Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 701-043-4 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Biodegradation in water: screening tests
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- biodegradation in water: ready biodegradability
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: According to international guideline(s), GLP-compliant, performed in recognized contract research organization, no restrictions, fully adequate for assessment.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 301 F (Ready Biodegradability: Manometric Respirometry Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method C.4-D (Determination of the "Ready" Biodegradability - Manometric Respirometry Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Oxygen conditions:
- aerobic
- Inoculum or test system:
- activated sludge, domestic, non-adapted
- Details on inoculum:
- - Source of inoculum/activated sludge: Totnes Sewage Treatment Works, Totnes, Devon, UK
- Method of cultivation / Preparation of inoculum for exposure: At the laboratory, the activated sludge was kept aerated at room temperature and the pH maintained at 7.0 ± 1.0. Seven days prior to the exposure start the activated sludge was centrifuged, washed and resuspended in the mineral medium and the solids concentration determined. This sludge was then diluted in medium, added to test bottles and stirred until required for use. The pH of the seeded mineral medium was adjusted as necessary to 7.4 ± 0.2 prior to use. - Duration of test (contact time):
- 28 d
- Initial conc.:
- 100 mg/L
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Initial conc.:
- 200 mg/L
- Based on:
- COD
- Parameter followed for biodegradation estimation:
- O2 consumption
- Details on study design:
- TEST CONDITIONS
- Composition of medium: mineral salts medium according to guidelines, prepared using reverse osmosis (RO) water.
- Test temperature: 22 ± 1°C. The temperature of the solutions in a selection of test bottles was measured on days 0 and 28. The temperature of the incubator was continuously monitored throughout the study.
- pH: RUN 1: 7.4 at the start of the test and 7.0-8.0 at the end; RUN 2: 7.3 at the start of the test and 7.1 at the end
- pH adjusted: not necessary
- Suspended solids concentration: 30 mg/L
- Continuous darkness: yes
TEST SYSTEM
- Culturing apparatus: The measurement of oxygen uptake was conducted in the Oxitop™ respirometers (Wissenschaftlich-Technische Werkstätten, GmbH, Germany). Each individual unit consisted of a dark glass 500 mL bottle with an Oxitop™ bottle top containing a piezoresistive electronic pressure sensor. Bottles were situated on a magnetic stirrer in a constant temperature incubator. Carbon dioxide produced by microbial respiration was absorbed by potassium hydroxide solution (KOH) placed in a seal cup in the neck of each bottle, and the oxygen taken up was measured as a decrease in pressure. The Oxitop™ controller collected the pressure values from the measuring tops and calculated the BOD (as mg/L).
- Number of culture flasks/concentration: 3
SAMPLING
- Sampling frequency: In Run 1, the oxygen uptake was recorded automatically every 112 minutes during the 28 day experimental period. In Run 2, oxygen uptake was recorded automatically every 112 minutes during days 0 to 6.9. Due to a fault with the transfer of data from the Oxitop™ controller, oxygen uptake was recorded manually once per day, on week days, during days 12 to 28.
CONTROL AND BLANK SYSTEM
- Inoculum blank (3 flasks): inoculated mineral medium
- Reference (3 flasks): inoculated mineral medium + sodium benzoate (100 mg/L)
- Toxicity control: not performed - Reference substance:
- benzoic acid, sodium salt
- Key result
- Parameter:
- % degradation (O2 consumption)
- Value:
- 40
- Sampling time:
- 28 d
- Remarks on result:
- other: Run 1
- Key result
- Parameter:
- % degradation (O2 consumption)
- Value:
- 30
- Sampling time:
- 28 d
- Remarks on result:
- other: Run 2
- Details on results:
- The test material attained a maximum mean level of biodegradation (based on the BOD:COD ratio) of 40% in Run 1 and 30% in Run 2 (see Table 1). The increased surface area of the test material in the second run did not improve its degradation.
Less than 60% degradation was achieved within the 10-day window, so the test material cannot be classified as readily biodegradable, however it is not considered likely to persist in the environment. - Results with reference substance:
- Sodium benzoate attained a maximum mean level of biodegradation (based on the BOD:ThOD ratio) of 67% in Run 1 and 64% in Run 2 (see Table 2).
More than 60% degradation was achieved within the 10 day window as expected for a biodegradable substance, thus confirming that the activated sludge contained viable organisms. - Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Remarks:
- rate of degradation of sodium benzoate was 60% of its ThOD within 10 days; difference between replicates was <20%.
- Interpretation of results:
- inherently biodegradable
- Conclusions:
- The test material is not considered likely to persist in the environment.
Reference
Table 1: Biodegradation of the test substance
% Biodegradation |
||||||||
Day |
Run 1 |
Run 2 |
||||||
Flask 1 |
Flask 2 |
Flask 3 |
Mean |
Flask 1 |
Flask 2 |
Flask 3 |
Mean |
|
5 |
24 |
24 |
26 |
25 |
14 |
13 |
14 |
14 |
10/12.1* |
32 |
32 |
35 |
33 |
25 |
24 |
25 |
25 |
15 |
36 |
36 |
39 |
37 |
27 |
26 |
27 |
27 |
20 |
39 |
38 |
42 |
40 |
29 |
28 |
29 |
29 |
28 |
39 |
39 |
42 |
40 |
30 |
30 |
30 |
30 |
*: Run 1/Run 2. Due to a fault with the transfer of data from the Oxitop™ controller during Run 2, oxygen uptake was recorded manually once per day, on week days, during days 12 to 28.
Table 2: Biodegradation of the reference substance
% Biodegradation |
||||||||
Day |
Run 1 |
Run 2 |
||||||
Flask 1 |
Flask 2 |
Flask 3 |
Mean |
Flask 1 |
Flask 2 |
Flask 3 |
Mean |
|
5 |
60 |
58 |
60 |
59 |
58 |
56 |
53 |
56 |
10/12.1* |
68 |
63 |
66 |
66 |
63 |
65 |
59 |
62 |
15 |
69 |
65 |
66 |
67 |
64 |
64 |
60 |
63 |
20 |
70 |
65 |
65 |
67 |
64 |
64 |
61 |
63 |
28 |
68 |
65 |
65 |
66 |
66 |
64 |
61 |
64 |
*: Run 1/Run 2. Due to a fault with the transfer of data from the Oxitop™ controller during Run 2, oxygen uptake was recorded manually once per day, on week days, during days 12 to 28.
Description of key information
Biodegradation in water: screening tests: aerobic biodegradation 30-40% (COD) in 28 days (OECD 301F, EU C.4-D)
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- Biodegradation in water:
- inherently biodegradable
- Type of water:
- freshwater
Additional information
The test material is not considered likely to persist in the environment.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
