Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
vapour pressure
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
8th-6th July 2016
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2016
Report date:
2016

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 104 (Vapour Pressure Curve)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method A.4 (Vapour Pressure)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of method:
effusion method: by loss of weight or by trapping vaporisate

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Methyl non-2-ynoate
EC Number:
203-909-2
EC Name:
Methyl non-2-ynoate
Cas Number:
111-80-8
Molecular formula:
C10H16O2
IUPAC Name:
methyl non-2-ynoate
Test material form:
liquid

Results and discussion

Vapour pressureopen allclose all
Key result
Temp.:
20 °C
Vapour pressure:
5.03 Pa
Temp.:
25 °C
Vapour pressure:
7.45 Pa

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Executive summary:

The vapour pressure of the test item METHYL OCTINE CARBONATE was determined at four different temperatures (30, 40, 50 and 60 °C) following EU A.4 using the effusion method (weight loss). At 30 °C the first and third measurement the test item bubbled slightly over. To avoid bias the whole experiment 1 (30 °C) was not used for calculation. Three experiments could be evaluated as they showed relevant and reproducible weight loss. All evaluated experiments showed good reproducibility, giving relative standard deviations of less than 8 % and very good correlation. Therefore, the result of the test can be considered valid.