Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 219-268-7 | CAS number: 2399-48-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
No genotoxicity study is available on the registered substance, however,
the three required in vitro studies are available on an analogue
substance (THFMA):
- negative results are obtained in the Ames test with S. typhimurium TA
1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and E. coli WP2 (met. act.: with and
without) (similar to OECD TG 471; GLP);
- negative results are obtained in the Mammalian cell gene mutation
assay with V79 cells (HPRT) (met. act.: with and without) (OECD TG 476;
GLP);
- negative results are obtained in vitro mammalian cell micronucleus
assay with cultured peripheral human lymphocytes (met. act.: with and
without) (OECD TG 487; GLP).
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2013-09-04 - 2013-10-25
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: EU method B.49 (In vitro Mammalian Cell Micronucleus Test), dated July 06, 2012.
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 487 (In vitro Mammalian Cell Micronucleus Test)
- Version / remarks:
- adopted July 22, 2010
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test
- Target gene:
- not applicable
- Species / strain / cell type:
- lymphocytes: human, healthy donors not receiving medication
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Type and identity of media: Dulbecco's Modified Eagles Medium/Ham's F12 (DMEM/F12, mixture 1:1) already supplemented with 200 mM GlutaMAX, supplemented with penicillin/streptomycin (100 U/mL/100 Lg/mL), the mitogen PHA (3 Lg/mL), 10 % FBS (fetal bovine serum), 10 mM HEPES and the anticoagulant heparin (125 U.S.P.-U/mL)
- Properly maintained: yes
- Periodically checked for Mycoplasma contamination: not relevant
- Periodically checked for karyotype stability: not relevant
- Periodically "cleansed" against high spontaneous background: not relevant - Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not applicable
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9 mix
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Experiment I (4 h exposure, 16 h recovery, fixation time 40 h, without S9): 11.0, 19.3, 33.8, 59.2, 103.6, 181.3, 317.2, 555.1, 971.4, 1700.0 µg/mL
Experiment I (4 h exposure, 16 h recovery, fixation time 40 h, with S9): 11.0, 19.3, 33.8, 59.2, 103.6, 181.3, 317.2, 555.1, 971.4, 1700.0 µg/mL
Experiment II (20 h exposure, fixation time 40 h, without S9): 11.0, 19.3, 33.8, 59.2, 103.6, 181.3, 317.2, 555.1, 971.4, 1700.0 µg/mL
Experiment II (4 h exposure, 16 h recovery, fixation time 40 h, with S9): 103.6, 181.3, 317.2, 555.1, 971.4, 1700.0 µg/mL - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO, final concentration in medium 0.5%
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: The solvent was chosen due to its solubility properties and its relative non-toxicity to the cell cultures. - Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- mitomycin C
- other: (without metabolic activation, pulse treatment)
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: Demecolcin (without metabolic activation, continuous treatment)
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- other: (with metabolic activation)
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION
- Exposure duration:
Experiment I:
4 hours pulse treatment (with and without metabolic activation), expression phase 16 hours, cytokinesis block 20 hours.
Experiment II:
4 hours pulse treatment (with metabolic activation), expression phase 16 hours, cytokinesis block 20 hours
20 hours continuous treatment (without metabolic activation), cytokinesis block 20 hours
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 20 h (+ cytochalasin B)
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): 40
A series of in-house non-GLP validation experiments was performed to get distinct responses of statistical significance when using the specified positive controls. To achieve such response the test design, specifically for the treatment, the recovery phase and harvest time, was slightly modified comparing the current proposal given in the OECD Guideline 487.
SPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays): 4 µg/mL cytochalasin B
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): Giemsa
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 2 per experiment
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: 1000 binucleate cells per culture were scored for cytogenetic damage
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: CBPI (Cytokinesis-block proliferation index) was determined in approximately 500 cells per culture and cytotoxicity is expressed as % cytostasis - Evaluation criteria:
- The micronucleus assay is considered acceptable if it meets the following criteria:
- The number of micronuclei found in the negative and solvent controls falls within the range of the laboratory historical control data
- The positive control substances should produce significant increases in the number of cells with micronuclei.
