Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 405-290-6 | CAS number: 12036-37-2
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 14 February 1989 - 3 March 1989
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Read across to similar substance. Study conducted to GLP in compliance with agreed protocols, with no or minor deviations from standard test guidelines and/or minor methodological deficiencies, which do not affect the quality of the relevant results.
- Justification for type of information:
- See read-across justification in Section 13.
Cross-reference
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- other: Target substance
Reference
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Study conducted on read across material
- Justification for type of information:
- See read-across justification in Section 13.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium, other: TA 1535, TA100, TA 1537, TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Report date:
- 1989
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Automatically generated during migration to IUCLID 6, no data available
- IUPAC Name:
- Automatically generated during migration to IUCLID 6, no data available
- Test material form:
- solid: particulate/powder
- Remarks:
- migrated information: powder
- Details on test material:
- Description: White powder
Constituent 1
Method
- Target gene:
- S. typhimurium: Histidine locus
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium, other: TA1535, TA100, TA1537, TA1538 and TA98
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- other: TA1535 and TA100 are sensitive to agents inducing base-pair substitutions. TA1537, TA1538 and TA98 are sensitive to agents inducing frame-shift mutations.
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9. Prepared from the livers of male Sprague-Dawley rats that had each recieved a single i.p. injection of Aroclor 1254 at 500 mg/kg 5 days before S9 preparation.
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Experiment 1 ± S9: 0, 8, 40, 200, 1000, 5000 µg/plate
Experiment 2 ± S9: 0, 312.5, 625, 1250, 2500, 5000 µg/plate - Vehicle / solvent:
- The test material was accurately weighed and dissolved in sterile distilled water and appropriate dilutions made.
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Remarks:
- A solvent treatment group was used as the negative control
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: N-Methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (MNNG); 9-Aminoacridine (9AA); 4-Nitro-O-phenylenediamine (4NOPD) and 2-Aminoanthracene (2AA)
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- Test Procedure
a) Preliminary Toxicity Study
In order to select appropriate dose levels for use in the main study, a preliminary test was carried out to determine the toxicity of the test material to the tester organisms. 0.1 mL of bacterial suspension (TA100) and 0.L ml of test solution were added to 2 mL of molten, trace histidine supplemented media (histidine/biotin & top agar) and overlayed onto sterile plates of Vogel-Bonner agar (minimal agar - 25 mL/ plate). Five doses of the test compound and a solvent control (distilled water) were tested in duplicate. After 48 - 72 hours incubation the plates were scored for revertant colonies and examined for a thinning of the background lawn.
b) Mutation Study
EXPERIMENT 1
Five concentrations of the test material were assayed in triplicate against each tester strain, using the direct plate incorporation method in accordance with the standards for mutagenicity tests using microorganisms.
Test Material and Negative Controls
0.1 mL of the appropriately diluted test material or negative control solution was placed in sets of sterile test tubes containing 2.0 mL of molten, trace histidine supplemented, top agar at 45°C. These sets comprised of two test tubes for each bacterial tester strain. A 0.1 mL aliquot of one of the bacterial suspensions was also added to each of the two test tubes. Into one of the test tubes was placed 0.5 mL of the S9 liver microsome mix; in the other tube 0.5 mL of pH 7.4 buffer was added. This procedure was repeated, in triplicate, for each bacterial strain and for each concentration of test material.
Positive Controls
Without Activation
0.1 mL of one of the positive control solutions (MNNG, 9AA, or 4NOPD) was added to a test tube containing 2.0 mL of molten, trace histidine supplemented, top agar. 0.1 mL of the appropriate bacterial suspension and 0.5 mL of pH 7.4 buffer was also added to the test tube. This procedure was then repeated, in triplicate, for each of the positive controls.
With Activation
0.1 mL of 2AA solution was added to a test tube containing 2.0 mL of molten, trace histidine supplemented, top agar. 0.1 mL of one of the test bacterial suspensions and 0.5 mL of S9 mix were also added to the test tube. The procedure was then repeated, in triplicate, for each tester strain.
The contents of each test tube were equally distributed onto the surface of Vogel-Bonner agar plates (one tube per plate). These plates were incubated at 37°C for at least 48 hours and the number of revertant colonies counted.
EXPERIMENT 2
The complete experiment was repeated using fresh bacterial cultures, test material and control solutions. - Statistics:
- For a substance to be considered positive in this test system, it should have induced a dose-related and statistically significant increase in mutation rate (of at least twice the spontaneous reversion rate) in one or more strains of bacteria in the presence and/or absence of the S9 microsomal enzymes in both experiments. To be considered negative the number of induced revertants compared to spontaneous revertants should be less than twofold at each dose level employed, the intervals of which should be between 2 and 5 fold and extend to the limits imposed by toxicity, solubility or up to the maximum recommended dose of 5000 µg/plate. In this case the limiting factor was the maximum recommended dose.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium, other: TA1535, TA100, TA1537, TA1538 and TA98
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- a) Preliminary Toxicity Study
The dose range of Substance 1658/5 used in the preliminary toxicity study was 0, 312.5, 625, 1250, 2500 and 5000 µg/plate. The test material was nontoxic in the strain of Salmonella used (TA100).
b) Mutation Study
Checks were done on viability and spontaneous reversion rate for each tester strain. The overnight culture of each strain was found to be in the required range of 10^7 – 10^9 bacteria per mL and the spontaneous reversion rate for each was found to be within the expected range.
