Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 944-817-9 | CAS number: 244626-73-1
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicity to microorganisms
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to microorganisms
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- From June 19th to June 21st 2012
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Remarks:
- This study was performed according to ISO Guideline 10712 (1995) without GLP statement as this study was originally conducted by R&D department to increase knowledge on the fate of the substance, not related to registration purposes. Minor deviation was observed but all validity criteria were fullfiled and this study is well documented.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: ISO 10712 (1995)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- . Maximum temperature during 16 hour's incubation was 24.4°C which is 0.4°C higher than the target temperature range of 23 +/- 1°C.
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Not applicable
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Remarks:
- This study was originally conducted by R&D department to increase knowledge on the fate of the substance, not related to registration purposes.
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- No additional information
- Analytical monitoring:
- no
- Details on sampling:
- Not applicable
- Vehicle:
- no
- Details on test solutions:
- PREPARATION AND APPLICATION OF TEST SOLUTION (especially for difficult test substances)
- Method: The test item is of low water solubility. Therefore, water accommodated fractions (WAF) were performed. The following loading rates were prepared with bi-distilled water: 10, 2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.1 and 0.05 mg/L. The two highest loading rates (10 and 2.5 mg/L) were prepared by direct addition of the test item to bi-distilled water: for the loading rate of 10 mg/L, 10 mg of the test item was diluted to 1 L of bi-distilled water; for the loading rate of 2.5 mg/L, 5 mg of the test item was diluted to 2 L of bi-distilled water. For the preparation of the four lower loading rates (1, 0.5, 0.1 and 0.05 mg/L), the WAF with the loading rate of 2.5 mg/L was diluted because it was technically not possible weight lower amounts of the test item than 4 mg and to stir much higher volumes of bi-distilled water. The WAFs were stirred for 24 hours followed by a sedimentation period of 30 minutes. The test solution was taken out from the middle of the liquid with a pipette.
- Eluate: bi-distilled water
- Controls: The controls were prepared by adding 20 mL bi-distilled water, 2.5 mL 10-fold concentrated exposure medium and 2.5 mL of the diluted pre-culture bacteria suspension. In addition, blanks have been prepared without bacteria for the loading rates 10, 2.5 and 1 mg/L. Instead of the bacterial inoculumsuspension growth medium was added.
- Evidence of undissolved material (e.g. precipitate, surface film, etc): The loading rate of 10 mg/L was slightly whitely and turbid. At the end of the sedimentation period, very small white flakes could be observed on the ground of the bottle and an oily film remained on the surface of the liquid. With the loading rate of 2.5 mg/L, the liquid was uncoloured and clear. - Test organisms (species):
- Pseudomonas putida
- Details on inoculum:
- Pseudomonas putida is a non pathogenic gram-negative, saprophytic, free living bacterium in soil or water where it plays an important role in decomposition, biodegradation, and the carbon and nitrogen cycles. The optimum growth temperature is between 25 and 30°C.
Pseudomonas putida, MIGULA strain Berlin 33/2 (SSM 50026) was obtained from the German Collection of Microorganisms (DSMZ - Deutsche Stammsammlung für Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen GmbH, Braunschweig) on April 4th, 2006. A working culture was prepared at May 3rd, 2006, which was kept at -80°C deep-frozen till test performance.
Preparation of the pre-culture and the inoculum: about 5 hours before starting the test a pre-culture with a starting concentration of 50 FNU (Formazine Nephelometric Units) was prepared with the permanent working suspension and incubated at 23.5-24.4°C in a tempered water-bath shaker in the dark. At the end of the pre-culture period an optical density of the pre-culture of 0.594 corresponding to 258 FNU at 436 nm was measured. The pre-culture was diluted to obtain an optical density corresponding to 50 FNU. - Test type:
- static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 16 h
- Remarks on exposure duration:
- none
- Post exposure observation period:
- none
- Hardness:
- No data
- Test temperature:
- 23.9-24.4°C
- pH:
- At the start of the experiment, pH of the test and control solutions is 7.0. With the higher loading rates pH increased up to 8.0.
