Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 606-970-7 | CAS number: 222716-77-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 201 (Alga, Growth Inhibition Test)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- (on Days 1 and 2 of the test, the light intensity exceeded the mean by more than ±15% (-15 to +18%). This deviation did not adversely impact the results of this study.)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method C.3 (Algal Inhibition test)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- (on Days 1 and 2 of the test, the light intensity exceeded the mean by more than ±15% (-15 to +18%). This deviation did not adversely impact the results of this study.)
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Details on sampling:
- At the start of the test, four samples (50 mL) were taken from freshly prepared uninoculated control and test media. After 72 hours, four samples (50 mL) of control and test media were taken from the pooled contents of uninoculated replicate flasks. Samples were stored in a freezer prior to analysis.
- Vehicle:
- no
- Details on test solutions:
- REPARATION AND APPLICATION OF TEST SOLUTION (especially for difficult test substances)
- Method: water accommodated fractions (WAF)
200 mg test material was dispersed in 2 L dilution medium (algal nutrient medium as recommended in the guidelines) in a glass vessel. The contents of the vessel were stirred for approximately 24 hours in the dark and then left to stand for approximately 24 hours. An aliquot (1200 mL) was then removed mid vessel to provide the Water Accomodated Fraction (WAF). - Test organisms (species):
- Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata (previous names: Raphidocelis subcapitata, Selenastrum capricornutum)
- Details on test organisms:
- TEST ORGANISM
- Strain: CCAP 278/4
- Source (laboratory, culture collection): Culture Collection of Algae and Protozoa (CCAP), Dunstaffnage Marine Laboratory, Oban, Argyll, Scotland
- Age of inoculum (at test initiation): Three days. Algal cells used for inoculation were in the log phase of growth.
- Method of cultivation: Liquid slope cultures were stored in an illuminated refrigerator. Sterile algal nutrient medium was inoculated with cells aseptically removed from the slope culture; these primary liquid cultures were incubated for approximately three days in an orbital incubator under continuous illumination at nominal temperatures in the range 21 to 25°C. Subsequently, appropriate volumes of these primary cultures were aseptically transferred to fresh sterile algal nutrient medium to prepare secondary liquid cultures; these cultures were incubated, as stated above, for three days and used as inoculum for the test.
ACCLIMATION
- Acclimation period: 6 days (pre-culturing)
- Culturing media and conditions (same as test or not): same - Test type:
- static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- yes
- Total exposure duration:
- 72 h
- Hardness:
- 25 mg/L as CaCO3
- Test temperature:
- 23 °C
- pH:
- test start (0 h): 7.8
test end (72 h): 8.8 - Nominal and measured concentrations:
- nominal loading rates: 100 mg/L as WAF
measured levels at test start: below background - 0.13 mg C/L (mean: 0.069 mg C/L)
measured levels at test end: the mean measured level of TOC in the test medium was below that found in the control sample; so it was not possible to quantify the level of carbon that was attributable to the test substance - Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Test vessel: 250 mL conical flasks (autoclaved) containing 100 mL of inoculated test medium and loosly plugged with foam bungs
- Aeration/gaseous exchange: orbital incubator, oscillating at nominal 130 cycles per minute
- Initial cells density: 1x10⁴ cells/mL
- Control end cells density: 134x10⁴ cells/mL
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): 6
- No. of vessels per control (replicates): 6
GROWTH MEDIUM
- Standard medium used: yes
TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
- Source/preparation of dilution water: OECD medium according to guidelines, using filtered, dechlorinated tap water, softened and treated by reverse osmosis before microfiltration and purification (resistivity 18 Megohm/cm)
- Total organic carbon: 2.2 mg C/L
- Ca/Mg ratio: 1:1
- Culture medium different from test medium: no
OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Sterile test conditions: no
- Adjustment of pH: no
- Photoperiod: continuous illumination
- Light intensity and quality: nominally 5870 to 6854 lux provided by 6 x 30 W “cool white” 1 metre fluorescent tubes. Light intensity (four corner positions and in a central position of the random block design) within the test area were determined each day. To minimise the impact of differences in light intensity across the test area on algal growth, control and test flasks were re-positioned in the test area each day during the test.
On Days 1 and 2, the light intensity ranged between -15 and +18% of the mean. As the validity criteria were met, this deviation to guideline was not thought to have affected either the validity or integrity of the study.
EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED (with observation intervals if applicable) : cell densities measured at 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Determination of cell concentrations: electronic particle counter
TEST CONCENTRATIONS
- Range finding study
- Test concentrations: nominal loading rates of 10 and 100 mg/L
- Results used to determine the conditions for the definitive study: no inhibition after 72 h - Reference substance (positive control):
- yes
- Remarks:
- potassium dichromate
- Key result
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EL50
- Effect conc.:
- 100 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- other: growth rate, yield and biomass
- Remarks on result:
- other: results are expressed in terms of loading rates
- Key result
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- NOELR
- Effect conc.:
- >= 100 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- other: growth rate, yield and biomass
- Remarks on result:
- other: results are expressed in terms of loading rates
- Details on results:
- - Exponential growth in the control (for algal test): yes
- Observation of abnormalities (for algal test): no microscopic abnormalities
- Any stimulation of growth found in any treatment: no biologically significant stimulation of growth was observed (see Tables 1 and 2).
At the start of the test, the test media (as WAF) at all nominal loading rates were colourless dispersions. - Results with reference substance (positive control):
- - 72-hour EbC50: 0.541 mg/L (typical range in this laboratory: 0.3 to 1 mg/L)
- Reported statistics and error estimates:
- Statistical analysis was perfomed using SAS 9.1 (SAS Institute 2002), using nominal loading rates. 95% confidence intervals were calculated using the likelihood ratio method. Williams’ test was used to compare each treated group with control unless there was evidence of a non-monotonic dose-response relationship, in which case Dunnett’s test was used.
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Remarks:
- The criteria of OECD Guideline 201 and EU Method C.3 for biomass and growth rates were fulfilled.
- Conclusions:
- The results indicate that the test material is not toxic to freshwater algae up to the limits of its water solubility and a NOEC and thus a PNEC cannot be determined.
Reference
Table 1: Cell densities
Nominal loading rates |
Replicate |
Cell densities (cells/mL) |
||
(mg/L) |
number |
24 hours |
48 hours |
72 hours |
|
|
|
|
|
Control |
R1 |
14750 |
232733 |
1346183 |
|
R2 |
20817 |
215967 |
1358917 |
|
R3 |
22650 |
221100 |
1239883 |
|
R4 |
20250 |
255100 |
1326950 |
|
R5 |
17183 |
259667 |
1362817 |
|
R6 |
16617 |
211767 |
1403450 |
|
Mean |
18711 |
232722 |
1339700 |
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
R1 |
12317 |
196933 |
1234717 |
|
R2 |
22083 |
233433 |
1365883 |
|
R3 |
15317 |
203533 |
1401917 |
|
R4 |
15317 |
240233 |
1469450 |
|
R5 |
16783 |
211433 |
1417117 |
|
R6 |
18617 |
252033 |
1591583 |
|
Mean |
16739 |
222933 |
1413444 |
|
|
|
|
|
R1-R6: replicate number
Note: the initial cell density was estimated to be 1.405 x 104/mL
Table 2 Inhibition of growth
Parameter |
Nominal loading rates (mg/L) |
Sample size |
Mean |
Inhibition (%) |
p-value |
|
Area under curve to 72 hours |
Control |
6 |
21.5 |
0.0 |
- |
|
100 |
6 |
22.1 |
-2.8 |
0.489 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Growth rate to 72 hours |
Control |
6 |
0.068 |
0.0 |
- |
|
100 |
6 |
0.069 |
-1 |
0.208 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Growth rate 0 to 24 hours |
Control |
6 |
0.026 |
0.0 |
- |
|
100 |
6 |
0.021 |
19 |
0.289 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Growth rate 24 to 48 hours |
Control |
6 |
0.105 |
0.0 |
- |
|
100 |
6 |
0.108 |
-2.9 |
0.484 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Growth rate 48 to 72 hours |
Control |
6 |
0.073 |
0.0 |
- |
|
100 |
6 |
0.077 |
-5.4 |
0.068 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yield |
Control |
6 |
1329506 |
0.0 |
- |
|
10 |
6 |
1373039 |
-3.3 |
0.264 |
||
|
||||||
pvalues are for the comparison with Control using thet-test |
Control cultures:
-cell concentration increased by a factor of 134;
-the mean coefficient of variation for daily growth rates ranged between 6 and 26%;
- the coefficient of variation for the average specific growth rates was 0.9% during the 72 hour exposure period.
Description of key information
effect values for average specific growth rates of Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata, 0-72 h, based on loading rates (OECD TG 201, EU C.3):
EL50: >100 mg/L, NOELR: ≥ 100 mg/L
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Additional information
EL50, EL10/NOELR for freshwater algae > water solubility
The results indicate that the test material is not toxic to freshwater algae up to the limits of its water solubility and a NOEC and thus a PNEC cannot be determined.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.