Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 946-604-6 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 26 April to 29 May 2017
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Remarks:
- GLP study conducted according to OECD test Guideline No. 471 without any deviation.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 017
- Report date:
- 2017
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.5100 - Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test (August 1998)
- Deviations:
- no
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Not applicable
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- 28 October 2016
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 1-isopropyl-4-methylbicyclo[3.1.0]hexan-3-one
- EC Number:
- 208-912-2
- EC Name:
- 1-isopropyl-4-methylbicyclo[3.1.0]hexan-3-one
- Cas Number:
- 546-80-5
- Molecular formula:
- C10H16O
- IUPAC Name:
- (1S,4R,5R)-4-methyl-1-propan-2-ylbicyclo[3.1.0]hexan-3-one
- Reference substance name:
- 1-isopropyl-4-methylbicyclo[3.1.0]hexan-3-one
- EC Number:
- 214-405-7
- EC Name:
- 1-isopropyl-4-methylbicyclo[3.1.0]hexan-3-one
- Cas Number:
- 1125-12-8
- Molecular formula:
- C10H16O
- IUPAC Name:
- (1S,4S,5R)-4-methyl-1-propan-2-ylbicyclo[3.1.0]hexan-3-one
- Reference substance name:
- Bornan-2-one
- EC Number:
- 200-945-0
- EC Name:
- Bornan-2-one
- Cas Number:
- 76-22-2
- Molecular formula:
- C10H16O
- IUPAC Name:
- 1,7,7-trimethylbicyclo[2.2.1]heptan-2-one
- Test material form:
- liquid
- Details on test material:
- Appareance: yellow to orange-yellow liquid
Odor : characteristic
Batch number: MN16 081-1
Expiration date: 01 feb 2018
Storage conditions: Room Temp. (20 ± 5°C), keep away from light/ humidity, keep under inert gas
Purity: 100%wt (UVCB substance)
Constituent 1
Constituent 2
Constituent 3
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- SOURCE OF TEST MATERIAL
- Source and lot/batch No.of test material: The Thujone Consortium / MN16 081-1
- Appearance: Clear yellow liquid
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: 06 April 2018
- Purity test date: April 2016
STORAGE CONDITIONS OF TEST MATERIAL
- Storage condition of test material: Room temperature in the dark
Method
- Target gene:
- Histidine and tryptophan for Salmonella typhimurium and Escherichia coli, respectively
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and E. coli WP2
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- not applicable
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not applicable
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9 mix (10% v/v S9 fraction): S9 fraction, prepared from male rats dosed with phenobarbital and β-Naphthaflavone
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Experiment 1 - Plate Incorporation Method: 1.5, 5, 15, 50, 150, 500, 1500 and 5000 μg/plate, with and without S9-mix
Experiment 2 – Pre-Incubation Method: 1.5, 5, 15, 50, 150, 500, 1500 and 5000 μg/plate, with and without S9-mix
The maximum dose level of the test item in the first experiment was selected as the maximum recommended dose level of 5000 μg/plate. - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: Dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO)
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: The test item was immiscible in sterile distilled water at 50 mg/mL but was fully miscible in dimethyl sulphoxide at the same concentration in solubility checks performed in-house. Dimethyl sulphoxide was therefore selected as the vehicle.
- Preparation of test formulation: The test item was accurately weighed and approximate half-log dilutions prepared in dimethyl sulphoxide by mixing on a vortex mixer on the day of each experiment. No correction for purity was required. Prior to use, the solvent was dried to remove water using molecular sieves i.e. 2 mm sodium alumino-silicate pellets with a nominal pore diameter of 4 x 10^-4 microns. All formulations were used within four hours of preparation and were assumed to be stable for this period.
Controlsopen allclose all
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DMSO
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide
- 9-aminoacridine
- N-ethyl-N-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine
- Remarks:
- Without S9-mix
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DMSO
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- benzo(a)pyrene
- other: 2-Aminoanthracene
- Remarks:
- With S9-mix
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- SOURCE OF TEST SYSTEM
- Bacteria used in the test were obtained from the University of California, Berkeley, on culture discs, on 04 August 1995 and from the British Industrial Biological Research Association, on a nutrient agar plate, on 17 August 1987.
METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation); preincubation
DURATION
- Exposure duration: Plates were incubated at 37 °C ± 3 °C for approximately 48 hours
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: Triplicate plates per dose level.
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: The plates were viewed microscopically for evidence of thinning (toxicity).
OTHERS:
After incubation, the plates were assessed for numbers of revertant colonies using an automated colony counting system. - Evaluation criteria:
- There are several criteria for determining a positive result. Any, one, or all of the following can be used to determine the overall result of the study:
1. A dose-related increase in mutant frequency over the dose range tested (De Serres and Shelby, 1979).
2. A reproducible increase at one or more concentrations.
3. Biological relevance against in-house historical control ranges.
4. Statistical analysis of data as determined by UKEMS (Mahon et al., 1989).
5. Fold increase greater than two times the concurrent solvent control for any tester strain (especially if accompanied by an out-of-historical range response (Cariello and Piegorsch, 1996)).
