Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Genetic toxicity: in vitro

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Justification for type of information:
Data is from study report

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2018
Report date:
2018

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
Principles of method if other than guideline:
This study was performed to investigate the potential of test substance to induce gene mutations in comparison to vehicle control according to the plate incorporation test (Trial I) and the pre-incubation test (Trial II) using the Salmonella typhimurium strains TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102.
GLP compliance:
not specified
Type of assay:
bacterial reverse mutation assay

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Ethyl 2-naphthyl ether
EC Number:
202-226-7
EC Name:
Ethyl 2-naphthyl ether
Cas Number:
93-18-5
Molecular formula:
C12H12O
IUPAC Name:
2-ethoxynaphthalene
Test material form:
solid
Details on test material:
- Name of test material: 2-Ethoxynaphthalene
- Molecular formula: C12H12O
- Molecular weight: 172.226 g/mole
- Smiles notation: c12c(ccc(c1)OCC)cccc2
- InChl: 1S/C12H12O/c1-2-13-12-8-7-10-5-3-4-6-11(10)9-12/h3-9H,2H2,1H3
- Substance type: Organic
- Physical state: Solid
Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Name of test material: 2-Ethoxynaphthalene (β-naphthyl ethyl ether)
- Molecular formula: C12H12O
- Molecular weight: 172.226 g/mol
- Subsatnce type: Organic
- Physical state: No data
- Purity: No data

Method

Target gene:
Histidine
Species / strain
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102
Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
Not applicable
Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
other:
Cytokinesis block (if used):
No data
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
Aroclor 1254 induced S9 metabolic activation system
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
0, 0.008, 0.025, 0.079, 0.250 and 0.791 mg/plate
Vehicle / solvent:
- Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: The test chemical was solulble in DMSO
Controls
Untreated negative controls:
yes
Remarks:
RO water
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Remarks:
DMSO
True negative controls:
not specified
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
sodium azide
methylmethanesulfonate
other: 4-Nitro-o-phenylenediamine (TA 1537, TA 98, without S9); 2-Aminoanthracene (TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102, with S9)
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation- Trial I); preincubation (Trial II)

DURATION
- Preincubation period: Trial I: Not applicable Trial II: 60 min
- Exposure duration: 48 hrs
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 48 hrs
- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent): No data
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): No data

SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): No data

SPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays): No data

STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): No data

NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: Each concentration, including the negative, vehicle and positive controls was tested in triplicate in two independent experiments performed

METHODS OF SLIDE PREPARATION AND STAINING TECHNIQUE USED: Not applicable

NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: No data

NUMBER OF METAPHASE SPREADS ANALYSED PER DOSE (if in vitro cytogenicity study in mammalian cells): No data

CRITERIA FOR MICRONUCLEUS IDENTIFICATION: No data

DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: mitotic index; cloning efficiency; relative total growth; other: No data
- Any supplementary information relevant to cytotoxicity: No data

OTHER EXAMINATIONS:
- Determination of polyploidy: No data
- Determination of endoreplication: No data
- Methods, such as kinetochore antibody binding, to characterize whether micronuclei contain whole or fragmented chromosomes (if applicable): No data

- OTHER: No data
Rationale for test conditions:
No data
Evaluation criteria:
A test item is considered as a mutagen, if a biologically relevant increase in the number of revertants exceeding the threshold of twice (strains TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102) or thrice (strains TA 1535 and TA 1537) the colony count of the corresponding vehicle/solvent control is observed.

A dose dependent increase is considered biologically relevant if the threshold is exceeded at more than one concentration.

An increase exceeding the threshold at only one concentration is judged as biologically relevant if reproduced in an independent second experiment.

A dose dependent increase in the number of revertant colonies below the threshold is regarded as an indication of a mutagenic potential if reproduced in an independent second experiment. However, whenever the colony counts remain within the historical range of negative control and vehicle control such an increase is not considered biologically relevant.
Statistics:
No data

Results and discussion

Test results
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium, other: TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
not specified
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not specified
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:
TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Effects of pH: No data
- Effects of osmolality: No data
- Evaporation from medium: No data
- Water solubility: No data
- Precipitation: No data
- Definition of acceptable cells for analysis: No data
- Other confounding effects: No data

RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES: To evaluate the toxicity of the test item, a pre-experiment was performed with strains TA 98 and TA 100. Eight concentrations (0, 0.001, 0.003, 0.008, 0.025, 0.079, 0.250, 0.791 and 2.5 mg/plate) were tested for toxicity and mutation induction with 3 plates each (triplicates). The experimental conditions in this pre-experiment were the same as described below for the Trial-I (Plate incorporation test).
Toxicity of the test item results in a reduction in the number of spontaneous revertants or a clearing of the bacterial background lawn.

