Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 700-107-9 | CAS number: 87189-25-1
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 994
- Report date:
- 1994
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Version / remarks:
- (1983)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.10 (Mutagenicity - In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- zinc(2+) 3-hydroxypropane-1,2-bis(olate)
- EC Number:
- 700-107-9
- Cas Number:
- 87189-25-1
- Molecular formula:
- (C3H6O3Zn)n
- IUPAC Name:
- zinc(2+) 3-hydroxypropane-1,2-bis(olate)
- Details on test material:
- White Powder
Constituent 1
Method
- Target gene:
- not applicable
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- lymphocytes: human
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Source: human blood was collected aseptically from healthy male donors.
- Type and identity of media: RPMI 1640 tissue culture medium (Sigma Chemical Company Ltd.)
- Preparation: Lymphocytes were separated by centrifugation
- Media after preparation: RPMI 1640 + 20% foetal calf serum (Imperial Laboratories) + phytohaemagglutinin (Wellcome) (approx. 175 µg/ml) to stimulate cell division
- Cell density: 1 x E+6 cells per ml.
- Incubation time: approx. 48 hours (37°C, 5% CO2)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9-mix prepared from the livers of male 7-8 weeks old Sprague-Dawley derived rats, stimulated with Aroclor 1245 administered as a single intraperitoneal injection in Arachis oil at a dosage of 500 mg/kg bw.
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Test article (first experiment): 1.0, 2.0, 3.9, 7.8, 15.6, 31.1, 62.5, 125, 250 and 500 µg/ml
Test article (second experiment): 2.5, 5, 7.5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 40, 50, 62.5 and 100 µg/ml (without S9); 5, 7.5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 40, 50, 62.5 and 100 µg/ml (with S9)
Solvent control: 0.1 M HCl
Positive control: 500 and 750 µg/ml Ethyl methanesulphonate (without S9); 10 and 15 µg/ml Cyclophosphamide (with S9) - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Solvent used: 0.1 M hydrochloric acid (HCl)
- Justification for choice of solvent: The test substance formed a dosable suspension in 0.1 M HCl on sonication at 50 mg/ml. This formed a fine dispersion in the culture medium when dosed at 1% v/v to give a final concentration of 500 µg/ml. This was used as the highest concentration for subsequent testing.
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- (0.1 M HCl)
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: Ethyl methanoesulphonate (without S9) and Cyclophosphamide (with S9)
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION
- Preincubation period (+ phytohaemagglutinin): 48 h
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 18 h (without S9-mix), 15 h (with S9-mix)
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): 18 h
- Treatment time: 18 h, no recovery period (without S9-mix); 3 h and 15 h recovery (with S9-mix)
SPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays): Colchicin (0.25 µg/ml), added 2 hours before harvest
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): Giemsa
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 2 experiments à 2 plates per dose
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: 100 per dose per experiment
CONCENTRATIONS OF THE TEST SUBSTANCE SELECTED FOR ANALYSIS:
- First test: 15.6, 7.8 and 3.9 µg/ml (without S9); 31.1, 15.6 and 7.8 µg/ml (with S9); posive cotrols: ehtyl methanesulphonate and cyclophosphamide: 500 and 15 µg/ml, respectively
- Second test: 20, 10 and 5 µg/ml (without S9); 40, 30, 20 and 10 µg/ml (with S9); posive cotrols: ehtyl methanesulphonate and cyclophosphamide: 500 and 10 µg/ml, respectively
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: mitotic index
SCORING OF SLIDE PREPARATION:
Metaphase cells were examined under a microscope for structural and numerical abnormalities. Structural abnormalities of chromosome were classified as gap (included chromosome type and chromatid type), chromatid break (ctb), chromosome break (csb), chromatid exchange (cte), chromosome exchange (cse), and other (fragmentation and so on). Observations of slides were carried out by the plural number of observers. The cell having at least one aberration was recorded as an aberrant cell. - Evaluation criteria:
- Numbers of cells with chromosome aberration and polyploidy cells in the groups treated by the test substance are compared with those of the control groups for each dose. In principle, the test substance is judged to be clastogenic or aneugenic, if significant increase in aberration frequency, dose response and reproducibility of the result could be confirmed. For evaluation of the number of aberrant cells gaps were not included.
