Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 265-742-1 | CAS number: 65405-72-3
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- The study was conducted between 09 May 2014 and 25 June 2014.
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP guideline study.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 014
- Report date:
- 2014
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.17 (Mutagenicity - In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.5300 - In vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Kanpoan No. 287 - Japanese Environment Protection Agency; Eisei No. 127 - Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare and Heisei 09/10/31 Kikyoku No. 2 - Japanese Ministry of International Trade & Industry.
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- mammalian cell gene mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 1,2,3,4,4a,7,8,8a-octahydro-2,4a,5,8a-tetramethyl-1-naphthyl formate
- EC Number:
- 265-742-1
- EC Name:
- 1,2,3,4,4a,7,8,8a-octahydro-2,4a,5,8a-tetramethyl-1-naphthyl formate
- Cas Number:
- 65405-72-3
- Molecular formula:
- C15H24O2
- IUPAC Name:
- 1,2,3,4,4a,7,8,8a-octahydro-2,4a,5,8a-tetramethyl-1-naphthyl formate
- Test material form:
- liquid
Constituent 1
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Batch: SC00010054
Purity: 96.5%
Physical state/Appearance: Clear colourless liquid
Method
- Target gene:
- Thymidine kinase
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not specified
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9-mix
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Experiment 1
4-hour without S9: 2.5, 5, 10, 20 µg/mL
4-hour with S9 (2%): 2.5, 5, 10, 20, 40, 50 µg/mL
Experiment 2
24-hour without S9: 2, 4, 8, 16, 24, 32 µg/mL
4-hour with S9 (2%): 8, 16, 32, 40, 48, 56 µg/mL - Vehicle / solvent:
- Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)
Controls
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- ethylmethanesulphonate
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- Cell Line
The L5178Y TK+/- 3.7.2c mouse lymphoma cell line was obtained from Dr. J. Cole of the MRC Cell Mutation Unit at the University of Sussex, Brighton, UK. The cells were originally obtained from Dr. D. Clive of Burroughs Wellcome (USA) in October 1978 and were frozen in liquid nitrogen at that time.
Cell Culture
The stocks of cells are stored in liquid nitrogen at approximately -196 °C. Cells were routinely cultured in RPMI 1640 medium with Glutamax-1 and HEPES buffer (20 mM) supplemented with Penicillin (100 units/mL), Streptomycin (100 µg/mL), Sodium pyruvate (1 mM), Amphotericin B (2.5 µg/mL) and 10% donor horse serum (giving R10 media) at 37 °C with 5% CO2 in air. The cells have a generation time of approximately 12 hours and were subcultured accordingly. RPMI 1640 with 20% donor horse serum (R20) and without serum (R0) are used during the course of the study. Master stocks of cells were tested and found to be free of mycoplasma.
Cell Cleansing
The TK +/- heterozygote cells grown in suspension spontaneously mutate at a low but significant rate. Before the stocks of cells were frozen they were cleansed of homozygous (TK -/-) mutants by culturing in THMG medium for 24 hours. This medium contained Thymidine (9 µg/mL), Hypoxanthine (15 µg/mL), Methotrexate (0.3 µg/mL) and Glycine (22.5 µg/mL). For the following 24 hours the cells were cultured in THG medium (i.e. THMG without Methotrexate) before being returned to R10 medium.
Mutagenicity Test
Experiment 1
Several days before starting the experiment, an exponentially growing stock culture of cells was set up so as to provide an excess of cells on the morning of the experiment. The cells were counted and processed to give 1E+06 cells/mL in 10 mL aliquots in R10 medium in sterile plastic universals. The treatments were performed in duplicate (A + B), both with and without metabolic activation (2% S9 final concentration) at eight dose levels of the test item (2.5 to 40 µg/mL in the absence of metabolic activation and 2.5 to 70 µg/mL in the presence of metabolic activation), vehicle and positive controls. To each universal was added 2 mL of S9 mix if required, 0.2 mL of the treatment dilutions, (0.2 mL for the positive control) and sufficient R0 medium to bring the total volume to 20 mL.
The treatment vessels were incubated at 37 °C for 4 hours with continuous shaking using an orbital shaker within an incubated hood.
