Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Repeated dose toxicity: inhalation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
sub-chronic toxicity: inhalation
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: GLP guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1988
Report date:
1988

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 413 (Subchronic Inhalation Toxicity: 90-Day Study)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes
Limit test:
no

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Tetrahydrothiophene
EC Number:
203-728-9
EC Name:
Tetrahydrothiophene
Cas Number:
110-01-0
Molecular formula:
C4H8S
IUPAC Name:
tetrahydrothiophene
Details on test material:
Source: Pennwalt Holland
Batch: 271
Purity: >99%

Test animals

Species:
rat
Strain:
Sprague-Dawley
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River (UK) Limited, Manston Road, Margate, Kent, England
- Age at study initiation: approximately 6 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 175-177 for males and 141-144 for females- Fasting period before study:
- Housing: 5 of the smae sax to a cage in suspended polypropylene cages fitted with stainless steel mesh tops and floors
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Labsure diet LAD 1, Lavender Mill, Manea, Cambridgeshire, UK
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): tap water
- Acclimation period: at least 10days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 17-25
- Humidity (%): 28-80
- Air changes (per hr): no data
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12

Administration / exposure

Route of administration:
inhalation
Type of inhalation exposure:
whole body
Vehicle:
other: unchanged (no vehicle)
Remarks on MMAD:
MMAD / GSD: The absence of aerosol was demonstrated using an optical particle monitor (Royco Instruments Inc.) at each level of exposure during Weeks 1, 4, 8 and 12 of the study. Droplet numbers in test chambers were similar to those present in the control chamber. No appreciable amount of THT was present as droplets in the atmospheres generated.
Details on inhalation exposure:
The vapour of THT was administered to rats by whole-body exposure, 6 hours a day, 5 days a week for 13 weeks. Control rats received air only.

Vapour generation:
The vapour generation system, contained in a separate, sealed exposure chamber metered the liquid from a pressurised reservoir to a glass sinter, contained in a glass vessel through which air was passed. The vapour produced passed out of this vessel and into each chamber via an inlet duct. By varying the feed rate to each vapour generator it was possible to obtain the desired chamber concentrations.

Exposure chambers:
The exposure chambers were constructed of stainless steel and glass and were approximately 0.675 m3 in volume. The vapour from each generator entered the top of the chamber and was exhausted via a perforated plenum located in the base of each chamber. The exhaust from all chamber was drawn through an activated charcoal scrubbing system (Ventsorb R, Chemviron Ltd., Uppermill, Lancs.) by an extractor fan, before being vented to atmosphere. Extract flow was adjusted using gate valves downstream of the chamber to maintain a chamber internal pressure of 10 mm H20) below ambient, as indicated by magnehelic gauges connected to each chamber.
The rats were held during exposure in compartmented stainless steel mesh cages. A wet and dry bulb hygrometer was positioned in the chamber to monitor chamber temperature and relative humidity during exposure. Ports, fitted with removeable bungs, were present in the walls of each chamber to permit removal of chamber air samples for analysis. Routinely a port mid-centre of the chamber side wall was used.

Exposure chamber conditions:
- Measurement of chamber concentration of THT
The concentration of THT within the exposure chambers was determined on at least three occasions during each exposure.
- Air flow
The air flow into each chamber was monitored continuously using tapered-tube rotameters and recorded at 30-minute intervals throughout each exposure.
- Temperature
The air temperature in each chamber was monitored continuously with a mercury bulb thermometer and recorded at approximately hourly intervals throughout each exposure.
- Pressure
The air pressure in each exposure chamber, relative to that in the exposure room, was monitored using a magnehelic gauge and recorded at 30-minute intervals throughout exposure.
- Relative humidity
The humidity in each exposure chamber was monitored continuously with a wet and dry bulb hygrometer and recorded at hourly intervals throughout each exposure.
Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
yes
Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
Samples of chamber air were withdrawn through glass tubes 10 cm in length, nominal bore 2 mm, packed for 2 - 3 cm of their length at one end only with chromosorb 102, 60 - 80 mesh. The vapour was adsorbed on this medium. The samples were thermally desorbed into a gas chromatograph and the amounts of THT collected determined by using external standards.
Duration of treatment / exposure:
13 weeks
Frequency of treatment:
6 h/day; 5 d/week
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
Remarks:
Doses / Concentrations:
50, 275 and 1500 ppm
Basis:
nominal conc.
Remarks:
Doses / Concentrations:
51, 236 and 1442 ppm (184, 852 and 5201 mg/m3)
Basis:
analytical conc.
No. of animals per sex per dose:
10
Control animals:
yes, sham-exposed
Details on study design:
Post-exposure period: none
Positive control:
Not required

Examinations

Observations and examinations performed and frequency:
Clinical signs:
- During exposure
Clinical signs during exposure were recorded either as a group response where all visible animals appeared to be responding similarly, or as an individual response where one particular rat was affected.
- At other times
Animals were examined at least twice each day.

