Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 279-256-2 | CAS number: 79771-28-1
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Acute toxicity: via oral route
The LD50 of Everzol Blue ED-G(Everzol SB26) was greater than 5000 mg/kg B.W. (EPA OPPTS 870.1100 and OECD TG401).
Acute toxicity: via dermal route
The LD50 of Everzol SB26 was greater than 2000 mg/kg B.W. (OECD TG402).
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Acute toxicity: via oral route
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- acute toxicity: oral
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- Single dose
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.1100 (Acute Oral Toxicity)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 401 (Acute Oral Toxicity)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Wistar
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- - Source: BioLASCO Taiwan Co., Ltd.
- Age at study initiation: about 5 week old
- Fasting period before study: overnight
- Housing: in polycarbonate cage
- Water: ad libitum
- Temperature (°C): 20-25 °C
- Humidity (%): 40-70 %
- Photoperiod: 12-hrs dark / 12-hrs light cycle - Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- water
- Doses:
- 5000 mg/kg body weight
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- For male: five
For female: five - Control animals:
- yes
- Sex:
- male/female
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Effect level:
- > 5 000 mg/kg bw
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Mortality:
- None
- Clinical signs:
- other: No adverse effects
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- According to EPA OPPTS 870.1100 and OECD 401 test method, the LD50 of Everzol Blue ED-G was greater than 5000 mg/kg B.W.. Therefore, Everzol Blue ED-G is not classified according to CLP regulation.
- Executive summary:
This test using the procedures outlined in the TACTRI for 0136Y07AORe which is based on the USEPA OPPTS 870.1100(US EPA 712-C-98-190) and OECD 401 (OECD, 2002). Wistar rats were administered by gavage with Everzol Blue ED-G at a fixed dose of 5,000 mg/kg body weight. At the end of experiment, all animals tolerated the test article well with increasing body weights and no mortality or gross lesions findings reported. The acute oral LD50 of Everzol Blue ED-G was greater than 5,000 mg/kg body weight in rats.
Reference
Table 1. Symptoms and time course of death of rats administered by gavage with Everzol Blue ED-G
Sex |
Dose (mg/kg) |
Treated No. |
Symptom |
No. Observed |
Total No. of death |
||||||||||
Hour |
Day |
||||||||||||||
1 |
2 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
14 |
|||||
Male |
0 |
5 |
Normal |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
Death |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|||
5,000 |
5 |
Normal |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
|
Death |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|||
Female |
0 |
5 |
Normal |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
Death |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|||
5,000 |
5 |
Normal |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
|
Death |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Table 2. Mortality rate of rats administered by gavage with Everzol Blue ED-G
Dose (mg/kg body weight) |
Dead No./Treated No. |
Mortality1) (%) |
||
Male |
Female |
Total No. |
||
Control |
0/5 |
0/5 |
0/10 |
0 |
5,000 |
0/5 |
0/5 |
0/10 |
0 |
1) Mortality (%) = Dead No.÷Treated No. × 100%
Table 3. The body weight changes of rats administered by gavage with Everzol Blue ED-G on days 0, 7 and 14
Sex |
Dose (mg/kg body weight) |
Body weight (g)1) |
||
Day 0 |
Day 7 |
Day 14 |
||
Male |
Control |
181.5 ± 4.7 |
205.2 ± 11.5 |
229.9 ± 20.8 |
5,000 |
180.6 ± 4.2 |
219.1 ± 19.2 |
240.9 ± 31.3 |
|
Female |
Control |
159.3 ± 5.2 |
174.3 ± 4.5 |
198.4 ± 6.0 |
5,000 |
159.2 ± 3.2 |
187.3 ± 11.8 |
203.1 ± 18.5 |
1) Mean ± S.D., n=5. Means in each column followed by asterisk (*) indicate significant difference at ρ<0.05 level by Student’st-test.
