Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Genetic toxicity in vitro

Description of key information

In a bacterial reverse mutation assay (Ames) no substantial increase in revertant colony numbers of any of the five tester strains was observed following treatment with the test item at any concentration level, neither in the presence nor absence of metabolic activation (S9 mix). There was also no tendency of higher mutation rates with increasing concentrations in the range below the generally acknowled­ged border of biological relevance.

The results of the forward gene mutation test at the hprt locus with the test item indicated that the test item was non-mutagenic.

In an in vitro chromosomal aberration study a total of 300 metaphases each from the SW control, each treatment level and the positive controls were evaluated for chromosomal aberrations. There was no evidence of induction of chromosomal aberrations, excluding gaps, either in the presence or in the absence of metabolic activation. The study indicated that the test item was not clastogenic.

Link to relevant study records

Referenceopen allclose all

Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Remarks:
Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2016 -04-19 till 2016-05-18
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Remarks:
Guideline-conform study under GLP without deviations
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of assay:
bacterial reverse mutation assay
Species / strain / cell type:
other: TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100, WP2 uvrA
Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
not applicable
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
Phenobarbital/ß-Naphthoflavone induced rat liver S9 in experiment I and non-induced hamster liver S9 in experiment II
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
3, 10; 33; 100; 333; 1000; 2500; and 5000 µg/plate / pre-experiment/experiment I and experiment II
Vehicle / solvent:
- Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: [deionised water
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: best suitable solvent
Untreated negative controls:
yes
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
congo red
other: sodium azide; 4-nitro-o-phenylene-diamine; methyl methane sulfonate, 2-aminoanthracene
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
METHOD OF APPLICATION:in agar (plate incorporation); preincubation;


DURATION
- Preincubation period: 30 min
- Exposure duration: 72 hours


NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 3 plates


DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
A reduction in the number of spontaneous revertants (below the induction factor of 0.5) or a clearing of the bacterial background lawn.

Evaluation criteria:
A test item is considered as a mutagen if a biologically relevant increase in the number of revertants exceeding the threshold of twice (strains TA 98, TA 100, and WP2 uvrA) or thrice (strains TA 1535 and TA 1537) the colony count of the corresponding solvent control is observed.
A dose dependent increase is considered biologically relevant if the threshold is exceeded at more than one concentration.
An increase exceeding the threshold at only one concentration is judged as biologically relevant if reproduced in an independent second experiment.
A dose dependent increase in the number of revertant colonies below the threshold is regarded as an indication of a mutagenic potential if reproduced in an independent second experiment. However, whenever the colony counts remain within the historical range of negative and solvent controls such an increase is not considered biologically relevant.
Statistics:
According to the OECD guideline 471, a statistical analysis of the data is not mandatory.
Species / strain:
other: TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100, WP2 uvrA
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Remarks:
in strain TA 1535, TA 1537 and TA 98
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:
TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Effects of pH: none
- Water solubility: yes
- Precipitation:No precipitation occurred in the overlay agar in the test tubes at any concentration. In Experiment I the minimal agar plates were densely colored after treatment with the test items at concentrations ranging from 1000 to 5000 µg/plate. In Experiment II only after treatment with 5000 µg/plate densely colored plates were recognized.
- Other confounding effects:
COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA: performed
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY:Toxic effects, evident as a reduction in the number of revertants (below the induction factor of 0.5), were observed at the following concentrations (µg/plate):
Strain Experiment I Experiment II
without S9 mix with S9 mix without S9 mix with S9 mix
TA 1535 / / / 5000
TA 1537 / 5000 5000 /
TA 98 / 5000 / /
TA 100 / / / /
WP2 uvrA / / / /

Remarks on result:
other: other: reverse mutation assay
Remarks:
Migrated from field 'Test system'.

Summary Tabellen

Table1            Summary of Experiment I

Study Name: 1763502

Study Code: Envigo 1763502

Experiment: 1763502 VV Plate

Date Plated: 19.04.2016

Assay Conditions:

Date Counted: 26.04.2016

 

Metabolic

Activation

Test

Group

Dose Level

(per plate)

Revertant Colony Counts (Mean ±SD)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TA 1535

TA 1537

TA 98

TA 100

WP2 uvrA

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Without Activation

Deion. water

 

11 ± 4

9 ± 2

29 ± 4

186 ± 16

54 ± 6

Untreated

 

12 ± 3

9 ± 4

32 ± 6

157 ± 14

52 ± 11

Sanodal-

3 µg

9 ± 1

10 ± 3

34 ± 4

172 ± 4

49 ± 11

Schwarz 2LW

10 µg

15 ± 5

7 ± 2

26 ± 5

172 ± 17

51 ± 7

 

