Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 284-965-5 | CAS number: 85005-32-9
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Skin irritation/corrosion
Key study: Test method according to OECD 431. GLP Study. Based on the read-across approach the target substance "Fatty acis, C14 -22, ethylene esters, bisulfited sodium salts" is not considered corrosive to the skin.
Key study: Test method equivalent to OECD 439. GLP Study. Based on the read-across approach the target substance "Fatty acis, C14 -22, ethylene esters, bisulfited sodium salts" is not considered irritant to the skin.
Eye irritation/corrosion
Key study: Test procedure (in vitro) in accordance with generally accepted scientific standards and described in sufficient detail. GLP Study. Based on the read-across approach the target substance "Fatty acis, C14 -22, ethylene esters, bisulfited sodium salts" is not expected to cause severe ocular damage.
Key study: Test method according to OECD 405. GLP Study. Based on the read-across approach, the target substance "Fatty acis, C14 -22, ethylene esters, bisulfited sodium salts" is not classified for eye irritation according to the CLP Criteria.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Read-across from an analogue substance for which a guideline study (Klimish =1) is available.
- Justification for type of information:
- REPORTING FORMAT FOR THE ANALOGUE APPROACH
See attached reporting format. - Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Irritation / corrosion parameter:
- % tissue viability
- Value:
- 108.1
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: Based on a read-across from an analogue substance.
- Remarks:
- Time point: 3 minutes.
- Irritation / corrosion parameter:
- % tissue viability
- Value:
- 99.4
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: Based on a read-across from an analogue substance.
- Remarks:
- Time point: 60 minutes.
- Irritation / corrosion parameter:
- % tissue viability
- Value:
- 105
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: Based on a read-across from an analogue substance.
- Remarks:
- Time point: 240 minutes.
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Remarks:
- CLP implementation.
- Conclusions:
- Based on a read-across from an analogue substance, it was determined that the target substance "Fatty acids, C14-22, ethylene esters, bisulfited sodium salts" is not corrosive to the skin.
- Executive summary:
An in vitro study according to the OECD guideline 431 was conducted to determine the corrosivity potential of the test material "Rape oil, bisulfited, sodium salt". The study was conducter under GLP conditions and the EPISKINTMmodel was used. The test item was determined to be non-corrosive to the skin. Based on the read-across approach, the target substance " Fatty acids, C14-22, ethylene esters, bisulfited sodium salts" was also determined to be non-corrosive to the skin.
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Read-across from an analogue substance for which a guideline study (Klimish =1) is available.
- Justification for type of information:
- REPORTING FORMAT FOR THE ANALOGUE APPROACH
See attached reporting format. - Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Irritation / corrosion parameter:
- % tissue viability
- Remarks:
- Mean
- Run / experiment:
- Test item
- Value:
- 102.2
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks:
- 100 %
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks:
- 27.9 %
- Remarks on result:
- other: Based on a read-across from an analogue substance.
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Remarks:
- CLP implementation.
- Conclusions:
- Based on a read-across from an analogue substance, the target substance "Fatty acids, C14-22, ethylene esters, bisulfited sodium salts" is determined to be a non-irritant to the skin.
- Executive summary:
An in vitro study using the EPISKIN ™ reconstituted human epidermis model was conducted to determine the skin irritation potential of the test material "Rape oil, bisulfited, sodium salt". The study was conducted under GLP conditions. The test item was determined to be non-irritant to the skin. Based on the read-across approach, the target substance "Fatty acids, C14-22, ethylene esters, bisulfited sodium salts"was also determined to be non-irritant to the skin.
Referenceopen allclose all
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Eye irritation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Read-across from an analogue substance for which a guideline study (Klimish =1) is available.
- Justification for type of information:
- REPORTING FORMAT FOR THE ANALOGUE APPROACH
See attached reporting format. - Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Remarks on result:
- other: Based on a read-across from an analogue substance.
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Remarks on result:
- other: Based on a read-across from an analogue substance.
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Remarks:
- Redness
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.33
- Max. score:
- 1
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 48 hours
- Remarks on result:
- other: Based on a read-across from an analogue substance.
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.33
- Max. score:
- 1
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 48 hours
- Remarks on result:
- other: Based on a read-across from an analogue substance.
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Remarks:
- CLP Implementation.
- Conclusions:
- Based on the read-across approach from the analogue substance "Rape oil, bisulfited, sodium salt", the substance "Fatty acids, C14-22, ethylene esters, bisulfited sodium salts" was determined to not irritating according to the CLP Criteria.
- Executive summary:
An acute eye irritation/corrosion study was performed with the analogue substance "Rape oil, bisulfited, sodium salt" in rabbit according to OECD Guideline 405. A single application of the test material to the non-irrigated eye of two rabbits produced moderate conjuctival irritation. Both treated eyes appeared normal at the 48 -Hour observation. The test material is not classified for eye irritation according to the CLP Criteria. Based on the read-across approach from the analogue substance "Rape oil, bisulfited, sodium salt", the target substance "Fatty acids, C14-22, ethylene esters, bisulfited sodium salts" was determined to be not irritating to the eyes according to the CLP Criteria.
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation
- Remarks:
- other: ex-vivo
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Read-across from an analogue substance for which a guideline study (Klimish =1) is available.
- Justification for type of information:
- REPORTING FORMAT FOR THE ANALOGUE APPROACH
See attached reporting format. - Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Remarks:
- Opacy
- Value:
- 0
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: Based on a read-across from an analogue substance.
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Remarks:
- CLP Implementation.
- Conclusions:
- Based on a read-across from an analogue substance, the target substance "Fatty acids, C14-22, ethylene esters, bisulfited, sodium salts" is not considered to be an ocular irritant.
- Executive summary:
A study was performed to assess the ocular irritancy potential of the analogue substance "Rape oil, bisulfited, sodium salts" in the rabbit following application onto the cornea of the enucleated eye. Following assessment of the data for all endpoints, the test material was considered unlikely to have the potential to cause severe ocular irritancy in vivo. Based on the read-across, the target substance "Fatty acids, C14-22, ethylene esters, bisulfited, sodium salts" is not expected to cause severe ocular irritancy.
Referenceopen allclose all
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Respiratory irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the read-across approach, the substance is not classified for skin irritation according to CLP (Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008): the mean cell viability of human skin models was not affected by the substance.
Based on the available data, the substance is not classified for eye irritation according to the CLP Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008: the conjunctival irritation was resolved after 48 hours and the mean scores for corneal opacity, iritis, conjuntival redness and chemosis following grading at 24, 48 and 72 h were below the CLP criteria for reversible eye effects.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

EU Privacy Disclaimer
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our websites.