Experiment 2
As in Experiment 1, an exponentially growing stock culture of cells was established. The cells were counted and processed to give 1 x 106 cells/mL in 10 mL cultures in R10 medium for the 4 hour treatment with metabolic activation cultures. In the absence of metabolic activation the exposure period was extended to 24 hours therefore 0.3E+06 cells/mL in 10 mL cultures were established in 25 cm2 tissue culture flasks. The treatments were performed in duplicate (A + B), both with and without metabolic activation (2% S9 final concentration) at eight dose levels of the test item (2 to 48 µg/mL in the absence of metabolic activation, and 2 to 56 µg/mL in the presence of metabolic activation), vehicle and positive controls. To each culture vessel was added 2 mL of S9 mix if required, 0.2 mL of the treatment dilutions, (0.2 mL for the positive controls) and sufficient R0 medium to give a final volume of 20 mL (R10 was used for the 24 hour exposure group).
The treatment vessels were incubated at 37 °C with continuous shaking using an orbital shaker within an incubated hood for 24 hours in the absence of metabolic activation and 4 hours in the presence of metabolic activation.
Measurement of Survival, Viability and Mutant Frequency
At the end of the treatment period, for each experiment, the cells were washed twice using R10 medium then resuspended in R20 medium at a cell density of 2E+05 cells/mL. The cultures were incubated at 37 °C with 5% CO2 in air and subcultured every 24 hours for the expression period of two days, by counting and dilution to 2E+05 cells/mL, unless the mean cell count was less than 3E+05 cells/mL in which case all the cells were maintained.
On Day 2 of the experiment, the cells were counted, diluted to 104 cells/mL and plated for mutant frequency (2000 cells/well) in selective medium containing 4 µg/mL 5 trifluorothymidine (TFT) in 96-well microtitre plates. Cells were also diluted to 10 cells/mL and plated (2 cells/well) for viability (%V) in non-selective medium.
The daily cell counts were used to obtain a Relative Suspension Growth (%RSG) value that gives an indication of post treatment toxicity during the expression period as a comparison to the vehicle control, and when combined with the Viability (%V) data a Relative Total Growth (RTG) value.
Plate Scoring
Microtitre plates were scored using a magnifying mirror box after ten to fourteen days’ incubation at 37 °C with 5% CO2 in air. The number of positive wells (wells with colonies) was recorded together with the total number of scorable wells (normally 96 per plate). The numbers of small and large colonies seen in the TFT mutation plates were also recorded as the additional information may contribute to an understanding of the mechanism of action of the test item (Cole et al, 1990). Colonies are scored manually by eye using qualitative judgement. Large colonies are defined as those that cover approximately ¼ to ¾ of the surface of the well and are generally no more than one or two cells thick. In general, all colonies less than 25% of the average area of the large colonies are scored as small colonies. Small colonies are normally observed to be more than two cells thick. To assist the scoring of the TFT mutant colonies 0.025 mL of thiazolyl blue tetrazolium bromide (MTT) solution, 2.5 mg/mL in phosphate buffered saline (PBS), was added to each well of the mutation plates. The plates were incubated for two hours. MTT is a vital stain that is taken up by viable cells and metabolized to give a brown/black color, thus aiding the visualization of the mutant colonies, particularly the small colonies.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Species / strain:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- other: There was evidence of marked reductions in the Relative Suspension Growth (%RSG) of cells treated with the test item when compared to the concurrent vehicle controls in all three of the exposure groups in the preliminary toxicity test.
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- Preliminary Cytotoxicity Test
The dose range of the test item used in the preliminary toxicity test was 9.2 to 2363 µg/mL in all three exposure groups.
There was evidence of marked reductions in the Relative Suspension Growth (%RSG) of cells treated with the test item when compared to the concurrent vehicle controls in all three of the exposure groups. The onset of test item-induced toxicity was very sharp in all three of the exposure groups. A precipitate of the test item was observed at and above 295.4 µg/mL in the absence of metabolic activation (4-hour and 24-hour exposure). A precipitate of the test item was observed at and above 590.8 µg/mL in the presence of metabolic activation (4-hour exposure). Based on the %RSG values observed, the maximum dose level in the subsequent mutagenicity experiment was limited by test item induced toxicity.