33 µg

11 ± 1

9 ± 1

27 ± 6

157 ± 6

41 ± 4

 

100 µg

13 ± 6

11 ± 5

28 ± 6

166 ± 28

61 ± 6

 

333 µg

12 ± 3

6 ± 1

29 ± 3

168 ± 12

48 ± 5

 

1000 µg

10 ± 2D M

8 ± 4D M

26 ± 7D M

149 ± 4D M

43 ± 6D M

 

2500 µg

10 ± 3D M

8 ± 3D M

19 ± 5D M

146 ± 7D M

36 ± 4D M

 

5000 µg

8 ± 2D M

7 ± 1D M

15 ± 1D M

135 ± 5D M

36 ± 3D M

NaN3

10 µg

1382 ± 52

 

 

2415 ± 69

 

4-NOPD

10 µg

 

 

403 ± 23

 

 

4-NOPD

50 µg

 

75 ± 7

 

 

 

MMS

2.0 µL

 

 

 

 

1075 ± 78

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

With Activation

Deion. water

 

10 ± 2

9 ± 3

40 ± 6

170 ± 20

63 ± 5

Untreated

 

13 ± 4

10 ± 5

45 ± 7

165 ± 20

61 ± 14

Sanodal-

3 µg

10 ± 1

11 ± 4

44 ± 6

167 ± 8

62 ± 8

Schwarz 2LW

10 µg

12 ± 5

9 ± 3

48 ± 6

172 ± 18

53 ± 10

 

33 µg

8 ± 2

11 ± 2

37 ± 5

172 ± 16

52 ± 4

 

100 µg

10 ± 0

8 ± 3

40 ± 10

173 ± 21

69 ± 11

 

333 µg

9 ± 5

11 ± 4

34 ± 2

174 ± 25

54 ± 13

 

1000 µg

10 ± 1D M

8 ± 2D M

27 ± 4D M

135 ± 6D M

42 ± 1D M

 

2500 µg

7 ± 3D M

5 ± 2D M

23 ± 6D M

115 ± 8D M

40 ± 2D M

 

5000 µg

5 ± 2D M

3 ± 1D M

17 ± 2D M

106 ± 7D M

30 ± 4D M

 

2-AA

2.5 µg

415 ± 21

219 ± 43

6586 ± 361

4872 ± 201

 

 

2-AA

10.0 µg

 

 

 

 

414 ± 15

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Key to Positive Controls

Key to Plate Postfix Codes

 

 

NaN3

2-AA

4-NOPD

MMS

sodium azide

2-aminoanthracene

4-nitro-o-phenylene-diamine

methyl methane sulfonate

D

M

Densely coloured plate

Manual count

 


 

Table2            Summary of Experiment II

Study Name: 1763502

Study Code: Envigo 1763502

Experiment: 1763502 HV2 Pre

Date Plated: 12.05.2016

Assay Conditions:

Date Counted: 18.05.2016

 

Metabolic

Activation

Test

Group

Dose Level

(per plate)

Revertant Colony Counts (Mean ±SD)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TA 1535

TA 1537

TA 98

TA 100

WP2 uvrA

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Without Activation

Deion. water

 

10 ± 1

13 ± 3

29 ± 2

146 ± 22

51 ± 9

Untreated

 

12 ± 7

12 ± 2

32 ± 8

169 ± 11

52 ± 7

Sanodal-

3 µg

11 ± 1

11 ± 1

26 ± 9

161 ± 8

41 ± 1

Schwarz 2LW

10 µg

12 ± 6

10 ± 2

25 ± 6

167 ± 13

42 ± 2

 

33 µg

13 ± 3

12 ± 6

28 ± 2

148 ± 22

50 ± 5

 

100 µg

13 ± 3

11 ± 3

27 ± 12

154 ± 8

37 ± 3

 

333 µg

14 ± 4P

10 ± 1P

32 ± 9P

167 ± 7P

32 ± 8P

 

1000 µg

7 ± 3P M

8 ± 2P M

16 ± 2P M

159 ± 6P M

29 ± 4M P

 

2500 µg

7 ± 2P M

8 ± 2P M

14 ± 2P M

157 ± 14P M

28 ± 7M P

 

5000 µg

7 ± 2P D M

4 ± 1P D M

15 ± 3P D M

143 ± 6P D M

28 ± 9M P D

NaN3

10 µg

1140 ± 35

 

 

1849 ± 49

 

4-NOPD

10 µg

 

 

447 ± 25

 

 

4-NOPD

50 µg

 

72 ± 12

 

