Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 202-634-5 | CAS number: 98-07-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Repeated dose toxicity: dermal
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- sub-chronic toxicity: dermal
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- other information
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: The study fulfils generally well accepted scientific criteria and is sufficiently described. Klimisch 2e
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- Carcinogenicity of benzyl chloride, benzal chloride, benzotrichloride and benzoyl chloride in mice by skin application
- Author:
- Fukuda K., Matsushita H., Sakabe H. and Takemoto K.
- Year:
- 1 981
- Bibliographic source:
- Gann, 72: 655-664
Materials and methods
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- - The backs of the ICR mice were clipped free of hair before treatment and clipping was repeated when necessary.
- Benzene solutions of the test material were prepared just prior to treatment. The dorsal skin application was done with a micropipette.
- Three experiments were performed with different exposure durations and concentrations. Experiment I was done on 14 week old mice, while experiment II used 3 week old weanling mice and experiment III 7 week old mice
- When moribund or at the indicated time mice were ether killed and completely necropsied. After gross pathological inspection the organs and
tumors were exised , fixed, paraffin embedded, 5 μm sections made and stained appropiately for histological evaluation. - GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Limit test:
- no
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- α,α,α-trichlorotoluene
- EC Number:
- 202-634-5
- EC Name:
- α,α,α-trichlorotoluene
- Cas Number:
- 98-07-7
- Molecular formula:
- C7H5Cl3
- IUPAC Name:
- α,α,α-trichlorotoluene
- Reference substance name:
- trichloromethylbenzene
- IUPAC Name:
- trichloromethylbenzene
- Details on test material:
- reagent grade commercial material from Tokyo Kasei Co. Ltd., Tokyo
No further information
Constituent 1
Constituent 2
Test animals
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- ICR
- Sex:
- female
Administration / exposure
- Type of coverage:
- other: No, painted
- Vehicle:
- other: benzene
- Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- no
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Experiment I: 30 weeks
Experiment II: 41 weeks
Experiment III: 50 weeks (terminated after 13.3 months.) - Frequency of treatment:
- Experiment I: 2/w 3 w, 1/w 27 w
Experiment II: 3/w 4 w, 2/w 37 w
Experiment III: 2/w 50 w
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
12.5, 25 μl/animal/painting (Experiment I)
Basis:
nominal per unit area
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
5, 10 μl/animal/painting (Experiment II)
Basis:
nominal per unit area
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
2.3 μl/animal/painting (Experiment III)
Basis:
nominal per unit area
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- Experiment I: 20, 19, 22 animals were exposed in the control, 12.5 and 25 μl/animal/painting respectively
Experiment II: 10 animals per dose
Experiment III: 20 animals per dose - Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
Results and discussion
Effect levels
open allclose all
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Basis for effect level:
- other: None of the effects reported allowed to derive a NOAEL
- Remarks on result:
- not determinable
- Remarks:
- no NOAEL identified
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEL
- Basis for effect level:
- other: None of the effects reported allowed to derive a NOEL
- Remarks on result:
- not measured/tested
- Remarks:
- Effect level not specified (migrated information)
Target system / organ toxicity
- Critical effects observed:
- not specified
Any other information on results incl. tables
- During a few minutes after dermal painting of mice a marked irritation of the eyes, the skin and the respiratory system as well as elevated motor activities were seen.
- At the painted area first erythema and swelling were noted later alopecia, induration, marked keratinization, ulcers and/or necrosis of the epidermis were observed. The lesions were rather severe.
Experiment I:
- Mortality at the termination of the experiment was 0, 10 and 46% in the control, low- and high-dose groups, respectively. The high dose corresponded to a total of approximately 1165 mg (average dose rate of 5.4 mg/day) and the low dose to 582.4 mg (average dose rate of 2.7 mg/day).
- The number of mice with tumours was 0/20, 17/19, and 21/22 in the control, low-dose, and high-dose groups, respectively.