A test item can be classified as non-mutagenic if:
- the number of micronucleated cells in all evaluated dose groups is in the range of the laboratory historical control data and/or
-no statistically significant or concentration-related increase in the number of micronucleated cells is observed.
A test item can be classified as mutagenic if:
- the number of micronucleated cells is not in the range of the historical laboratory control data and
- either a concentration-related increase of micronucleated cells in three test groups or a statistically significant increase of the number of micronucleated cells is observed. - Statistics:
- Chi square test (alpha < 0.05)
- Species / strain:
- lymphocytes: human
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- other: Exp. I: no cytotoxicity with and without S9; Exp II: cytotoxic without S9, no cytotoxicity with S9
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Effects of pH: 7.6 / 7.8 for solvent control, 7.7 / 7.8 for test item in experiment I / II -> no relevant influence
- Effects of osmolality: 376 / 385 for solvent control, 375 / 381 for test item in experiment I / II -> no relevant influence
- Precipitation: No precipitation of the test item in the culture medium was observed.
COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA: all results were within the range of the laboratory historical control data
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY:
In Experiment I in the absence and presence of S9 mix and in Experiment II in the presence of S9 mix, no cytotoxicity was observed up to the highest applied concentration. In Experiment II in the absence of S9 mix the highest applied concentration showing clear cytotoxic effects was not evaluable. - Conclusions:
- In this test under the experimental conditions reported, the test item Tetrahydrofurfuryl methacrylate did not induce micronuclei in human lymphocytes in vitro when tested up to cytotoxic or the highest evaluable concentration.
- Executive summary:
In a mammalian cell micronucleus assay according to OECD guideline 478 (adopted July 22, 2010) and EU method B.49, dated July 06, 2012., primary human lymphocyte cultures were exposed toTetrahydrofurfuryl methacrylate(99.0%) in DMSO with and without metabolic activation (S9 mix).
The following concentrations were evaluated (calculations were not adjusted to purity):
Experiment I:
4 h exposure, 16 h recovery, fixation time 40 h, without S9: 555.1, 971.4, 1700.0 µg/mL
4 h exposure, 16 h recovery, fixation time 40 h, with S9: 555.1, 971.4, 1700.0 µg/mL
Experiment II:
20 h exposure, fixation time 40 h, without S9: 317.2, 555.1, 971.4 µg/mL
4 h exposure, 16 h recovery, fixation time 40 h, with S9: 555.1, 971.4, 1700.0 µg/mL
The test item was tested up to cytotoxic or the guideline limit concentration of 10 mM (corresponding to 1700.0 µg/mL). No cytotoxicity was observed in Experiment I with and without metabolic activation as well as in Experiment II with metabolic activation. In Experiment II in the absence of S9 mix the highest applied concentration showing clear cytotoxic effects was not evaluable.
In both independent experiments, neither a statistically significant nor a biologically relevant increase in the number of micronucleated cells was observed after treatment with the test item.
Positive controls induced the appropriate response.
There was no evidence of micronucleated cells induced over background. Therefore,Tetrahydrofurfuryl methacrylate is considered to be non-clastogenic in this in vitro micronucleus test, when tested up to cytotoxic or the guideline limit concentration.