 

 

MMS

2 µL

 

 

 

 

879 ± 65

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

With Activation

Deion. water

 

18 ± 4

25 ± 3

50 ± 2

140 ± 32

46 ± 4

Untreated

 

18 ± 4

23 ± 9

57 ± 10

123 ± 19

50 ± 11

Sanodal-

3 µg

22 ± 0

29 ± 2

57 ± 3

147 ± 14

51 ± 3

Schwarz 2LW

10 µg

20 ± 4

30 ± 6

55 ± 13

150 ± 11

48 ± 3

 

33 µg

22 ± 6

31 ± 10

55 ± 6

177 ± 13

42 ± 4

 

100 µg

13 ± 1

30 ± 6

49 ± 8

167 ± 32

45 ± 11

 

333 µg

16 ± 5P

29 ± 4P

51 ± 4P

143 ± 7P

49 ± 4P

 

1000 µg

13 ± 3P M

30 ± 8P M

36 ± 3P M

139 ± 12P M

31 ± 5P M

 

 

2500 µg

11 ± 3P M

21 ± 3P M

29 ± 4P M

132 ± 11P M

33 ± 8P M

 

 

5000 µg

8 ± 2P D M

18 ± 3P D M

23 ± 3P D M

123 ± 2P D M

26 ± 9P D M

 

2-AA

2.5 µg

 

 

 

963 ± 99

 

 

2-AA

2.5 µg

329 ± 27

115 ± 14

 

 

 

 

2-AA

10 µg

 

 

 

 

1043 ± 60

 

Congo red

500 µg

 

 

328 ± 10

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Key to Positive Controls

Key to Plate Postfix Codes

 

 

NaN3

2-AA

4-NOPD

Congo red

MMS

sodium azide

2-aminoanthracene

4-nitro-o-phenylene-diamine

Congo red

methyl methane sulfonate

P

M

D

Precipitate

Manual count

Densely coloured plate

Conclusions:
In conclusion, it can be stated that during the described mutagenicity test and under the experimental conditions reported, the test item did not induce gene mutations by base pair changes or frameshifts in the genome of the strains used.
Executive summary:

This study was performed to investigate the potential of the test item to induce gene mutations according to the plate incorporation test (experiment I) with and without rat S9 mix and the pre-incubation test (experiment II) with and without hamster S9 mix using the Salmonella typhimurium strains TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100, and the Escherichia coli strain WP2 uvrA.

 

The assay was performed in two independent experiments both with and without liver microsomal activation. Each concentration and the controls were tested in triplicate. The test item was tested at the following concentrations in both experiments:

3; 10; 33; 100; 333; 1000; 2500; and 5000 µg/plate

No precipitation occurred in the overlay agar in the test tubes at any concentration. In Experiment I the minimal agar plates were densely colored after treatment with the test items at concentrations ranging from 1000 to 5000 µg/plate. In Experiment II only after treatment with 5000 µg/plate densely colored plates were recognized.

Furthermore in Experiment II precipitation of the test item in the overlay agar on the incubated agar plates was observed from 333 to 5000 µg/plate.The plates incubated with the test item showed normal back­ground growth up to 5000 µg/plate with and without S9 mix in all strains used.

Toxic effects, evident as a reduction in the number of revertants (below the induction factor of 0.5), were observed at the following concentrations (µg/plate):

Strain

Experiment I

Experiment II

 

without S9 mix

with S9 mix

without S9 mix

with S9 mix

TA 1535

/

/

/

5000

TA 1537

/

5000

5000

/

TA 98

/

5000

/

/

TA 100

/

/

/

/

WP2 uvrA

/

/

/

/

 

No substantial increase in revertant colony numbers of any of the five tester strains was observed following treatment with Sanodal-Schwarz 2LW at any concentration level, neither in the presence nor absence of metabolic activation (S9 mix). There was also no tendency of higher mutation rates with increasing concentrations in the range below the generally acknowled­ged border of biological relevance.

 

Appropriate reference mutagens were used as positive controls. They showed a distinct in­crease in induced revertant colonies.