Bodyweight:
Each rat was weighed for allocation to groups and weekly thereafter from Week -1 (pre-exposure) until day of death.

Food consumption:
The quantity of food consumed by each cage of rats was recorded weekly, commencing at Week -1 (pre-exposure) until day of death.

Water consumption:
The amount of water consumed by each cage of rats was recorded daily, commencing at Week 3 until day of death.

Ophthalmoscopy:
The eyes of all rats were examined pre-exposure using a Keeler indirect ophthalmoscope. During Week 12 of exposure the eyes of Group 1 and 4 rats were examined.

Laboratory investigations:
Samples of blood were collected from 5 male and 5 female rats in each group on Week 5 of exposure. Samples of blood and urine were collected from all rats on Week 13 of exposure.
- Haematology Units
Packed cell volume (PCV) %
Haemoglobin (Hb) g/dl
Red cell count (RBC) 10e6/mm3
Mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentrations (MCHC)
calculated: Hb (g/dl) x 100 = PCV (%) %
Mean corpuscular haemoglobin (MCH) - calculated:
Hb (g/d1) x 100 = RBC (106/mm3) pg
Mean corpuscular volume (MCV) - calculated:
PCV (%) x 100 = RBC (10e6/mm3) fl
Reticulocyte counts (Retic) % (of red cells)
Total white cell count (WBC) 10e3/mm3
Differential count (Diff)
Neutrophils (N) 10e3/mm3
Lymphocytes (L) 10e3/mm3
Eosinophils (E) 10e3/mm3
Basophils (B) 10e3/mm3
Monocytes (M) 10e3/mm3
Platelet count (Plts) 10e3/mm3
Thrombotest (TT) s

- Blood biochemistry Units
Glucose mg/dl
Total protein g/dl
Albumin g/dl
Globulin g/dl
Albumin/Globulin ratio
Urea nitrogen mg/dl
Creatinine mg/dl
Alkaline phosphatase mU/ml
Glutamic-pyruvic transaminase (GPT) mU/ml
Glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase (GOT) mU/ml
Total bilirubin mg/dl
Sodium (Na) mEq/l
Potassium (K) mEq/l
Calcium (Ca mEq/l
Inorganic phosphorus (P) mEq/l
Chloride (Cl) mEq/l
Cholesterol (Chol) mg/dl

- Urinalysis Units
Volume ml
pH
Osmolality (Osmol) mOsm/kg
Protein mg/dl
Qualitative tests:
Glucose, Ketones, Bile pigments, Haemoglobin
Sacrifice and pathology:
Sacrifice:
Following 13 weeks exposure all rats were sacrificed.

Macroscopic pathology and organ weight analysis:
A detailed macroscopic examination of all animals was performed and the following organs dissected free from each animal and weighed:
Lungs, Testes, Thyroids (with parathyroids), Epididymides, Liver, Prostate, Spleen, Ovaries, Adrenals, Brain, Heart, Pituitary, Kidneys

Microscopic examination:
Light microscope examination was performed on 5 µm-thick sections, stained with haematoxylin and eosin on the following tissues:
Nasal passages* (head for rostral and caudal nasal cavities), Adrenals*, Kidneys*, Oesophagus*, Urinary bladder*, Stomach*, Testes* (with epididymides), Trachea* (including bifurcation), Duodenum*, Jejunum*, Ovaries*, Lungs**, Ileum*, Uterus*, Tracheobronchial lymph nodes*, Caecum*, Brain* (section of medulla/pons, cerebellar cortex, cerebral cortex), Colon*, Salivary glands with attached mandibular lymph nodes*, Rectum*, Heart*, Aorta*, Pituitary*, Thyroids (with parathyroids)*, Lymph nodes* (cervical and mesenteric), Eyes*, Sciatic nerve*, Liver*, Thymus*, Sternum/ribs* (for bone and marrow), Spleen*, Skin*, Pancreas*, Spinal cord*, Gross abnormalities**, Optic nerve*.
* Groups 1 and 4 only
** All rats
Statistics:
All statistical analyses were carried out separately for males and females.