Experiment 1
There was evidence of marked toxicity following exposure to the test item in both the absence and presence of metabolic activation, as indicated by the %RSG and RTG values. There was no evidence of reductions in viability (%V) in either the absence or presence of metabolic activation, therefore indicating that residual toxicity had not occurred. Based on the %RSG and RTG values observed, optimum levels of toxicity were achieved in the absence of metabolic activation. Optimum levels of toxicity were not achieved in the presence absence of metabolic activation, despite using a narrow dose interval, due to the very steep toxicity curve of the test item. Whilst optimum levels of toxicity were not achieved a dose level, in the presence of metabolic activation, that exceeded the upper limit of toxicity was plated for viability and 5-TFT resistance as sufficient cells were available at the time of plating. The excessive toxicity observed at and above 25 µg/mL in the absence of metabolic activation, and at and above 60 µg/mL in the presence of metabolic activation, resulted in these dose levels not being plated for viability or 5-TFT resistance. The toxicity observed at 50 µg/mL in the in the presence of metabolic activation, exceeded the upper acceptable limit of 90%, therefore, this dose was excluded from the statistical analysis. Acceptable levels of toxicity were seen with both positive control substances.
The vehicle controls had mutant frequency values that were considered acceptable for the L5178Y cell line at the TK +/- locus. Both of the positive controls produced marked increases in the mutant frequency per viable cell indicating that the test system was operating satisfactorily and that the metabolic activation system was functional.
The test item did not induce any statistically significant or dose related (linear-trend) increases in the mutant frequency x 10-6 per viable cell, at any of the dose levels (including the dose levels that exceeded the upper limit of acceptable toxicity), in either the absence or presence of metabolic activation. With no evidence of any toxicologically significant increases in mutant frequency in either the absence or presence of metabolic activation in this Experiment, the test item was considered to have been adequately tested. Precipitate of the test item was not observed at any of the dose levels.
Experiment 2
As was seen previously, there was evidence of marked toxicity in both the absence and presence of metabolic activation, as indicated by the %RSG and RTG values. There was no evidence of a reduction in viability (%V) in either the absence or presence of metabolic activation, therefore indicating that residual toxicity had not occurred. Based on the RTG and / or %RSG values observed, optimum levels of toxicity were considered to have been achieved in the absence metabolic activation only. Despite using a narrow dose range, optimum levels of toxicity could not be achieved in the presence of metabolic activation due to shift in toxicity. The excessive toxicity observed at and above 40 µg/mL in the absence of metabolic activation resulted in these dose levels not being plated for viability or 5-TFT resistance. The toxicity observed at 56 µg/mL in the presence of metabolic activation exceeded the upper acceptable limit of 90%. Therefore, this dose level was excluded from the statistical analysis. Acceptable levels of toxicity were seen with both positive control substances.
The 24-hour exposure without metabolic activation (S9) treatment, demonstrated that the extended time point had a modest effect on the toxicity of the test item.
The vehicle (solvent) controls had mutant frequency values that were considered acceptable for the L5178Y cell line at the TK +/- locus. Both of the positive controls produced marked increases in the mutant frequency per viable cell indicating that the test system was operating satisfactorily and that the metabolic activation system was functional.