Endpoint:
in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
Remarks:
Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Remarks:
According to OECD and GLP guidelines
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of assay:
in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test
Target gene:
Cell cultures were exposed to the test item for 3 hours both in the presence and absence of exogenous metabolic activation and for 21 hours in the absence of metabolic activation. Following exposure of cell cultures to the test item, they were treated with Colchicine to arrest the cells in a metaphase-like stage of mitosis (c-metaphase). Cells were then harvested and chromosome preparations made. Preparations were stained and metaphases were analyzed for chromosomal aberrations.
Species / strain / cell type:
Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
rat liver S9 homogenate
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
Experiment No. Test Concentrations
Experiments 1 & 2: a) 12 b) 60 and c) 300 µg/mL (factor of 5)
Experiment 3: a) 6 b) 32 and c) 160 µg/mL (factor of 5)


Vehicle / solvent:
sterile water was used as the vehicle control.
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Remarks:
sterile water
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
cyclophosphamide
ethylmethanesulphonate
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- Source of the Test System:
American Type Culture Collection, P. O. Box 1549, Manassas, VA 20108, USA

- Storage of Test System
Stock cultures of the CHO-K1 cell line were stored in the test facility as frozen permanents in liquid nitrogen.

Evaluation criteria:
- Evaluation and Interpretation : When all the validity criteria are fulfilled:

a. A test chemical is considered to be clearly positive if, in any of the experimental conditions examined:

• At least one of the test concentrations exhibits a statistically significant increase in number of aberrations compared with the concurrent vehicle control
• The increase is dose-dependent when evaluated with an appropriate trend test
• Any of the results are outside the distribution of the historical vehicle control data

b. A test chemical is considered to be clearly negative if, in all experimental conditions examined:

• None of the test concentrations exhibits a statistically significant increase in number of aberrations compared with the concurrent vehicle control
• There is no concentration-related increase when evaluated with an appropriate trend test
• All results are inside the distribution of the historical vehicle control data

c. The results will be considered equivocal if they do not meet the criteria specified for a positive or negative response. Additional experimental work may be required to clarify such results.

Statistics:
Statistical analysis of the experimental data was carried out using validated SYSTAT Statistical package ver.12.0. Data were analyzed for proportions of aberrant metaphases in each sample excluding gaps as aberrations. Pooled data from each test concentration and the positive control were compared with the vehicle control using Fischer exact test. All analysis and comparisons were evaluated at 5 % (p < 0.05) level.
Key result
Species / strain:
Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not applicable
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
other: strain/cell type:
Remarks:
Migrated from field 'Test system'.

TABLE 1.         Preliminary Cytotoxicity Test - pH of Test Medium

Treatment (mg/mL)

pH at the beginning of exposure to treatment

pH at the end of exposure to treatment

With S9

Without S9

With S9

Without S9

SW

7.02

7.02

7.05

7.16

5

7.07

7.13

7.08

7.11

10

7.06

7.17

7.01

7.19

20

7.08

7.18

7.07

7.19

40

7.10

7.19

7.02

7.15

80

7.10

7.18

7.06

7.17

160

7.08

7.19

7.02

7.20

320

7.10

7.20

7.02

7.15

500

7.08

7.17

7.09

7.15

Note: No precipitation was observed both in the presence and absence of metabolic activation at any of the tested concentrations at 3 hours post treatment.

TABLE 2.    Preliminary Cytotoxicity Test - Osmolality of Test Medium

Treatment (mg/mL)

Osmolality at the beginning of exposure to treatment

(OSMOL/kg)

Osmolality at the end of exposure to treatment

(OSMOL/kg)

With S9

Without S9

With S9

Without S9

SW

0.317

0.311

0.329

0.320

500

0.319

0.311

0.328

0.321

TABLE 3.    Results of Preliminary Cytotoxicity Test

 

 

Treatment

(mg/mL)

Presence of metabolic activation

(3-hour exposure)

Absence of metabolic activation

(3-hour exposure)

Absence of metabolic activation

(21-hour exposure)

Final – initial cell count

(1x106/flask)

Cell growth index

RICC (%)

Cell growth inhibition (%)

Final – initial cell count

(1x106/flask)

Cell growth index

RICC (%)

 

Cell growth inhibition (%)

Final – initial cell count

(1x106/flask)

Cell growth index

RICC (%)

Cell growth inhibition (%)

SW

1.425

100

0

1.175

100

0

1.1375

100

0

5

1.175

82

18

1.025

87

13

0.9125

80

20

10

1.0125

71

29

0.925

79

21

0.775

68

32

20

0.925

65

35

0.8875

76

24

0.6875

60

40

40

0.8625

61

39

0.7875

67

33

0.650

57

43

80

0.80

56

44

0.675

57

43

0.55

48

52

160

0.75

53

47

0.6125

52

48

0.525

46

54

320

0.60

42

58

0.4875

41

59

0.075

7

93

500

0.425

30

70

0.30

26

74

0.0875

8

92

Note: Initial cell count (No. of cells at the beginning of treatment): 1.45 x 106cells/flask .

