Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: - | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
„2-propanol and 2-butanol production, distn. residue“ was found to be irritating to eyes in vivo (according to guideline OECD 405) and mildly irritating to eyes in vitro (according to guideline OECD 437).
The substance was found not being skin irritating (according to guideline EU B.46), but skin irritating based on the calculation method.
No irritating effects to the respiratory tract were observed in the 90 day repeated dose toxicity study.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
- Remarks:
- other: newly approved in vitro method
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 21. June 2010 - 05. July 2010
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Remarks:
- Study under GLP, according to international guidelines and with full documentation
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Commission Regulation (EC) No. 761/2009, Method B.46: “In Vitro Skin Irritation: Reconstructed human epidermis model test” adopted 23. July 2009
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: OECD Guideline for the Testing of Chemicals, Draft Proposal for a New Guideline, In Vitro Skin Irritation: Reconstructed Human Epidermis (RhE) Test Method, Version 7.6, 9 September 2009
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: ECVAM international validation study on in vitro tests for acute skin irritation: Report on the validity of the EPISKIN and EpiDerm assays and on the Skin Integrity Function Test (Altern Lab Anim. 2007 Dec; 35 (6): 559-601)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Protocol for IN VITRO EpiDermTM SKIN IRRITATION TEST (EPI-200-SIT), Rev. 3/23/2009, MatTek Corporation, Ashland, MA 01721, USA
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Test system:
- human skin model
- Source species:
- human
- Cell type:
- non-transformed keratinocytes
- Details on animal used as source of test system:
- human-derived epidermal keratinocytes (EPI-200 tissues)
- Justification for test system used:
- OECD approved and validated test system, suitable to replace in vivo studies
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Details on test system:
- The EpiDermTM tissue consists of normal, human-derived epidermal keratinocytes which have been cultured to form a multi-layered, highly differentiated model of the human epidermis. It consists of organized basal, spinous and granular layers, and a multi-layered stratum corneum containing intercellular lamellar lipid layers arranged in patterns analogous to those found in vivo. The EpiDermTM tissues are cultured on specially prepared cell cultures inserts.
Origin: Epi-200 tissues were procured from MatTek Corporation in Ashland, USA. Day of delivery: 1. July 2010 batch: 13657
pre-incubation of tissues at 37 °C and 5% CO2 for one hour; thereafter with fresh assay medium (0.9 mL) at 37 °C and 5% CO2 for 18 hours - Control samples:
- yes, concurrent negative control
- yes, concurrent positive control
- Amount/concentration applied:
- Applied volume: 30 µL of test item
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 35 - 60 minutes in incubator and then 24 hour incubation
- Duration of post-treatment incubation (if applicable):
- 18 ±2 hours
- Number of replicates:
- One plate (three tissues) as negative control, one plate (three tissues) as positive control, one plate was used for the test item
- Type of coverage:
- other: nylon mesh
- Amount / concentration applied:
- See "Any other information on materials and methods incl. tables".
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- See "Any other information on materials and methods incl. tables".
- Observation period:
- See "Any other information on materials and methods incl. tables".
- Number of animals:
- Not applicable
- Irritation / corrosion parameter:
- % tissue viability
- Remarks:
- Formazon production
- Run / experiment:
- mean of three tissues
- Value:
- 56.7
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not applicable
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- The test item is considered not irritant. After the treatment, the relative absorbance values were decreased to 56.7%. This value is above the threshold for irritation (50%).
The optical density of the negative control was well within the required acceptability criterion of 1.0 < mean OD < 2.5. The positive control induced a decrease in the relative absorbance as compared to the negative control to 7.8 % (required: <= 20%) thus ensuring the validity of the test system. Variation within replicates was within the accepted range for negative control, positive control and test item. For these reasons, the result of the test is considered valid. - Executive summary:
The skin irritation potential of „2-propanol and 2-butanol production, distn. residue“ in theHuman Skin Model Test was determined following EU-Method B.46. One valid experiment under GLP was performed. Three tissues of the human skin model EpiDerm(TM) were treated with „2-propanol and 2-butanol production, distn. residue“ for 60 minutes.
30 µL of the liquid test item (using a nylon mesh) were applied to each tissue and spread to match the tissue size. DPBS-buffer was used as negative control, 5% SDS-solution was used as positive control. After treatment with the negative control, the absorbance values were within the required acceptability criterion of 1.0 < mean OD < 2.5. The positive control showed clear irritating effects. Variation within tissues was acceptable (< 18%).
After the treatment with the test item, the relative absorbance values were reduced to 56.7%. This value is above the threshold for irritation potential (50%). Therefore, „2-propanol and 2-butanol production, distn. residue“ is considered as not irritant in the Human Skin Model Test.
