Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 926-601-6 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- April 2015
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Version / remarks:
- (1997)
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- - Stability under test conditions: The stability of the substance in the formulation was analytically verified for at least 24 hours.
- The substance in the test item is dissolved in approx. 30 % solvent. Test concentrations in the Ames-test were adjusted to the substance content (approx. 70 %). - Target gene:
- histidine locus
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9 Mix from rat liver induced with phenobarbital/beta-naphthoflavone.
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Experiment I (plate incorporation), with and without S9-mix: 10, 25, 50, 160, 500, 1600, and 5000 µg/plate for each tester strain
Experiment II (pre-incubation method), with and without S9-mix: 10, 25, 50, 160, 500, 1600, and 5000 µg/plate for each tester strain - Vehicle / solvent:
- EGDE (Ethylene glycol dimethylether)
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- EGDE
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 2-nitrofluorene
- sodium azide
- cumene hydroperoxide
- mitomycin C
- other: 4-Nitro-1,2-phenylene diamine (used for TA1537), Anthracene-2-amine (used for all strains).
- Remarks:
- The positive control Anthracene-2-amine was only used with S9 mix, the others were used without S9-mix..
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: Initially the plate incorporation method was used. As independent repeat the preincubation modification (20 min. at 37°C) was performed.
For each strain and dose level, including the controls, three plates were used.
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
The toxicity of the substance was assessed by a gross appraisal of background growth on the plates for mutant determination. Moreover, a toxic effect of the substance was assumed when there was a marked and dose-dependent reduction in the mutant count per plate, compared to the solvent controls. - Evaluation criteria:
- A reproducible and dose-related increase in mutant counts of at least one strain is considered to be a positive result. For TA1535, TA100, TA1537 and TA98 this increase should be about twice that of solvent controls. For TA 102 an increase of about 100 mutants should be reached. Otherwise, the result is evaluated as negative. However, these criteria may be overruled by good scientific judgment.
In case of questionable results, investigations should continue, possibly with modifications, until a final evaluation is possible. - Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Remarks:
- plate incorporation trial
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Remarks:
- plate incorporation trial
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Remarks:
- plate incorporation trial
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Remarks:
- plate incorporation trial
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 102
- Remarks:
- plate incorporation trial
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Remarks:
- preincubation trial
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- at 5000 µg/tube
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Remarks:
- preincubation trial
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Remarks:
- preincubation trial
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- at 5000 µg/tube for trials without S9-mix, no cytotoxicity for trials with S9-mix, but tested up to limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Remarks:
- preincubation trial
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 102
- Remarks:
- preincubation trial
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- at 1600 µg/tube for trials without S9-mix, no cytotoxicity for trials with S9-mix, but tested up to limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- None of the five strains used showed a dose-related and biologically relevant increase in mutant counts over those of the solvent controls in the plate incorporation test. This applied both to the tests with and without S9 mix and was confirmed by the results of the preincubation trials. The positive controls increased mutant counts to well over those of the solvent controls, and thus demonstrated the system's sensitivity and the activity of the S9 mix.
TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Precipitation: Substance precipitation occurred at 5000 µg per plate.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY:
Doses of up to and including 5000 µg per plate did not produce bacteriotoxic effects in the plate incorporation method. The preincubation method showed the test item to produce strain-specific bacteriotoxic effects at the dose of 5000 µg per plate. - Executive summary:
A bacterial reverse mutation test (Ames test) was conducted according to OECD TG 471 to investigate the potential of the test substance to induce gene mutations. The assay was performed in two independent experiments, the initial plate incorporation and the subsequent preincubation test, both with and without S9 mix and the following tester strains: Salmonella typhimurium TA 1535, TA 100, TA 1537, TA 98, and TA 102. The doses applied were up to and including 5000 µg/plate (the content of the substance in the test item, which is approx. 70 % in approx. 30 % solvent, was considered).
Substance precipitation occurred at 5000 µg per plate. None of the five strains used showed a dose-related and biologically relevant increase in mutant counts over those of the solvent controls in the plate incorporation test. This applied both to the tests with and without S9 mix and was confirmed by the results of the preincubation trials.
The positive controls increased mutant counts to well over those of the solvent controls, and thus demonstrated the system's sensitivity and the activity of the S9 mix.
In conclusion, the test substance was considered to be non-mutagenic in the Ames test with and without S9 mix.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
A bacterial reverse mutation test (Ames test) was conducted according to OECD TG 471 to investigate the potential of the test substance to induce gene mutations. The assay was performed in two independent experiments, the initial plate incorporation and the subsequent preincubation test, both with and without S9 mix and the following tester strains: Salmonella typhimurium TA 1535, TA 100, TA 1537, TA 98, and TA 102. The doses applied were up to and including 5000 µg/plate (the content of the substance in the test item, which is approx. 70 % in 30 % solvent, was considered).
Substance precipitation occurred at 5000 µg per plate. None of the five strains used showed a dose-related and biologically relevant increase in mutant counts over those of the solvent controls in the plate incorporation test. This applied both to the tests with and without S9 mix and was confirmed by the results of the preincubation trials.
The positive controls increased mutant counts to well over those of the solvent controls, and thus demonstrated the system's sensitivity and the activity of the S9 mix.
In conclusion, the test substance was considered to be non-mutagenic in the Ames test with and without S9 mix.Justification for classification or non-classification
According to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008, Annex I, no classification is warranted for genetic toxicity.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
