Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Physical & Chemical properties

Partition coefficient

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Reference
Endpoint:
partition coefficient
Type of information:
(Q)SAR
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Study period:
From 30th to 31th January 2017
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation / justification
Justification for type of information:
1. SOFTWARE
iSafeRat® toolbox – in Silico Algorithms For Environmental Risk And Toxicity version 2.2

2. MODEL (incl. version number)
iSafeRat® holistic HA-QSAR v1.6

3. SMILES OR OTHER IDENTIFIERS USED AS INPUT FOR THE MODEL
Constituent 1 CC1=CCCC(=C)C2CC(C2CC1)(C)C
Constituent 2 CC1=CCC(CC1)C(=C)C
Constituent 3 CC(C)C12CCC(=C)C1C2
Constituent 4 CC1(C2CCC(=C)C1C2)C
Constituent 5 CC1=CCC2CC1C2(C)C
Constituent 6 CC1=CCC2C(C1)C2(C)C
Constituent 7 CC1=CCC2C3C1C2(CCC3C(C)C)C
Constituent 8 CC(C)C1=CC(C(CC1)(C)C=C)C(=C)C
Constituent 9 C(CC(C1)C(=C)CCC=C(C)C)=C(C1)C
Constituent 10 CC(C)C1CCC(=C)C=C1
Constituent 11 CC1=CC2C(CCC(=C2CC1)C)C(C)C
Constituent 12 CC(=CCCC(=C)C=C)C
Constituent 13 CC1=CCC(C=CCC(=CCC1)C)(C)C
Constituent 14 CC1=CCC2(C1C2)C(C)C
Constituent 15 CC1=CCC(C=C1)C(C)C

4. SCIENTIFIC VALIDITY OF THE (Q)SAR MODEL
See attached QMRF

5. APPLICABILITY DOMAIN
See attached QPRF

6. ADEQUACY OF THE RESULT
See attached QPRF
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 107 (Partition Coefficient (n-octanol / water), Shake Flask Method)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
QSAR model
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 123 (Partition Coefficient (1-Octanol / Water), Slow-Stirring Method)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
QSAR model
Principles of method if other than guideline:
A Quantitative Structure-Property Relationship (QSPR) model was used to calculate the n-octanol/water partition coefficients of the consituents of the test item (a Natural Complex Substance). This QSPR model has been validated as a QSAR model to be compliant with the OECD recommendations for QSAR modeling (OECD, 2004) and predicts the endpoint value which would be expected when testing the substance under experimental conditions in a laboratory following the Guideline for Testing of Chemicals No. 107, "Partition Coeficient (n-octanol/water): Shake Flask Method" and No. 123 "Partition Coeficient (n-octanol/water): Slow Stirring Method”. The criterion predicted was the log KOW (also known as log POW).

