Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Some information in this page has been claimed confidential.

Administrative data

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2014
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Cross-referenceopen allclose all
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to same study
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to other study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2014
Report date:
2014

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU method B.47 (Bovine corneal opacity and permeability test method for identifying ocular corrosives and severe irritants)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 437 (Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Test Method for Identifying Ocular Corrosives and Severe Irritants)
Deviations:
no
Principles of method if other than guideline:
The measurement of the opacity was performed with a photometer (570 nm) instead of an opacitometer. This can be seen as uncritical, because the opacity can be calculated from the absorption. The deviation was signed and assessed by the study director on 07. Aug. 2014.
GLP compliance:
yes

Test material

Constituent 1
Test material form:
solid: particulate/powder
Remarks:
migrated information: powder
Details on test material:
None
Specific details on test material used for the study:
None

Test animals / tissue source

Species:
cattle
Strain:
not specified
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
Fresh bovine eyes (Bos primigenius Taurus (Fresh bovine corneas)) were obtained from the slaughterhouse Müller Fleisch GmbH, Enzstr. 2 -4, 75217 Birkenfeld, Germany, on the day of the test. The cattle were between 12 and 60 months old. The eyes were transported to the test facility in Hank’s balanced salt solution (supplemented with 0.01% streptomycin and 0.01% penicillin). Then, the corneas were dissected and incubated in medium at 32 ± 1 °C in an incubation chamber for 1 hour.

Test system

Vehicle:
not specified
Controls:
not specified
Amount / concentration applied:
750 μL of the test item were tested as suspension at 20% concentration in 0.9% sodium chloride solution.
Duration of treatment / exposure:
Incubation time: 4 hours
Observation period (in vivo):
No data
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
No data
Details on study design:
Refer to "Any other information on materials and methods incl. tables".

Results and discussion

In vitro

Results
Irritation parameter:
in vitro irritation score
Run / experiment:
1
Value:
-0.29
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid

In vivo

Irritant / corrosive response data:
None
Other effects:
None

Any other information on results incl. tables

 Opacity and Permeability Values

The absorption (570 nm) and opacity values which were measured before and after exposition are given in the following table:

Parameter

Negative Control

Absorption before exposition

0.1703

0.1803

0.1790

Absorption after exposition

0.2574

0.2851

0.5227

Opacity before exposition

1.4801

1.5146

1.5101

Opacity after exposition

1.8088

1.9280

3.3320

Opacity Difference

0.3287

0.4134

1.8219

 

Mean opacity difference of the negative control is 0.8547.

 

Absorption and Opacity Values Test Item and Positive Control

Parameter

Test ItemFAT 40865/A TE 

Positive Control

Absorption before exposition

0.1908

0.2072

0.1664

0.1583

0.1376

0.1975

Absorption after exposition

0.2762

0.3804

0.4183

1.7073

1.6212

1.6112

Opacity before exposition

1.5517

1.6114

1.4669

1.4398

1.3728

1.5758

Opacity
after exposition

1.8889

2.4010

2.6200

50.9683

41.8023

40.8507

Opacity
Difference

0.3372

0.7897

1.1531

49.5285

40.4295

39.2750

 

For the permeability measurement, three replicates for each treatment group were measured. The optical density values at 490 nm are given in the following table:

Repl.

Negative Control

Test ItemFAT 40865/A TE

Positive Control

Meas.

0.0058

0.0065

0.0051

0.0022

0.0029

0.0045

0.3828

0.3462

0.4711

Corr.

0.0290

0.0325

0.0255

0.0110

0.0145

0.0225

1.9140

1.7310

2.3555

Mean

0.0290

--

The calculated IVIS for each replicate and the corresponding means are presented in the following table:

Test Group

IVIS

Mean IVIS

Relative Standard Deviation IVIS

Negative Control
0.9% NaCl

0.764

1.290

61.6 %

0.901

2.204

Test Item
FAT 40865/A TE

- 0.788

- 0.290

170.4 %

- 0.283

0.201

Positive Control
20% imidazole solution

76.949

71.790

8.5 %

65.105

73.318

 

Classification

According to OECD Guideline no. 437 (Jul. 2013), a substance with an IVIS ≤ 3 requires no classification for eye irritation

or serious eye damage.

IVIS

UN GHS Category Eye Damage

≤ 3

No Category

> 3;≤ 55

No prediction can be made

> 55

Eye damage Category I

 

In the negative control, no signs of eye irritation were observed. The positive control induced serious eye damage, which would be classified as GHS category 1. The test item FAT 40865/A TE showed no effects on the cornea of the bovine eye. The calculated IVIS (in vitro irritancy score) is - 0.290

Validity

According to the guideline, the test is considered as valid if the positive control causes an IVIS that falls within two standard deviations of the current historical mean. The negative or solvent control has to show an IVIS between 0 and 3.

The validity criteria and findings are given in the following table:

Parameter

Criterion

Found

Assessment

IVIS of negative control 0.9% NaCl

0 - 3

1.290

ok

IVIS of positive control
20% imidazole solution

35.6 – 130.4

71.790

ok

 Values for negative and positive controls were within the range of historical data of the test facility. Therefore, the test system was acceptable.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not irritating
Conclusions:
Under the conditions of this test, the test item FAT 40865/A TE showed no effects on the cornea of the bovine eye. Hence, it was considered to be non-irritating to eyes.
Executive summary:

An OECD 437 guideline study was performed in accordance to GLP to assess the irritation potential of test item FAT 40865/A to eyes using bovine corneas. They were collected from slaughtered cattle which were between 12 and 60 months old. The test item FAT 40865/A TE was brought onto the cornea of a bovine eye which had been incubated with cMEM without phenol red at 32 ± 1 °C for one hour and whose opacity had been measured. The test item was incubated on the cornea for 4 hours at 32 ± 1 °C. After removal of the test item, opacity and permeability values were measured. Physiological sodium chloride solution was used as negative control. The negative control showed no irritating effect on the cornea. 20% Imidazole solution was used as positive control. The positive control induced serious eye damage on the cornea. The calculated IVIS (in vitro irritancy score) was - 0.290. According to OECD Guideline no. 437 (Jul. 2013), a substance with an IVIS≤3 requires no classification for eye irritation or serious eye damage. Hence, under the conditions of this test system, the test item FAT 40865/A TE showed no effects on the cornea of the bovine eye and considered to be non-irritating to eyes.