NOTE: Any of data in this dataset are disseminated by the European Union on a right-to-know basis and this is not a publication in the same sense as a book or an article in a journal. The right of ownership in any part of this information is reserved by the data owner(s). The use of this information for any other, e.g. commercial purpose is strictly reserved to the data owners and those persons or legal entities having paid the respective access fee for the intended purpose.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2006-12-19 to 2007-01-25
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Target gene:
- his (Salmonella strains), trp (E. coli strain)
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and E. coli WP2
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9 mix
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Experiment 1: 0, 4.88, 19.5, 78.1, 313, 1250, 5000 µg/plate
Experiment 2: 0, 156, 313, 625, 1250, 2500, 5000 µg/plate - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 2-Aminoanthracene
- Remarks:
- with metabolic activation
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 9-aminoacridine
- sodium azide
- other: 2-(2-Furyl)-3-(5-nitro-2-furyl)acrylamide
- Remarks:
- without metabolic activation
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation)
DURATION
- Exposure duration: 48 h
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 2
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: reduced bacterial growth - Evaluation criteria:
- Although not given in the study report, according to OECD guideline 471 a test item is considered mutagenic if:
- a clear and dose-related increase in revertant number occurs
- a biologically relevant positive response for at least one dose group occurs: in TA 100 and E. coli uvrA number of revertants at least twice as high as in solvent control; TA 98, TA 1535, TA 1537 at least three times higher number of revertants as in solvent control - Statistics:
- no
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and E. coli WP2
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY:
cytotoxic effects were observed in strains TA98, TA100, TA1535 and TA1537 at 5000 µg/plate without metabolic activation and in strains TA100 and TA1535 at 5000 µg/plate with metabolic activation - Conclusions:
- THFMA was not mutagenic in the bacterial reverse gene mutation assay when tested up to cytotoxic or limit concentrations (5000 µg/plate).
- Executive summary:
In a reverse gene mutation assay in bacteria similar to OECD guideline 471, S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and E. coli WP2 strains were exposed to THFMA in DMSO at concentrations of 0, 4.88, 19.5, 78.1, 313, 1250, 5000 µg/plate in the first experiment and 0, 156, 313, 625, 1250, 2500, 5000 µg/plate in the second experiment in the presence and absence of mammalian metabolic activation (S9 mix). THFMA was tested up to limit concentrations (5000 µg/plate).
Cytotoxic effects (reduced bacterial growth) were observed in strains TA98, TA100, TA1535 and TA1537 at 5000 µg/plate without metabolic activation and in strains TA100 and TA1535 at 5000 µg/plate with metabolic activation.
There was no evidence of induced mutant colonies over background.
THFMA was not mutagenic in this bacterial reverse gene mutation assay when tested up to cytotoxic or limit concentrations (5000 µg/plate).
NOTE: Any of data in this dataset are disseminated by the European Union on a right-to-know basis and this is not a publication in the same sense as a book or an article in a journal. The right of ownership in any part of this information is reserved by the data owner(s). The use of this information for any other, e.g. commercial purpose is strictly reserved to the data owners and those persons or legal entities having paid the respective access fee for the intended purpose.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2013-09-10 - 2013-10-14
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.17 (Mutagenicity - In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Version / remarks:
- dated May 30, 2008
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Version / remarks:
- adopted July 21, 1997
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- mammalian cell gene mutation assay
- Target gene:
- HPRT
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Type and identity of media: MEM (minimal essential medium) containing Hank’s salts supplemented with 10% foetal bovine serum (FBS), neomycin (5 µg/mL) and amphotericin B (1%)
- Properly maintained: yes
- Periodically checked for Mycoplasma contamination: yes
- Periodically checked for karyotype stability: yes
- Periodically "cleansed" against high spontaneous background: yes - Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9 mix
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Experiment I (4 h exposure, with and without S9): 53.8, 107.5, 215.0, 430.0, 860.0, 1720.0 µg/mL
Experiment II (24 h exposure, without S9): 107.5, 215.0, 430.0, 860.0, 1290.0, 1720.0 µg/mL
Experiment II (4 h exposure, with S9): 107.5, 215.0, 430.0, 860.0, 1290.0, 1720.0 µg/mL - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO, final concentration in medium 0.5%
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: The solvent was chosen due to its solubility properties and its relative non-toxicity to the cell cultures. - Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- ethylmethanesulphonate
- other: (without metabolic activation)
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 7,12-dimethylbenzanthracene
- other: (with metabolic activation)
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION
- Exposure duration:
Experiment I: 4 h with and without metabolic activation
Experiment II: 4 h with metabolic activation, 24 h without metabolic activation
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 7 days
- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent): 8 days
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): 15 days
SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): 11 µg/mL 6-thioguanine (6-TG)
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 2 replicates per experiment
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: cloning efficiency
OTHER:
- colonies used to determine the cloning efficiency (survival) were fixed and stained approx. 7 days after treatment
- the colonies were stained with 10 % methylene blue in 0.01 % KOH solution; colonies with more than 50 cells were counted.
