Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: - | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Oral: OECD Guideline 408; 90-day gavage, rats. NOAEL = 50 mg/kg (males), based on hepatocellular single cell necrosis and tubular cell vacuolation in kidneys at >250 mg/kg); 10 mg/kg (females, based on hepatocellular single cell necrosis at>50 mg/kg). Reliability = 1
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Repeated dose toxicity: via oral route - systemic effects
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- 10 mg/kg bw/day
- Study duration:
- subchronic
- Species:
- rat
- System:
- other: Effects noted at 50 mg/kg were limited to hepatocellular single cell necrosis in females and a single male rat with a minimal grade observation. The findings do not meet the criteria for classification as neither indicates functional organ impairment.
Repeated dose toxicity: inhalation - systemic effects
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Repeated dose toxicity: inhalation - local effects
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Repeated dose toxicity: dermal - systemic effects
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Repeated dose toxicity: dermal - local effects
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Groups of 10 male and 10 female rats received daily gavage concentrations of 0, 10, 50, 250, or 1000 mg/kg of the test item for 90 or 91 consecutive days according to OECD Guideline 408. Non-adverse test item-related changes were observed in clinical chemistry parameters at 1000 mg/kg/day dose in female rats. At 1000 mg/kg/day, test item related increased relative (to body and brain) liver weights in both sexes and relative kidney (to body) weights in males and absolute and relative (to body and brain) kidney weights in females were observed. Test item related potentially adverse histopathological findings included minimal to mild hepatocellular single cell necrosis (≥250 mg/kg/day in males and ≥50 mg/kg/day in females) and minimal to mild tubular cell vacuolation in kidneys (≥250 mg/kg/day in males and females).Test item related, non-adverse findings included minimal centrilobular hepatocellular hypertrophy (1000 mg/kg/day in males and females) and minimal to moderate pigmentation in hepatocytes and Kupffer cells (1000 mg/kg/day in males and ≥50 mg/kg/day in females). The No-Observed-Adverse-Effect-Level (NOAEL) of the test substance is 10 mg/kg bw/day in the female (based on hepatocellular single cell necrosis at ≥50 mg/kg/day) and 50 mg/kg bw/day in male rats (based on the hepatocellular single cell necrosis and tubular cell vacuolation in kidneys at ≥250 mg/kg/day).
Groups of 12 male and female rats received daily gavage concentrations
of 10, 50, 200, or 800 mg/kg of the test substance in a combined
repeated dose toxicity study with a reproduction/developmental toxicity
screening test according to OECD Guideline 422. Statistically
significant, potentially adverse effects observed on this study included
reduced body weight, body weight gain, and food efficiency in P1 male
animals. Treatment-related findings occurred in the kidneys (vacuolation
of tubules in the outer stripe of the medulla in male at ≥50 mg/kg/day
and females at ≥200 mg/kg/day). Non-adverse findings in the liver
consisted of centrilobular hepatocellular hypertrophy considered an
adaptive response to xenobiotic administration (800 mg/kg/day males and
females) and minimal centrilobular mononuclear cell infiltrates (800
mg/kg/day males and ≥200 mg/kg/day females). The NOAEL was 10 mg/kg/day
for systemic toxicity due to adverse treatment-related histopathologic
effects on the kidneys in P1 males at 50 mg/kg/day. These effects,
however, were limited to a single male rat with a minimal grade
observation.
Justification for classification or non-classification
The effects noted at 50 mg/kg/day in the OECD 408 study were limited to hepatocellular single cell necrosis in female rats. The effects noted at 50 mg/kg/day in the OECD 422 study were limited to a single male rat with a minimal grade observation. Neither of these findings not meet the criteria for classification based on the guidance outlined in ECHA’s Guidance on the Application of the CLP Criteria (2015) section 3.9.2.4. since neither finding indicates functional impairment of an organ. Therefore, classification is not warranted according to the criteria of EU’s Classification, Labelling and Packaging of Substances and Mixtures (CLP) Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.