Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Repeated dose toxicity: inhalation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
sub-chronic toxicity: inhalation
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Reliability:
4 (not assignable)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: The study contains no information on substance or animals. Exposure period is not properly defined with BeO. No raw data presented.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
publication
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1953

Materials and methods

Principles of method if other than guideline:
Inhalation of BeO in dogs and effect on blood concentration on lipids and cholesterol
GLP compliance:
no
Limit test:
no

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
Automatically generated during migration to IUCLID 6, no data available
IUPAC Name:
Automatically generated during migration to IUCLID 6, no data available
Details on test material:
BeO, no other information

Test animals

Species:
dog
Strain:
not specified
Sex:
not specified
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
No information

Administration / exposure

Route of administration:
inhalation
Type of inhalation exposure:
not specified
Remarks:
most likely whole body
Vehicle:
other: no data
Remarks on MMAD:
MMAD / GSD: No information
Details on inhalation exposure:
Dogs were exposed for six hours a day, 5 days per week, to 3.6 mg/m3 BeO
Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
not specified
Duration of treatment / exposure:
Not clear
Frequency of treatment:
6 hours a day, 5 days per week
No. of animals per sex per dose:
4 dogs
Details on study design:
Limited information on study design. BeO is included as part of a larger study including BeSO4 and BeF.

The levels of phospholipids and free cholesterol was measured in exposed animals.

Examinations

Observations and examinations performed and frequency:
No information
Sacrifice and pathology:
No information
Statistics:
No information

Results and discussion

Results of examinations

Clinical signs:
not specified
Mortality:
not specified
Body weight and weight changes:
not specified
Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
not specified
Food efficiency:
not specified
Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
not specified
Ophthalmological findings:
not specified
Haematological findings:
not specified
Clinical biochemistry findings:
not specified
Urinalysis findings:
not specified
Behaviour (functional findings):
not specified
Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
not specified
Gross pathological findings:
not specified
Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
not specified
Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
not specified
Details on results:
BeO caused a 1 value above 2 standard deviations in the phospholipid/free cholesterol ratio.

Effect levels

Dose descriptor:
NOAEL
Remarks:
Study not sufficient to determine NOAEL
Effect level:
ca. 3.6 mg/m³ air
Sex:
not specified
Basis for effect level:
other: Beryllium oxide at this concentration produced a slight increase in phospholipid: free cholesterol ratio. The strenght of this finding and the relevance (biological implications) is highly uncertain.
Remarks on result:
not determinable
Remarks:
no NOAEL identified

Target system / organ toxicity

Critical effects observed:
not specified

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Not enough information to conclude on results or validity of study.
Executive summary:

Dogs were exposed to BeO over a not properly defined period. This exposure caused an increase in the ratio of phospholipids to free cholesterol. The relevance of this finding is highly uncertain.