Experiment II:
The high dose represented a total of 1206 mg and the low dose 603 mg (4.3 and 2.1 mg/day, respectively). Mortality at termination was 0, 60, and 80% for the control, low-dose, and high-dose groups, respectively. The number of mice with tumours was 0/10, 10/10, and 8/9 in the control, lowdose, and high-dose groups, respectively.
Experiment III:
The total dose was approximately 315 mg (0.9 mg/day). Mortality at termination was 20% in the controls compared with 35% in the treated group. In the control group, 2/20 mice had lung adenomas while in the treated group, 13/19 had skin carcinoma and 11/19 had lung adenoma/carcinoma. Nineteen other tumors, attributed to licking, were observed in the lips, tongue, esophagus, forestomach and glandular stomach of the treated mice.
Systemic effects:
Leukemogenic and pulmonary tumourigenic activity was observed
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- The authors tested the repeated dose toxicity of benzotrichloride by painting the clipped back of ICR female mice in three different sets of sub-chronic experiment. The authors observed irritation of the eyes, the skin and the respiratory tract as well as an increase in motor activities. Erythema and swelling were noted, later-on alopecia, induration, marked keratinization, ulceration and/or epidermal necrosis and especially an greater induction of skin tumors were observed at treated skin. Neither a NOEL nor a NOAEL could be derived since the experiment was not adequately designed.
- Executive summary:
The authors tested the repeated dose toxicity of benzotrichloride (CAS n° 98 -07 -7) by painting the clipped back of ICR female mice in three different sets of sub-chronic experiments.
In an first experiment (I), mice received 12.5 or 25 μl/animal/painting, twice a week during 3 weeks, and then once a week for 27 weeks. In a second experiment (II), mice received 5 or 10 μl/animal/painting, three times a week during 4 weeks, and then twice a week for 37 weeks. In a third experiment (III), mice received 2.3 μl/animal/painting twice a week during 50 weeks.
The high dose corresponded in experiment (I) to a total of approximately 1165 mg (average dose rate of 5.4 mg/day) and the low dose to 582.4 mg (average dose rate of 2.7 mg/day). For the experiment (II), the high dose represented a total of 1206 mg and the low dose 603 mg (4.3 and 2.1 mg/day, respectively). And then for the experiment (III), the total dose was approximately 315 mg (0.9 mg/day). Immediate reactions, mortality and pathological signs were monitored and tumours were diagnosed and counted in all animals at their death or at the end of the exposure period.
Hence, during a few minutes after dermal painting of mice a marked irritation of the eyes, the skin and the respiratory system as well as elevated motor activities were seen. Besides, at the painted area first erythema and swelling were noted later alopecia, induration, marked keratinization, ulcers and/or necrosis of the epidermis were observed. The lesions were rather severe.
Thus, in the experiment (I), mortality at the termination of the experiment was 0, 10 and 46% in the control, low- and high-dose groups, respectively. The number of mice with tumours was 0/20, 17/19, and 21/22 in the control, low-dose, and high-dose groups, respectively.
In the experiment (II), mortality at termination was 0, 60, and 80% for the control, low-dose, and high-dose groups, respectively. The number of mice with tumours was 0/10, 10/10, and 8/9 in the control, lowdose, and high-dose groups, respectively.
in the experiment (III), mortality at termination was 20% in the controls compared with 35% in the treated group. In the control group, 2/20 mice had lung adenomas while in the treated group, 13/19 had skin carcinoma and 11/19 had lung adenoma/carcinoma. Nineteen other tumors, attributed to licking, were observed in the lips, tongue, esophagus, forestomach and glandular stomach of the treated mice.
Altogether, these elements prove that benzotrichloride induced local and systemic effects (leukemogenic and pulmonary) on female mice exposed dermally, mainly tumerogenic activity.
None of the effects reported allowed to derive a NOEL or a NOAEL. They only show obvious evidence of the carcinogenic potential of benzotrichloride. The GLP status of the study is unknwon but the study is sufficiently described even if further investigation on the clinical signs would have been preferable. Besides, due to the small of the group, no statistical evaluation was performed. The experiment was nethertheless based on generally well accepted scientific principles. Therefore, this study should be considered as reliable with restrictions, a Klimisch 2.e study.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.