- Following the expression time of 7 days five cell culture flasks were seeded with about 3 - 5E05 cells each in medium containing 6-TG; 2 additional flasks were seeded with approx. 500 cells each in non-selective medium to determine the viability. - Evaluation criteria:
- The assay is considered acceptable if it meets the following criteria:
- the numbers of mutant colonies per 10E06 cells found in the solvent controls fall within the laboratory historical control data range
- the positive control substances must produce a significant increase in mutant colony frequencies
- the cloning efficiency (absolute value) of the solvent controls must exceed 50%
A positive response is described as follows:
- reproducible induction of a mutation frequency that is three times above the spontaneous mutation frequency at least at one of the concentrations in the experiment
- reproducible concentration-related increase of the mutation frequency; such evaluation may be considered also in the case that a threefold increase of the mutant frequency is not observed - Statistics:
- A linear regression (least squares) was performed to assess a possible dose dependent increase of mutant frequencies. The number of mutant colonies obtained for the groups treated with the test item were compared to the solvent control groups. A trend is judged as significant whenever the p-value (probability value) is below 0.05.
Biological and statistical significance were considered together. - Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- other: Exp. I: no cytotoxicity with and without S9; Exp II: cytotoxic without S9, no cytotoxicity with S9
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Effects of pH: 7.4 for solvent control, 7.42 for test item -> no relevant influence
- Effects of osmolality: 383 mOsmfor solvent control, 374 mOsm for test item -> no relevant influence
- Precipitation: No precipitation of the test item in the culture medium was observed.
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES: pre-test for cytotoxicity, cytotoxic after 24 h exposure at 430.0 µg/mL and above without metabolic activation
COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA: mutant frequencies were within the historical range of solvent controls, except the first culture of the first experiment without metabolic activation at 107.5 µg/mL, which was slightly above the historical range, however, this was neither reproduced nor dose dependent
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY: Relevant cytotoxic effects indicated by a relative cloning efficiency I or cell density below 50% occurred in experiment II at 430.0 µg/mL and above without metabolic activation. - Conclusions:
- In this HPRT test, Tetrahydrofurfuryl methacrylate was found to be not mutagenic.
- Executive summary:
In a mammalian cell gene mutation assay according to OECD guideline 476, adopted 21 July 1997 (HPRT test) and EU Method B.17 dated May 30, 2008, V79 cells cultured in vitro were exposed toTetrahydrofurfuryl methacrylate (99.0% a.i.) at the following concentrations in the presence and absence of mammalian metabolic activation (S9 mix).
Experiment I (4 h exposure, with and without S9): 53.8, 107.5, 215.0, 430.0, 860.0, 1720.0 µg/mL
Experiment II (24 h exposure, without S9): 107.5, 215.0, 430.0, 860.0, 1290.0, 1720.0 µg/mL
Experiment II (4 h exposure, with S9): 107.5, 215.0, 430.0, 860.0, 1290.0, 1720.0 µg/mL
The test item was tested up to cytotoxic or the guideline limit concentration of 10 mM (corresponding to 1720.0 µg/mL). The positive controls induced the appropriate response.