- Statistics:
- no data
Results and discussion
Test resultsopen allclose all
- Species / strain:
- lymphocytes: human
- Metabolic activation:
- without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- (>15.6 µg/ml)
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- lymphocytes: human
- Metabolic activation:
- with
- Genotoxicity:
- positive
- Remarks:
- (30, 31.3 and 40 µg/ml)
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- (> 10 µg/ml)
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Effects of osmolality: Following the exposure of the cells to the test substance, a sample of the supenatant medium from cultures treated with the solvent control and the two highest concentrations of test substance was removed and stored at -20°C. This was retained for osmolality measurement in the case of a positive response which is only detected at high dose levels and may be attributed to a hyperosmotic effect - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Toxicity data:
First experiment: In the absence of S9 -mix, there was a decrease in mitotic index to 47% of the solvent control value at 15.6 µg/ml. All higher concentrations were too toxic for analysis. In the presence of S9 -mix, the test substance caused a dose-related reduction in mitotic index leading to complete cell death at 125 µg/ml. The highest concentration suitable for analysis, 31.3 µg/ml, caused a decline in mitotic index to 45% of the control level.
Second experiment: In the absence of S9 -mix, there was a decrease in mitotic index to 53% of the solvent control value at 20 µg/ml. All higher concentrations were too toxic for analysis. In the presence of S9 -mix, the test substance caused a decrease in mitotic index to 51% of control levels at 40 µg/ml. The additional concentration of 30 µg/ml was included to assess the reproducibility of the response seen in the first test.
Metaphase data:
First experiment: In the absence of S9 -mix, the test substance caused no statistically significant increases in the proportion of metaphase figures with chromosome damage at any concentration. In the presence of S9 -mix, a statistically significant increase in the number of aberrant cells was observed at 31.3 µg/ml. This increase, to 10.5%, lies outside the historical control range.
Second experiment: In the absence of S9 -mix, the test substance caused no statistically significant increases in the number of aberrant cells at any concentration. In the presence of S9 -mix, a statistically significant increase in the number of aberrant cells was observed at 30 and 40 µg/ml. The increases, to 5.5 and 16%,respectively, lie outside the historical control range (0 -5.25%).
The test substance has shown evidence of clastogenic activity in human lymphocytes in the presence of S9 -mix, but not in its absence, in this in vitro cytogenetic test system.
First experiment, without metabolic activation, 18 hour harvest:
Concentration test agent (µg/ml) |
Relative mitotic index (%) |
No. of aberrant cells (exc. gaps) (%) |
Solvent control |
100 |
4.0 |
1.0 |
98 |
- |
2.0 |
105 |
- |
3.9 |
88 |
4.5 |
7.8 |
58 |
3.0 |
15.6 |
47 |
4.0 |
31.3 |
28 |
- |
62.5 |
12 |
- |
125 |
- |
- |
250 |
- |
- |
500 |
- |
- |
Etylmethanesulphonate |
- |
15.0 |
First experiment, with metabolic activation, 18 hour harvest:
Concentration test agent (µg/ml) |
Relative mitotic index (%) |
No. of aberrant cells (exc. gaps) (%) |
Solvent control |
100 |
2.25 |
1.0 |
96 |
- |
2.0 |
88 |
- |
3.9 |
96 |
- |
7.8 |
63 |
3.0 |
15.6 |
73 |
3.0 |
31.3 |
45 |
10.5 |
62.5 |
6 |
- |
125 |
- |
- |
250 |
- |
- |
500 |
|
- |
Cyclophosphamide |
- |
21.5 |
Second experiment, without metabolic activation, 18 hour harvest:
Concentration test agent (µg/ml) |
Relative mitotic index (%) |
No. of aberrant cells (exc. gaps) (%) |
Solvent control |
100 |
1.5 |
2.5 |
89 |
- |
5.0 |
83 |
1.5 |
7.5 |
69 |
- |
10.0 |
61 |
1.5 |
15.0 |
56 |
- |
20.0 |
53 |
2.5 |
30.0 |
8 |
- |
40.0 |
11 |
- |
50.0 |
11 |
- |
62.5 |
28 |
- |
100 |
- |
- |
Ethylmethanesulfonat |
- |
21.0 |
Second experiment, with metabolic activation, 18 hour harvest:
Concentration test agent (µg/ml) |
Relative mitotic index (%) |
No. of aberrant cells (exc. gaps) (%) |
Solvent control |
100 |
1.25 |
2.5 |
- |
- |
5.0 |
77 |
- |
7.5 |
77 |
- |
10.0 |
74 |
2.5 |
15.0 |
54 |
- |
20.0 |
51 |
3.5 |
30.0 |
80 |
7.0 |
40.0 |
51 |
16.5 |
50.0 |
29 |
- |
62.5 |
26 |
- |
100 |
3 |
- |
Cyclophosphamide |
- |
24.0 |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- The test item has shown evidence of clastogenic activity in the presence of S-9 mix, but not in its absence, in this in vitro cytogenetic test system.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.