Table 4. The body weight gains of rats administered by gavage with Everzol Blue ED-G on days 7 and 14
Sex |
Dose (mg/kg body weight) |
Body weight gain (g)1) |
|
Day 72) |
Day 143) |
||
Male |
Control |
23.6 ± 9.6 |
48.4 ± 18.7 |
5,000 |
38.5 ± 15.7 |
60.3 ± 28.2 |
|
Female |
Control |
15.1 ± 3.6 |
39.1 ± 7.0 |
5,000 |
28.1 ± 12.6 |
43.9 ± 20.0 |
1) Mean ± S.D., n=5. Means in each column followed by asterisk (*) indicate significant difference at ρ<0.05 level by Student’st-test.
2) Body weight (BW) gain on the 7thday = (7th-0th) BW (g).
3) Body weight (BW) gain on the 14thday = (14th-0th) BW (g).
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Value:
- 5 000 mg/kg bw
Acute toxicity: via inhalation route
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- acute toxicity: inhalation
- Data waiving:
- other justification
- Justification for data waiving:
- the study does not need to be conducted because exposure of humans via inhalation is not likely taking into account the vapour pressure of the substance and/or the possibility of exposure to aerosols, particles or droplets of an inhalable size
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Acute toxicity: via dermal route
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- acute toxicity: dermal
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- From August 22, 2016 to December 08, 2016
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 402 (Acute Dermal Toxicity)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Limit test:
- yes
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Sprague-Dawley
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- - Source: BioLASCO Taiwan Co. Ltd.
- Age at study initiation: about 7 weeks old
- Housing: Male and female rats were fed, respectively. Two rats per cage in an autoclaved polyethylene cage.
- Acclimation period: 7 Days
- Temperature (°C): 22 ± 3 °C
- Humidity (%): 55 ± 15%
- Photoperiod: 12 hrs dark / 12 hrs light - Type of coverage:
- occlusive
- Duration of exposure:
- 24 hours
- Doses:
- 2000 mg/kg B.W.
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- Six of male and six female
- Control animals:
- yes
- Sex:
- male/female
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Effect level:
- > 2 000 mg/kg bw
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of skin irritation up to the relevant limit dose level
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- According to OECD 402 test method, the LD50 of Everzol SB26 was greater than 2000 mg/kg B.W.. Therefore, Everzol SB26 was Category 5 based on GHS criteria.
- Executive summary:
This test using the procedures outlined in the SuperLab for M62-151100129001EN which is based on the SOP (SOPP-342) for the OECD 402and OECD 402 (OECD, 1987). Six male and six femaleSprague-Dawley rats for each group were used in limit test. For Test group, 12Sprague-Dawley ratsweredermally dosed with 2000 mg/kg B.W. of Everzol SB26. All animals tolerated the test article well with increasing body weights and no mortality or gross lesions findings reported. In absence of mortality or other significant clinical signs of toxicity, LD50 ofEverzol SB26was greater than 2,000 mg/kg B.W..