No relevant and reproducible increase in mutant colony numbers/1E6 cells was observed in the main experiments up to the maximum concentration. The induction factor exceeded the threshold of three times the mutation frequency of the corresponding solvent control in the first culture of the first experiment without metabolic activation at 107.5 and 1720µg/mL. However, the increases were neither reproduced nor dose dependent as indicated by the lacking statistical significance. Consequently, the isolated increases of the mutation frequency were judged as biologically irrelevant and based on a relatively low solvent control.
There was no evidence of induced mutant colonies over background. In this HPRT test,Tetrahydrofurfuryl methacrylate was found to be not mutagenic.
NOTE: Any of data in this dataset are disseminated by the European Union on a right-to-know basis and this is not a publication in the same sense as a book or an article in a journal. The right of ownership in any part of this information is reserved by the data owner(s). The use of this information for any other, e.g. commercial purpose is strictly reserved to the data owners and those persons or legal entities having paid the respective access fee for the intended purpose.
Referenceopen allclose all
|
Proliferation index CBPI, mean of 2 cultures |
Cytostasis [%] |
Micronucleated cells [%] |
Experiment I; Exposure period 4 hrs without S9 mix |
|||
Solvent control, 0.5% DMSO |
2.01 |
--- |
0.85 |
Positive control, 2.0 µg/mL MMC |
1.70 |
30.8 |
15.50 |
Test item 555.1 µg/mL |
1.95 |
5.4 |
0.60 |
Test item 971.4 µg/mL |
1.77 |
24.0 |
0.80 |
Test item 1700.0 µg/mL |
1.89 |
11.8 |
0.75 |
Experiment I; Exposure period 4 hrs with S9 mix |
|||
Solvent control, 0.5% DMSO |
1.86 |
--- |
0.95 |
Positive control, 17.5 µg/mL CPA |
1.87 |
n.c. |
3.10 |
Test item 555.1 µg/mL |
1.91 |
n.c. |
0.35 |
Test item 971.4 µg/mL |
1.92 |
n.c. |
0.50 |
Test item 1700.0 µg/mL |
1.83 |
3.5 |
0.45 |
Experiment II; Exposure period 20 hrs without S9 mix |
|||
Solvent control, 0.5% DMSO |
1.82 |
--- |
0.50 |
Positive control, 125 ng/mLDemecolcin |
1.47 |
43.2 |
5.55 |
Test item 317.2 µg/mL |
1.88 |
n.c. |
0.25 |
Test item 555.1 µg/mL |
1.75 |
8.6 |
0.40 |
Test item 971.4 µg/mL |
1.71 |
14.0 |
0.40 |
Experiment II; Exposure period 4 hrs with S9 mix |
|||
Solvent control, 0.5% DMSO |
1.92 |
--- |
0.55 |
Positive control, 15 µg/mL CPA |
1.70 |
23.7 |
3.10 |
Test item 555.1 µg/mL |
1.94 |
n.c. |
0.65 |
Test item 971.4 µg/mL |
1.95 |
n.c. |
0.70 |
Test item 1700.0 µg/mL |
1.96 |
n.c. |
0.60 |
n.c.= Not calculated as the CBPI is equal or higher than the solvent control value
S9 mix |
test item concentration [µg/plate] |
mean number revertants/plate |
||||
TA100 |
TA1535 |
E. coli WP2uvrA- |
TA98 |