Data relating to food and water consumption were analysed on a cage basis. For all other parameters, the analyses were carried out using the individual animal as the basic experimental unit.

Food consumption data were analysed using cumulative cage totals, and water consumption data were analysed as the total recorded intake over selected time periods. Bodyweight data were analysed using weight gains.

The following sequence of statistical tests were used for food consumption, water consumption, bodyweight, organ weight and clinical pathology data:
(i) If the data consisted predominantly of one particular value (relative frequency of the mode exceeded 75%), the proportion of animals with values different from the mode was analysed by appropriate methods. Otherwise:
(ii) Bartlett's test was applied to test for heterogeneity of variance between treatments. Where significant (at the 1% level) heterogeneity was found, logarithmic transformation was tried to see if a more stable variance structure could be obtained.
(iii) If no significant heterogéneity was detected (or if a satisfactory transformation was found), a one-way analysis of variance was carried out. If significant heterogeneity of variance was present, and could not be removed by a transformation, the Kruskal-Wallis analysis of ranks was used.
(iv) Except for pre-dose data, analyses of variance were followed by Student's 't' test and Williams' test for a dose-related response, although only Williams' was reported. The Kruskal-Wallis analyses were followed by the non-parametric equivalents of the 't' test and Williams' test (Shirley's test.

Where appropriate, analysis of covariance was used in place of analysis of variance in the above sequence. For organ weight data, the final bodyweight was used as a covariate in an attempt to allow for differences in bodyweight which might influence the organ weights.

Results and discussion

Results of examinations

Clinical signs:
effects observed, treatment-related
Mortality:
mortality observed, treatment-related
Body weight and weight changes:
no effects observed
Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
no effects observed
Food efficiency:
not examined
Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
effects observed, treatment-related
Ophthalmological findings:
no effects observed
Haematological findings:
effects observed, treatment-related
Clinical biochemistry findings:
no effects observed
Urinalysis findings:
no effects observed
Behaviour (functional findings):
not examined
Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
no effects observed
Gross pathological findings:
no effects observed
Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
no effects observed
Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
not examined
Details on results:
CHAMBER ATMOSPHERE CONDITIONS
Chamber temperature:
Chamber temperatures during exposure were similar for all groups.

Chamber relative humidity:
Chamber relative humidities were similar for all groups.

CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS
Clinical signs:
During exposure; no abnormalities were seen for rats in Group 1 (Air Control).
Signs noted in exposed groups considered related to exposure to THT were as follows:
Groups 2: licking of the inside of the mouth, salivation on week 4 and lachrymation on week 7
Group 3: licking of the inside of the mouth, salivation on weeks 3, 4 and 5 and lachrymation on weeks 4 and 6
Group 4: licking of the inside of the mouth, salivation, lachrymation, adoption of a hunched posture, rubbing the chin on the grid mesh floor of the exposure cage and a marked reduced response to a sharp tap on the exposure chamber side wall.
At all other times; no abnormalities were seen.

Bodyweight:
Over the course of the 13-week study period there was a minimal reduction in bodyweight gain by female rats exposed to THT which attained statistical significance compared with control values. However, the reduced gain was not dose-related and therefore considered not of toxicological significance.
No treatment-related differences were seen for male rats exposed to THT.

Food consumption:
No treatment-related differences were seen.

Water consumption:
Measurement was initiated at the commencement of Week 3 of exposure after a difference in the amount of water consumed by High dose THT groups was noted visually.
Increased amounts of water were consumed by male and female rats in Group 4 (High dose THT) and by male rats in Group 3 (Inter. dose THT). These values were statistically significant compared with control values. Water consumption by female rats in Group 3 (Inter. dose THT) was also increased but did not achieve statistically significant separation compared with control data.

Ophthalmoscopy:
No treatment-related defects were seen.

LABORATORY INVESTIGATIONS
Haematology:
No differences were seen for male rats during Weeks 5 and 13 of the study.
Differences from control values achieving a degree of statistical significance were noted for female rats in Groups 3 (Inter. dose THT) and 4 (High dose THT) at Week 5, including:
reduced mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration (MCHC)
(Group 4); increased mean corpuscular volume (MCV) (Groups 3 and 4); increased mean corpuscular haemoglobin (MCH) (Group 4); increased total white cell and lymphocyte counts (Group 4).
At Week 13 a similar effect was noted but confined to female rats in Group 4 only, including:
increased mean corpuscular volume; increased mean corpuscular haemoglobin; increased total white cell and lymphocyte counts.
The changes in red blood cell parameters MCHC, MCV and MCH were minimal and considered not be of toxicological significance.
The increases in total white cells and lymphocytes were inconsistent but the possibility of a treatment-related effect cannot be excluded.

