Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 700-932-4 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicity to terrestrial plants
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
Description of key information
waiving
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Additional information
According to the REACH Regulation EC 1907/2006, Annex IX, Column 2 (specific rules for adaptation from Column 1), plant toxicity testing is not proposed by the registrant because the Chemical Safety Assessment, according to Annex I, does not indicate the need to investigate further the effects on plants.
Leucophor 1111X is a Stilbene Fluorescent Whitening Agent (SFWA), 4,4’-bis(1,3,5-triazinyl-2-yl)amino)stilbene-2,2’-disulfonic acid (DAS) derivative. This class of substances have been available since 1941 and remain the most important class of optical brighteners in terms of quantity [1]. Some 75 derivatives Because fluorescent whiteners have been found to be present in ppm amounts in composted sludge of waste water treatment stations, investigations have been conducted in order to assess whether SFWAs were taken up through the root system by higher forms of plant life and whether should the sludge be used for land fill. In literature secondary source [3], it is reported that Muecke et al. [4] have investigated this and have found evidence of a successive accumulation of radiolabelled substances on the roots of bean plants (Phasaeolus vulgaris). Plants grown for 40 days in a nutrient solution containing 11.5 ppm of labelled SFWAs analogous substance 04 and 08 showed on their roots a linear increase in the accumulation of the whiteners applied. The authors also show that this accumulation of the whitener on the roots is greatly reduced if the plants are grown in soil instead of nutrient solution. Due to the strong adhesion of the SFWA to the soil particles, only 2 % of the amount of whitener applied to the soil was found on the roots after 42 days. The same writers also showed that the growth of the test plants was not adversely affected by the application of the analogous substance 04 in amounts far in excess of those used commercially.
Ganz et al. [3 and 5] have conducted similar experiments using corn plants (Zea mais) and soybean plants (Glycine scja) and analogous substance 04 in concentrations of 1, 10, 100, and 1000 ppm of the weight of the soil. ln the experiment with 1000 ppm analogous substance 04 they detected in the plants radioactivity corresponding to 0.4 ppm of the substance or less in the case of soybeans and only 0.07 ppm or less in com plants. In the experiments with the lower concentrations no radioactivity was detectable in the plants.
The substances abovementioned and used in a read across approach are Stilbene derivatives Fluorescent Whitening Agents salts. They display similar structural and physicochemical properties: all of them exhibit high degree of dissociation in water and very low octanol/water partition coefficients because to a higher affinity with water phase than the octanol one. They are all very soluble in water, due to the presence of sulphonated groups in the molecules; all of them are non readily biodegradable and are expected to undergo to the same environmental fate.
In both cases the read across approach can be considered as reliable and representative.
Further details about the justification for read across approach are given in the report attached to the Section 13 of this dossier.
REFERENCE
[1] AAVV, 2003. Industrial dyes. Chemistry, Properties, Applications. Edited by Klaus Hunger. Wiley-vch.
[2] Siegrist A. E., Eckhardt C., Kaschig J., Schmidt E, 1991. Optical Brighteners in Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry, vol. A18, VCH, Weinheim, pp. 153176.
[3] Zinkernagel R., 1975. Fluorescent whitening agents in the environment. Environ Qual Saf Suppl. 4:12.-42.
[4] Muecke W., Dupuis G., Esser H.O. 1975. Fluorescent Whitening Agents, Environmental Quality and Safety, Supplement Vol. IV. Ed. by F. Coulston and F. Korte, p. 174, Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart and Accademic Press, New York/London.
[5] Ganz C.R., Lyman F.L., Schulze J., Stensby P.S., 1975. Macek:Environ. Sc. Technol. 9: 738 - 744.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.