Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 265-200-4 | CAS number: 64742-96-7 A complex combination of hydrocarbons obtained from the distillation of crude oil or natural gasoline. It consists predominantly of saturated hydrocarbons having carbon numbers predominantly in the range of C11 through C16 and boiling in the range of approximately 190°C to 290°C (374°F to 554°F).
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- migrated information: read-across based on grouping of substances (category approach)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1983-01-21 to 1983-06-24
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: This study is classified as reliable without restrictions because it was carried out in a method equivalent/similar to OECD TG 476.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 984
- Report date:
- 1984
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- mammalian cell gene mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 64742-81-0
- Cas Number:
- 64742-81-0
- IUPAC Name:
- 64742-81-0
- Reference substance name:
- Hydrodesulfurised kerosine
- IUPAC Name:
- Hydrodesulfurised kerosine
- Test material form:
- other: low viscosity liquid hydrocarbon
- Details on test material:
- Test substance: Hydrodesulfurised kerosine Sample API 81-07, CAS No. 64742-81-0
Constituent 1
Constituent 2
Method
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 3.91 to 6.25 nl/ml with activation, 6.25 to 37.5 nl/ml without activation.
- Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: none
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- corn oil
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- triethylenemelamine
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- Mouse lymphoma assay
Results and discussion
Test results
- Species / strain:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- The test material induced a good range of toxicities for evaluation (relative growths ranged from 2.8% to 65.3%, -S9, and 6.1 to 107.9% relative growths, +S9)
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'. Remarks: mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
Any other information on results incl. tables
The
test material was immiscible with water and DMSO at 100 µl/ml but was
miscible with ethanol at the same concentration. Stocks were prepared by
performing serial dilutions in ethanol just prior to each assay. The
mutation assays were then initiated by performing final dilutions of the
stocks into the assay medium containing the lymphoma cells. The
test material appeared soluble in the assay medium up to 125 nl/ml but a
white precipitate was noted from 250 to 1000 nl/ml.
Two trials of the assay were initiated.
Trial 1 was performed with and without activation but the non-activation
assay was NOT used in the evaluation because of unacceptable suspension
growth in the negative controls. The non-activation portion of the assay
was therefore repeated in Trial 2.
The report summarized here included the acceptable activation assay from
Trial 1 and the acceptable non-activation assay from Trial 2.
The results are summarized below.
|
Rel |
Total |
Total |
Cloning |
Rel |
Mutant |
|
Susp. |
mutant |
viable |
eff. |
growth |
frequency |
|
growth |
colonies |
|
(%) |
10E-6units |
|
|
(% of control) |
|
|
|
|
|
Non activation assay (Trial 2) |
||||||
Solvent control (ethanol) |
||||||
|
100 |
70 |
392 |
100 |
100 |
17.9 |
|
100 |
74 |
287 |
100 |
100 |
25.8 |
|
100 |
75 |
367 |
100 |
100 |
20.4 |
|
100 |
50 |
324 |
100 |
100 |
15.4 |
Untreated control |
||||||
|
107.1 |
82 |
374 |
109.2 |
116.7 |
21.9 |
|
97.4 |
70 |
392 |
116.5 |
111.3 |
17.9 |
EMS(µl/ml) |
||||||
0.5 |
46.7 |
851 |
170 |
49.6 |
23.2 |
500.6 |
0.5 |
57.3 |
753 |
155 |
45.3 |
25.9 |
485.8 |
API81-07 (nl/ml) |
||||||
6.25 |
28.3 |
83 |
331 |
96.6 |
27.3 |
25.1 |
12.5 |
24.7 |
61 |
282 |
82.3 |
20.3 |
21.6 |
12.5 |
67.4 |
89 |
332 |
96.9 |
65.3 |
26.8 |
25.0 |
16.3 |
87 |
258 |
75.3 |
12.3 |
33.7 |
25.0 |
45.4 |
61 |
248 |
72.4 |
82.7 |
24.6 |
37.5 |
10.3 |
105 |
366 |
106.8 |
11 |
28.7 |
37.5 |
6.2 |
77 |
143 |
41.7 |
2.6 |
53.8 |
Activation assay |
||||||
Solvent control (ethanol) |
||||||
|
100 |
98 |
236 |
100 |
100 |
41.5 |
|
100 |
92 |
282 |
100 |
100 |
32.6 |
Untreated control |
||||||
|
128.2 |
99 |
226 |
87.2 |
111.8 |
43.8 |
DMN( µl/ml) |
||||||
0.3 |
58.5 |
151 |
34 |
13.1 |
7.7 |
444.1 |
API81-07 (nl/ml) |
||||||
3.91 |
100.1 |
66 |
194 |
74.8 |
74.9 |
34 |
7.81 |
194.1 |
52 |
144 |
55.6 |
107.9 |
36.1 |
15.6 |
101.7 |
42 |
259 |
99.9 |
101.6 |
16.2 |
31.3 |
27.3 |
45 |
158 |
61 |
16.7 |
28.5 |
62.5 |
9 |
68 |
175 |
67.5 |
6.1 |
38.9 |
Under
non-activation conditions the test material induced a good range of
toxicities for evaluation (relative growths ranged from 2.8% to 65.3%).
None of the assays induced a mutant frequency that exceeded the minimum
criterion (40.8 x 10-6). The test material was not mutagenic under
non-activation conditions.
In the presence of metabolic activation, a wide range of toxicities were
induced (6.1 to 107.9% relative growths). The minimum criterion mutant
frequency of 69.0 x 10-6 was not exceeded. The test material was
therefore considered non mutagenic under activation conditions.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative
The test substance does not induce chromosomal aberrations in rat bone marrow cells under the condition of the study. ... (see attached file) - Executive summary:
In a mammalian cell gene mutation assay, mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells, cultured in vitro, were exposed to hydrodesulfurised kerosine at concentrations from 6.25 nL/mL to 37.5 nL/mL without activation and from 3.91 nl/ml to 62.5 nl/ml with S9 metabolic activation. The cells were exposed for four hours both in the presence and absence of the rat liver S9 metabolic activation.
Under non-activation conditions the test material induced a good range of toxicities for evaluation (relative growths ranged from 2.8% to 65.3%). None of the assays induced a mutant frequency that exceeded the minimum criterion (40.8 x 10-6). The test material was not mutagenic under non-activation conditions. In the presence of metabolic activation, a wide range of toxicities were induced (6.1 to 107.9% relative growths). The minimum criterion mutant frequency of 69.0 x 10-6 was not exceeded. The test material was therefore considered non mutagenic under activation conditions.
This study received a Klimisch score of 1 and is classified as reliable without restriction because it was carried out in a method similar/equivalent to OECD TG 471.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.