Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Genetic toxicity in vitro

Description of key information

- Ames Test (OECD 471, GLP, K, rel. 1): non mutagenic up to limit or cytotoxic concentration in S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 & E.coli WP2uvrA.

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
From July 25 to August 18, 2017
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Remarks:
GLP study conducted in compliance with OECD Guideline No. 471 without any deviation.
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
Version / remarks:
1997
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
Version / remarks:
30 May 2008
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EPA OPPTS 870.5100 - Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test (August 1998)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: Japanese Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare and Japanese Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries.
Deviations:
no
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Not applicable
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Remarks:
inspected on 05 July 2016 / signed on 28 October 2016
Type of assay:
bacterial reverse mutation assay
Target gene:
Histidine and tryptophan gene for Salmonella typhimurium and Escherichia coli, respectively.
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and E. coli WP2
Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
not applicable
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
The S9 Microsomal fraction was pre-prepared using standardized in-house procedures (outside the confines of this study). The 10% S9-mix was prepared before use using sterilized co-factors and maintained on ice for the duration of the test.
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
Experiment 1 (Pre-incubation Method):
1.5, 5, 15, 50, 150, 500, 1500 and 5000 µg/plate in all strains with and without S9-mix.
Experiment 1 (Pre-incubation Method) / repeat:
0.05, 0.15, 0.5, 1.5, 5, 15, 50, 150 μg/plate in all strains with and without S9-mix.
Experiment 2 (Pre-Incubation Method):
Salmonella strains TA100 and TA1535 (absence of S9): 0.05, 0.15, 0.5, 1.5, 5, 15, 50 μg/plate.
Salmonella strains TA98 and TA1537 and E.coli strain WP2uvrA (absence of S9): 0.5, 1.5, 5, 15, 50, 150, 500 μg/plate.
E.coli strain WP2uvrA and Salmonella strains TA100, TA1535 and TA98 (absence of S9): 5, 15, 50, 150, 500, 1500, 5000 μg/plate.
Salmonella strain TA1537 (presence of S9): 1.5, 5, 15, 50, 150, 500, 1500 μg/plate.
Vehicle / solvent:
- Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: Tetrahydrofuran
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: In solubility checks performed in-house the test item was noted as insoluble in dimethyl sulphoxide and dimethyl formamide at 50 mg/mL and acetone at 100 mg/mL but fully soluble in tetrahydrofuran at 200 mg/mL. Tetrahydrofuran was therefore selected as the vehicle. Following solubility information provided by the Sponsor, sterile distilled water was not evaluated as a potential vehicle in this test system.
- Preparation of test materials: The test item was accurately weighed and, on the day of each experiment, approximate half-log dilutions prepared in tetrahydrofuran by mixing on a vortex mixer and sonication for 10 minutes at 40 °C. No correction was required for purity allowance. Tetrahydrofuran is toxic to the bacterial cells at and above 50 μL (0.05 mL), therefore all of the formulations were prepared at concentrations four times greater than required on Vogel-Bonner agar plates. To compensate, each formulation was dosed using 25 μL (0.025 mL) aliquots. Tetrahydrofuran is considered an acceptable vehicle for use in this test system (Maron et al., 1981). Prior to use, the solvent was dried to remove water using molecular sieves i.e. 2 mm sodium alumino-silicate pellets with a nominal pore diameter of 4 x 10-4 microns.
All formulations were used within four hours of preparation and were assumed to be stable for this period.
Untreated negative controls:
yes
Remarks:
untreated: spontaneous mutation rates
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Remarks:
Tetrahydrofuran
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide
9-aminoacridine
N-ethyl-N-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine
Remarks:
Without S9-mix
Untreated negative controls:
yes
Remarks:
untreated: spontaneous mutation rates
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Remarks:
Tetrahydrofuran
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
benzo(a)pyrene
other: 2-Aminoanthracene
Remarks:
With S9-mix
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
SOURCE OF TEST SYSTEM: The bacteria used in the test were obtained from the University of California, Berkeley, and from the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

METHOD OF APPLICATION: preincubation (The test item was confirmed to either have unknown volatility or was suspected to be volatile, therefore all testing was performed using the pre-incubation method (20 minutes at 37 ± 3 °C) except for the untreated controls).

DURATION
- Preincubation period: 20 minutes with shaking
- Exposure duration: approximately 48 hours

NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: Triplicate plates per dose level in experiment 1 and experiment 2.

DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: The plates were viewed microscopically for evidence of thinning.