TABLE 4.    Summary Results of Chromosomal Aberration Assay - Experiment 1

Treatment

(µg/mL)

No. of metaphases scored

No. (%) of metaphases with aberrations@

Total No.(%) of aberrant metaphases*

Cell Growth Inhibition

(%)

Gaps

Breaks

Exchanges

Including Gaps

Excluding Gaps

Cs

Ct

Cs

Ct

Cs

Ct

RC

 

SW

 

300

 

0

 

0

 

0

 

0

 

0

 

0

 

0

 

0

 

0

0

 

12

300

 

2

(0.7)

 

0

 

0

 

0

 

0

 

0

 

0

 

2

(0.7)

 

0

17

 

60

300

 

0

 

1

(0.3)

 

0

 

0

 

0

 

0

 

0

 

1

(0.3)

 

0

39

 

300

300

 

1

(0.3)

 

2

(0.7)

 

0

 

0

 

0

 

0

 

0

 

3

(1.0)

 

0

52

 

CPA 55

300

 

0

 

0

 

32

(10.7)

 

71

(23.7)

 

24

(8.0)

 

24

(8.0)

 

0

 

141

(47.0)

+

141

(47.0)

21

*: Metaphase plate with one or more than one aberrations considered as one metaphase plate with aberrations

@: values are the sum of two replicates and values in parenthesis represent %   

Cs: Chromosome type             Ct: Chromatid type      RC: Ring chromosome    

CPA: Cyclophosphamide monohydrate            +: Significantly higher than control (p <0.05) by Fischer exact test

Note: There were no incidences of polyploidy and endoreduplicated cells.

TABLE 5.    Summary Results of Chromosomal Aberration Assay - Experiment 2

Treatment

(µg/mL)

No. of metaphases scored

No. (%) of metaphases with aberrations@

Total No.(%) of aberrant metaphases*

Cell Growth Inhibition

(%)

Gaps

Breaks

Exchanges

Including Gaps

Excluding Gaps

Cs

Ct

Cs

Ct

Cs

Ct

RC

 

SW

 

300

 

0

 

 

2

(0.7)

 

0

 

 

0

 

 

0

 

 

0

 

 

0

 

 

2

(0.7)

 

0

 

 

0

 

12

300

 

0

 

 

0

 

 

0

 

 

0

 

 

0

 

 

0

 

 

0

 

 

0

 

 

0

 

19

 

60

300

 

0

 

 

0

 

 

0

 

 

0

 

 

0

 

 

0

 

 

0

 

 

0

 

 

0

 

 

43

 

 

300

300

 

0

 

 

0

 

 

0

 

 

0

 

 

0

 

 

0

 

 

0

 

 

0

 

 

0

 

58

*: Metaphase plate with one or more than one aberrations considered as one metaphase plate with aberrations

@: values are the sum of two replicates and values in parenthesis represent %   

Cs: Chromosome type             Ct: Chromatid type                  RC: Ring chromosome 

Note: There were no incidences of polyploidy and endoreduplicated cells

TABLE 6.    Summary Results of Chromosomal Aberration Assay - Experiment 3

Treatment

(µg/mL)

No. of metaphases scored

No. (%) of metaphases with aberrations@

Total No.(%) of aberrant metaphases*

Cell Growth Inhibition

(%)

Gaps

Breaks

Exchanges

Including Gaps

Excluding Gaps

Cs

Ct

Cs

Ct

Cs

Ct

RC

 

SW

 

300

 

1

(0.3)

 

1

(0.3)

 

0

 

 

2

(0.7)

 

0

 

 

0

 

 

0

 

 

4

(1.3)

 

2

(0.7)

 

0

 

6

300

 

0

 

 

2

(0.7)

 

0

 

 

1

(0.3)

 

0

 

 

0

 

 

0

 

 

3

(1.0)

 

1

(0.3)

 

21

 

32

300

 

1

(0.3)

 

1

(0.3)

 

0

 

 

2

(0.7)

 

0

 

 

0

 

 

0

 

 

4

(1.3)

 

2

(0.7)

 

43

 

160

300

 

1

(0.3)

 

0

 

 

0

 

 

0

 

 

0

 

 

0

 

 

0

 

 

1

(0.3)

 

0

 

 

52

 

EMS600

300

 

8

(2.7)

 

9

(3.0)

 

41

(13.7)

 

75

(25.0)

 

52

(17.3)

 

28

(9.3)

 

0

 

 

151

(50.3)

+

151

(50.3)

 

33

*: Metaphase plate with one or more than one aberrations considered as one metaphase plate with aberrations

@: values are the sum of two replicates and values in parenthesis represent %   

Cs: Chromosome type             Ct: Chromatid type      RC: Ring chromosome    

EMS: Ethyl methanesulfonate   +: Significantly higher than control (p <0.05) by Fischer exact test

Note: There were no incidences of polyploidy and endoreduplicated cells

Conclusions:
Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative

The test item was not clastogenic in CHO-K1 cells at the tested concentration (up to 300 µg/mL) and under the conditions of testing employed
Executive summary:

The clastogenic potential of the test item to induce chromosomal aberrations in mammalian cells was evaluated using cultured Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO-K1) cells in the presence and absence of an exogenous metabolic activation system (S9 fraction prepared from Aroclor 1254 induced rat liver).

