Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: - | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: study conducted according to OECD Guideline and in compliance with GLP
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Version / remarks:
- 1997
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.17 (Mutagenicity - In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Version / remarks:
- 2000
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- mammalian cell gene mutation assay
- Target gene:
- thymidine kinase
- Species / strain / cell type:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not specified
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9-mix, Phenobarbital/ß-naphthoflavone induced
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Cytotoxicity test concentrations:
1.22, 4.88, 19.53, 78.13, 312.5, 1250 and 5000 µg/mL (3-hour treatment period with and without S9)
0.3125, 0.625, 1.25, 2.5, 5, 10 and 20 µg/mL (24-hour treatment period without S9)
Genotoxicity test concentrations:
1st experiment: 0, 0.625, 1.25, 2.5, 5, 10 and 20 µg/mL (3-hour treatment period, with and without S9)
2nd experiment: 0, 0.313, 0.625, 0.938, 1.25, 2.5 and 5 µg/mL (24-hour treatment period, without S9),
0, 2.5, 5, 10, 15, 20 and 30 µg/mL (3-hour treatment period, with S9) - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle/solvent used: R0 medium
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: with S9-mix: Cyclophosphamide, without S9-mix: Ethylmethanesulphonate
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION
- Exposure duration: 24 hours and 3 hours
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 2
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: relative total growth - Evaluation criteria:
- Treated cultures were examined for a significant increase in mutant frequency.
- Statistics:
- UKEMS statistical package
- Species / strain:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- treatment period / test concentration / decrease in relative suspension growth: without S9-mix: 3 h / 20 µg/mL / 98 %; with S9-mix: 3 h / 20 µg/mL / 70 and 73 %; without S9-mix: 24 h / 5 µg/mL / 91 %
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY:
Cytotoxicity was observed at 20 µg/mL with and without S9-mix (3 hour treatment period) and at 5 µg/mL without S9 (24-hour treatment period) - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Additional information
Ames test:
In the bacterial reverse mutation assay according to OECD Guideline 471 (1983) using Salmonella typhimurium strains TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100 the test material (33 % w/w active substance in aqueous solution) was tested at concentrations of 0, 1, 3, 10, 32, 100 µg/plate with and without metabolic activation (S9-mix). In the presence of the metabolic activation system, 2 -aminoanthracene (strain TA 1535) and benzo[a]pyrene (all other strains) were used as positive controls. Positive controls in the absence of S9-mix were sodium azide (strains TA1535 and TA100), 2-aminoanthracene (strain TA1535), 9-aminoacridine (strain TA1537), 2-nitrofluorene (strain TA98) and benzo[a]pyrene (strains TA1537, TA100 and TA98). Distilled water served as negative and as vehicle control. Cytotoxicity (absence or thinning of background lawn and reduction in colony numbers) was observed at 100 µg/plate with and without S9-mix. As a result, no increase in the reverse mutation rate was observed when tested up to cytotoxic concentrations. Therefore, the test material was considered to be not mutagenic in the bacterial reverse mutation assay.
Chromosome aberration test:
A study was conducted according to OECD Guideline 473 to assess the clastogenic potential of the test substance in vitro in mammalian cells. Therefore, cultured human lymphocytes were used. Test concentrations were 0, 0.4, 2, 10 µg/mL (24-hour treatment period without S9-mix) and 0, 2, 10 and 50 µg/mL (3-hour treatment period with S9-mix). Chlorambucil served as positive control in the absence and Cyclophosphamide in the presence of a metabolic activation system. The cells were evaluated for genotoxicity by evaluating the mean aberrant cell frequencies. The cells were also evaluated for polyploidy. Cytotoxicity was evaluated by determination of the mitotic index. As a result, cytotoxicity was observed at 10 µg/mL both with and without metabolic activation. There was no increase in the aberrant cell frequencies, therefore the test item was concluded to be not clastogenic in this assay.
Mouse lymphoma gene mutation assay:
To assess the potential of the test material to induce gene mutations in vitro in mammalian cells, a study (according to OECD 476 (1997) “In vitro mammalian cell gene mutation test”) was conducted. Two independent tests were performed with duplicate cultures. The following test concentrations were used:
1st Experiment: 0, 0.625, 1.25, 2.5, 5, 10 and 20 µg/mL (3-hour treatment period, with and without S9)
2nd Experiment: 0, 0.313, 0.625, 0.938, 1.25, 2.5 and 5 µg/mL (24-hour treatment period, without S9),
0, 2.5, 5, 10, 15, 20 and 30 µg/mL (3-hour treatment period, with S9)
As positive controls, Cyclophosphamide (with S9-mix) and Ethylmethanesulphonate (without S9-mix) were used.
Cytotoxicity was observed at 20 µg/mL with and without metabolic activation (3 hour treatment period) and at 5 µg/mL without metabolic activation (24-hour treatment period). No increase in mutant frequencies were observed, therefore the test substance was considered to be not mutagenic.
Justification for selection of genetic toxicity endpoint
Genetic toxicity was evaluated on the basis of three studies, adressing gene mutation in bacteria, gene mutation in mammalian cells and clastogenicity in mammalian cells, respectively. All available studies were considered reliable and suitable for classification.
Justification for classification or non-classification
In the available in vitro studies the test substance did not induce gene mutations in bacteria and in mammalian cells and was also not clastogenic in mammalian cells. Therefore the substance is considered not to be genotoxic under Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 (CLP).
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.