In the pre-experiment, the concentration range of the test item was 0.001 – 2.5 mg/plate based on the solubility and precipitation test. There was no reduction in colony count but reduction in background lawn was observed in treated concentrations 2.5 mg/plate (T8), 0.791 mg/plate (T7) and no reduction in colony count as well as in background lawn in treated concentrations (0.250 (T6) mg/plate – 0.001 (T1) mg/plate) both in absence and in the presence of metabolic activation. Based on the results of pre-experiment following doses were selected for the main study trials: (0, 0.008, 0.025, 0.079, 0.250 and 0.791 mg/plate , both in the absence (-S9) as well as in the presence of metabolic activation (+S9).

CYTOKINESIS BLOCK (if used)
- Distribution of mono-, bi- and multi-nucleated cells: No data

NUMBER OF CELLS WITH MICRONUCLEI
- Number of cells for each treated and control culture: No data
- Indication whether binucleate or mononucleate where appropriate: No data

HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA (with ranges, means and standard deviation and confidence interval (e.g. 95%)
- Positive historical control data: No data
- Negative (solvent/vehicle) historical control data: No data

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY:
- Measurement of cytotoxicity used: No data
- Other observations when applicable: No data
Remarks on result:
other: No mutagenic potential

Any other information on results incl. tables

              MEAN REVERTANT COUNT IN PLATE INCORPORATION METHOD (TRIAL I)

Dose (mg/plate)

In the presence of Metabolic Activation (+S9)

TA 1537

TA 1535

TA 98

TA 100

TA 102

MEAN

SD

MEAN

SD

MEAN

SD

MEAN

SD

MEAN

SD

NC

(0.00)

6.00

2.00

11.67

1.15

16.00

1.73

93.67

8.02

229.33

12.22

VC

(0.00)

7.67

1.15

13.00

1.73

18.67

0.58

106.67

9.07

289.33

29.14

T1

(0.008)

5.33

2.31

9.67

0.58

21.33

4.16

90.67

11.02

232.67

5.03

T2

(0.025)

5.67

2.52

13.67

2.52

18.33

1.53

119.67

8.08

242.67

9.45

T3

(0.079)

7.33

1.53

13.00

2.65

17.00

2.00

111.00

8.54

258.67

17.24

T4

(0.250)

5.33

1.53

10.67

2.08

18.67

3.06

124.00

6.08

233.33

9.45

T5

(0.791)

6.33

2.89

13.33

1.53

16.67

1.53

93.00

4.58

294.00

12.00

PC

158.00

12.00

361.33

29.96

1014.67

45.49

1229.33

59.91

1740.67

101.87

 

Dose

(mg/plate)

In the Absence of Metabolic Activation (-S9)

TA 1537

TA 1535

TA 98

TA 100

TA 102

MEAN

SD

MEAN

SD

MEAN

SD

MEAN

SD

MEAN

SD

NC

(0.00)

5.00

1.00

9.00

2.65

16.00

1.00

82.00

7.55

246.67

6.11

VC

(0.00)

7.33

1.53

9.33

0.58

15.67

2.89

100.33

1.53

307.33

8.33

T1

(0.008)

4.33

0.58

13.33

2.08

24.67

6.11

114.33

8.50

281.33

15.53

T2

(0.025)

6.33

1.15

11.67

1.53

19.67

2.08

113.33

14.36

298.67

4.16

T3

(0.079)

4.33

1.53

14.67

1.15

23.00

3.61

107.00

4.58

300.00

14.42

T4

(0.250)

7.33

2.08

12.67

2.08

22.33

4.04

121.67

6.03

293.33

16.04

T5

(0.791)

5.33

1.15

12.33

2.08

17.33

1.53

79.33

3.21

302.00

4.00

PC

199.33

18.15

1182.67

151.66

788.00

136.18

1458.00

71.36

2007.33

18.15

NC= Negative Control,VC= Vehicle Control,T =Test concentration (T5: Highest, T1: Lowest),SD= Standard Deviation

PC= Positive control

2-Aminoanthracene [2.5μg/plate]: TA 1537, TA 1535, TA 98, TA 100                  Methyl methanesulfonate [4μl/plate]: TA 102

2-Aminoanthracene [10μg/plate]:TA 102                                           

Sodium azide [10μg/plate]: TA 1535, TA 100

4-Nitro-o-phenylenediamine: TA 1537[50μg/plate], TA 98 [10μg/plate]

 

 

TABLE 5 - MEAN REVERTANT COUNT IN PRE-INCUBATIONMETHOD
(TRIAL II)

Dose

(mg/plate)

In the presence of Metabolic Activation (+S9)

