Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 813-338-6 | CAS number: 106155-02-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Eye irritation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- from 25/6/1986 to 4/8/1986
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 986
- Report date:
- 1986
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: US Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association 1977
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- 1) The observation on day 0 of the study was not performed 60 min after installation of the test substance as protocoled, but after approximately 80 min. 2) In the night of study day 13 and 14 the temperature in the animal room raised up to 28°C.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: US EPA Pesticide Assessment Guidelines, Subdivision F $81-4 “Primary Eye Irritation”
- Version / remarks:
- version: Nov. 1984. EPA protocol in accordance with the FDA requirements.
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- with the following exception: Three additional animals have been used to investigate the effect of remedial irrigation
- GLP compliance:
- yes
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- (E)-2-methyl-4-(2,2,3-trimethylcyclopent-3-en-1-yl)but-2-en-1-ol
- Cas Number:
- 106155-02-6
- Molecular formula:
- C13H22O
- IUPAC Name:
- (E)-2-methyl-4-(2,2,3-trimethylcyclopent-3-en-1-yl)but-2-en-1-ol
- Reference substance name:
- (Z)-2-methyl-4-(2,2,3-trimethylcyclopent-3-en-1-yl)but-2-en-1-ol
- Cas Number:
- 106155-03-7
- Molecular formula:
- C13H22O
- IUPAC Name:
- (Z)-2-methyl-4-(2,2,3-trimethylcyclopent-3-en-1-yl)but-2-en-1-ol
- Reference substance name:
- Unknown impurities
- IUPAC Name:
- Unknown impurities
- Test material form:
- other: clear liquid
Constituent 1
impurity 1
impurity 2
Test animals / tissue source
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: The Broekman Institute, Someren, The Netherlands
- Age at study initiation: 2 to 3 months old
- Weight at study initiation: 1.9 to 2.4 grams
- Housing: individually housed in metal cages with perforated floors
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): standard laboratory animal diet. 100g/day
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): tap water free access
- Acclimation period: 7 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 19.5-21 ºC
- Humidity (%): 60-85%
- Air changes (per hr): no data
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12h light/12h dark
Test system
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- yes, concurrent no treatment
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 24 hours for animals #1 to #6 (marked as no remedial irrigation applied) and 30 seconds for animals #7 to #9 (marked as remedial irrigation applied)
- Observation period (in vivo):
- Immediately after instillation of the test substance
70-90min after instillation
24,48 and 72h after instillation
7 and 14 days after instillation - Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 9 young adult female animals
- Details on study design:
- REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): after application, the lids were held gently together for 2 seconds and released. The treated eye was washed with 125-150 mL tepid tap-water for aprox 1 minute
- Time after start of exposure: 30 seconds
SCORING SYSTEM: The Draize scoring system
TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE: fluorescein
FLUORESCEIN TREATMENT: Fluorescein was used to determine the area of corneal epitheliak damage, For that purpose, a solution of 2% sodium fluorecein in water (pH adjusted to 7) was applied to both eyes.
Results and discussion
In vivo
Resultsopen allclose all
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- mean individual scores of the unwashed eyes after application (animals #1 to #6)
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.44
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 7 days
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- mean individual scores of the washed eyes after application (animals #7 to #9)
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 0 days
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- mean individual scores of the unwashed eyes after application (animals #1 to #6)
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.18
- Max. score:
- 1
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 7 days
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- mean individual scores of the washed eyes after application (animals #7 to #9)
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.22
- Max. score:
- 1
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 7 days
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- mean individual scores of the unwashed eyes after application (animals #1 to #6)
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 1.33
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 14 days
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- mean individual scores of the washed eyes after application (animals #7 to #9)
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 1.11
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 14 days
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- mean individual scores of the unwashed eyes after application (animals #1 to #6)
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.44
- Max. score:
- 1
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 7 days
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- mean individual scores of the washed eyes after application (animals #7 to #9)
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.44
- Max. score:
- 1
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 7 days
- Irritation parameter:
- other: conjunctivae discharge
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- mean individual scores of the unwashed eyes after application (animals #1 to #6)
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.5
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 7 days
- Irritation parameter:
- other: conjunctivae discharge
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- mean individual scores of the washed eyes after application (animals #7 to #9)
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.33
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 7 days
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- According to the GHS and CLP criteria for classification of the eye irritancy potential, based on the grading of ocular lesions as described in OECD 405 guideline, the tested substance should not be classified for eye irritancy under the test conditions
- Executive summary:
A sample of the test item was tested in the rabbit acute eye irritation/corrosion test to determine its possible irritating or corrosive effects. Approximately 0.1 mL of the test substance was instilled into one of the eyes of nine female albino rabbits, three of which subsequently received remedial irrigation. The unwashed eyes reacted to contact with the test substance by corneal damage, involving the epithelium and in some cases also the stroma, slight iridial irritation and moderate conjunctival reddening and swelling. Remedial irrigation appeared to have a positive effect on the degree of corneal injury but it hardly reduced the irritation of conjunctivae and iris. From these results a Draize score of 19.8 was obtained for unwashed eyes and 10 for remedially irrigated eyes (both at 24 hours). According to the Kay and Calandra scheme the test substance can be classified as moderately and mildly irritating, respectively. However according to the GHS (Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals) and CLP regulation (Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006) scheme for classification of the eye irritancy potential, based on the grading of ocular lesions as described in OECD 405 guideline, the tested substance should not be classified for eye irritancy under the test conditions.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.