Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 270-287-7 | CAS number: 68424-27-1 This substance is identified by SDA Substance Name: C16 and C18 unsaturated trialkyl carboxylic acid trimethylolpropane triester and SDA Reporting Number: 09-015-00.
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicity to reproduction
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- screening for reproductive / developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Justification for type of information:
- The substance has a low Toxicologic activity.and none of the available test supply evidence of toxicity, However relevant data are available
Cross-referenceopen allclose all
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
Reference
- Endpoint:
- screening for reproductive / developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Remarks:
- structural similarity assessed by QSAR Toolbox v 3.4.0
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Justification for type of information:
- The substance has a low Toxicologic activity.and none of the available test supply evidence of toxicity, However relevant data are available
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 422 (Combined Repeated Dose Toxicity Study with the Reproduction / Developmental Toxicity Screening Test)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- other: Crj:CD(sd)IGS
- Sex:
- male/female
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- corn oil
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: no adverse effects on the estrous cycle, mating index, fertility index, gestation index, gestation length, number of corpora lutea, number and rate of implantations, and delivery index.
- Remarks on result:
- not determinable due to absence of adverse toxic effects
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Generation:
- F1
- Effect level:
- >= 1 000 mg/kg bw/day
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- sexual maturation
- clinical signs
- body weight and weight gain
- Reproductive effects observed:
- no
- Conclusions:
From these results, under the conditions of this study, the NOAEL, both for repeated dose toxicity and reproductive and developmental toxicity, is considered to be 1000 mg/kg/day.
<Reproductive and developmental toxicity>
There were no adverse effects on the estrous cycle, mating index, fertility index, gestation index, gestation length, number of corpora lutea, number and rate of implantations, and delivery index. Observations of pups revealed no effects of the compound on viability, sex ratio and body weight. There were no abnormalities in morphology of pups related to dosing.
<No observed adverse effect level(NOAEL)>
From these results, under the conditions of this study, the NOAEL, both for repeated dose toxicity and reproductive and developmental toxicity, is considered to be 1000 mg/kg/day.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
Reference
- Endpoint:
- screening for reproductive / developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Study period:
- 1986
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Justification for type of information:
- The substance has a low Toxicologic activity.and none of the available test supply evidence of toxicity, However relevant data are available
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: EPA Proposed guidelines for health assessment of suspect developmental toxicants. Federal Register 49 (227) p.46325
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Sprague-Dawley
- Remarks:
- (approximately 9 weeks old)
- Sex:
- male/female
- Route of administration:
- dermal
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 20 Day
- Frequency of treatment:
- daily
- Remarks:
- 0.0, 800.0 or 2000.0 mg/kg/day
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 20
- Details on study design:
- No. of animals: Three groups of 15 presumed-pregnant rats: Six groups of 10 males and 10 females Group 1 (control); Group 2 (800 mg/kg); and Group 3 (2000 mg/kg) Control: 15 Females for Group 1
During the mating period female rats which had not previously borne pups were placed Conditions with male rats in a ratio of 1:1 and observed daily for evidence of having engaged ir breeding activity.
Presumed-pregnant rats were distributed among three experimental groups: one dermal control, and two exposed groups. At the start of the dosing phase of the study, all of the experimental groups contained 15 presumed-pregnant females. All treatments for Groups l-3 were preformed on each of gestation days 0-19, where designation as gestation day 0 followed detection of a vaginal plug (in situ or expelled) and spermatozoa in the vaginal lavage fluid.
Test article was applied once daily to the clipped, intact dorsal skin of the rat. In no case were the application sites covered. To minimize ingestion of the test material, the rats were fitted with cardboard Elizabethan-style collars.
All animals were monitored throughout gestation until sacrifice for
1.) changes in appearance, behavior, and excretory function, and
2.) signs of ill-health, mortality, or abortion. A pre-partum investigation on a variety of fetal and maternal parameters foi each of the groups was undertaken to assess the influence of test article on reproductive performance. - Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 2 000 mg/kg diet
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- clinical signs
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Generation:
- F1
- Effect level:
- 2 000 mg/kg bw/day
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- clinical signs
- Reproductive effects observed:
- no
- Conclusions:
- Dermal administration of test article did not adversely affect parameters of reproductiw performance during gestation, nor did it adversely affect in utero survival and development of concepti.
Administration of test article to the uncovered skin of collared rats at doses of 800 or 2000 mg/kg/day produced slight skin irritation (erythema and flaking) at the site of application. Neither maternal parameters (food consumption, body weight gain: monitored throughout gestation (days O-19) nor reproductive parameters (number ol implants, resorptions, or viable fetuses) were adversely affected at either of the dose levels tested. No evidence of teratogenicity (abnormal development) was observec during external examination of fetuses from pregnant dams exposed to test article. Mean fetal body weights and crown-rump distances were similar in all of the experimental groups.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- Pentaerythritol tetra(2-ethylhexanoate) Repeated dose and Reproductive/developmental toxicity
- Year:
- 2 005
- Bibliographic source:
- http://dra4.nihs.go.jp/mhlw_data/home/pdf/PDF7299-99-2d.pdf
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 422 (Combined Repeated Dose Toxicity Study with the Reproduction / Developmental Toxicity Screening Test)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Reference substance 002
- Cas Number:
- 7299-99-2
1
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- other: Crj:CD(sd)IGS
- Sex:
- male/female
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- corn oil
Results and discussion
Results: P0 (first parental generation)
Effect levels (P0)
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: no adverse effects on the estrous cycle, mating index, fertility index, gestation index, gestation length, number of corpora lutea, number and rate of implantations, and delivery index.
- Remarks on result:
- not determinable due to absence of adverse toxic effects
Results: F1 generation
Effect levels (F1)
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Generation:
- F1
- Effect level:
- >= 1 000 mg/kg bw/day
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- sexual maturation
- clinical signs
- body weight and weight gain
Overall reproductive toxicity
- Reproductive effects observed:
- no
Any other information on results incl. tables
<Reproductive and developmental toxicity>
There were no adverse effects on the estrous cycle, mating index, fertility index, gestation index, gestation length, number of corpora lutea, number and rate of implantations, and delivery index. Observations of pups revealed no effects of the compound on viability, sex ratio and body weight. There were no abnormalities in morphology of pups related to dosing.
<No observed adverse effect level(NOAEL)>
From these results, under the conditions of this study, the NOAEL, both for repeated dose toxicity and reproductive and developmental toxicity, is considered to be 1000 mg/kg/day.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
From these results, under the conditions of this study, the NOAEL, both for repeated dose toxicity and reproductive and developmental toxicity, is considered to be 1000 mg/kg/day.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.