reviewed in the dataset showed LC/EC50 values greater than 1 mg/L, this results in there being no classification for acute aquatic effects.
Chronic aquatic toxicity
The long-term aquatic toxicity database covers 7 different species, representing 3 trophic levels (1 algae, 4 invertebrates and 2 fish species).
Indium precipitates under neutral (6-8) pH conditions. Therefore, no dose-response could be correlated with the observed dissolved In concentrations. The effect concentrations
are expressed as total recoverable In concentrations, including In ion and In(OH)3, formed upon release of In in solution. Total and dissolved indium concentrations were measured in 3 tests with Ceriodaphnia and 2 tests with D. magna. In the study of Aecom (2012d) DOC was used in the test medium (nominal concentration of 10 mg C/L). This study clearly indicates that Indium binds strongly to DOC, as the dissolved In concentration was comparable to the total In concentration; whereas in the other studies where no DOC was used, the dissolved concentrations were much less than the total In concentrations. Results are shown in Table below:
Species | NOEC nominal (µg total In/L) |
NOEC dissolved (µg In/L) |
NOEC total (µg In/L) |
DOC | Reference |
Ceriodaphnia dubia | 62 | 3.6 | 52.9 | ND | Aecom (2011a) |
Ceriodaphnia dubia | 62 | 1.9 | 58.1 | ND | Aecom (2012c) |
Ceriodaphnia dubia | 1847 | 1184 | 1710 | 10 | Aecom (2012d) |
Daphnia magna | 1000 | 5.4 | 809 | ND | Aecom (2012e) |
Daphnia magna | <3300 | 3.6 | 2780 | ND | Aecom (2012e) |
The studies of Aecom (2011b,c; 2012 a,c,d,e) also clearly indicate that the ecotoxicity of Indium towards invertebrates is influenced by hardness, see table below:
Fish:
Species | pH | Hardness (mg CaCO3/L) |
DOC (mg C/L) |
NOEC (µg total In/L) |
EC10 (µg total In/L) |
EC50 (µg total In/L) |
Reference |
Remarks |
Pimephales promelas |
7.8 -8.2 |
ND |
ND |
>25000 |
>25000 |
ND |
Aecom (2012a) |
|
Oreochromis mossambicus |
ND |
ND |
ND |
1951.9 |
ND |
ND |
Lin and Hwang (1998) |
pH was not measured |
Invert.:
Species | pH | Hardness (mg CaCO3/L) |
DOC (mg C/L) |
NOEC (µg total In/L) |
EC10 (µg total In/L) |
EC50 (µg total In/L) |
Reference |
Remarks |
Ceriodaphnia dubia |
8.0 |
90 |
ND |
10 |
ND |
ND |
Aecom (2011b) |
|
Ceriodaphnia dubia |
8.1 |
96 |
ND |
52.9 |
>20.4 |
ND |
Aecom (2011a) |
Test was range finder study; test result not used for classification and PNEC derivation |
Ceriodaphnia dubia |
8.2 |
90 |
ND |
20 |
<20 |
ND |
Aecom (2011c) |
|
Ceriodaphnia dubia |
7.9 |
402 |
ND |
58.1 |
87.2 |
ND |
Aecom (2012c) |
|
Ceriodaphnia dubia |
7.9 |
90 |
10 |
<1710 |
130 |
ND |
Aecom (2012d) |
NOEC test result not used for PNEC derivation as lower reproduction in control determines NOEC |
Daphnia magna |
7.3 -8.5 |
170 |
1.55 -2.21 |
809 |
1398 |
412 |
Aecom (2012e) |
Tests conducted in hard water |
Daphnia magna |
6.8 -7.6 |
510 |
1.43 -2.03 |
<2780 |
<2780 |
<2780 |
Aecom (2012e) |
Tests conducted in very hard water |
Algae:
Species |
pH |
Hardness (mg CaCO3/L) |
DOC (mg C/L) |
NOEC (µg total In/L) |
EC10 (µg total In/L) |
EC50 (µg total In/L) |
Reference |
Remarks |
Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata |
7.4 -9.6 |
14 |
1.39 |
321 |
1164 |
>5025 |
Aecom (2012f) |
|
Given the number of species data and the taxonomic coverage, the PNEC was derived using a species sensitivity distribution approach.
3. Aquatic chronic toxicity: marine water
Two marine species are included in the aquatic chronic dataset, Mediterranean mussel (Mytilus galloprovincialis) and the purple sea urchin (Strongylocentrotus purpuratus) (see Section 6.1). They are neither the most sensitive or tolerant species in the SSD and are included with the freshwater species-sensitivity distribution. Given the lack of difference observed in toxicity in freshwater and marine water, the same PNEC is derived for the marine water.
4. STP
There were two test results available. In a first test, the respiration sludge study was carried out without pH adjustment. This resulted in a NOEC of 460 mg InCl3/L and an EC50 of 680 mg InCl3/L. The pH in the controls and substance series, before addition of sludge was 7.3 at 10 mg/L and decreased to 2.9 at 1000 mg/L. After 3 hours exposure period the pH in the Indium trichloride series was 7.8 at 10 mg/L and decreased to 3.4-3.7 at 1000 mg/L.
In a second test, the pH was adjusted to 7.2. This resulted in a NOEC of 1000 mg/L and an EC50 of >1000 mg InCl3/L. As pH was very low in the pH non adjustment treatment, the results of the pH adjusted treatments were taken to set the PNEC for STP. The NOEC was 1000 mg InCl3/L or 516 mg In/L. Using an AF of 10, this results in a PNEC of 51.6 mg In/L for STP.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

EU Privacy Disclaimer
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our websites.