Reference
Table 1: Absorption values for negative control, test item and positive control (mean of 2 measurements, blank value substracted)
Designation |
Negative Control |
Test Item |
Positive Control |
Mean – blank (Tissue 1) |
2.389 |
1.348 |
0.171 |
Mean – blank (Tissue 2) |
2.244 |
1.240 |
0.182 |
Mean – blank (Tissue 3) |
2.129 |
1.244 |
0.177 |
Mean of the three Tissues |
2.254 |
1.277 |
0.177 |
Relative Standard Deviation |
5.8% |
4.8% |
3.1% |
Table 2: % Formazan production for the test item and positive control
Designation |
Test Item |
Positive Control |
% Formazan production (Tissue 1) |
59.8% |
7.6% |
% Formazan production (Tissue 2) |
55.0% |
8.1% |
% Formazan production (Tissue 3) |
55.2% |
7.9% |
% Formazan production Mean |
56.7% |
7.8% |
Assessment
The relative absorbance values were reduced to 56.7% after the treatment. This value is above the threshold for irritation (50%). Therefore, the test item is considered as not irritant.
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Eye irritation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 13. September 2010 - 28. September 2010
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Remarks:
- Study under GLP, according to international guidelines and with full documentation
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Elevage de Gérome (Quartier Labaste –F40260 Linxe)
- Age at study initiation: 11 or 15 weeks old
- Weight at study initiation: between 1.93 kg and 3.53 kg
- Housing: individual box
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum), Water (e.g. ad libitum): Drinking water (tap-water from public distribution system) and foodstuff (SDS - C15) were supplied freely.
- Acclimation period: a minimal 5-day acclimatisation period
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 17 to 23 °C
- Humidity (%): 30 to 70%
- Air changes (per hr): approximately fifteen changes per hour
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): twelve hours continuous light (07.00 to 19.00) and twelve hours darkness - Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- yes, concurrent no treatment
- Amount / concentration applied:
- amount: 0.1 mL
- Observation period (in vivo):
- Ocular examinations were performed on both right and left eyes 1 hour, 24, 48 and 72 hours following treatment.
NOTE: As persistent reactions were noted at 72 hours post-dose, additional observations have been carried out from day 4 daily for up to 9 days in order to determine the reversible character of the lesions observed. - Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 3 males
- Details on study design:
- Eye examinations were carried out using the scale of lesion scores according to OECD 405.
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Remarks:
- redness
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 2
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: between days 7 and 9
- Remarks on result:
- other: a moderate redness noted 1 hour after the test item instillation
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 1.8
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: between days 7 and 8
- Remarks on result:
- other: a moderate to important chemosis noted 1 hour after the test item instillation
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: one day
- Remarks on result:
- other: a congestion, noted 1 hour after the test item instillation in two animals
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Remarks:
- opacity
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.7
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 2 days
- Remarks on result:
- other: a moderate corneal opacity
- Interpretation of results:
- Category 2A (irritating to eyes) based on GHS criteria
- Conclusions:
- In conclusion, the results obtained, under these experimental conditions, enable to conclude that the test item „2-propanol and 2-butanol production, distn. residue“ has to be classified in accordance with the Regulation EC No. 1272/2008 on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures, in category 2 “Irritating to eyes”. The signal word “Warning” and hazard statement H319 “Causes serious eye irritation” are required.
- Executive summary:
Acute eye irritation was assessed for „2-propanol and 2-butanol production, distn. residue“ according to OECD guideline No 405. The test item was instilled as supplied, into the eye of 3 New Zealand rabbits at the dose of 0.1 mL. The experimental protocol was established on the basis of the official method as defined in the OECD guideline No 405 dated April 24th, 2002 and the test method B.5 of the Council regulation No 440/2008. The ocular reactions observed during the study have been moderate to important and totally reversible in the three animals:
- at the conjunctivae level: a moderate redness noted 1 hour after the test item instillation and totally reversible between days 7 and 9, associated with a moderate to important chemosis noted 1 hour after the test item instillation and totally reversible between days 7 and 8,
- at the iris level: a congestion, noted 1 hour after the test item instillation in two animals, and totally reversible on day 1.
- at the corneal level: a moderate corneal opacity, noted 24 hours after the test item instillation, and totally reversible on day 2.
In accordance with the Regulation EC No. 1272/2008 on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures, the test item has to be classified in category 2 “Irritating to eyes”. The signal word “Warning” and hazard statement H319 “Causes serious eye irritation” are required.
