Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 939-875-7 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Justification for type of information:
- QSAR prediction: migrated from IUCLID 5.6
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 013
- Report date:
- 2013
Materials and methods
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Several computational tools are nowadays available for applying in silico approaches. Among them, for QSAR predictions the following were selected and used:
- ACD/Percepta for the prediction of acute oral toxicity, skin and eye irritation, gene mutation (Ames test), micronucleus in vivo (rodent), carcinogenicity rat and mouse composite, acute aquatic toxicity (Daphnia), octanol-water partition coefficient (logKow)
- Leadscope for the prediction of gene mutation (Ames test), chromosome aberration in vivo (rat and other rodent), micronucleus in vivo (mouse and rodent), carcinogenicity mouse and rat composite.
- Toxtree for the prediction of skin and eye irritation, skin sensitization, gene mutation (Ames test), micronucleus in vivo (rodent) and biodegradation (ready)
- Vega for the prediction of skin sensitization - GLP compliance:
- no
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 1-(4-(2-(benzyloxy)ethoxy)phenyl)-1,2-diphenylbutane-1,4-diol
- EC Number:
- 939-875-7
- Molecular formula:
- C31H32O4
- IUPAC Name:
- 1-(4-(2-(benzyloxy)ethoxy)phenyl)-1,2-diphenylbutane-1,4-diol
Constituent 1
Method
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- not specified
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not specified
- Metabolic activation:
- not specified
Results and discussion
Test results
- Species / strain:
- not specified
- Metabolic activation:
- not specified
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not determined
Any other information on results incl. tables
ACD/Percepta
ACD/Percepta genotoxicity predicted 1-(4-(2-(benzyloxy)ethoxy)phenyl)-1,2-diphenylbutane-1,4-diol negative, being its probability of being positive for the Ames test equal to 0.13. The prediction is provided together with a reliability index ranging from 0 to 1, which serves as an evaluation of whether a submitted compound falls within the Model Applicability Domain. Estimation of the RI takes into account the following two aspects: similarity of the tested compound to the training set and the consistency of experimental values for similar compounds. If the RI is less than 0.3 the prediction has to be considered not reliable while if RI is equal to or more than 0.5 the prediction results reliable. In this case, the reliability index takes value equal to 0.17 and therefore the prediction has to be considered not reliable.
Leadscope Model Applier
Leadscope FDA Model Applier predicted 1-(4-(2-(benzyloxy)ethoxy)phenyl)-1,2-diphenylbutane-1,4-diol negative, being the positive prediction probability equal to 0.05 and therefore under 0.5. The reliability of the prediction is evaluated by two parameters:
Model Fragment Count. Parameter used to verify that the test compound contains a significant number of fragments that are present in the prediction model. The prediction is reliable if at least one model fragment is present in the test compound.
30% Similarity Training Neighbours Count. Number of compound structurally similar to the test compound.
In the case of 1-(4-(2-(benzyloxy)ethoxy)phenyl)-1,2-diphenylbutane-1,4-diol, the prediction is reliable since the model fragment count is equal to 21, meaning that 1-(4-(2-(benzyloxy)ethoxy)phenyl)-1,2 -diphenylbutane-1,4-diol is well described by the model, and 5 training structures were identified being similar to 1-(4-(2-(benzyloxy)ethoxy)phenyl)-1,2-diphenylbutane-1,4-diol. The similar training structures exhibit a little similarity with 1-(4-(2-(benzyloxy)ethoxy)phenyl)-1,2-diphenylbutane-1,4-diol, being the reason of the moderate reliability of the prediction. Among the similar training structures, the mostly similar ones, i.e. Bisoprolol and Bosentan, are characterized by consistent experimental data, being all of them negative to Ames test.
Vega
Vega assess the reliability of the gene mutation prediction according to many parameters, e.g. descriptor ranges, chemical similarity index, fragments similarity, ...Vega predicted 1-(4-(2-(benzyloxy)ethoxy)phenyl)-1,2-diphenylbutane-1,4-diol as negative. The prediction is considered reliable, since, despite only moderately similar compounds are found in the training, their experimental values agree with the predicted value; the accuracy of prediction for similar molecules found in the training set is good; all atom centered fragment of the compound have been found in the compounds of the training set and 1-(4-(2-(benzyloxy)ethoxy)phenyl)-1,2-diphenylbutane-1,4-diol has values inside the descriptor range of the compounds of the training set.
Toxtree
Toxtree predicts the positive or negative mutagenicity according to decision rules based on the identification of Structural Alerts (SA) for mutagenicity, i.e. molecular functional groups or substructures known to be linked to the mutagenicity activity of chemicals. As one or more SAs embedded in a molecular structure are recognised, the system flags the potential mutagenicity of the chemical. Toxtree did not identify any structural alert for genotoxicity for 1-(4-(2-(benzyloxy)ethoxy)phenyl)-1,2-diphenylbutane-1,4-diol, concluding that 1-(4-(2-(benzyloxy)ethoxy)phenyl)-1,2-diphenylbutane-1,4-diol is negative on Ames test.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative
The gene mutation of 1-(4-(2-(benzyloxy)ethoxy)phenyl)-1,2-diphenylbutane-1,4-diol was predicted employing four in silico approaches: QSAR model as provided by ACD/Percepta, Leadscope Model applier and Vega and a decision rule system as provided by Toxtree. The different predictors were employed in order to apply a consensus analysis to enhance the reliability of the prediction. In the consensus assessment only reliable predictions were taken into account. The two reliable QSAR predictions, i.e. Leadscope Model Applier and Vega, both agreed predicting 1-(4-(2-(benzyloxy)ethoxy)phenyl)-1,2-diphenylbutane-1,4-diol negative for Ames test gene mutation. In addition, Toxtree decision rule system did not identify any structural alert. Thus, it is concluded that 1-(4-(2-(benzyloxy)ethoxy)phenyl)-1,2-diphenylbutane-1,4-diol is NEGATIVE on Ames test.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.