A test item will be considered non-mutagenic (negative) in the test system if the above criteria are not met.
Although most experiments will give clear positive or negative results, in some instances the data generated will prohibit making a definite judgment about test item activity. Results of this type will be reported as equivocal. - Statistics:
- Statistical analysis of data as determined by UKEMS (Mahon et al., 1989).
Results and discussion
Test resultsopen allclose all
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium, other: TA1535, TA1537, TA98 and TA100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A pKM 101
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Precipitation: None
- Other confounding effects: None
COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA: All tester strain cultures exhibit a characteristic number of spontaneous revertants per plate in the vehicle and positive controls. The comparison was made with the historical control ranges for 2015 and 2016 of the corresponding Testing Laboratory.
MAIN EXPERIMENTS
Experiment 1 and 2:
- In the first mutation test (plate incorporation method) the test item induced a visible reduction in the growth of the bacterial background lawns of all of the tester strains, initially from 1500 μg/plate in the absence of S9-mix and at 5000 μg/plate in the presence of S9-mix. Consequently the same maximum recommended dose level (5000 μg/plate) of the test item was selected as the maximum dose in the second mutation test. The test item again induced a toxic response in the second mutation test (pre-incubation method) with weakened bacterial background lawns noted in the absence of S9-mix from 500 μg/plate (TA1535 and TA1537) and 1500 μg/plate (TA100, TA98 and WP2uvrA). In the presence S9-mix, weakened bacterial background lawns were noted from 1500 μg/plate (all Salmonella strains) and at 5000 μg/plate (WP2uvrA). The sensitivity of the bacterial tester strains to the toxicity of the test item varied slightly between strain type, exposures with or without S9-mix and experimental methodology.
- No test item precipitate was observed on the plates at any of the doses tested in either the presence or absence of S9-mix.
- There were no increases in the frequency of revertant colonies recorded for any of the bacterial strains, with any dose of the test item, either with or without metabolic activation (S9-mix) in Experiment 1 (plate incorporation method). Similarly, no increases in the frequency of revertant colonies were recorded for any of the bacterial strains, with any dose of the test item, either with or without metabolic activation (S9-mix) in Experiment 2 (pre-incubation method).
OTHERS:
- Prior to use, the master strains were checked for characteristics, viability and spontaneous reversion rate (all were found to be satisfactory). The amino acid supplemented top agar, S9-mix and test item formulation used in both experiments were shown to be sterile.
Any other information on results incl. tables
None
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Under the test conditions, test item is not considered as mutagenic in S. typhimurium (TA1535, TA1537, TA98 and TA100) and E. coli WP2 uvrA (pKM101) strains.
- Executive summary:
In a reverse gene mutation assay performed according to the OECD test guideline No. 471 and in compliance with GLP, Salmonella typhimurium strains TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100 and Escherichia coli strain WP2 uvrA- were exposed to test item both in the presence and absence of metabolic activation system (10% liver S9 in standard co-factors).
Experiment 1 - Plate Incorporation Method: 1.5, 5, 15, 50, 150, 500, 1500 and 5000 μg/plate, with and without S9-mix
Experiment 2 – Pre-Incubation Method: 1.5, 5, 15, 50, 150, 500, 1500 and 5000 μg/plate, with and without S9-mix
Negative, vehicle and positive control groups were also included in mutagenicity tests.
The vehicle (dimethyl sulphoxide) control plates gave counts of revertant colonies within the normal range. All of the positive control chemicals used in the test induced marked increases in the frequency of revertant colonies, both with or without metabolic activation. Thus, the sensitivity of the assay and the efficacy of the S9-mix were validated.
The maximum dose level of the test item in the first experiment was selected as the maximum recommended dose level of 5000 μg/plate. In the first mutation test (plate incorporation method) the test item induced a visible reduction in the growth of the bacterial background lawns of all of the tester strains, initially from 1500 μg/plate in the absence of S9-mix and at 5000 μg/plate in the presence of S9-mix. Consequently the same maximum recommended dose level (5000 μg/plate) of the test item was selected as the maximum dose in the second mutation test. The test item again induced a toxic response in the second mutation test (pre-incubation method) with weakened bacterial background lawns noted in the absence of S9-mix from 500 μg/plate (TA1535 and TA1537) and 1500 μg/plate (TA100, TA98 and WP2uvrA). In the presence S9-mix, weakened bacterial background lawns were noted from 1500 μg/plate (all Salmonella strains) and at 5000 μg/plate (WP2uvrA). The sensitivity of the bacterial tester strains to the toxicity of the test item varied slightly between strain type, exposures with or without S9-mix and experimental methodology. No test item precipitate was observed on the plates at any of the doses tested in either the presence or absence of S9-mix.
There were no increases in the frequency of revertant colonies recorded for any of the bacterial strains, with any dose of the test item, either with or without metabolic activation (S9-mix) in Experiment 1 (plate incorporation method). Similarly, no increases in the frequency of revertant colonies were recorded for any of the bacterial strains, with any dose of the test item, either with or without metabolic activation (S9-mix) in Experiment 2 (pre-incubation method).
Under the test conditions, test item is not considered as mutagenic in these bacterial systems.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.