Reference
Table 1. Body weight of the rats in the study period
Group |
Animal I.D. |
Dosing volume (mL) |
Body weight (g) |
Weight chenges(g) |
|
Day 1 |
Day 14 |
||||
Control |
01M |
0.5 |
246.6 |
345.4 |
+98.8 |
02M |
0.5 |
240.2 |
349.6 |
+109.4 |
|
03M |
0.5 |
266.4 |
355.2 |
+88.8 |
|
04M |
0.5 |
256.3 |
352.8 |
+96.5 |
|
05M |
0.6 |
283.5 |
385.8 |
+102.3 |
|
06M |
0.5 |
271.6 |
370.0 |
+98.4 |
|
Test |
07M |
0.5 |
267.7 |
359.7 |
+92.0 |
08M |
0.5 |
262.7 |
365.6 |
+102.9 |
|
09M |
0.5 |
249.4 |
356.9 |
+107.5 |
|
10M |
0.5 |
271.4 |
352.5 |
+81.1 |
|
11M |
0.5 |
264.1 |
361.1 |
+97.0 |
|
12M |
0.6 |
275.0 |
383.0 |
+108.0 |
|
Control |
13F |
0.4 |
204.6 |
260.2 |
+55.6 |
14F |
0.4 |
219.4 |
258.0 |
+38.6 |
|
15F |
0.4 |
220.5 |
275.2 |
+54.7 |
|
16F |
0.4 |
218.0 |
275.9 |
+57.9 |
|
17F |
0.5 |
230.2 |
270.9 |
+40.7 |
|
18F |
0.4 |
219.5 |
270.5 |
+51.0 |
|
Test |
19F |
0.4 |
206.0 |
254.0 |
+48.0 |
20F |
0.4 |
211.4 |
248.1 |
+36.7 |
|
21F |
0.5 |
225.1 |
287.3 |
+62.2 |
|
22F |
0.4 |
223.3 |
271.5 |
+48.2 |
|
23F |
0.4 |
224.7 |
282.6 |
+57.9 |
|
24F |
0.5 |
239.5 |
299.7 |
+60.2 |
Table 2. Clinical observation of the rats
Animal I.D. |
Clinical sign observation |
||||||||||||||
30 mins |
4 hours |
D2 |
D3 |
D4 |
D5 |
D6 |
D7 |
D8 |
D9 |
D10 |
D11 |
D12 |
D13 |
D14 |
|
01M |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
02M |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
03M |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
04M |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
05M |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
06M |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
07M |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
08M |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
09M |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
10M |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
11M |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
12M |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
13F |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
14F |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
15F |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
16F |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
17F |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
18F |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
19F |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
20F |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
21F |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
22F |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
23F |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
24F |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
DX: Day X in the study period
N: Normal
Table 3. Results of gross necropsy examination
Animal I.D. |
Dose |
Gross lesion |
01M |
─ |
No significant lesion founded |
02M |
No significant lesion founded |
|
03M |
No significant lesion founded |
|
04M |
No significant lesion founded |
|
05M |
No significant lesion founded |
|
06M |
No significant lesion founded |
|
07M |
2000 mg/kg B.W. |
No significant lesion founded |
08M |
No significant lesion founded |
|
09M |
No significant lesion founded |
|
10M |
No significant lesion founded |
|
11M |
No significant lesion founded |
|
12M |
No significant lesion founded |
|
13F |
─ |
No significant lesion founded |
14F |
No significant lesion founded |
|
15F |
No significant lesion founded |
|
16F |
No significant lesion founded |
|
17F |
No significant lesion founded |
|
18F |
No significant lesion founded |
|
19F |
2000 mg/kg B.W. |
No significant lesion founded |
20F |
No significant lesion founded |
|
21F |
No significant lesion founded |
|
22F |
No significant lesion founded |
|
23F |
No significant lesion founded |
|
24F |
No significant lesion founded |
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Value:
- 2 000 mg/kg bw
Additional information
Acute toxicity: via oral route
Wistar rats were administered by gavage with Everzol Blue ED-G(Everzol SB26) at a fixed dose of 5,000 mg/kg body weight. At the end of experiment, all animals tolerated the test article well with increasing body weights and no mortality or gross lesions findings reported. The acute oral LD50 of Everzol Blue ED-G (Everzol SB26) was greater than 5,000 mg/kg body weight in rats.
Acute toxicity: via dermal route
Six male and six femaleSprague-Dawley rats for each group were used in limit test. For Test group, 12 Sprague-Dawley rats were dermally dosed with 2000 mg/kg B.W. of Everzol SB26. All animals tolerated the test article well with increasing body weights and no mortality or gross lesions findings reported. In absence of mortality or other significant clinical signs of toxicity, LD50 of Everzol SB26was greater than 2,000 mg/kg B.W..
Justification for classification or non-classification
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.