The test item did not induce any statistically significant or dose related (linear-trend) increases in the mutant frequency x 1E-06 per viable cell, at any of the dose levels (including the dose level that exceeded the upper limit of acceptable toxicity), in either the absence or presence of metabolic activation. Precipitate of test item was not observed at any of the dose levels. - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
Any other information on results incl. tables
The results for the Relative Suspension Growth (%RSG) were as follows:
Dose (mg/mL) |
% RSG (-S9) 4-Hour Exposure |
% RSG (+S9) 4-Hour Exposure |
% RSG (-S9) 24-Hour Exposure |
0 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
9.2 |
106 |
10 |
110 |
18.5 |
76 |
88 |
73 |
36.9 |
0 |
85 |
8 |
73.8 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
147.7 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
295.4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
590.8 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1181.5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2363 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Summary of results
Experiment 1
Treatment (µg/ml) |
4-hours-S-9 |
Treatment (µg/ml) |
4-hours+S-9 |
||||||||
|
%RSG |
RTG |
MF§ |
|
%RSG |
RTG |
MF§ |
||||
0 |
|
100 |
1.00 |
137.59 |
|
0 |
|
100 |
1.00 |
128.61 |
|
2.5 |
|
94 |
1.03 |
115.89 |
|
2.5 |
|
98 |
1.00 |
117.24 |
|
5 |
|
94 |
0.99 |
128.48 |
|
5 |
|
97 |
1.04 |
108.62 |
|
10 |
|
86 |
0.98 |
94.03 |
|
10 |
|
94 |
0.88 |
115.31 |
|
20 |
|
22 |
0.27 |
104.22 |
|
20 |
|
80 |
0.97 |
108.70 |
|
25 |
Ø |
1 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
37 |
0.36 |
117.40 |
|
30 |
Ø |
0 |
|
|
|
50 |
X |
8 |
0.07 |
149.70 |
|
35 |
Ø |
0 |
|
|
|
60 |
Ø |
1 |
|
|
|
40 |
Ø |
0 |
|
|
|
70 |
Ø |
0 |
|
|
|
Linear trend |
|
NS |
Linear trend |
|
NS |
||||||
EMS |
|
|
|
|
|
CP |
|
|
|
|
|
400 |
|
57 |
0.48 |
839.87 |
|
2 |
|
37 |
0.19 |
1036.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Experiment 2
Treatment (µg/ml) |
24-hours-S-9 |
Treatment (µg/ml) |
4-hours+S-9 |
||||||||
|
%RSG |
RTG |
MF§ |
|
%RSG |
RTG |
MF§ |
||||
0 |
|
100 |
1.00 |
126.54 |
|
0 |
|
100 |
1.00 |
146.88 |
|
2 |
|
116 |
0.95 |
145.67 |
|
2 |
Ø |
92 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
108 |
0.93 |
130.01 |
|
4 |
Ø |
93 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
93 |
1.01 |
111.55 |
|
8 |
|
90 |
0.98 |
107.82 |
|
16 |
|
64 |
0.83 |
113.49 |
|
16 |
|
94 |
1.00 |
142.45 |
|
24 |
|
32 |
0.45 |
122.83 |
|
32 |
|
90 |
1.01 |
127.00 |
|
32 |
|
7 |
0.14 |
143.07 |
|
40 |
|
87 |
0.90 |
132.42 |
|
40 |
Ø |
1 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
39 |
0.46 |
150.35 |
|
48 |
Ø |
0 |
|
|
|
56 |
X |
4 |
0.05 |
182.95 |
|
Linear trend |
|
NS |
Linear trend |
|
NS |
||||||
EMS |
|
|
|
|
|
CP |
|
|
|
|
|
150 |
|
53 |
0.42 |
1075.60 |
|
2 |
|
56 |
0.35 |
1389.62 |
|
Cell and 96-Well Plate Counts: Experiment 1 (-S9) 4-Hour Exposure
Treatment (µg/ml) |
Cell counts $ |
Viability § after day 2 2 cells/well |
Resistant mutants § after day 2 2000 cells/well |
|||||||||
|
|
0h |
24h |
48h |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
A B |
8.81 8.83 |
7.65 7.99 |
7.24 6.34 |
72 74 |
73 75 |
85 76 |
77 85 |
17 18 |
25 18 |
18 14 |
19 25 |
2.5 |
A B |
8.28 8.36 |
8.65 8.27 |
6.03 6.48 |
80 76 |
87 77 |
|
|
21 15 |
19 17 |
|
|
5 |
A B |
8.62 8.85 |
8.17 8.32 |
6.48 5.71 |
76 82 |
74 83 |
|
|
22 13 |
26 15 |
|
|
10 |
A B |
8.39 8.20 |
8.94 8.39 |
5.34 5.90 |
83 82 |
80 78 |
|
|
12 18 |
15 16 |
|
|
20 |
A B |
6.80 4.99 |
3.69 3.85 |
4.66 4.82 |
82 81 |
87 80 |
|
|
22 14 |
18 17 |
|
|
25 |
A B |
2.32 2.28 |
1.56(2.32) 1.74(2.28) |
1.25(1.56) 1.52(1.74) |
NP NP |
NP NP |
|
|
NP NP |
NP NP |
|
|
30 |
A B |
1.74 1.55 |
1.18(1.74) 1.05(1.55) |
0.81(1.18) 0.73(1.05) |
NP NP |
NP NP |
|
|
NP NP |
NP NP |
|
|
35 |
A B |
1.40 1.66 |
0.85(1.40) 0.94(1.66) |
