Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 233-823-0 | CAS number: 10377-52-3
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicological Summary
- Administrative data
- Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
- Workers - Hazard via dermal route
- Workers - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - workers
- General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
- General Population - Hazard via dermal route
- General Population - Hazard via oral route
- General Population - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - General Population
Administrative data
Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 10 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 1
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 6.67 mg/kg bw/day
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 23.35 mg/m³
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
Performance of the inhalation study was waived according to column 2 of REACH Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, Annex VIII, section 8.6.1 (see IUCLID section 7.5.2).
A conservative approach is used assuming a two times higher absorption via the inhalation route (end route) as compared to the oral route (starting route).
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- The dose response relationship is considered unremarkable, therefore no additional factor is used.
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 1
- Justification:
- No time extrapolation factor is needed since a chronic toxicity study is available.
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- Respiratory interspecies differences are fully covered by the factors used for route to route extrapolation.
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 1
- Justification:
- Not applicable, since human data are available.
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 1
- Justification:
- Not applicable, please refer to "Additional information - worker"
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- The quality of the whole data base is considered to be sufficient and uncritical.
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- The approach used for DNEL derivation is conservative. No further assessment factors are required.
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Workers - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 66.7 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 1
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 6.67 mg/kg bw/day
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 66.7 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
Performance of the dermal study was waived according to column 2 of REACH Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, Annex VIII, section 8.6.1 (see IUCLID section 7.5.3).
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- The dose response relationship is considered unremarkable, therefore no additional factor is used.
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 1
- Justification:
- No time extrapolation factor is needed since a chronic toxicity study is available.
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- Not applicable, since human data are available.
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 1
- Justification:
- Not applicable, since human data are available
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 1
- Justification:
- Not applicable, please refer to "Additional information - worker"
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- The quality of the whole data base is considered to be sufficient and uncritical.
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- The approach used for DNEL derivation is conservative. No further assessment factors are required.
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Workers - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Additional information - workers
General:
DNEL derivation for each of the relevant endpoints was based on the most conservative dose descriptors obtained. Assessment factors were assigned accordingly. Thus, the DNELs represent worst-case scenarios.
Worker – Hazard via inhalation route
Step 1: Selection of the relevant dose descriptor (starting point):
For risk characterisation an inhalation NOAEC was derived by route to route extrapolation (ECHA CSA R.8, 2012). The oral NOAEL long-term (human) of 6.67 mg Li3PO4/kg bw/day was considered as key value for the chemical safety assessment and therefore, most relevant starting point.
Step 2: Modification into a correct starting point:
For worker a NOEC long-term, inhalation was calculated assuming 70 kg per person (70 kg/person x 6.67 mg Li3PO4/kg bw/day = 467 mg/person/day), 8h light activity (10 m³ breathing volume), 50 % absorption via oral routes and 100 % absorption via inhalatory routes.
NOAEC (worker) inhalation = 467 mg Li3PO4/person/day * (1 / 10m³/person/day(8h)) * (50% Abs. / 100 / abs.) = 23.35 mg Li3PO4/m³
Step 3: Use of assessment factors: 1
An AF for exposure duration was not applicable, as data covered long-term / chronic exposure. Interspecies AFs were not applicable as the relevant NOAEL was derived from reliable and relevant high quality human data. Intraspecies differences were considered not applicable as the NOAEL was based on therapeutic concentrations (being acceptable to humans, which are physically fit, but also being applicable to all sub-populations, in conclusion being applicable to worker and general population).
The resulting worker DNEL long-term inhalation is 23.35 mg Li3PO4/m³/day (23.35 mg/m³/day : 1 (AFs)).
According to ECHA guidance document CSA R.8, 2012, for dust as in case with lithium phosphate, the general dust limit should be applied if the derived DNEL for inhalation is above the general dust limit (10 mg/m³). The calculated DNEL long-term inhalation for lithium phosphate was determined to be 23.35 mg/m³, the DNEL considered for risk characterisation is the general dust limit of 10 mg/m³.