TA1537 |
||
without |
0 |
117 |
12 |
28 |
10 |
5 |
4.88 |
92 |
8 |
23 |
17 |
9 |
|
19.5 |
99 |
10 |
23 |
13 |
7 |
|
78.1 |
107 |
11 |
26 |
15 |
7 |
|
313 |
91 |
12 |
23 |
16 |
4 |
|
1250 |
109 |
10 |
20 |
17 |
5 |
|
5000 |
80* |
8* |
28 |
11* |
5* |
|
positive control |
722 |
404 |
257 |
414 |
138 |
|
with |
0 |
112 |
9 |
32 |
26 |
10 |
4.88 |
105 |
12 |
33 |
23 |
15 |
|
19.5 |
92 |
7 |
33 |
29 |
12 |
|
78.1 |
111 |
9 |
30 |
26 |
7 |
|
313 |
110 |
10 |
38 |
30 |
8 |
|
1250 |
124 |
7 |
34 |
24 |
10 |
|
5000 |
87* |
11* |
30 |
22 |
9 |
|
positive control |
1341 |
256 |
1017 |
421 |
124 |
S9 mix |
test item concentration [µg/plate] |
mean number revertants/plate |
||||
TA100 |
TA1535 |
E. coli WP2uvrA- |
TA98 |
TA1537 |
||
without |
0 |
106 |
13 |
16 |
14 |
7 |
156 |
113 |
14 |
24 |
12 |
4 |
|
313 |
108 |
11 |
24 |
18 |
5 |
|
625 |
88 |
15 |
21 |
18 |
10 |
|
1250 |
110 |
13 |
20 |
12 |
7 |
|
2500 |
114 |
20 |
18 |
16 |
7 |
|
5000 |
65* |
4* |
18 |
10* |
9* |
|
positive control |
679 |
454 |
188 |
520 |
195 |
|
with |
0 |
112 |
10 |
26 |
26 |
12 |
156 |
109 |
5 |
28 |
21 |
11 |
|
313 |
99 |
8 |
28 |
29 |
10 |
|
625 |
104 |
7 |
30 |
26 |
11 |
|
1250 |
112 |
11 |
36 |
22 |
10 |
|
2500 |
110 |
12 |
33 |
21 |
12 |
|
5000 |
99* |
10* |
37 |
25 |
12 |
|
positive control |
1311 |
276 |
981 |
426 |
132 |
* cytotoxic, reduced bacterial growth
No relevant and reproducible increase in mutant colony numbers/1E06 cells was observed in the main experiments up to the maximum concentration. The induction factor exceeded the threshold of three times the mutation frequency of the corresponding solvent control in the first culture of the first experiment without metabolic activation at 107.5 and 1720µg/mL. However, the increases were neither reproduced nor dose dependent as indicated by the lacking statistical significance. Consequently, the isolated increases of the mutation frequency were judged as biologically irrelevant and based on a relatively low solvent control.
Conc. [mg/L] |
S9 mix |
Rel. CE I (survival) [%] |
Mutant colonies /1E06 cells |
Induction factor |
Rel. CE I (survival) [%] |
Mutant colonies /10E06 cells |
Induction factor |
|
Experiment I, 4 h treatment |
Culture I |
Culture II |
||||||
Solvent control |
--- |
- |
100.0 |
6.2 |
1.0 |
100.0 |
13.7 |
1.0 |
Positive control (EMS) |
150.0 |
- |
80.5 |
87.2 |
14.0 |
88.7 |
121.6 |
8.9 |
Test item |
53.8 |
- |
82.6 |
# |
# |
87.8 |
# |
# |
Test item |
107.5 |
- |
99.0 |
44.0 |
7.1 |
89.3 |
4.5 |
0.3 |
Test item |
215.0 |
- |
86.8 |
15.9 |
2.6 |
94.2 |
12.0 |
0.9 |
Test item |
430.0 |
- |
90.4 |
3.8 |
0.6 |
83.4 |
3.3 |
0.2 |
Test item |
860.0 |
- |
89.5 |
9.1 |
1.5 |
78.4 |
9.5 |
0.7 |
Test item |
1720.0 |
- |
88.8 |
24.1 |
3.9 |
84.6 |
7.7 |
0.6 |
Experiment I, 4 h treatment |