Blood biochemistry:
Differences between treated and control groups achieving a degree of statistical significance during Weeks 5 and 13 of the study, were noted for; proteins, urea, creatinine, alkaline phosphatase, glutamic-pyruvic transaminase, glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase, electrolytes and cholesterol.
The differences were not dose-related, inconsistent between the sexes and minimal in scale, and were therefore considered not to be of toxicological significance.

Urinalysis:
There was a slight increase in the urinary pH of female rats from Group 4 (6.2) compared with control values (6.0). This difference was very small and considered unlikely to be of toxicological significance.
No other intergroup differences were seen achieving statistically significant separation.

TERMINAL STUDIES
Macroscopic pathology
No effects were seen that were considered related to exposure to THT.

Organ weights:
A minimal increase in the liver weights of female rats from Group 4 (High dose THT) achieved statistically significant separation from control values. However, this change was considered not of toxicological significance.
No other differences were seen that were considered related to exposure to THT.

Microscopic pathology:
Inhalation of THT by rats under the conditions of this study did not produce any observable treatment-related histopathological changes.
- Treatment-related changes
No histopathological changes were observed in any of the tissues examined that were considered to be related to treatment with THT.
- Incidental changes
The small number of minor histopathological changes observed in occasional tissues were within the background range normally observed in rats of this strain and age and were considered to be of no toxicological significance.

Effect levels

open allclose all
Key result
Dose descriptor:
NOAEC
Remarks:
systemic toxicity
Effect level:
>= 1 442 ppm (analytical)
Based on:
test mat.
Sex:
male/female
Basis for effect level:
other: (5201 mg/m3)
Remarks on result:
not determinable due to absence of adverse toxic effects
Key result
Dose descriptor:
NOAEC
Remarks:
local irritation
Effect level:
51 ppm (analytical)
Based on:
test mat.
Sex:
male/female
Basis for effect level:
clinical signs
other: (184 mg/m3)

Target system / organ toxicity

Key result
Critical effects observed:
yes
Lowest effective dose / conc.:
236 ppm (analytical)
System:
eye
Organ:
lacrimal gland
Treatment related:
yes
Dose response relationship:
yes
Relevant for humans:
yes

Any other information on results incl. tables

Bodyweights - group means (g)

Group.and dosage

Week

-

Male

Female

Air

Control

Low dose

THT

Int.dose

THT

High dose

THT

Air

Control

Low dose

THT

Int.dose

THT

High dose

THT

Pre-dose

-1

201

202

199

203

157

156

159

157

Dosing

0

263

261

254

258

181

176

179

184

1

304

304

290

294

200

191

194

196

2

340

341

323

329

217

204

209

214

3

370

371

353

360

232

216*

223*

226*

4

400

397

377

392

247

225*

234*

237*

5

417

415

393

410

251

232*

237*

243*

6

447

439

414

436

262

239*

249*

251*

7

465

459

435

456

267

246*

253*

255*

8

483

477

451

472

275

253*

259*

261*

9

502

491

467

488

280

258*

265*

267*

10

518

506

481

507

286

264*

271*

273*

11

531

519

498

523

291

270

280

278

12

541

527

511

536

296

271*

277*

281*

13

544

529

509

536

292

269*

275*

279*

Gain

-1 to 13

324

327

310

334

135

113*

115*

123*

* P<0.05 compared with control values using Williams' test

Water consumption - group mean cumulative values (g)