 

The study consisted of a preliminary cytotoxicity test and a chromosome aberration assay. Chromosome aberration assay consisted of three independent experiments: Experiments 1 and 2 in the presence and absence of metabolic activation system with 3-hour exposure, respectively, and Experiment 3 in the absence of metabolic activation system with 21-hour exposure.

 

The test item formed a free flowing suspension in sterile water (SW) at 50 mg/mL.

 

In a preliminary cytotoxicity test for the selection of test concentrations for the chromosomal aberration assay, CHO-K1 cells exposed to the test item, exhibited required level of cytotoxicity as RICC between 160 and 500 µg/mL, compared to the SW control, both in the presence and absence of metabolic activation with 3-hour exposure. In the absence of metabolic activation with 21-hour exposure, required level of cytotoxicity was observed between 40 and 320 µg/mL compared to the SW. Based on these observations, a maximum of 300 µg/mL in experiments 1 and 2 and a maximum of 160 µg/mL in experiment 3 of the chromosomal aberration assay was tested.

 

In the definitive chromosomal aberration assay, CHO-K1 cells were exposed to the test item in duplicate for 3 hours at concentrations of 12, 60 and 300mg/mL in experiments 1 and 2 (presence and in the absence of metabolic activation, respectively). Similarly, in experiment 3, CHO-K1 cells were exposed to the test item in duplicate for 21 hours at concentrations of 6, 32, and 160 µg/mL in the absence of metabolic activation. Concurrent vehicle (SW) and positive controls (cyclophosphamide monohydrate in the presence of metabolic activation and ethyl methanesulfonate in the absence of metabolic activation) were also tested in duplicate. In each case, the cells in C-metaphase were harvested at 21 hours after the start of the treatment and slides were prepared for chromosomal analysis.

 

At the respective highest concentrations tested, the reduction in cell growth as RICC was 52, 58 and 52% in Experiments 1, 2 and 3, respectively, compared to the vehicle control.

 

A total of 300 metaphases each from the SW control, each treatment level and the positive controls were evaluated for chromosomal aberrations.

There was no evidence of induction of chromosomal aberrations, excluding gaps, either in the presence or in the absence of metabolic activation. In each of these experiments, under identical conditions, the respective positive control substances produced a large and statistically significant increase in aberrant metaphases.

 

The study indicated that the test item was not clastogenic at the concentrations tested and under the conditions of testing.

Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
Remarks:
Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Remarks:
according to OECD and GLP
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of assay:
mammalian cell gene mutation assay
Target gene:
This mammalian cell mutation assay system detects point mutations involving base substitutions, deletions, frameshifts and rearrangements within the locus. The enzyme hypoxanthine guanine phosphoribosyl transferase (hprt) catalyses phosphorylation of purines in one of the purine salvage pathways. The selective agent used in this assay, 6-Thioguanine (6-TG), is also a substrate for this enzyme and cells that retain the functional hprt enzyme are susceptible to the cytotoxic effects of 6-TG. Forward mutations that result in the loss of the functional hprt gene render cells resistant to 6-TG. These mutant cells can be quantitated after an expression period by cloning in culture medium supplemented with 6-TG, the selective agent.
Species / strain / cell type:
Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
rat liver S9 homogenate
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
A) 62.5 B) 125 C) 250 and D) 500 µg/mL (factor of 2)

Vehicle / solvent:
sterile water was used as the vehicle control.
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Remarks:
sterile water
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
3-methylcholanthrene
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- Source of the Test System:
American Type Culture Collection, P. O. Box 1549, Manassas, VA 20108, USA

- Storage of Test System
Stock cultures of the CHO-K1 cell line were stored in the test facility as frozen permanents in liquid nitrogen.