OTHERS:
After incubation, the plates were assessed for numbers of revertant colonies using an automated colony counting system. The plates were viewed microscopically for evidence of thinning (toxicity).
Rationale for test conditions:
Experiment 1 - Maximum concentration was 5000 μg/plate (the maximum recommended dose level).*
Experiment 1 / repeat - the test item induced excessive toxicity to Salmonella strains TA100 and TA1535 (absence of S9 only) and consequently part of the experiment was repeated on a separate day using fresh cultures of the bacterial strains and fresh test item formulations and employing an amended dose range of 0.05, 0.15, 0.5, 1.5, 5, 15, 50, 150 μg/plate.
Experiment 2 - test item dose levels were selected based on Experiment 1 results. Up to seven test item dose levels per bacterial strain were selected in the second mutation test in order to achieve both a minimum of four non-toxic dose levels and the toxic limit of the test item.
Evaluation criteria:
There are several criteria for determining a positive result. Any, one, or all of the following can be used to determine the overall result of the study:
- A dose-related increase in mutant frequency over the dose range tested (De Serres and Shelby, 1979).
- A reproducible increase at one or more concentrations.
- Biological relevance against in-house historical control ranges.
- Statistical analysis of data as determined by UKEMS (Mahon et al., 1989).
- Fold increases greater than two times the concurrent solvent control for any tester strain (especially if accompanied by an out of historical range response (Cariello and Piegorsch, 1996)).
A test item will be considered non-mutagenic (negative) in the test system if the above criteria are not met.
Statistics:
NA
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and E. coli WP2
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Remarks:
Cf. Table of results
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not applicable
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:
TEST SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Effects of pH: Not applicable
- Effects of osmolality: Not applicable
- Evaporation from medium: No data
- Water solubility: immiscible
- Precipitation: A test item precipitate (greasy in appearance with red flecks ) was noted at and abo
- Other confounding effects: None

COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA:
Not needed (no statistical significant increase were noted)
The vehicle (tetrahydrofuran) control plates gave counts of revertant colonies within the normal range. All of the positive control chemicals used in the test induced marked increases in the frequency of revertant colonies, both with or without metabolic activation. Thus, the sensitivity of the assay and the efficacy of the S9-mix were validated.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY:
In the first mutation test, the test item caused a visible reduction in the growth of the bacterial background lawns of all of the bacterial tester strains initially from 15 μg/plate (TA100), 50 μg/plate (TA1535), 150 μg/plate (TA98) and 500 μg/plate (WP2uvrA and TA1537) in the absence of S9-mix and to three bacterial strains initially from 500 μg/plate (TA1537), 1500 μg/plate (TA100) and 5000 μg/plate (TA1535) in the presence S9-mix. Consequently, the toxic limit or the maximum recommended dose (5000 μg/plate) of the test item was employed as the maximum dose in the second mutation test, depending on bacterial tester strain type and presence or absence of S9-mix. In the second mutation test, the test item again induced a toxic response with weakened bacterial background lawns noted in the absence of S9-mix from 15 μg/plate (TA100), 50 μg/plate (TA1535), 150 μg/plate (TA98 and TA1537) and 500 μg/plate (WP2uvrA). In the presence S9-mix weakened bacterial background lawns were noted to three of the bacterial tester strains from 1500 μg/plate (TA1537) and at 5000 μg/plate (TA1535 and TA100). The sensitivity of the bacterial tester strains to the toxicity of the test item varied slightly between strain type, exposures with or without S9-mix and experiment.

CONCLUSION:
There were no increases in the frequency of revertant colonies recorded for any of the bacterial strains, with any dose of the test item, either with or without metabolic activation (S9-mix) in Experiment 1. Similarly, no increases in the frequency of revertant colonies were recorded for any of the bacterial strains, with any dose of the test item, either with or without metabolic activation (S9-mix) in Experiment 2.
Remarks on result:
other:
Remarks:
Table of results are in "Attached background documents"

Cf Tables of results in attached background material

Conclusions:
Under the test condition, test material is not mutagenic with and without metabolic activation in S. typhimurium (strains TA1535, TA1537, TA98 and TA100) and E.coli WP2 uvrA.
Executive summary:

In a reverse gene mutation assay performed according to the OECD test guideline No. 471 and in compliance with GLP, Salmonella typhimurium strains TA1535, TA1537, TA98 and TA100 and Escherichia coli strain WP2uvrA were treated with the test item diluted in Tetrahydrofuran both in the presence and absence of metabolic activation system (10% liver S9 in standard co-factors) using the Ames pre‑incubation methods in Experiment 1 and 2.