TA 1537

TA 1535

TA 98

TA 100

TA 102

MEAN

SD

MEAN

SD

MEAN

SD

MEAN

SD

MEAN

SD

NC

(0.00)

4.00

1.00

9.00

1.00

19.33

2.08

101.00

2.65

274.67

6.11

VC

(0.00)

5.33

2.08

11.00

3.00

22.00

2.65

110.00

7.00

294.00

11.14

T1

(0.008)

6.33

2.08

11.33

2.08

19.33

1.15

87.33

8.50

271.33

13.01

T2

(0.025)

5.00

1.73

12.33

1.53

26.00

2.00

102.33

4.51

285.33

8.33

T3

(0.079)

4.00

1.00

8.67

1.15

22.67

2.08

112.00

9.54

268.00

12.00

T4

(0.250)

5.33

1.53

10.67

1.53

21.00

2.65

95.00

16.52

303.33

7.57

T5

(0.791)

6.33

2.89

11.67

1.53

22.00

4.00

106.33

7.09

286.00

8.00

PC

176.67

11.72

380.00

48.04

1051.33

97.04

1013.33

82.81

1748.67

80.41

 

Dose

(mg/plate)

In the Absence of Metabolic Activation (-S9)

TA 1537

TA 1535

TA 98

TA 100

TA 102

MEAN

SD

MEAN

SD

MEAN

SD

MEAN

SD

MEAN

SD

NC

(0.00)

4.33

1.53

10.33

1.53

18.33

2.08

105.33

9.45

270.00

15.62

VC

(0.00)

5.00

2.00

11.33

1.53

20.67

2.52

86.33

12.10

267.33

3.06

T1

(0.008)

3.33

0.58

11.33

3.51

21.00

5.57

98.33

10.79

282.00

14.42

T2

(0.025)

5.33

1.53

11.33

2.08

21.67

2.08

85.33

9.45

292.67

16.65

T3

(0.079)

7.00

1.00

11.00

2.65

22.67

4.16

118.67

5.13

277.33

11.37

T4

(0.250)

4.67

1.53

11.00

3.00

24.33

3.06

109.33

5.03

296.00

9.17

T5

(0.791)

5.33

2.52

9.67

2.08

22.67

3.51

113.00

9.85

300.67

9.02

PC

199.33

14.74

1112.00

41.90

969.33

72.04

1121.33

85.19

1792.00

51.73

NC= Negative Control,VC= Vehicle Control,T =Test concentration (T5: Highest, T1: Lowest),SD= Standard Deviation

PC= Positive control

2-Aminoanthracene [2.5μg/plate]: TA 1537, TA 1535, TA 98, TA 100

2-Aminoanthracene [10μg/plate]: TA 102

Sodium azide [10μg/plate]: TA 1535, TA 100

4-Nitro-o-phenylenediamine: TA 1537[50μg/plate] TA 98[10μg/plate]

Methyl methanesulfonate: [4μl/plate]: TA 102

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Test substance did not induce gene mutations by base pair changes or frame shifts in the genome of the Salmonella typhimurium strains TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102 in the presence and absence of S9 metabolic activation system and hence it is not likely to classify as a gene mutant as per the criteria mentioned in CLP regulation.
Executive summary:

Ames assay was performed to investigate the potential of test substance to induce gene mutations in comparison to vehicle control according to the plate incorporation test (Trial I) and the pre-incubation test (Trial II) using the Salmonella typhimurium strains TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102.

 

The assay was performed in two independent experiments both with and without liver microsomal activation. Each concentration, including the negative, vehicle and positive controls was tested in triplicate. Based on the solubility and precipitation test results eight different concentrations viz. 0, 0.001, 0.003, 0.008, 0.025, 0.079, 0.250, 0.791 and 2.5 mg/plate were selected for pre-experiment.

 

Based on the pre-experiment results, the test item was tested with the following concentrations 0, 0.008, 0.025, 0.079, 0.250 and 0.791 mg/plate for main study, both in the presence of metabolic activation (+S9) and in the absence of metabolic activation (-S9).

 

No substantial increase in revertant colony numbers in any of the tester strains were observed following treatment with test substance at any dose level in both the confirmatory trials, neither in the presence nor in the absence of metabolic activation (S9 mix). There was also no tendency of higher mutation rates with increasing concentrations in the range below the generally acknowledged border of biological relevance. The spontaneous reversion rates in the negative, vehicle and positive controls are within the range of our historical data. The positive controls used for various strains showed a distinct increase in induced revertant colonies in both the methods i.e. Plate incorporation method and Pre-incubation method.

 

Conclusion

 

In conclusion, it is stated that during the described mutagenicity test and under the experimental conditions reported, the test item did not induce gene mutations by base pair changes or frame shifts in the genome of the strains used.