0.49(0.85) 0.48(0.94) |
NP NP |
NP NP |
|
|
NP NP |
NP NP |
|
|
40 |
A B |
1.19 0.90 |
0.68(1.19) 0.46(0.90) |
0.42(0.68) 0.25(0.46) |
NP NP |
NP NP |
|
|
NP NP |
NP NP |
|
|
Positive Control EMS (µg/ml) |
||||||||||||
400 |
A B |
7.93 7.88 |
6.63 6.59 |
4.27 5.99 |
70 73 |
72 70 |
|
|
77 59 |
70 55 |
|
|
Statistical Analysis: Experiment 1 (-S9) 4-Hour Exposure
Treatment (µg/ml) |
|
SG |
%RSG |
%V |
RTG |
MF§ |
0 |
|
13.27 |
100 |
81.33 |
1.00 |
137.59 |
2.5 |
|
13.23 |
94 |
89.59 |
1.03 |
115.89 |
5 |
|
12.56 |
94 |
85.83 |
0.99 |
128.48 |
10 |
|
12.17 |
86 |
91.99 |
0.98 |
94.03 |
20 |
|
4.47 |
22 |
98.08 |
0.27 |
104.22 |
25 |
Ø |
0.57 |
1 |
|
|
|
30 |
Ø |
0.21 |
0 |
|
|
|
35 |
Ø |
0.11 |
0 |
|
|
|
40 |
Ø |
0.05 |
0 |
|
|
|
Positive Control EMS |
||||||
Treatment (µg/ml) |
SG |
%RSG |
%V |
RTG |
MF§ |
|
400 |
|
8.48 |
57 |
67.78 |
0.48 |
839.87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Test for linear trend
Slope |
‑1.664E‑006 |
Variance |
7.174E‑013 |
b²/Sb |
3.861 |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- The test item did not induce any toxicologically significant increases in the mutant frequency at the TK +/- locus in L5178Y cells.
- Executive summary:
Introduction
The study was conducted according to a method that was designed to assess the potential mutagenicity of the test item on the thymidine kinase, TK +/-, locus of the L5178Y mouse lymphoma cell line. The method was designed to be compatible with the OECD Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals No.476 "In VitroMammalian Cell Gene Mutation Tests" adopted 21 July 1997, Method B17 of Commission Regulation (EC) No. 440/2008 of 30 May 2008, the US EPA OPPTS 870.5300 Guideline, and in alignment with the Japanese MITI/MHW guidelines for testing of new chemical substances.
Methods…….
Two independent experiments were performed. In Experiment 1, L5178Y TK +/- 3.7.2c mouse lymphoma cells (heterozygous at the thymidine kinase locus) were treated with the test item at eight dose levels in duplicate, together with vehicle, dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), and positive controls using 4-hour exposure groups both in the absence and presence of metabolic activation (2% S9). In Experiment 2, the cells were treated with the test item at eight dose levels using a 4‑hour exposure group in the presence of metabolic activation (2% S9) and a 24-hour exposure group in the absence of metabolic activation.
The dose range of test item used in the main test was selected following the results of a preliminary toxicity test. The dose levels plated out for viability and expression of mutant colonies were as follows:
Experiment 1
Group
Concentration of OxyoctalineFormate (µg/mL) plated for mutant frequency
4-hour without S9
2.5, 5, 10, 20,
4-hour with S9 (2%)
2.5, 5, 10, 20, 40, 50
Experiment 2
Group
Concentration of OxyoctalineFormate (µg/mL) plated for mutant frequency
24-hour without S9
2, 4, 8, 16, 24, 32
4-hour with S9 (2%)
8, 16, 32, 40, 48, 56
Results……..
The maximum dose levels used in the Mutagenicity Test were limited by test item-induced toxicity. Precipitate of the test item was not observed at any of the dose levels in the Mutagenicity Test. The vehicle controls (DMSO) had mutant frequency values that were considered acceptable for the L5178Y cell line at the TK +/- locus. The positive control treatment induced marked increases in the mutant frequency indicating the satisfactory performance of the test and of the activity of the metabolizing system.
The test item did not induce any toxicologically significant dose-related (linear-trend) increases in the mutant frequency at any of the dose levels, either with or without metabolic activation, in either the first or the second experiment.
Conclusion
The test item did not induce any toxicologically significant increases in the mutant frequency at the TK +/- locus in L5178Y cells.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.