The original dose range for Experiment 1 was predetermined and was 1.5 to 5000 μg/plate. However, the test item induced excessive toxicity to Salmonella strains TA100 and TA1535 (absence of S9 only) and consequently part of the experiment was repeated on a separate day using fresh cultures of the bacterial strains and fresh test item formulations and employing an amended dose range of 0.05 to 150 μg/plate. The second experiment was performed at a later date again using fresh cultures of the bacterial strains and fresh test item formulations. The dose range was amended following the results of Experiment 1 (and the repeat assay) and ranged between 0.05 and 5000 μg/plate, depending on bacterial strain type and presence or absence of S9-mix. Up to seven test item concentrations per bacterial strain were selected in Experiment 2 in order to achieve both four non-toxic dose levels and the toxic limit of the test item.

 

The vehicle (tetrahydrofuran) control plates gave counts of revertant colonies within the normal range. All of the positive control chemicals used in the test induced marked increases in the frequency of revertant colonies, both with or without metabolic activation. Thus, the sensitivity of the assay and the efficacy of the S9-mix were validated.

In the first mutation test, the test item caused a visible reduction in the growth of the bacterial background lawns of all of the bacterial tester strains initially from 15 μg/plate (TA100), 50 μg/plate (TA1535), 150 μg/plate (TA98) and 500 μg/plate (WP2uvrA and TA1537) in the absence of S9-mix and to three bacterial strains initially from 500 μg/plate (TA1537), 1500 μg/plate (TA100) and 5000 μg/plate (TA1535) in the presence S9-mix. Consequently, the toxic limit or the maximum recommended dose (5000 μg/plate) of the test item was employed as the maximum dose in the second mutation test, depending on bacterial tester strain type and presence or absence of S9-mix. In the second mutation test, the test item again induced a toxic response with weakened bacterial background lawns noted in the absence of S9-mix from 15 μg/plate (TA100), 50 μg/plate (TA1535), 150 μg/plate (TA98 and TA1537) and 500 μg/plate (WP2uvrA). In the presence S9-mix weakened bacterial background lawns were noted to three of the bacterial tester strains from 1500 μg/plate (TA1537) and at 5000 μg/plate (TA1535 and TA100). The sensitivity of the bacterial tester strains to the toxicity of the test item varied slightly between strain type, exposures with or without S9-mix and experiment.

A test item precipitate (greasy in appearance with red flecks ) was noted at and above 1500 μg/plate, this observation did not prevent the scoring of revertant colonies.

There were no increases in the frequency of revertant colonies recorded for any of the bacterial strains, with any dose of the test item, either with or without metabolic activation (S9-mix) in Experiment 1. Similarly, no increases in the frequency of revertant colonies were recorded for any of the bacterial strains, with any dose of the test item, either with or without metabolic activation (S9-mix) in Experiment 2.

Under the test condition, test material is not mutagenic with and without metabolic activation in S. typhimurium (strains TA1535, TA1537, TA98 and TA100) and E.coli WP2 uvrA.

 

This study is considered as acceptable and satisfies the requirement for reverse gene mutation endpoint.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (negative)

Genetic toxicity in vivo

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Additional information

Table 7.6/1: Summary of genotoxicity tests

Test n°

Test / Guideline

Reliability

Focus

Strains tested

Metabolic activation

Test concentration

Statement

1

 

Envigo, 2017

Ames Test

(OECD 471)

K, rel. 1

Gene mutation

TA 1535,

TA 1537,

TA 98,

TA 100

E. coli WP2uvrA

-S9

+S9

Up to limit or cytotoxic concentration

-S9 : non mutagenic

+S9 : non mutagenic

Gene mutation Assays (Tests n° 1):

A Bacterial Reverse mutation Assay (Ames test) was performed according to OECD guideline No. 471 with the substance (Test n°1, see Table 7.6/1). No significant increases in the frequency of revertant colonies were recorded for any of the bacterial strains under the test condition, with any dose of the substance, either in the presence or absence of metabolic activation. The substance does not induce gene mutations in bacteria whereas all positive control chemicals (with and without metabolic activation) induced significant increase of colonies. The substance is therefore considered as non-mutagenic according to the Ames test.

Justification for classification or non-classification

Harmonized classification:

The test material has no harmonized classification for human health according to the Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008.

Self-classification:

Based on the available data, no additional classification is proposed regarding germ cell mutagenicity according to the Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008 (CLP) and to the Globally Harmonised System of classification and labelling of chemicals (GHS).