Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Eye irritation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: GLP guideline study with acceptable restrictions (purity: 80%)

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2015
Report date:
2015

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
Version / remarks:
(2012)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EPA OPPTS 870.2400 (Acute Eye Irritation)
Version / remarks:
(1998)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
Fatty acids, C18 unsaturated, ethyl & methyl esters
EC Number:
941-981-3
Molecular formula:
not available, substance is UVCB
IUPAC Name:
Fatty acids, C18 unsaturated, ethyl & methyl esters

Test animals / tissue source

Species:
rabbit
Strain:
other: New Zealand albino
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Robinson Sevices (no further details)
- Age at study initiation: 11 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 1956 - 2168 g
- Housing: individually housed in suspended stainless steel caging
- Diet: Harlan Teklad Global High Fiber Rabbit Diet #2031, a designated amount of the diet (approximately 150 g/day) and a Premium Timothy Cube (Ontario Dehy Inc.) were available to each rabbit
- Water: filtered tap water, ad lbitum
- Acclimation period: 6 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20 - 22
- Humidity (%): 53 - 56
- Air changes (per hr): 12
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 / 12

Test system

Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
other: the untreated eye served as control
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.1 mL
Prior to instillation, 1 - 2 drops of ocular anesthetic (Tetracaine Hydrochloride Ophthalmic Solution USP, 0.5%) were placed into both the treated and control eye of each animal.
Duration of treatment / exposure:
single instillation (no washing)
Observation period (in vivo):
72 h
Reading time points: 1, 24, 48 and 72 h
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
3 females
Details on study design:
SCORING SYSTEM: Draize

TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE: wight light source, fluorescein dye evaluation in the treated eye 24 h after administration

Results and discussion

In vivo

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
out of all 3 animals
Time point:
other: mean over 24, 48 and 72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
3
Reversibility:
other: Reversibility: not applicable
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
out of all 3 animals
Time point:
other: mean over 24, 48 and 72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
other: Reversibility: not applicable
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
out of all 3 animals
Time point:
other: mean over 24, 48 and 72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
2
Reversibility:
other: Reversibility: not applicable
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
out of all 3 animals
Time point:
other: mean over 24, 48 and 72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
other: Reversibility: not applicable
Irritant / corrosive response data:
No local, occular effects indicative for eye irritation have been observed in any test animal at any reading time point.
Other effects:
All animals appeared active and healthy and gained body weight during the study. There was no ocular irritation or other signs of gross toxicity, adverse clinical effects, or abnormal behavior.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not irritating
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
CLP: not classified