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 26/08/2010-13/09/2010
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Remarks:
- Fully documented study run under GLP and according to international guidelines
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: OECD 437 “Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Test Method for Identifying Ocular Corrosives and Severe Irritants”
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Species:
- other: bovine cornea
- Controls:
- yes, concurrent positive control
- yes, concurrent negative control
- Irritation parameter:
- in vitro irritation score
- Value:
- 11.7
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not applicable
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Interpretation of results:
- Category 2B (mildly irritating to eyes) based on GHS criteria
- Remarks:
- Criteria used for interpretation of results: other: criteria defined in “Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability (BCOP) Assay”, SOP of Microbiological Associates Ltd., UK, Procedure Details, April 1997; Gautheron et al. (1992), refined by Vanparys et al. (1994)
- Conclusions:
- According to this test, the test item „2-propanol and 2-butanol production, distn. residue“ possesses mild eye irritation potential.
- Executive summary:
The potential for eye irritation of „2-propanol and 2-butanol production, distn. residue“ was tested according to the OECD 437 guideline under GLP. One valid experiment was performed.
The test item reaction mass of 2,2'-oxybisbutane (DSBE), DIPE, SBA and 2-methylpropan-2-ol (TBA) was brought onto the cornea of a bovine eye which had been incubated with cMEM without Phenol red at 32 ±1 °C for one hour and whose opacity had been measured. The test item was incubated on the cornea for 10 minutes at 32 ±1 °C. After removal of the test item and two hours post-incubation, opacity and permeability values were measured.
Physiological sodium chloride solution was used as negative control. The negative control showed no irritating effect on the cornea.
10% sodium hydroxide solution was used as positive control. The positive control induced a severe irritation on the cornea.
The test item „2-propanol and 2-butanol production, distn. residue“ showed mild effects on the cornea of the bovine eye. The calculated IVIS (in vitro irritancy score) is 11.6920.
In conclusion, it can be stated that in this study and under the experimental conditions reported, the test item „2-propanol and 2-butanol production, distn. residue“ possesses mild eye irritation potential.
Referenceopen allclose all
INDIVIDUAL AND MEAN SCORES OF CONJUNCTIVAE, IRIS AND CORNEA
Animal n° | Time after treatment | Conjunctivae | Iris | Cornea | |
Chemosis (A) | Redness (C ) | Lesion (D) | Opacity (E ) | ||
A0356 | 24 hours | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
48 hours | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
72 hours | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
Total | 4 | 6 | 0 | 2 | |
Mean | 1.3 | 2 | 0 | 0.7 | |
A0374 | 24 hours | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
48 hours | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
72 hours | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
Total | 6 | 5 | 0 | 2 | |
Mean | 2 | 1.7 | 0 | 0.7 | |
A0375 | 24 hours | 2 | 3 | 0 | 2 |
48 hours | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
72 hours | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
Total | 6 | 7 | 0 | 2 | |
Mean | 2 | 2.3 | 0 | 0.7 | |
Classificationin accordance with the European regulation | According to the calculated means, the test item has to be classified R36 "irritating to eyes". | ||||
Classificationin accordance with the GHS regulation | According to the calculated means, the test item has to be classified in category 2 "irritating to eyes" with the hazard statement H319 "causes serious eye irritation". |
TOTAL AND INDIVIDUAL SCORES OF OCULAR IRRITATION
Animal No: A0356
Observation time | Conjunctivae | Iris | Cornea | Individual irritation index | ||||||
A | B | C | (A+B+C)x2 | D | Dx5 | E | F | ExFx5 | ||
X= | Y= | Z= | X+Y+Z= | |||||||
1 hour (D0) | 2 | 3 | 2 | 14 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19 |
24 hours (D1) | 2 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 18 |
48 hours (D2) | 1 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
72 hours (D3) | 1 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
Day 4 (D4) | 1 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
Day 5 (D5) | 1 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
Day 6 (D6) | 1 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
Day 7 (D7) | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
Day 8 (D8) | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Day 9 (D9) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Animal No: A0374
Observation time | Conjunctivae | Iris | Cornea | Individual irritation index | ||||||
A | B | C | (A+B+C)x2 | D | Dx5 | E | F | ExFx5 | ||
X= | Y= | Z= | X+Y+Z= | |||||||
1 hour (D0) | 3 | 3 | 2 | 16 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 21 |
24 hours (D1) | 2 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 18 |
