Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 701-065-4 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Carcinogenicity
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- carcinogenicity, other
- Remarks:
- intra-pleural injection
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 10 Jan. 1983 - 22 Jan. 1986
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 995
- Report date:
- 1995
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- no guideline available
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 451 (Carcinogenicity Studies)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Special design/comparative study focussed on induction of mesothelioma; therefore, intrapleural application, one dose only, one sex only / no haematology, clinical chemistry and urinalysis
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Method: Special test design, whole-life study
Comprehensive test programme and comparative study including various silicates (crystalline and amorphous) as well as quartz and TiO2. Fibrous minerals, UICC crocidolite (blue asbestos) and Oregon erionite (fibrous zeolite) served as positive control substances. - GLP compliance:
- yes
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Silicic acid, aluminum sodium salt
- EC Number:
- 215-684-8
- EC Name:
- Silicic acid, aluminum sodium salt
- Cas Number:
- 1344-00-9
- Details on test material:
- Crosfield ASA: Amorphous sodium aluminosilicate
Constituent 1
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Crosfield ASA: Amorphous sodium aluminosilicate
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Wistar
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Unilever Environ. Safety Laboratory Breeding Unit
- Age at study initiation: 8 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: no data
- Fasting period before study: no
- Housing: groups of 10 animals
- Diet: ad libitum
- Water: ad libitum
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 21 +-2
- Humidity (%): 55 +-10
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 / 12
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- other: intra-pleural injection
- Vehicle:
- other: suspension in saline
- Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- no
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- The animals were allowed to live their whole life-span or maximally 3 years.
- Frequency of treatment:
- single dose
- Post exposure period:
- see "Duration of treatment" and "Frequency of treatment"
Doses / concentrations
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
20 mg/animal
Basis:
other: nominal dose
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 50
positive and negative control groups: 30 - Control animals:
- other: negative controls: saline, TiO2 (20 mg), Dorentrup quartz(20 mg)
- Details on study design:
- - Dose selection rationale: cancerogenic dose for fibrous materials
- Positive control:
- crocidolite [blue asbestos] (20+40 mg) and erionite [fibrous zeolite] (20 mg)
Examinations
- Observations and examinations performed and frequency:
- CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
daily
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
at weighing
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
before and directly after treatment, then weekly
FOOD EFFICIENCY:
- Body weight gain in kg/food consumption in kg per unit time X 100 calculated as time-weighted averages from the consumption and body weight gain data: No data
OPHTHALMOSCOPIC EXAMINATION: No
HAEMATOLOGY: No
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY: No
URINALYSIS: No
NEUROBEHAVIOURAL EXAMINATION: No
- Sacrifice and pathology:
- GROSS PATHOLOGY: Yes
HISTOPATHOLOGY: Yes (see Appendix 8, Summaries Appendices 9 and 10 / 14 and 15)
Weight laid on intra-thoracic changes, in particular of the pleura. - Statistics:
- Analysis of survival data, neoplastic conditions and associated pre-neoplastic condition: tumours were evaluated by giving a "Peto score" (Peto R. et al. 1980) for malignancy and cause of death. 39 groupings of tumours and hyperplasia used for statistical analysis (Appendix 18).
Results and discussion
Results of examinations
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- not specified
- Food efficiency:
- not specified
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not specified
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not examined
- Haematological findings:
- not examined
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- not examined
- Urinalysis findings:
- not examined
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- not examined
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- not specified
- Gross pathological findings:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- no effects observed
- Details on results:
- CLINICAL SIGNS AND MORTALITY
- SURVIVAL (Tab. 2 and 4):
ASA-treated animals as well as all other groups having been treated with non-fibrous material showed normal survival
as compared to the saline control.
- CAUSES of MORTALITY (Tab. 7 and 8):
There was no shift towards neoplastic lesions as primary cause of mortality
due to treatment with non-fibrous material, ASA and untreated control groups:
52 - 60 % of all deaths were due to neoplasia but none were caused by mesotheliomas.