Evaluation criteria:
- Evaluation and Interpretation : When all the validity criteria are fulfilled:

a.A test chemical is considered to be clearly positive if, in any of the experimental conditions examined:

•At least one of the test concentrations exhibits a statistically significant increase in number of aberrations compared with the concurrent vehicle control
•The increase is dose-dependent when evaluated with an appropriate trend test
•Any of the results are outside the distribution of the historical vehicle control data

b.A test chemical is considered to be clearly negative if, in all experimental conditions examined:

•None of the test concentrations exhibits a statistically significant increase in number of aberrations compared with the concurrent vehicle control
•There is no concentration-related increase when evaluated with an appropriate trend test
•All results are inside the distribution of the historical vehicle control data

c.The test chemical is then considered unable to induce gene mutations in cultured mammalian cells in this test system.
Statistics:
A power transformation procedure (Snee and Irr, 1981) was used with which, the observed mutant frequency was transformed.
Statistical analysis of the experimental data was carried out using validated copies of SYSTAT Statistical package version 12.0. In cases where analysis of variance was significant at p < 0.05, a Dunnett’s test was conducted, comparing each treatment group and the positive control to the vehicle control (p < 0.05).
Species / strain:
Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not applicable
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
other: strain/cell type:
Remarks:
Migrated from field 'Test system'.

TABLE 1.         Determination of pH of Test Medium

Treatment (mg/mL)

pH at the beginning of exposure to treatment

pH at the end of exposure to treatment

With S9

Without S9

With S9

Without S9

SW

7.12

7.15

7.08

7.16

5

7.14

7.16

7.10

7.19

10

7.16

7.18

7.10

7.22

20

7.16

7.18

7.11

7.24

40

7.17

7.16

7.10

7.23

80

7.18

7.20

7.12

7.24

160

7.18

7.23

7.10

7.24

320

7.19

7.25

7.09

7.23

500

7.20

7.25

7.08

7.24

Note: There was no precipitation of the test item at any of tested concentrations either in the presence or absence of metabolic activation at 3 hours post treatment.

TABLE 2.         Determination of Osmolality of Test Medium

Treatment (mg/mL)

Osmolality at the beginning of exposure to treatment

(OSMOL/kg)

Osmolality at the end of exposure to treatment

(OSMOL/kg)

With S9

Without S9

With S9

Without S9

SW

0.317

0.311

0.329

0.320

500

0.319

0.311

0.328

0.321

TABLE 3.         Results of Preliminary Cytotoxicity Test

 

Treatment

(mg/mL)

3-hour exposure with metabolic activation

3-hour exposure without metabolic activation

Cloning Efficiency

(CE)

Cells at end of treatment

(1x105/mL)

Adjusted Cloning Efficiency

Relative Survival (%RS)*

Cloning Efficiency

(CE)

Cells at end of treatment

(1x105/mL)

Adjusted Cloning Efficiency

Relative Survival (%RS)*

SW

0.97

12.90

1.44

100

0.97

12.45

1.39

100

5

0.88

12.00

1.21

84

0.94

11.80

1.27

91

10

0.82

10.95

1.03

72

0.86

11.35

1.12

81

20

0.80

10.35

0.95

66

0.79

10.50

0.95

68

40

0.74

9.15

0.78

54

0.76

9.30

0.81

58

80

0.65

7.05

0.53

37

0.71

8.50

0.69

50

160

0.62

6.90

0.49

34

0.66

7.20

0.55

40

320

0.57

5.15

0.34

24

0.58

4.90

0.33

24

500

0.47

4.95

0.27

19

0.48

3.80

0.21

15

TABLE 4.         Parallel Cytotoxicity Test Results from Experiment 1

Treatment

µg/mL

No. of Colonies /Flask

CE*

ACE

RS

%

1

2

3

SW

191

189

195

0.968

1.41

100

197

193

197

62.5

137

141

135

0.707

0.72

51

145

147

143

125

138

131

136

0.670

0.55

39

129

132

138

250

126

127

130

0.633

0.46

33

136

121

119

500

111

118

99

0.547

0.28

20

106

109

113

3-MCA

136

148

131

0.716

0.72

51

152

143

149

CE: Cloning Efficiency ; ACE: Adjusted CE;                  RS: Relative Survival   

TABLE 5.         Parallel Cytotoxicity Test Results from Experiment 2

Treatment

µg/mL

No. of Colonies /Flask

CE*

ACE

RS

%

1

2

3

SW

197

195

196

0.974

1.49

100

191

197

193

62.5

153

160

149

0.763

0.77

52

147

156

151

125

141

138

135

0.69

0.62

42

143

140

131

250

121

127

120

0.616

0.50

34

119

129

123

500

110

113

97

0.533

0.24

16

107

101

112

CE: Cloning EfficiencyACE: Adjusted CE                 RS: Relative Survival   

* calculated from the mean values of the replicates of each group and rounded off to two decimal places

