Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Genetic toxicity: in vitro

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
Remarks:
Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
1991-02-11 to 1991-09-30
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Well performed GLP study according to former version of OECD technical guideline

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1991
Report date:
1991

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
Version / remarks:
adopted May 26, 1983
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.10 (Mutagenicity - In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
Version / remarks:
EEC Directive 84/449
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of assay:
in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
2,4-xylidine
EC Number:
202-440-0
EC Name:
2,4-xylidine
Cas Number:
95-68-1
Molecular formula:
C8H11N
IUPAC Name:
2,4-dimethylaniline

Method

Target gene:
Chromosome aberration
Species / strain
Species / strain / cell type:
Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- Type and identity of media: CHO cell line, supplied by Toxicology Department Bayer AG, Dr. Lehn, D-5600 Wuppertal, Germany
- Properly maintained: yes
- Periodically checked for Mycoplasma contamination: yes
- Periodically checked for karyotype stability: yes
Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
not specified
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
S9
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
Study I/II (with and without S9 mix)
8h: 300; 500; 700; 900; 1000 µg/mL
24h: 30; 100; 300, 500; 700; 900; 1000 µg/mL
30h: 300; 500; 700; 900; 1000 µg/mL



Vehicle / solvent:
- DMSO (Merck, D-6100 Darmstadt, Germany)
- Purity >= 99.5%
- Final concentration in culture medium did not exceed 1% v/v
Controlsopen allclose all
Untreated negative controls:
yes
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
ethylmethanesulphonate
Remarks:
Dissolved in nutrient medium, final concentration: 0.72mg/mL

Migrated to IUCLID6: Without metabolic activation
Untreated negative controls:
yes
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
cyclophosphamide
Remarks:
Dissolved in nutrient medium, final concentration 4.20µg/mL

Migrated to IUCLID6: With metabolic activation
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium


DURATION
- Exposure duration: 4hrs
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 8, 24, 30h

SPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays): 5, 21 and 27h after start of the treatment colcemid was added to the cultures
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): Giemsa


NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 2


NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: 200 per test group (100 per slide)


DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: mitotic index
Evaluation criteria:
Mutagenicity:
- A dose-related increase in number of structural chromosomal aberrations OR
- A reproducible significant positive response for at least one of these test points
Both, biological and statistical significance should be considered together
Statistics:
Statistical significance at the five per cent level (p < 0.05) was evaluated by means of chi-square test

Results and discussion

Test resultsopen allclose all
Species / strain:
Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
Metabolic activation:
with
Genotoxicity:
positive
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Remarks:
> 100 µg/mL
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Species / strain:
Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
Metabolic activation:
without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Remarks:
> 100 µg/mL
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:
- Toxic effects were observed in both cytogenetic experiments evidenced by reductions of the mitotic indices after treatment at least in the samples scored treated with the top concentrations
- In both experiments, there were clonal effects in the CHS cell line revealing dicentric marker chromosomes distributed randomly in the treatment and control groups; therefore, dicentric chromosomes were recorded but not included in the calculation of the aberration rates
- Due to their random distribution this measure did not affect the validity of the study
Remarks on result:
other: all strains/cell types tested
Remarks:
Migrated from field 'Test system'.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Interpretation of results (migrated information):
positive with metabolic activation
negative without metabolic activation

In conclusion, it can be stated that in the described study and under the experimental conditions reported, the test article 2,4-Xyldine induced structural chromosome aberration in the CHO cell line in the presence of metabolic activation and was non-mutagenic in the absence of S9 mix.
Executive summary:

Based on the results of this chromosome aberration study 2,4-Xylidine was non-mutagnic in the absence and mutagenic in the presence of metabolic activtion.