Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 236-244-1 | CAS number: 13254-34-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Toxicological Summary
- Administrative data
- Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
- Workers - Hazard via dermal route
- Workers - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - workers
- General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
- General Population - Hazard via dermal route
- General Population - Hazard via oral route
- General Population - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - General Population
Administrative data
Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 4.02 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 50
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 228 mg/kg bw/day
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 201 mg/m³
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
Exposure via the oral route is considered a more appropriate route of exposure than inhalation as the physical chemical properties such as physical state (liquid at room temperature and pressure) and vapour pressure indicate that exposure via inhalation is unlikely. Thus, testing via the oral route was suitable for classification and risk assessment.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- the dose-response relationship is judged reliable
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 1
- Justification:
- extrapolation from a reproductive study to chronic study exposure
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- not applicable for inhalation
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- accounts for toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic differences
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- accounts for extrapolation to humans in the worker environment
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- use of the default assessment factor since the starting point of the DNEL calculation was the NOAEL
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- no remaining uncertainties exist
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 16.08 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 12.5
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 228 mg/kg bw/day
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 201 mg/m³
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
Exposure via the oral route is considered a more appropriate route of exposure than inhalation as the physical chemical properties such as physical state (liquid at room temperature and pressure) and vapour pressure indicate that exposure via inhalation is unlikely. Thus, testing via the oral route was suitable for classification and risk assessment.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- the dose response relationship is judged reliable
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- not applicable for inhalation
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- accounts for toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic differences
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- accounts for extrapolation to human in the worker environment
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- use of the default assessment factor since the starting point of the DNEL calculation was the NOAEL
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- no remaining uncertainties exist
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 10.05 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 20
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 201 mg/m³
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- the dose response relationship is judged reliable
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 4
- Justification:
- extrapolation from reproductive/developmental study to chronic study exposure
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- not applicable for inhalation
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 1
- Justification:
- accounts for toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic differences
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- accounts for extrapolation to human in the worker environment
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- use of the default assessment factor since the starting point of the DNEL calculation was the NOAEL
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- no remaining uncertainties exist
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 40.2 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 5
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 201 mg/m³
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- the dose response relationship is judged reliable
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- not applicable for inhalation
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 1
- Justification:
- accounts for toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic differences
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- accounts for extrapolation to human in the worker environment
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- use of the default assessment factor since the starting point of the DNEL calculation was the NOAEL
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- no remaining uncertainties exist
Workers - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 1.14 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 200
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 228 mg/kg bw/day
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- the dose response relationship is judged reliable
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 4
- Justification:
- extrapolation from reproductive/developmental study to chronic study exposure
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- account for allometric scaling from rats
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- accounts for remaining interspecies differences
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- accounts for extrapolation to human in the worker environment
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- default assessment factor applied since starting point for DNEL calculation is NOAEL
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- no remaining uncertainties exist
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 4.56 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- skin irritation/corrosion
- Route of original study:
- Dermal
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 50
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 228 mg/kg bw/day
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- the dose response relationship is judged reliable
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- extrapolation from reproductive/developmental study to chronic study exposure
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- accounts for remaining interspecies differences
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- accounts for extrapolation to human in the worker environment
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- default assessment factor applied since starting point for DNEL calculation is NOAEL
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- no remaining uncertainties exist
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 2.85 mg/cm²
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- skin irritation/corrosion
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 80
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- the dose response relationship is judged reliable
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 4
- Justification:
- extrapolation from reproductive/developmental study to chronic study exposure
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- extrapolation from reproductive/developmental study to chronic study exposure
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 1
- Justification:
- accounts for remaining interspecies differences
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- accounts for extrapolation to human in the worker environment
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- default assessment factor applied since starting point for DNEL calculation is NOAEL
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- no remaining uncertainties exist
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 11.4 mg/cm²
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- skin irritation/corrosion
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 20
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- the dose response relationship is judged reliable
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- extrapolation from reproductive/developmental study to chronic study exposure
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 1
- Justification:
- accounts for remaining interspecies differences
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- accounts for extrapolation to human in the worker environment
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- default assessment factor applied since starting point for DNEL calculation is NOAEL
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- no remaining uncertainties exist
Workers - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- low hazard (no threshold derived)
Additional information - workers
To reduce the potential for skin and/or eye irritation, workers should wear personal protective equipment (impervious gloves, eye protection for example) appropriate for the tasks they will perform.
