Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 263-793-4 | CAS number: 63022-06-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Effects on fertility
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- screening for reproductive / developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 18 July 2017 - 21 February 2018
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 422 (Combined Repeated Dose Toxicity Study with the Reproduction / Developmental Toxicity Screening Test)
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Limit test:
- no
- Justification for study design:
- Species: Recognized by international guidelines as a recommended test system.
Dose levels: It was considered a suitable dose level range, based on the preliminary results obtained in the previous non-GLP study PQ36XP 14-day Oral (Gavage) Dose-Range Toxicity Study for OECD 422 conducted at in Envigo CRS, S.A.U.:
- The high dose was selected as no toxicity was observed in the preliminary study at 1000 mg/kg/day and considering it as a limit dose to be tested.
- Intermediate and low dose levels were selected considering approximately a 3-fold interval between doses. - Specific details on test material used for the study:
- SOURCE OF TEST MATERIAL
- Source and lot/batch No.of test material: 021340
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: July 2022
- Purity test date: 25 August 2003
- Appearance: Red powder
STABILITY AND STORAGE CONDITIONS OF TEST MATERIAL
- Storage condition of test material: stored at ambient conditions in the dark (away from direct light).
- Stability under test conditions: 8 days
- Solubility and stability of the test substance in the solvent/vehicle: Yes - Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Wistar
- Details on species / strain selection:
- Recognized by international guidelines as a recommended test system. Also selected for consistency with species used in previous toxicological studies.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Age at study initiation:
Males: 10 weeks
Females: 10 weeks
- Weight at study initiation:
Males: 256-359 g
Females: 186-248 g
- Housing:
Cages with standard, granulated, S8-15 sawdust bedding.
Premating period (four animals/cage) Makrolon type-IV cages
Mating period (one male and one female/cage) Makrolon type-III cages
Postmating, gestation and lactation periods (individual) Makrolon type-III
- Diet: ad libitum, standard commercial diet
- Water: ad libitum, tap water
- Acclimation period: 5 days
DETAILS OF FOOD AND WATER QUALITY:
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C):
20 - 24
- Humidity (%):
between 30 and 70
- Air changes (per hr):
15-20
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light):
12 fluorescent light/12 hours dark - Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- arachis oil
- Details on exposure:
- The necessary amount of test item was weighed in a disposable flask. 70-80% of vehicle (Arachis oil) required to reach the final formulation volume was poured into an empty disposable flask and the test item was added. The content of the flask was mixed using an Ultra-Turrax or a homogenizer (depending on the total volume of formulation prepared) until complete homogenization. The suspension was then transferred to a volumetric vessel. A small amount of vehicle was used to remove any formulation remaining in the disposable flask and the mixture was poured into the vessel. Vehicle was then added to the volumetric vessel to make up to volume. Finally, the suspension was transferred to an appropriate container and submitted to magnetic stirring for 10 minutes before sampling for dilution. Dilution Preparation: Intermediate and Low concentration Formulations (Groups 2 and 3) It was prepared by diluting the high formulation and submitted to magnetic stirring for 10 minutes before aliquoting.
The density was taken the first day of preparation of formulation. Formulations were maintained under agitation for 3 ¾ to 24 hours until the end of the administration, assuring that formulations were homogenous during their administration. - Details on mating procedure:
- - M/F ratio per cage: 1:1
- Length of cohabitation: 1-4 days
- Proof of pregnancy:Ejected copulation plugs. Sperm within vaginal smear referred to as [day 0 / day 1] of pregnancy
Day 0 of gestation: When positive evidence of mating detected.
Male/female separation: day when mating evidence detected.
Pre-coital interval: Calculated for each female as time between first pairing and evidence of mating.
Females showing no evidence of pregnancy (female 95 at 300 mg/kg/day and females 105 and 107 at 1000 mg/kg/day) were sacrificed 26 days after the last day of the mating period. - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- no
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- The formulations prepared at three different concentrations were analyzed twice over the course of the study to verify correct preparation.
Control (vehicle) formulations were analyzed to confirm the absence of test item or other substances at the retention time of the test item.
The test item was used as analytical standard.
Results were expected to be within ±20% of nominal value and the coefficient of variation (CV) should be ≤10%. - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 5-8 weeks
- Frequency of treatment:
- daily
- Details on study schedule:
- - F1 parental animals not mated until 2 weeks after selected from the F1 litters.