48 hours (D2) | 2 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 |
72 hours (D3) | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
Day 4 (D4) | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
Day 7 (D7) | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Day 8 (D8) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Animal No: A0375
Observation time | Conjunctivae | Iris | Cornea | Individual irritation index | ||||||
A | B | C | (A+B+C)x2 | D | Dx5 | E | F | ExFx5 | ||
X= | Y= | Z= | X+Y+Z= | |||||||
1 hour (D0) | 3 | 3 | 2 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16 |
24 hours (D1) | 2 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 20 |
48 hours (D2) | 2 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 |
72 hours (D3) | 2 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 |
Day 4 (D4) | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
Day 7 (D7) | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Day 8 (D8) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Table 1: Opacity Values
Test Group |
Absorption at 570 nm |
Opacity before exposition |
Absorption at 570 nm |
Opacity |
Opacity |
Negative Control |
0.1960 |
1.5704 |
0.2099 |
1.6215 |
0.0511 |
0.1879 |
1.5414 |
0.2431 |
1.7504 |
0.2090 |
|
0.1879 |
1.5479 |
0.2417 |
1.7445 |
0.1966 |
|
Test substance |
0.1450 |
1.3963 |
0.3016 |
2.0027 |
0.6064 |
0.1969 |
1.5736 |
0.4861 |
3.0629 |
1.4893 |
|
0.2138 |
1.6361 |
0.5943 |
3.9291 |
2.2930 |
|
Positive Control 10% NaOH |
0.1516 |
1.4177 |
2.0405 |
109.7837 |
108.3660 |
0.2301 |
1.6986 |
2.0670 |
166.6820 |
144.9835 |
|
0.1636 |
1.4576 |
2.1933 |
156.0522 |
154.5947 |
Table 2: Optical density at 490 nm
Repl. |
Negative Control |
Test substance |
Positive Control |
||||||
1 |
0.043 |
0.054 |
0.045 |
0.255 |
0.448 |
0.659 |
1.640 |
1.738 |
1.242 |
2 |
0.056 |
0.062 |
0.042 |
0.260 |
0.447 |
0.664 |
1.632 |
1.716 |
1.265 |
3 |
0.043 |
0.052 |
0.042 |
0.261 |
0.445 |
0.675 |
1.639 |
1.722 |
1.251 |
Mean |
0.047 |
0.056 |
0.043 |
0.259 |
0.447 |
0.666 |
1.637 |
1.725 |
1.253 |
Net |
-0.026 |
-0.017 |
-0.030 |
0.186 |
0.374 |
0.593 |
1.564 |
1.652 |
1.180 |
Net – Neg. Contr. |
0.210 |
0.398 |
0.617 |
1.588 |
1.676 |
1.204 |
Tab. 3: IVIS
Test Group |
IVIS |
Mean IVIS |
Relative Standard Deviation IVIS |
Negative Control 0,9% NaCl |
-0.6099 |
-0.4660 = 0.00 |
-45.4% |
-0.2232 |
|||
-0.5661 |
|||
Test substance |
5.7934 |
11.6920 |
51.5% |
11.4559 |
|||
17.8275 |
|||
Positive Control 10% NaOH |
148.5869 |
163.6940 |
11.6% |
157.4416 |
|||
185.0528 |
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (irritating)
Respiratory irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Additional information
One in vitro skin irritation study conducted under GLP showed that „2-propanol and 2-butanol production, distn. residue“ is not irritating to skin. However, the substance 2-methyl-pentane which is classified as skin irritating 2 in Annex VI of the CLP Regulation, is also present in „2-propanol and 2-butanol production, distn. residue“ as a component. As the concentration of 2-methyl-pentane observed in other samples of the substance may trespass the concentration limit for classification as skin irritating 2 (10% w/w), „2-propanol and 2-butanol production, distn. residue“ was precautionary classified as skin irritating, based on concentration ranges in boundary composition, even if the result of the in vitro skin irritation study (test sample contained 8.7% C6-alkanes) indicated no irritating effect.
One in vivo eye irritation study conducted under GLP and according to OECD 405 (key study) showed eye irritation. A previously conducted in vitro study according to the stepwise testing approach (according to OECD 437, BCOP test) showed mild eye irritation.
The results of the in vivo eye irritation study cannot be used for quantitative risk assessment since no dose-response data are available. However, they are used for qualitative risk assessment which consists of classification into a risk category and definition of risk management measures.
Justification for selection of skin irritation / corrosion endpoint:
No adverse effect observed based on experimental study, but skin irritating based on calculation method
Effects on skin irritation/corrosion: irritating
Effects on eye irritation: irritating
Justification for classification or non-classification
One in vitro skin irritation study conducted under GLP showed that „2-propanol and 2-butanol production, distn. residue“ is not skin irritant. However due to the observation of the impurity 2-methyl-pentane in concentration above the concentration limit for classification in some samples of „2-propanol and 2-butanol production, distn. residue“ the substance is classified as irritating to skin, category 2, H315.
One in vivo eye irritation study conducted under GLP according to OECD 405 (key study) showed eye irritation. A supporting in vitro study (according to OECD 437, BCOP test) showed mild eye irritation.
Consequently, „2-propanol and 2-butanol production, distn. residue“ has to be classified as eye irritating (Irritating to eyes cat. 2, H319) and skin irritating (Irritating to the skin cat. 2, H315) according to the criteria of Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.