Worker – Hazard via dermal route
Step 1: Selection of the relevant dose descriptor (starting point):
For risk characterisation a dermal NOAEL was derived by route to route extrapolation. The oral NOAEL of 6.67 mg Li3PO4/kg bw/day, was considered as key value for the chemical safety assessment and therefore, most relevant starting point.
Step 2: Modification into a correct starting point:
The NOAEL long-term dermal of 66.7 mg Li3PO4/kg bw/day was calculated from the NOAEL long-term oral of 6.67 mg Li3PO4/kg bw/day considering a conservative 10 % absorption through the skin (ECHA document R.7C, 2014, 7.12)
NOAEL (Li3PO4) long-term dermal = 6.67 mg/kg bw/day x 100%: 10% = 66.7 mg Li3PO4/kg bw/day
Step 3: Use of assessment factors: 1
An AF for exposure duration was not applicable, as data covered long-term / chronic exposure. Interspecies AFs were not applicable as the relevant NOAEL was derived from very reliable and relevant high quality human data. Intraspecies differences were considered not applicable as the NOAEL was based on therapeutic concentrations (being acceptable to humans, which are physically fit but also being applicable to all sub-populations) and therefore applicable for worker and general population.
The resulting worker DNEL long-term dermal is 66.7 mg Li3PO4/kg bw/day (66.7 mg/kg bw/day: 1 (AFs) = 66.7 mg Li3PO4/kg bw/day)
General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 10 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 1
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 6.67 mg/kg bw/day
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 10.01 mg/m³
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
Performance of the inhalation study was waived according to column 2 of REACH Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, Annex VIII, section 8.6.1 (see IUCLID section 7.5.2). A conservative approach is used assuming a two times higher absorption via the inhalation route (end route) as compared to the oral route (starting route).
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- The dose response relationship is considered unremarkable, therefore no additional factor is used.
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 1
- Justification:
- No time extrapolation factor is needed since a chronic toxicity study is available.
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- Not applicable, since human data are available
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 1
- Justification:
- Not applicable, since human data are available
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 1
- Justification:
- Not applicable, please refer to "Additional information - general population"
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- The quality of the whole data base is considered to be sufficient and uncritical.
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- The approach used for DNEL derivation is conservative. No further assessment factors are required.
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 66.7 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 1
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 6.67 mg/kg bw/day
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 66.7 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
Performance of the dermal study was waived according to column 2 of REACH Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, Annex VIII, section 8.6.1 (see IUCLID section 7.5.3).
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- The dose response relationship is considered unremarkable, therefore no additional factor is used.
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 1
- Justification:
- No time extrapolation factor is needed since a chronic toxicity study is available.
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- Not applicable, since human data are available.
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 1
- Justification:
- Not applicable, since human data are available.
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 1
- Justification:
- Not applicable, please refer to "Additional information - general population"
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- The quality of the whole data base is considered to be sufficient and uncritical.
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- The approach used for DNEL derivation is conservative. No further assessment factors are required.
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- acute toxicity
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
General Population - Hazard via oral route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 6.67 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 1
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
- No route to route extrapolation required.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- The dose response relationship is considered unremarkable, therefore no additional factor is used.
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 1
- Justification:
- No time extrapolation factor is needed since a chronic toxicity study is available.
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- Not applicable, since human data are available.
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 1
- Justification:
- Not applicable, since human data are available.
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 1
- Justification:
- Not applicable, please refer to "Additional information - general population"
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- The quality of the whole data base is considered to be sufficient and uncritical.
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- The approach used for DNEL derivation is conservative. No further assessment factors are required.
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 20.01 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 1
- DNEL extrapolated from long term DNEL
General Population - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Additional information - General Population
Gerneral:
DNEL derivation for each of the relevant endpoints was based on the most conservative dose descriptors obtained. Assessment factors were assigned accordingly. Thus, the DNELs represent worst-case scenarios.
General population – Hazard via inhalation route
Step 1: Selection of the relevant dose descriptor (starting point):
For risk characterisation an inhalation NOAEC was derived by route to route extrapolation (ECHA CSR R.8, 2012). The oral NOAEL long-term (human) of 6.67 mg Li3PO4/kg bw/day was considered as key value for the chemical safety assessment and therefore, most relevant starting point.