Culture I |
Culture II |
||||||
Solvent control |
--- |
+ |
100.0 |
6.5 |
1.0 |
100.0 |
8.2 |
1.0 |
Positive control (DMBA) |
1.1 |
+ |
84.2 |
872.2 |
133.8 |
91.9 |
759.8 |
92.1 |
Test item |
53.8 |
+ |
92.0 |
# |
# |
94.6 |
# |
# |
Test item |
107.5 |
+ |
93.4 |
6.2 |
0.9 |
92.9 |
14.5 |
1.8 |
Test item |
215.0 |
+ |
91.8 |
8.2 |
1.3 |
95.9 |
7.8 |
0.9 |
Test item |
430.0 |
+ |
89.8 |
14.1 |
2.2 |
90.1 |
6.9 |
0.8 |
Test item |
860.0 |
+ |
91.7 |
5.5 |
0.8 |
92.6 |
7.0 |
0.9 |
Test item |
1720.0 |
+ |
93.3 |
6.0 |
0.9 |
91.9 |
5.5 |
0.7 |
Experiment I, 24 h treatment |
Culture I |
Culture II |
||||||
Solvent control |
--- |
- |
100.0 |
13.7 |
1.0 |
100.0 |
23.1 |
1.0 |
Positive control (EMS) |
150.0 |
- |
95.3 |
746.0 |
54.5 |
95.5 |
540.5 |
23.3 |
Test item |
107.5 |
- |
102.8 |
27.5 |
2.0 |
105.9 |
11.8 |
0.5 |
Test item |
215.0 |
- |
103.5 |
25.6 |
1.9 |
90.4 |
8.8 |
0.4 |
Test item |
430.0 |
- |
35.6 |
10.5 |
0.8 |
36.1 |
9.7 |
0.4 |
Test item |
860.0 |
- |
35.8 |
11.4 |
0.8 |
39.8 |
15.6 |
0.7 |
Test item |
1290.0 |
- |
0.0 |
## |
## |
0.0 |
## |
## |
Test item |
1720.0 |
- |
0.0 |
## |
## |
0.0 |
## |
## |
Experiment I>I, 4 h treatment |
Culture I |
Culture II |
||||||
Solvent control |
--- |
+ |
100.0 |
27.3 |
1.0 |
100.0 |
8.9 |
1.0 |
Positive control (DMBA) |
1.1 |
+ |
95.6 |
649.0 |
23.8 |
94.8 |
756.1 |
85.3 |
Test item |
107.5 |
+ |
102.3 |
# |
# |
97.4 |
# |
# |
Test item |
215.0 |
+ |
97.7 |
16.6 |
0.6 |
97.1 |
14.3 |
1.6 |
Test item |
430.0 |
+ |
96.1 |
19.6 |
0.7 |
94.1 |
17.9 |
2.0 |
Test item |
860.0 |
+ |
98.3 |
14.3 |
0.5 |
92.7 |
20.7 |
2.3 |
Test item |
1290.0 |
+ |
98.3 |
18.7 |
0.7 |
93.3 |
6.4 |
0.7 |
Test item |
1720.0 |
+ |
95.0 |
21.4 |
0.8 |
95.3 |
4.5 |
0.5 |
# culture was not continued since a minimum of only four analysable concentrations is required
## culture was not continued due to exceedingly severe cytotoxic effects
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
For the assessment of the genotoxic potential of Tetrahydrofurfuryl methacrylate (THFMA), an analogue substance of the registered substance (THFA), the following reliable, relevant and adequate studies are available: a reverse gene mutation assay in bacteria, a mammalian cell gene mutation assay (HPRT) and a mammalian cell micronucleus assay.
In a reverse gene mutation assay in bacteria similar to OECD guideline 471, S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and E. coli WP2 strains were exposed to THFMA in DMSO at concentrations of 0, 4.88, 19.5, 78.1, 313, 1250, 5000 µg/plate in the first experiment and 0, 156, 313, 625, 1250, 2500, 5000 µg/plate in the second experiment in the presence and absence of mammalian metabolic activation (S9 mix). THFMA was tested up to limit concentrations (5000 µg/plate).