The determination was performed using a fragment based approach in which the molecule is divided into large and small fragments and each fragment is related to a specific log KOW contribution which may be positive or negative. The final log KOW is determined by simple addition of the fragments. The predicted log KOW values have been validated against high quality experimental studies generally using the shake-flask method but slow-stir values have been used when available. The results are considered to be as accurate as those from a good quality OECD 107 or 123 study.
GLP compliance:
no
Partition coefficient type:
other: QSAR
Key result
Type:
log Pow
Partition coefficient:
6.4
Temp.:
25 °C
Remarks on result:
other: Constituent 1
Key result
Type:
log Pow
Partition coefficient:
4.6
Temp.:
25 °C
Remarks on result:
other: Constituent 2
Key result
Type:
log Pow
Partition coefficient:
4.4
Temp.:
25 °C
Remarks on result:
other: Constituent 3
Key result
Type:
log Pow
Partition coefficient:
4.4
Temp.:
25 °C
Remarks on result:
other: Constituent 4
Key result
Type:
log Pow
Partition coefficient:
4.8
Temp.:
25 °C
Remarks on result:
other: Constituent 5
Key result
Type:
log Pow
Partition coefficient:
4.8
Temp.:
25 °C
Remarks on result:
other: Constituent 6
Key result
Type:
log Pow
Partition coefficient:
6.8
Temp.:
25 °C
Remarks on result:
other: Constituent 7
Key result
Type:
log Pow
Partition coefficient:
6.6
Temp.:
25 °C
Remarks on result:
other: Constituent 8
Key result
Type:
log Pow
Partition coefficient:
6.7
Temp.:
25 °C
Remarks on result:
other: Constituent 9
Key result
Type:
log Pow
Partition coefficient:
4.3
Temp.:
25 °C
Remarks on result:
other: Constituent 10
Key result
Type:
log Pow
Partition coefficient:
6.3
Temp.:
25 °C
Remarks on result:
other: Constituent 11
Key result
Type:
log Pow
Partition coefficient:
4.7
Temp.:
25 °C
Remarks on result:
other: Constituent 12
Key result
Type:
log Pow
Partition coefficient:
6.6
Temp.:
25 °C
Remarks on result:
other: Constituent 13
Key result
Type:
log Pow
Partition coefficient:
4.4
Temp.:
25 °C
Remarks on result:
other: Constituent 14
Key result
Type:
log Pow
Partition coefficient:
4.6
Temp.:
25 °C
Remarks on result:
other: Constituent 15

The partition coefficient of the test item was estimated using the recommended QSAR model iSafeRat®, based onRegression based-Fragment Approach’(RFA) method. The substance is within the applicability domain (MW, descriptors).

The calculated result is log Kow =5.3 (range of constituents 4.3 -6.8).

The log KOW is predicted as follows:

 

log KOWat 25°C

references

Constituent 1

6.4

See QPRF

Constituent 2

4.6

See QPRF

Constituent 3

4.4

See QPRF

Constituent 4

4.4

See QPRF

Constituent 5

4.8

See QPRF

Constituent 6

4.8

See QPRF

Constituent 7

6.8

See QPRF

Constituent 8

6.6

See QPRF

Constituent 9

6.7

See QPRF

Constituent 10

4.3

See QPRF

Constituent 11

6.3

See QPRF

Constituent 12

4.7

See QPRF

Constituent 13

6.6

See QPRF

Constituent 14

4.4

See QPRF

Constituent 15

4.6

See QPRF

Conclusions:
The calculated result is log Kow =5.3 (range of constituents 4.3 -6.8).
Executive summary:

The partition coefficient of the test item was estimated using the recommended QSAR modeliSafeRat®, based onRegression based-Fragment Approach’(RFA) method. The substance is within the applicability domain (MW, descriptors).

The calculated result is log Kow =5.3 (range of constituents 4.3 -6.8).

The log KOW was predicted as follows:

 

log KOWat 25°C

Constituent 1

6.4

Constituent 2

4.6

Constituent 3

4.4

Constituent 4

4.4

Constituent 5

4.8

Constituent 6

4.8

Constituent 7

6.8

Constituent 8

6.6

Constituent 9

6.7

Constituent 10

4.3

Constituent 11

6.3

Constituent 12

4.7

Constituent 13

6.6

Constituent 14

4.4

Constituent 15

4.6

Description of key information

The range of constituents is from 4.3 to 6.8 (estimated by QSAR).

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Additional information

The partition coefficient of the test item was estimated using the recommended QSAR modeliSafeRat®, based onRegression based-Fragment Approach’(RFA) method. The substance is within the applicability domain (MW, descriptors).

The log KOW is predicted as follows:

 

log KOWat 25°C

Constituent 1

6.4

Constituent 2

4.6

Constituent 3

4.4

Constituent 4

4.4

Constituent 5

4.8

Constituent 6

4.8

Constituent 7

6.8

Constituent 8

6.6

Constituent 9

6.7

Constituent 10

4.3

Constituent 11

6.3

Constituent 12

4.7

Constituent 13

6.6

Constituent 14

4.4

Constituent 15

4.6