- Dissolved oxygen:
- No data
- Salinity:
- Not applicable
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- - Nominal concentrations: loading rates 10, 2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.1 and 0.05 mg/L.
- Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Test vessel: Erlenmeyer flasks
- Material, size, headspace, fill volume: each test vessel and the control vessels contained 25 mL of the test solution.
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): 3
- No. of vessels per control (replicates): 4
- No. of vessels per vehicle control (replicates): not applicable
TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
See "stock solutions" in "Any other information on materials and methods incl. tables".
The preculture medium is made up adding 25 mL of each of solution 1 and 3 and 50 mL of solution 4 to 900 mL sterilized water.
The exposure medium consists of 25 mL of each of solutions 2 and 3 and 50 mL of solution 4 in 900 mL sterilized water.
OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
The vessels were kept for 16 h +/- 1 h in a water-bath shaker at 23.9-24.4°C in the dark. At the end of the incubation period the optical density of the cell suspension was measured photometric at 436 nm vs. growth medium. The measured optical density was converted into FNU. The pH was determined at the end of the experiment.
The photometer used was calibrated with formazine solution according to ISO 7027 for converting the E 436 nm to FNU. Only E 436 < 0.4 were used for correlation. The following correlation was determined: FNU = E 436 / 0.0023 with r² = 0.999.
EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED (with observation intervals if applicable) : For each test vessel, the inhibition of cell growth in comparison to the control is calculated according to the following formula:
Inhibition (sample) [%] = [(FNU control at 16h - FNU sample at 16h) / (FNU control at 16h - FNU control at 0h)] * 100 - Reference substance (positive control):
- yes
- Remarks:
- 3,5-dichlorophenol
- Key result
- Duration:
- 16 h
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 10 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth inhibition
- Details on results:
- None of the loading rates tested between 10 mg/L and 0.05 mg/L resulted in an inhibition of bacterial growth.
No turbidity occurred and no increased extinction with the blanks could be measured.
Maximum growth promotion was 10.4% with the middle concentratio of 1 mg/L.
See table 6.1.7/1 in "Any other information on results incl. tables". - Results with reference substance (positive control):
- - Results with reference substance valid? yes
- Relevant effect levels: 16h-EC50 = 29.7 mg/L. The target range should be between 10 and 30 mg/L. - Reported statistics and error estimates:
- None
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- 16h-NOEC = 10 mg/L. None of the loading rates tested between 10 mg/L and 0.05 mg/L resulted in an inhibition of bacterial growth.
- Executive summary:
This study was performed according to ISO Guideline 10712 (1995) without GLP statement, to determine the inhibition of the growth of the bacterium Pseudomonas putida during a period of 16 hours of exposure of the test item HYD006. This study was originally conducted by R&D department to increase knowledge on the fate of the substance, not related to registration purposes.
Due to the low water solubility of the test item, water accommodated fractions (WAF) were performed with stirring times of 24 hours and a subsequent sedimentation period of 30 minutes. The following loading rates were prepared with bi-distilled water: 10, 2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.1 and 0.05 mg/L. These loading rates were inclubated with a defined starting concentration of the bacteria measured photometric as optical density at 436 nm of the suspension. One control was performed without test item and other controls were performed without bacteria for the loading rates 10, 2.5 and 1 mg/L. The decrease of optical density compared to a control without test item is calculated as %-inhibition of cell growth.
The loading rate of 10 mg/L was slightly whitely and turbid. At the end of the sedimentation period, very small white flakes could be observed on the ground of the bottle and an oily film remained on the surface of the liquid. With the loading rate of 2.5 mg/L, the liquid was uncoloured and clear.
None of the loading rates tested between 10 mg/L and 0.05 mg/L resulted in an inhibition of bacterial growth. Maximum growth promotion was 10.4% with the middle concentration of 1 mg/L.
In conclusion, it seems that the 16h-NOEC is equivalent to 10 mg/L of the test item.