Group and dosage

Week

Male

Female

Air

Control

Low dose

THT

Int. dose

THT

High dose

THT

Air

Control

Low dose

THT

Int. dose

THT

High dose

THT

Dosing

3

202

207

228

281**

169

178

166

222*

4

403

409

458

569**

334

356

340

438*

5

617

620

689

860**

491

543

507

666*

6

836

827

922

1146**

655

719

684

900*

7

1047

1030

1153

1436**

816

901

850

1130**

8

1252

1228

1388

1728**

976

1079

1017

1355*

9

1460

1433

1629

2015**

1127

1262

1195

1584*

10

1664

1638

1879

2320**

1285

1453

1377

1811*

11

1867

1839

2127

2617**

1441

1636

1580

2027*

12

2062

2036

2374*

2908**

1587

1804

1759

2246*

13

2251

2230

2598*

3166**

1728

1983

1924

2437*

* P<0.05 compared with control data using Williams' test

** P<0.01 compared with control data using Williams' test

(Haematology – Female) Week 5

Group

PCV

%

Hb

g/dl

RBC

Xl06/

mm3

MCHC

%

MCV

fl

MCH

pg

Retic

%

WBC + Diff x103/mm3

Plts

x103/

mm3

TT

s

Total

N

L

E

B

M

Air

Control

48

17.2

7.9

35.6

62

21.9

9.5

1.30

8.08

0.11

0.00

0.03

1077

25

Low dose

THT

48

16.8

7.6

35.4

62

22.0

11.5

1.47

10.01

0.04

0.00

0.00

1013

24

Int.dose

THT

50

17.5

7.8

35.3

64**

22.4

10.6

0.62

9.95

0.07

0.00

0.00

1055

23

High dose

THT

50

17.6

7.7

35.1*

65**

22.9**

15.2*

1.47

13.58*

0.14

0.00

0.05

1005

23

(Haematology - female) Week 13

Group

PCV

%

Hb

g/dl

RBC

x106/

mm3

MCHC

%

MCV

fl

MCH

pg

Retic

%

WBC + Diff x103/mm3

Plts

x103/

mm3

TT

s

Total

N

L

E

B

M

Air

Control

#48

#14.8

#7.3

30.8

66

20.3

7.9

1.12

6.70

0.05

0.00

0.01

839

20

Low dose

THT

48

14.9

7.2

31.0

67

20.6

9.4

1.12

8.15

0.09

0.00

0.00

820

21

Int.dose

THT

49

14.8

7.2

30.4

68

20.7

9.4

0.96

8.29

0.09

0.00

0.01

924

20

High dose

THT

49

15.1

7.2

30.7

68*

21.0**

12.7**

1.28

11.31**

0.05

0.00

0.07

847

20

* P<0.05 compared with control data using Williams' test; ** P<0.01

# Distribution-free analysis applied to data F Frequency analysis applied to data

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Clinical signs indicative of mild local irritation were seen at 236 and 1442 ppm. These signs were not apparent between exposures and not related to any macro-or microscopic abnormalities. Lacrimation and salivation occurred also once at the lowest concentration of 51 ppm However, this seems not significant due to the low frequency.
The amount of water consumed by male and female rats exposed at 1442 ppm and by male rats exposed at 236 ppm was significantly higher than control values but whithout any effects on blood chemistry, urinalysis and the histophatology of kidneys.
There were no other toxicologically significant effects at levels of exposure up to 1442 ppm.
The no effect level for clinical signs of irritation is 51 ppm.
The no effect level for sytemic toxicity is higher than 1442 ppm.
Executive summary:

Ten male and ten female Sprague-Dawley rats were whole-body exposed to analytical concentrations of 0, 51, 236 and 1442 ppm (184, 852 or 5201 mg/m3) tetrahydrothiophene (purity > 99%), six hours per day, five days per week for 13 weeks (Hardy, 1988). The study was performed according to the good laboratory practice and the OECD Test Guideline 413. The clinical symptoms of irritation (lacrimation, salivation, eyes closed) are a cluster of symptoms seen with increasing concentration. From 236 ppm, there was a more frequent occurrence of irritative symptoms (eyes closed). The significance of the symptoms of "licking the inside mouth and "shake his head" is unclear and questionable. The animals of the 1442 ppm group and the males of 236 ppm group drank more water than the animals in the control group. Ophthalmological examinations were unremarkable. In females of the 236 and 1442 ppm groups, the hematological parameters showed small differences compared to the control animals, but these changes were considered as not toxicologically significant, excepted an increase of white blood cells and lymphocytes at 1442 ppm. There was also a slight, not toxicologically significant increase in pH urine in females at 1442 ppm. Macroscopic examination and the determination of organ weights provided no abnormal findings. A minimal increase in liver weights was observed in females exposed to 1442 ppm but this effect was not considered toxicologically relevant. Histopathological examinations was performed on the lungs of all animals and on some other tissues of the control and 1442 ppm group animals. This included tissues from the nasal cavity (rostral and caudal). No histopathological changes were observed in any of the tissues examined that were considered to be related to treatment with THT. Free blood in sinuses was observed in one male animal of the 1442 ppm group and sinusoidal free blood in one female of the control group. These changes were considered as random. The NOAEC for the local irritation was 51 ppm (184 mg/m3) based on the clinical signs observed during exposure and the NOAEC for systemic effect was higher than 1442 ppm (5201 mg/m3).