General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.99 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 100
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 228 mg/kg bw/day
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 99.13 mg/m³
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
Exposure via the oral route is considered a more appropriate route of exposure than inhalation as the physical chemical properties such as physical state (liquid at room temperature and pressure) and vapour pressure indicate exposure via inhalation is unlikely. Therefore, testing via the oral route was suitable for classification and risk assessment.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- dose-response relationship is judged reliable
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 4
- Justification:
- extrapolation from reproductive/developmental study to chronic study exposure duration
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- not applicable for inhalation exposures
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic remaining differences
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- accounts for extrapolation to human general population
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- default assessment factor when NOAEL is used as starting point for DNEL calculation
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- no remaining uncertainties exist
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 3.97 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 25
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 228 mg/kg bw/day
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 99.13 mg/m³
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
Exposure via the oral route is considered a more appropriate route of exposure than inhalation as the physical chemical properties such as physical state (liquid at room temperature and pressure) and vapour pressure indicate exposure via inhalation is unlikely. Therefore, testing via the oral route was suitable for classification and risk assessment.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- dose-response relationship is judged reliable
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- not applicable for inhalation exposures
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic remaining differences
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- accounts for extrapolation to human general population
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- default assessment factor when NOAEL is used as starting point for DNEL calculation
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- no remaining uncertainties exist
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 2.48 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 40
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 99.13 mg/m³
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- dose-response relationship is judged reliable
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 4
- Justification:
- extrapolation from reproductive/developmental study to chronic study exposure duration
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- not applicable for inhalation exposures
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 1
- Justification:
- toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic remaining differences
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- accounts for extrapolation to human general population
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- default assessment factor when NOAEL is used as starting point for DNEL calculation
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- no remaining uncertainties exist
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 9.91 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 10
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 99.13 mg/m³
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- dose-response relationship is judged reliable
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- not applicable for inhalation exposures
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 1
- Justification:
- toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic remaining differences
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- accounts for extrapolation to human general population
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- default assessment factor when NOAEL is used as starting point for DNEL calculation
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- no remaining uncertainties exist
General Population - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.57 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 400
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 228 mg/kg bw/day
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- dose response relationship is judged reliable
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 4
- Justification:
- extrapolation from reproductive/developmental study to chronic study exposure
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- accounts for allometric scaling from rats
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic remaining differences
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- accounts for extrapolation to general human population
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- default assessment factor if starting point of DNEL calculation is NOAEL
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- no remaining uncertainties exist
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- low hazard (no threshold derived)
- Value:
- 2.28 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 100
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- dose response relationship is judged reliable
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- accounts for allometric scaling from rats
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic remaining differences
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- accounts for extrapolation to general human population
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- default assessment factor if starting point of DNEL calculation is NOAEL
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- no remaining uncertainties exist
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 1.43 mg/cm²
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 160
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- dose response relationship is judged reliable
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 4
- Justification:
- extrapolation from reproductive/developmental study to chronic study exposure
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- accounts for allometric scaling from rats
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 1
- Justification:
- toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic remaining differences
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- accounts for extrapolation to general human population
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- default assessment factor if starting point of DNEL calculation is NOAEL
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- no remaining uncertainties exist
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 5.7 mg/cm²
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 40
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- dose response relationship is judged reliable
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- accounts for allometric scaling from rats
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 1
- Justification:
- toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic remaining differences
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- accounts for extrapolation to general human population
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- default assessment factor if starting point of DNEL calculation is NOAEL
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- no remaining uncertainties exist
General Population - Hazard via oral route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.57 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 400
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 228 mg/kg bw/day
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- dose response relationship is judged reliable
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 4
- Justification:
- extrapolation from reproductive/developmental study to chronic study exposure
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- accounts for allometric scaling from rat
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic remaining differences accounted for here
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- accounts for extrapolation to the human general population
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- default assessment factor when DNEL is calculated using NOAEL as starting point
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- no remaining uncertainties exist
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 2.28 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 100
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- dose response relationship is judged reliable
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- accounts for allometric scaling from rat
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic remaining differences accounted for here
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- accounts for extrapolation to the human general population
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- default assessment factor when DNEL is calculated using NOAEL as starting point
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- no remaining uncertainties exist
General Population - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- low hazard (no threshold derived)
Additional information - General Population
No additional information for the general population.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

EU Privacy Disclaimer
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our websites.