Reference
Table 6.1.7/1: FNU (Formazine Nephelometric Units) for the controls and the replicates of the six different test concentrations
Concentrations (mg/L) |
Repl. |
Ext. 436 nm |
FNU |
Inhibition (%) |
Mean Inhibition (%) |
Relative standard deviation (%) |
Control, 0h |
0.01 |
4 |
- |
- |
- |
|
Control, 16h |
1 2 3 4 |
1.102 1.071 1.234 1.040 |
479 466 537 452 |
- |
- |
- |
0.05 |
1 2 3 |
1.109 1.113 1.091 |
482 484 474 |
0.2 -0.1 1.9 |
0.7 |
158.0 |
0.1 |
1 2 3 |
1.215 1.190 1.215 |
528 517 528 |
-9.4 -7.1 -9.4 |
-8.6 |
-15.2 |
0.5 |
1 2 3 |
1.131 1.184 1.189 |
492 515 517 |
-1.7 -6.6 -7.0 |
-5.1 |
-57.1 |
1.0 |
1 2 3 |
1.231 1.224 1.225 |
535 532 533 |
-10.8 -10.2 -10.3 |
-10.4 |
-3.3 |
2.5 |
1 2 3 |
1.121 1.114 1.051 |
487 484 457 |
-0.8 -0.2 5.5 |
1.5 |
234.8 |
10 |
1 2 3 |
1.150 1.111 1.097 |
500 483 477 |
-3.5 0.1 1.3 |
-0.7 |
-362.2 |
Description of key information
ISO Guideline 10712, non GLP, key study, validity 2:
16h-NOEC (Pseudomonas putida) = 10 mg/L;
The test substance is non-toxic for the bacterium Pseudomonas putida up to 10 mg/L.
OECD Guideline 301D, non GLP, Supporting study, validity 2:
Toxic effect observed in activated sludge micro-organisms up to 84 days at the tested concentration of 2 mg/L.
The estimated NOEC can be expected at 1.0 mg/L (by dividing the toxic concentration by 2). To consider a worst case scenario, this NOEC is used for chemical safety assessment.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- EC10 or NOEC for microorganisms:
- 1 mg/L
Additional information
One key study is available to assess the toxicity of the registered substance to micro-organisms. This study was performed, according to ISO Guideline 10712 (1995) without GLP statement, to determine the inhibition of the growth of the bacterium Pseudomonas putida during a period of 16 hours of exposure of the registered substance. This study was originally conducted by R&D department to increase knowledge on the fate of the substance, not related to registration purposes. Due to the low water solubility of the test substance, water accommodated fractions (WAF) were performed with stirring times of 24 hours and a subsequent sedimentation period of 30 minutes. The following concentrations were prepared with bi-distilled water: 10, 2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.1 and 0.05 mg/L. These concentrations were incubated with a defined starting concentration of the bacteria measured photometrically as optical density of the suspension at a wavelength of 436 nm. One control was performed without test item and other controls were performed without bacteria for the concentrartions 10, 2.5 and 1 mg/L. The decrease of optical density compared to a control without test item is calculated as %-inhibition of cell growth. The concentration of 10 mg/L was observed to be slightly white and turbid. At the end of the sedimentation period, very small white flakes could be observed at the bottom of the bottle and an oily film remained on the surface of the test solution. With the concentration of 2.5 mg/L, the liquid was colourless and clear. None of the concentrations tested between 10 mg/L and 0.05 mg/L resulted in an inhibition of bacterial growth. Maximum growth promotion was 10.4% with the middle concentration of 1 mg/L. In conclusion, it seems that the 16h-NOEC is equivalent to 10 mg/L of the test item, the highest concentration tested.
However, considering the toxicity effect observed in the biodegradation studies mentioned in the present dossier, the toxic effect observed in activated sludge micro-organisms up to 84 days at the tested concentration of 2 mg/L (AkzoNobel (2012) OECD 301D study) is considered relevant for chemical safety assessment. Therefore, the estimated NOEC for the toxicity to STP micro-organisms can be expected at 1.0 mg/L (by dividing the toxic concentration by 2). This worst case value is used for the chemical safety assessment.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.