Cytotoxic effects (reduced bacterial growth) were observed in strains TA98, TA100, TA1535 and TA1537 at 5000 µg/plate without metabolic activation and in strains TA100 and TA1535 at 5000 µg/plate with metabolic activation.
There was no evidence of induced mutant colonies over background.
THFMA was not mutagenic in this bacterial reverse gene mutation assay when tested up to cytotoxic or limit concentrations (5000 µg/plate).
In a mammalian cell gene mutation assay according to OECD guideline 476, adopted 21 July 1997 (HPRT test) and EU Method B.17 dated May 30, 2008, V79 cells cultured in vitro were exposed to Tetrahydrofurfuryl methacrylate (99.0% a.i.) at the following concentrations in the presence and absence of mammalian metabolic activation (S9 mix).
Experiment I (4 h exposure, with and without S9): 53.8, 107.5, 215.0, 430.0, 860.0, 1720.0 µg/mL
Experiment II (24 h exposure, without S9): 107.5, 215.0, 430.0, 860.0, 1290.0, 1720.0 µg/mL
Experiment II (4 h exposure, with S9): 107.5, 215.0, 430.0, 860.0, 1290.0, 1720.0 µg/mL
The test item was tested up to cytotoxic or the guideline limit concentration of 10 mM (corresponding to 1720.0 µg/mL). The positive controls induced the appropriate response.
No relevant and reproducible increase in mutant colony numbers/1E6 cells was observed in the main experiments up to the maximum concentration. The induction factor exceeded the threshold of three times the mutation frequency of the corresponding solvent control in the first culture of the first experiment without metabolic activation at 107.5 and 1720µg/mL. However, the increases were neither reproduced nor dose dependent as indicated by the lacking statistical significance. Consequently, the isolated increases of the mutation frequency were judged as biologically irrelevant and based on a relatively low solvent control.
There was no evidence of induced mutant colonies over background. In this HPRT test, Tetrahydrofurfuryl methacrylate was found to be not mutagenic.
In a mammalian cell micronucleus assay according to OECD guideline 487 (adopted July 22, 2010) and EU method B.49, dated July 06, 2012, primary human lymphocyte cultures were exposed to Tetrahydrofurfuryl methacrylate (99.0%) in DMSO with and without metabolic activation (S9 mix).
The following concentrations were evaluated (calculations were not adjusted to purity):
Experiment I:
4 h exposure, 16 h recovery, fixation time 40 h, without S9: 555.1, 971.4, 1700.0 µg/mL
4 h exposure, 16 h recovery, fixation time 40 h, with S9: 555.1, 971.4, 1700.0 µg/mL
Experiment II:
20 h exposure, fixation time 40 h, without S9: 317.2, 555.1, 971.4 µg/mL
4 h exposure, 16 h recovery, fixation time 40 h, with S9: 555.1, 971.4, 1700.0 µg/mL
The test item was tested up to cytotoxic or the guideline limit concentration of 10 mM (corresponding to 1700.0 µg/mL). No cytotoxicity was observed in Experiment I with and without metabolic activation as well as in Experiment II with metabolic activation. In Experiment II in the absence of S9 mix the highest applied concentration showing clear cytotoxic effects was not evaluable.
In both independent experiments, neither a statistically significant nor a biologically relevant increase in the number of micronucleated cells was observed after treatment with the test item.
Positive controls induced the appropriate response.
There was no evidence of micronucleated cells induced over background. Therefore, Tetrahydrofurfuryl methacrylate is considered to be non-clastogenic in this in vitro micronucleus test, when tested up to cytotoxic or the guideline limit concentration.
There are no data gaps for the endpoint genotoxicity. No human information is available for this endpoint. However, there is no reason to believe that these results would not be applicable to humans.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the available data, the registered substance (THFA) does not need to be classified for mutagenicity according to the criteria given in regulation (EC) 1272/2008
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.