On the other hand, an increased fraction of the crocidolite-treated groups died of mesotheliomas (67 - 87 %),
while among the rats treated with Oregon erionite, all deaths were due to mesotheliomas.
HISTOPATHOLOGY: NON-NEOPLASTIC
- LOCAL NON-NEOPLASTIC, REACTIVE REPONSE
Test material was occasionally present intra-thoracically. There was infrequent slight pleural/pericardial thickening
composed of macrophages with or without connective tissue.(p. 15), occasionally associated with slight intra-thoracic adhesions (p. 12).
There was a trend to form nodules (Tab.5/6).
On the other hand, quartz elicited much more extensive granulomatous, fibroblastic reactions with dense deposition of collagen
forming nodules, also involving the mediastinal lymph nodes which were enlarged, intra-thoracic adhesions, hydrothorax and
accumulation of macrophages and mononuclear cells (p. 12/15).
HISTOPATHOLOGY: NEOPLASTIC
- MESOTHELIOMAS (Tab. 10)
No pleural mesotheliomas appeared in the saline group.
No pleural mesotheliomas were induced by ASA and the other non-fibrous minerals including TiO2 and quartz,
apart from a single benign testicular mesothelioma (unrelated to treatment).
The application of asbestos material distinctly produced pleural mesotheliomas in 71 - 93 % of the animals.
- ACTION in COMBINATION of non-fibrous with crocidolite (fibrous mineral) (Tab. 10):
The results corresponded to those found with asbestos alone (77 - 87% vs,. 87% mesotheliomas).
Hence, a statement on co-carcinogenic or promoter-like interaction is not possible, as the tumour yields were already
at the maximum limit for crocidolite alone.
[see Table Histopathology for neoplastic effects under "Remarks on results..." ]
- OTHER TUMORS (Tab. 9)
The treatment with the test minerals, irrespective of the fibrous or non-fibrous nature, did not influence the pattern of prevalence
of isolated spontaneous tumors other than mesotheliomas (most of them thyroid follicular tumors).
Any other information on results incl. tables
Summary of incidences of
mesotheliomas
(from Report Vol. 1, Table
10)
Group Code |
Treatment |
Sex |
No. |
No. of rats with mesothelioma |
Incidence [%] |
Total incidence [%] |
Test compounds |
||||||
G |
20 mg Crosfield ASA* (relevant test compound) |
M |
50 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
F |
50 |
0 |
0 |
|||
D |
20 mg non-fibrous erionite |
M |
50 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
F |
50 |
0 |
0 |
|||
E |
20 mg Degussa Sasil |
M |
50 |
1** |
2 |
0 |
F |
50 |
0 |
0 |
|||
F |
20 mg AKZO zeolite |
M |
50 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
F |
50 |
0 |
0 |
|||
Test controls |
||||||
A |
Saline control |
M |
50 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
F |
50 |
0 |
0 |
|||
N |
20 mg TiO2 |
M |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
F |
3 |
0 |
0 |
|||
R |
20 mg Dorentrup Quartz 12 |
M |
30 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
F |
29 |
0 |
0 |
|||
B |
20 mg UICC crocidolite |
M |
30 |
28 |
93 |
87 |
F |
30 |
24 |
80 |
|||
C |
20 mg Oregon erionite |
M |
30 |
30 |
100 |
100 |
F |
30 |
30 |
100 |
|||
P |
20 mg TiO2 + |
M |
30 |
26 |
87 |
82 |
F |
30 |
23 |
77 |
|||
S |
20 mg Dorentrup Quartz 12 + 20 mg mg UICC crocidolite |
M |
30 |
23 |
77 |
82 |
F |
29 |
24 |
83 |
* ASA = Amorphous sodium aluminosilicate
** benign testicular mesothelioma, not treatment related
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Executive summary:
A study was conducted based on OECD Guideline 451 using Crosfield ASA (Amorphous sodium aluminosilicate) in rats. A single dose of 20 mg/animal was administered by intra-pleural injection. There was no evidence that ASA acted as a carcinogen.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.