- Age at mating of the mated animals in the study: 12 weeks minimum - Dose / conc.:
- 0 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Remarks:
- control
- Dose / conc.:
- 100 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Dose / conc.:
- 300 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Dose / conc.:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 12
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- - Dose selection rationale: It was considered a suitable dose level range, based on the preliminary results obtained in the previous non-GLP study PQ36XP 14-day Oral (Gavage) Dose-Range Toxicity Study for OECD 422 conducted at in Envigo CRS, S.A.U.:
- The high dose was selected as no toxicity was observed in the preliminary study at 1000 mg/kg/day and considering it as a limit dose to be tested.
- Intermediate and low dose levels were selected considering approximately a 3-fold interval between doses.
- Rationale for animal assignment (if not random): random
- Other: The animals were allocated at random to four treatment groups. Spare animals were used and/or animals were exchanged. The rejected animals took no further part in the study after commencement of treatment. - Positive control:
- None
- Parental animals: Observations and examinations:
- CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: twice daily
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: weekly
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: day 1, and weekly thereafter
OTHER:Sensory Reactivity and Grip Strength, Motor Activity, - Oestrous cyclicity (parental animals):
- Using a inoculation loops during the following phases:
• For 14 days before treatment (all females including spares); animals that failed to exhibit 4-5 day cycles were not allocated to study.
• Daily from the beginning of treatment period until evidence of mating.
• On the day of necropsy
A cotton swab impregnated in physiological saline was used in order to check the evidence of mating during the mating period. - Sperm parameters (parental animals):
- not specified
- Litter observations:
- Clinical observations, litter size, sex ratio, Individual offspring body weights, ano-genital distance, nipple/areolae count
- Postmortem examinations (parental animals):
- Organ Weights, Macroscopic Pathology
- Postmortem examinations (offspring):
- Premature decedents,
- Statistics:
- All statistical analyses were carried out separately for males and females. The following comparisons were performed: Group 1 vs. 2, 3 and 4.
For continuous data, a parametric analysis was performed if Bartlett's test for variance homogeneity is not significant at the 1% level. Treated groups were compared to control using Williams' test, unless there is evidence against a monotonic dose-response when Dunnett's test was performed instead.
A non-parametric analysis was performed if Bartlett's test is still significant at the 1% level following both logarithmic and square-root transformations. Treated groups were compared to control using Shirley's test, unless there is evidence against a monotonic dose response when Steel's test was performed instead. - Reproductive indices:
- Percentage mating, Conception rate, Fertility index
- Offspring viability indices:
- Post-implantation survival index, live birth index, viability index
- Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Dermal irritation (if dermal study):
- not examined
- Mortality:
- no mortality observed
- Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- not examined
- Food efficiency:
- no effects observed
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not examined
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not examined
- Haematological findings:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Statistically significant differences from controls (hemoglobin at 1000 mg/kg/day in males and females, mean cell hemoglobin at 1000 mg/kg/day in females, mean corpuscular volume at 100 and 1000 mg/kg/day in females and at the doses of 300 and 1000 mg/kg/day in large unstained cells in females and in monocytes in males) were minor or lacked dose relationship and were therefore attributed to normal biological variation.
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Blood chemistry after 6-7 weeks of treatment in males and on day 16 of lactation revealed statistically higher than control creatinine levels at 300 and 1000 mg/kg/day in males and lower than control bile acids in males at 1000 mg/kg/day. A trend to higher urea mean values in the test item administered groups was observed in males and females. Females receiving 1000 mg/kg/day had statistically higher urea values than controls. Statistically significant higher potassium, chloride and calcium means were recorded in males at 1000 mg/kg/day when compared to control. The higher chloride mean value was also significant compared to control at 300 and 1000 mg/kg/day in males. As a general rule, increased albumin and albumin/globulin ratio mean values at 300 and 1000 mg/kg/day were recorded in both sexes (they were statistically significant at1000 mg/kg/day for albumin and for albumin/globulin ratio at 300 and 1000 mg/kg/day).
- Urinalysis findings:
- not examined
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Sensory reactivity conducted during week 5 in males and between days 7-9 of lactation in females revealed no findings which were considered treatment related.
Grip strength recordings revealed a significant dose-related increase in mean hind limb values in females. However there was no evidence observed in clinical signs that can corroborate this finding and it was not observed in males.