Step 2: Modification into a correct starting point:
For general population a NOEC long-term, inhalation was calculated assuming 60 kg per person (60 kg/person x 6.67 mg Li3PO4/kg bw/day = 400 mg/person/day), 50 % absorption via oral routes and 100 % absorption via inhalatory routes and a daily exposure period of 24 hours (corresponding to breathing volume of 20 m³/day).
NOAEC (general population) inhalation = 400 mg Li3PO4/person/day * (1 / 20 m³/person/day(24h)) * (50 % Abs./ 100 % Abs.)= 10.01 mg Li3PO4/m³
Step 3: Use of assessment factors: 1
An AF for exposure duration was not applicable, as data covered long-term / chronic exposure. Interspecies AFs were not applicable as the relevant NOAEL was derived from reliable and relevant high quality human data. Intraspecies differences were considered not applicable as the NOAEL was based on therapeutic concentrations (being acceptable to humans, which are physically fit but also being applicable to all sub-populations), being applicable for general population.
The resulting general population DNEL long-term inhalation is 10.01 mg Li3PO4/m³/day (10.01 mg/m³/day : 1 (AFs)).
According to ECHA guidance document CSA R.8, 2012, for dust as in case with lithium phosphate, the general dust limit should be applied if the derived DNEL for inhalation is above the general dust limit (10 mg/m³). The calculated DNEL long-term inhalation for lithium phosphate was determined to be 23.35 mg/m³, the DNEL considered for risk characterisation is the general dust limit of 10 mg/m³.
General population – Hazard via dermal route
Step 1: Selection of the relevant dose descriptor (starting point):
For risk characterisation a dermal NOAEL was derived by route to route extrapolation. The oral NOAEL of 6.67 mg Li3PO4/kg bw/day, was considered as key value for the chemical safety assessment and therefore, most relevant starting point.
Step 2: Modification into a correct starting point:
The NOAEL long-term dermal of 66.7 mg Li3PO4/kg bw/day was calculated from the NOAEL long-term oral of 6.67 mg Li3PO4/kg bw/day considering a conservative 10 % absorption through the skin (ECHA document R.7C, 2014, 7.12)
NOAEL (Li3PO4) long-term dermal = 6.67 mg/kg bw/day x 100%: 10% = 66.7 mg Li3PO4/kg bw/day
Step 3: Use of assessment factors: 1
An AF for exposure duration was not applicable, as data covered long-term / chronic exposure. Interspecies AFs were not applicable as the relevant NOAEL was derived from very reliable and relevant high quality human data. Intraspecies differences were considered not applicable as the NOAEL was based on therapeutic concentrations being also acceptable to general population.
The resulting general population DNEL long-term dermal is 66.7 mg Li3PO4/kg bw/day (66.7 mg/kg bw/day: 1 (AFs) = 66.7 mg Li3PO4/kg bw/day)
General population - Hazard via oral route
Step 1: Selection of the relevant dose descriptor (starting point):
The toxicological relevant component of lithium phosphate is lithium. Thus, the NOAEL long-term oral was calculated to be 6.67 mg Li3PO4/kg bw/day, based on lithium NOAEL long-term oral of 1.2 mg Li/kg bw/day (obtained from human data on long-term (chronic) treatment of bipolar disorder with lithium carbonate, see IUCLID section 7.5).
Step 2: Modification into a correct starting point:
Not required.
Step 3: Use of assessment factors: 1
An AF for exposure duration was not
applicable as data available covered long-term / chronic exposure.
Interspecies AFs were not applicable as the relevant NOAEL was derived
from reliable and relevant high quality human data. Intraspecies
differences were considered not applicable as the NOAEL was based on
therapeutic concentrations being applicable to general population.
The resulting DNEL general population long-term oral is 6.67 mg
Li3PO4/kg bw/day (6.67 mg Li3PO4/kg bw/day : 1 (AFs)).
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.