Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 701-015-1 | CAS number: 2156592-72-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
No genetic toxicity study with the target substance is available. Data generated with the category substance LABS Na was considered pitoval to this endpoint. The target substance is therefore considered to not be mutagenic.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- read-across based on grouping of substances (category approach)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Justification for type of information:
- The justification for the read across category approach is included in IU section 13.
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1538
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- During the pre-incubation test, signs of toxicity were noted at concentrations as low as 125 µg/plate. No precipitation of the product was observed at any concentration tested.
- Conclusions:
- No genetic toxicity study with the target substance is available. Data generated with the category substance LABS Na was considered pivotal to this endpoint. The target substance is considered to not be mutagenic.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- read-across based on grouping of substances (category approach)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Justification for type of information:
- The justification for the read across category approach is included in IU section 13.
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- positive
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- >= 15 µg/ml with S9, >= 58 µg/ml without S9
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not examined
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Conclusions:
- No geneitic toxicity study with the target substance is available. Data generated with the cateogry substance LABS Na is considered pivotal to this endpoint. LABS NA is not clastogenic in the absence of metabolic activation. THe test substance is also not clastogenic in the presence of metabolic activation at non-cytotoxic concentrations. At cytotoxic xoncentrations, the test substance was weakly clastogenic. The target substance is considered to be not mutagenic.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- read-across based on grouping of substances (category approach)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Justification for type of information:
- The justification for the read across category approach is included in IU section 13.
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- preliminary test showed cytotoxicity at >= 50 µg/ml without S9, and >= 100 µg/ml with S9.
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not examined
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- No genetic toxicity study with the target substance is available. Data generated with the category substance LABS Na is considered pivotal. The target substance is therefore considered to be not mutagenic in either presence or absence of metabolic activation.
Referenceopen allclose all
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Description of key information
No genetic toxicity study with the target substance is available. Data generated with the category substance LABS Na was considered pitoval to this endpoint. The target substance is therefore considered to not be mutagenic.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / erythrocyte micronucleus
- Type of information:
- read-across based on grouping of substances (category approach)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Justification for type of information:
- The justification of the read across category approach is included in IU section 13.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- no effects
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Conclusions:
- No genetic toxicity study with thetarget substance is available. Data generated with the category substance LABS Na is considered pivotal. Therefore, the target substance is considered to not be mutagenic.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Additional information
Genetic toxicity in vitro:
No in vitro genetic toxicity study is available with the target substance. Data generated with the category substance LABS Na were considered pivotal to this endpoint.
Ames: S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 1538, TA 98 and TA 100 were treated with LABS Na at five dose levels 8, 40, 200, 1000 and 5000 ug/plate, both with and without the addition of S9-mix according to EU Method B.13/14. No significant increases in the frequency of revertant colonies were recorded for any of the bacterial strains, with any dose of the test item, either with or without metabolic activation or exposure method. During the pre-incubation test, signs of toxicity were noted at concentrations as low as 125 ug/plate. No precipitation of the product was observed at any concentration tested.
Chromosome aberration: Chinese hamster ovary cells were exposed to concentrations of 0.32 to 78 µg/ml with S9, and 1.25 to 156 µg/ml without S9. Methyl methanesulphonate and cyclophosphamide were used as positive controls. No biologically significant results were seen in treated cultures in the absence of metabolic activation. Positive responses were seen at cytotoxic concentrations in the presence of S9. Concentrations below the level of cytotoxicity with S9 did not show positive results. The test substance is not clastogenic in the absence of metabolic activation, or with metabolic activation below cytotoxic concentrations. These results indicate that LABS Na is weakly clastogenic at cytotoxic concentrations but negative at concentrations below cytotoxic concentrations.
Mammalian cells: A HPRT study examined the potential of LABS Na, to cause mutations in mammalian cells according to OECD guideline 476. Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cells were exposed to concentrations of 0, 0.6, 1, 1.8, 3, and 6 ug/mL without S9, and 0, 6, 10, 18, 30, and 60 ug/mL with S9. The cells were then examined for cytogenicity and mutation frequency. Ethyl methane sulfonate and 3-(20-)methylcholanthrene were used as positive control substances. The test substance was cytogenic at concentrations of 50 ug/ml or greater with metabolic activation, and 100 ug/mL or above without metabolic activation. There was no biologically significant increase in mutation frequency in the treated groups. The test substance is considered not mutagenic to CHO cells both in the presence and absence of S9.
Genetic toxicity in vivo:
No genetic toxicity study in vivo with the target substance is not available. Data generated with LABS Na is considered pivotal to this endpoint. The test substance is observed to be not mutagenic. No significant increases in the number of polychromatic erythrocytes with micronuclei were observed.
Short description of key information:
No study on mutagenic activity is available with the target
substance. Data generated with LABS Na was considered pivotal to this
endpoint. The target substance is considered to be not mutagenic.
Endpoint Conclusion: not mutagenic
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on data generated with category substances, the target substance is considered to be not mutagenic and does not need to be classified for genotoxicity.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.