Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
other information
Study period:
from July to August
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1987
Report date:
1987

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
Deviations:
no
Type of study:
guinea pig maximisation test

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
17-hydroxy-6-methylenepregn-4-ene-3,20-dione 17-acetate
EC Number:
251-133-8
EC Name:
17-hydroxy-6-methylenepregn-4-ene-3,20-dione 17-acetate
Cas Number:
32634-95-0
Molecular formula:
C24H32O4
IUPAC Name:
17-Acetoxy-6-methylene-4-pregnene-3,20-dione

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
guinea pig
Strain:
other: Pirbright White
Sex:
male/female

Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)

Inductionopen allclose all
Route:
intradermal
Vehicle:
other: liquid paraffin
Concentration / amount:
Induction: 2.5 w/v%
challenge: 15 w/v%
Challengeopen allclose all
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
other: liquid paraffin
Concentration / amount:
Induction: 2.5 w/v%
challenge: 15 w/v%
No. of animals per dose:
control group: 10 (5/sex)
test substance group: 10 (5/sex)
Positive control substance(s):
not specified

Results and discussion

In vivo (non-LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
challenge 15 %
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: test group. Dose level: challenge 15 %. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
challenge 15 %
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. Dose level: challenge 15 %. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
negative control
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: negative control. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
negative control
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: negative control. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.

Any other information on results incl. tables

The intradermal injections (induction procedere) did not produce necrosis and ulcerations at the application site.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Executive summary:

In a guinea pig maximization test (GPMT) according to OECD TG 406 the test substance proved to be not senistizing after challenge with 15 % test substance.