No toxicity was exhibited to any of the strains of Salmonella used.
No significant increases in the numbers of revertant colonies of bacteria were recorded for any of the strains of Salmonella, at any dose level used, either with or without metabolic activation.
The positive control substances all produced marked increases in the number of revertant colonies and the activity of the S9 fraction was found to be satisfactory. - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Experiment 1
Mutation Study Mean and Individual Plate Counts for Test Material and Negative Controls
Strain of Salmonella typhimurium |
Concentration (µg/plate) |
Metabolic Activation |
Mean Number of Revertants |
TA1535 |
5000 1000 200 40 8 0
5000 1000 200 40 8 0 |
- - - - - -
+ + + + + + |
14 18 13 15 20 15
11 12 13 15 10 13 |
TA1537 |
5000 1000 200 40 8 0
5000 1000 200 40 8 0 |
- - - - - -
+ + + + + + |
6 4 3 3 6 5
9 8 9 10 7 9 |
TA1538 |
5000 1000 200 40 8 0
5000 1000 200 40 8 0 |
- - - - - -
+ + + + + + |
8 13 11 9 8 11
16 18 14 19 20 18 |
TA98 |
5000 1000 200 40 8 0
5000 1000 200 40 8 0 |
- - - - - -
+ + + + + + |
17 23 15 17 19 20
25 29 20 26 21 28 |
TA100 |
5000 1000 200 40 8 0
5000 1000 200 40 8 0 |
- - - - - -
+ + + + + + |
85 84 95 89 93 98
94 93 102 104 102 85 |
Experiment 2
Mutation Study Mean and Individual Plate Counts for Test Material and Negative Controls
Strain of Salmonella typhimurium |
Concentration (µg/plate) |
Metabolic Activation |
Mean Number of Revertants |
TA1535 |
5000 2500 1250 625 312.5 0
5000 2500 1250 625 312.5 0 |
- - - - - -
+ + + + + + |
11 11 13 10 10 10
15 10 12 13 17 13 |
TA1537 |
5000 2500 1250 625 312.5 0
5000 2500 1250 625 312.5 0 |
- - - - - -
+ + + + + + |
7 8 8 7 5 8
9 11 8 8 9 11 |
TA1538 |
5000 2500 1250 625 312.5 0
5000 2500 1250 625 312.5 0 |
- - - - - -
+ + + + + + |
10 8 9 13 14 13
14 10 13 11 11 15 |
TA98 |
5000 2500 1250 625 312.5 0
5000 2500 1250 625 312.5 0 |
- - - - - -
+ + + + + + |
17 15 16 16 15 20
23 25 24 24 21 26 |
TA100 |
5000 2500 1250 625 312.5 0
5000 2500 1250 625 312.5 0 |
- - - - - -
+ + + + + + |
87 74 72 82 88 81
93 85 93 90 86 94 |
Positive Controls
Experiment 1
Mean and Individual Plate Counts for Concurrent Positive Controls
Strain of Salmonella typhimurium |
Test Material |
Concentration (µg/plate) |
Metabolic Activation |
Mean Number of Revertants |
TA1535 TA1537 TA1538 TA98 TA100 TA1535 TA1537 TA1538 TA98 TA100 |
MNNG 9AA 4NOPD 4NOPD MNNG 2AA 2AA 2AA 2AA 2AA |
2 50 10 10 2 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 |
- - - - - + + + + + |
45 316 655 751 519 65 41 241 551 970 |
Experiment 2
Mean and Individual Plate Counts for Concurrent Positive Controls
Strain of Salmonella typhimurium |
Test Material |
Concentration (µg/plate) |
Metabolic Activation |
Mean Number of Revertants |
TA1535 TA1537 TA1538 TA98 TA100 TA1535 TA1537 TA1538 TA98 TA100 |
MNNG 9AA 4NOPD 4NOPD MNNG 2AA 2AA 2AA 2AA 2AA |
2 50 10 10 2 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 |
- - - - - + + + + + |
103 401 509 678 394 124 219 335 375 558 |
REFERENCES
Ames, B.N., Durston, W.E., Yamasaki, E., and Lee, F.D. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA (1970), 70, 2285
Ames, B.N., McCann, J. and Yamasaki, E., Mutation Research (1975), 31, 347.
McCann, J., Coi, E., Yamasaki, E., and Ames, B.N. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA (1975) 75, 5135.
Garner, R.C., Miller, E.C., and Miller, J.A. Cancer Res. (1972), 33, 2058.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative
The test material was found to be non-mutagenic under the conditions of this test. - Executive summary:
The test material, SUBSTANCE 1658/5, was found to be non-mutagenic under the conditions of this test, in both the presence and absence of metabolic activation. The method used conforms with the OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Protocol No. 471 and also with Method B14 in Annex V of EEC Commission Directive 84/449/EEC.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.