TABLE 6.         Summary Results of the Gene Mutation Assay in the Presence of Metabolic Activation (Experiment 1)

Treatment

µg/mL

Mutation Assay Flasks

Cloning Efficiency of Mutant Colonies

Cloning Efficiency Flasks

6-TG Mutants

per 106Clonable Cells

(MF)

TG Colonies/Flask

No. of Colonies/Flask

1

2

3

4

5

Total

1

2

3

CE*

SW

1

1

3

1

1

16

0.000008

188

189

193

0.95

8.42

2

3

1

1

2

191

194

190

62.5

0

1

2

1

1

12

0.000006

183

172

176

0.89

6.74

1

2

1

1

2

181

179

174

125

3

0

2

1

1

12

0.000006

158

162

171

0.83

7.23

1

1

1

1

1

172

170

164

250

1

1

1

1

2

12

0.000006

157

149

158

0.77

7.79

0

2

2

1

1

146

151

159

500

2

2

1

0

0

11

0.0000055

141

136

133

0.67

8.21

2

1

1

1

1

133

130

135

3-MCA

36

34

38

29

26

315

0.0001575

148

150

141

0.75

210+

28

29

31

34

30

153

157

146

Positive Control: 8 µg/mL 3-MCA             Vehicle Control: DMSO               CE: Cloning Efficiency                MF: Mutant Frequency

TABLE 7.         Summary Results of the Gene Mutation Assay in the Absence of Metabolic Activation (Experiment 2)

Treatment

µg/mL

Mutation Assay Flasks

Cloning Efficiency of Mutant Colonies

Cloning Efficiency Flasks

6-TG Mutants

per 106Clonable Cells

(MF)

TG Colonies/Flask

No. of Colonies/Flask

1

2

3

4

5

Total

1

2

3

CE*

SW

2

2

2

3

1

22

0.000011

191

196

187

0.95

11.58

2

3

2

2

3

189

190

192

62.5

1

1

2

2

2

17

0.0000085

178

180

191

0.92

9.24

2

3

1

1

2

184

185

183

125

0

3

1

1

2

15

0.0000075

163

167

160

0.83

9.04

4

2

0

1

1

169

165

166

250

1

1

1

1

2

14

0.000007

148

153

154

0.76

9.21

2

1

2

2

1

150

157

152

500

1

1

2

2

1

14

0.000007

143

149

137

0.71

9.86

2

3

1

1

0

135

141

145

Vehicle Control: DMSO              CE: Cloning Efficiency        MF: Mutant Frequency                                        

Conclusions:
Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative

It is concluded that the test item does not have the potential to induce gene mutation in CHO-K1 cells at the tested concentrations and under the conditions of testing employed.
Executive summary:

The genotoxic potential of the test item to induce gene mutation in mammalian cells was evaluated using Chinese Hamster ovary (CHO) cells.

 

The study consisted of a preliminary cytotoxicity test and a definitive gene mutation assay. The gene mutation assay comprised of two independent experiments, one each in the presence and absence of metabolic activation system (S9 fraction prepared from Aroclor 1254 induced rat liver).

 

The test item formed a free flowing suspension in sterile water (SW) at 50 mg/mL.

 

In a preliminary cytotoxicity test for the selection of test concentrations for the gene mutation assay, the Relative Survival was 19 and 15 % at the 500 µg/mL, in the presence and absence of metabolic activation, respectively. The test item neither precipitated in the test medium at the highest concentration nor showed any appreciable change in the pH and osmolality of test medium. Based on these observations a maximum of
500 µg/mL was tested in the gene mutation assay.
 

 

In the gene mutation assay, CHO-K1 cells were exposed to the test item in duplicate at concentrations of 62.5, 125, 250 and 500 µg/mL of the medium for 3 hours in the presence (Experiment 1) and absence (Experiment 2) of metabolic activation. In a similar way, a concurrent vehicle control (SW) and a positive control, 3-methylcholanthrene (Experiment 1) were also tested in duplicate.

 

There was no evidence of induction of gene mutations in any of the test item treated cultures either in the presence or absence of metabolic activation. The positive control in experiment 1 produced a statistically significant increase in the frequencies of mutants, under identical conditions.

 

The results of the forward gene mutation test at the hprt locus with the test item indicated that the test item was non-mutagenic under the conditions of this study.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (negative)

Genetic toxicity in vivo

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Mode of Action Analysis / Human Relevance Framework

No relevant findings observed.

Additional information

Justification for classification or non-classification

No classification

All studies (Ames, HPRT, Chromosomal Aberration) did not afford any indication of mutagenicity.