The motor activity assessment conducted during week 5 in males and between days 7-9 of lactation in females revealed no treatment related effects in males and females at all dose levels. - Immunological findings:
- not examined
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Changes that were considered related to treatment with the test item were seen in:
- Kidneys (renal cortex): minimal to moderate tubular basophilia in both genders in all test item administered groups. Tubules of the most affected males showed karyomegaly and were accompanied by minimal, multifocal, interstitial mononuclear
cell infiltrates.
- Thymus of both sexes at 1000 mg/kg/day: minimal involution/atrophy or minimally increased cortical apoptosis was seen and cortical hypertrophy was also observed in the affected females.
- Adrenal glands of females at 1000 mg/kg/day: bilateral, minimal to slight diffuse cortical hypertrophy. - Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- not examined
- Other effects:
- not examined
- Reproductive function: oestrous cycle:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- All females allocated to the study showed regular 4 day estrus cycle prior to the start of treatment and during treatment
- Reproductive function: sperm measures:
- not examined
- Reproductive performance:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- At termination, all reproductive phase females (pregnant) showed diestrus with the exception of 2/12 at 100 mg/kg/day, 1/11 at 300 mg/kg/day and 2/9 at 1000 mg/kg/day, which showed different stages of estrous cycle, indicating that these females had recovered estrous cycle again. There was no effect of treatment on the pre-coital interval: all animals mated within four days of mating at the first estrous.
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- clinical signs
- mortality
- body weight and weight gain
- food efficiency
- haematology
- clinical biochemistry
- organ weights and organ / body weight ratios
- gross pathology
- histopathology: non-neoplastic
- reproductive function (oestrous cycle)
- reproductive performance
- Key result
- Critical effects observed:
- no
- System:
- other: kidney
- Organ:
- other: various
- Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Dermal irritation (if dermal study):
- not examined
- Mortality / viability:
- no mortality observed
- Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- not examined
- Food efficiency:
- not examined
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not examined
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not examined
- Haematological findings:
- not examined
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- not examined
- Urinalysis findings:
- not examined
- Sexual maturation:
- not examined
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- not examined
- Gross pathological findings:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- There were no macroscopic findings observed in the offspring that died prior to the scheduled termination or among those offspring killed on days 4 or 13-15 of age that were attributable to maternal treatment with Lumière Pink S.M. 8135N.
- Histopathological findings:
- no effects observed
- Other effects:
- not examined
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- not examined
- Developmental immunotoxicity:
- not examined
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Generation:
- F1
- Effect level:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- viability
- clinical signs
- mortality
- body weight and weight gain
- gross pathology
- histopathology: non-neoplastic
- Key result
- Critical effects observed:
- no
- System:
- other: various
- Organ:
- other: various
- Key result
- Reproductive effects observed:
- no
- Lowest effective dose / conc.:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Treatment related:
- no
- Conclusions:
- In conclusion, the effects of oral (gavage) administration of Lumière Pink S.M. 8135N to Wistar rats receiving 100, 300 or 1000 mg/kg/day for 14 days prior to mating and until sacrifice can be summarized as follows:
Reproductive / developmental toxicity:
- The No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) for reproductive / developmental toxicity was considered to be 1000 mg/kg/day, taking into account that there was no effect on estrous cycle, pre-coital interval, mating performance, fertility and gestation
length or in the offspring on litter size, survival, sex ratio, clinical signs, body weights, ano-genital distances or macropathology.
Reference
Estrous cycles and reproductive parameters of pre-coital interval, mating performance, fertility or gestation length or index were unaffected by treatment.
There were no clinical signs observed among the F1 litters that could be clearly attributable to parental treatment with Lumière Pink S.M. 8135N.
There was no effect of treatment on mean body weights of male and female offspring on day 1 of age or on subsequent body weight measurements until day 13 of age.
Mean ano-genital distance in male offspring was similar in the test item dosed groups and slightly higher than in controls. Despite the fact that the differences recorded were statistically significant they were not considered dose related, thus these changes were devoid of any toxicological relevance. There was no effect recorded in male nipple observations.
Effect on fertility: via oral route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day
- Study duration:
- subacute
- Species:
- rat
- Quality of whole database:
- Guideline study Klimisch 1
Effect on fertility: via inhalation route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Effect on fertility: via dermal route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Effects on developmental toxicity
Effect on developmental toxicity: via oral route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Effect on developmental toxicity: via inhalation route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
Effect on developmental toxicity: via dermal route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Justification for classification or non-classification
The test substance Lumière Pink S.M. 8135N is not classified for toxicity to reproduction.
Additional information
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.