Registration Dossier

Toxicological information

Eye irritation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
08 January 2015 - 16 February 2015
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Performed in a GLP lab in accordance with OECD test guidelines with one minor deviation that was considered not to affect the integrity of the study.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2015
Report Date:
2016

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 437 (Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Test Method for Identifying Ocular Corrosives and Severe Irritants)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
Control groups data and documentation were shared with another study. This deviation was considered not to affect the integrity of the study.
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. certificate)

Test material

Reference
Name:
Unnamed
Type:
Constituent
Type:
Constituent
Test material form:
other: Off white solid blocks
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): Diacetate
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: 16 June 2015
- Storage condition of test material: Room temperature in the dark

Test animals / tissue source

Species:
other: Cattle
Strain:
not specified
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Local abattoir
- Age at study initiation: 12 to 60 months old

The eyes were excised by an abattoir employee after slaughter, and were placed in Hanks’ Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS) supplemented with antibiotics (penicillin at 100 IU/mL and streptomycin at 100 µg/mL). They were transported to the test facility over ice packs on the same day of slaughter. The corneas were prepared immediately on arrival.

Test system

Vehicle:
physiological saline
Controls:
yes, concurrent vehicle
Amount / concentration applied:
0.75 mL of the test substance present at 20% w/v in a 0.9% w/v sodium chloride solution.
Duration of treatment / exposure:
240 minutes followied by three rinces in fresh minimum essential medium (MEM).
Observation period (in vivo):
Opacity readings were taken and coreneas were observed visually following MEM rince. Permeability to sodium fluoresein was als evaluated.
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
Nine eyes were used during the study, corneas with opacity values close to the median value were used.
Three corneas were issued to each group, test group, positive and negative control group.
Details on study design:
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing: Corenas were rinced three times with fresh MEM.
- Time after start of exposure: 240 minutes


SCORING SYSTEM:

Opacity Measurement:
The change in opacity for each cornea (including the negative control) was calculated by subtracting the initial opacity reading from the final opacity reading. These values were then corrected by subtracting the average change in opacity observed for the negative control corneas. The mean opacity value of each treatment group was then calculated by averaging the corrected opacity values of each cornea for that treatment group.

Permeability Measurement:
The corrected OD492 was calculated by subtracting the mean OD492 of the negative control corneas from the OD492 value of each treated cornea. The OD492 value of each treatment group was calculated by averaging the corrected OD492 values of the treated corneas for the treatment group.

In Vitro Irritancy Score:
The following formula was used to determine the In Vitro Irritancy Score: In Vitro Irritancy Score = mean opacity value + (15 x mean OD492 value).
In Vitro Irritancy Score: ≤ 3 - No category. Not requiring classification to UN GHS or EU CLP
In Vitro Irritancy Score: > 3; ≤55 - No prediction of eye irritation can be made
In Vitro Irritancy Score > 55 -Category 1. UN GHS or EU CLP Causes serious eye damage

Additionally, the opacity and permeability values were evaluated independently to determine whether the test item induced a response through only one of the two endpoints.


TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE: fluorescein permeability

Results and discussion

In vivo

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Remarks:
Negative Control
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 240 minutes
Score:
ca. 2.2
Reversibility:
not specified
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Remarks:
Positive Control
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 240 minutes
Score:
ca. 97.7
Reversibility:
not specified
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Remarks:
Test substance
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 240 minutes
Score:
ca. 66.1
Reversibility:
not specified
Irritant / corrosive response data:
The In Vitro irritancy scores are summarized as follows:
Test Item: 66.1
Negative Control: 2.2
Positive Control: 97.7
Other effects:
The corneas treated with the test item were cloudy post treatment. The corneas treated with the negative control item were clear post treatment. The corneas treated with the positive control item were cloudy post treatment

Any other information on results incl. tables

Table 1: Individual and Mean Corneal Opacity and Permeability Measurements

Treatment Cornea
Number
Opacity Permeability (OD) InVitroIrritancyScore
Pre-Treatment Post-Treatment Post-Treatment−
Pre-Treatment
Corrected
Value
  Corrected
Value
Negative
Control⊕
12 3 6 3   0.009    
18 3 5 2   0.012    
19 3 4 1   0.014    
      2.0*   0.012♦   2.2
Positive
Control⊕
1 6 85 79 77 1.505 1.493  
3 2 77 75 73 1.393 1.381  
5 4 82 78 76 1.601 1.589  
        75.3•   1.488• 97.7
Test Item 14 1 69 68 66 0.042 0.03  
16 1 67 66 64 0.047 0.035  
20 2 71 69 67 0.04 0.028  
        65.7•   0.031• 66.1

OD = Optical density

* = Mean of the post-treatment − pre-treatment values

♦ = Mean permeability

• = Mean corrected value

⊕ = Control group shared with Harlan study number 41500024

Table 2: Corneal Epithelium Condition Post Treatment

Treatment Cornea Number Observation
Post Treatment
NegativeControl⊕ 12 Clear
18 Clear
19 Clear
PositiveControl⊕ 1 Cloudy
3 Cloudy
5 Cloudy
Test Item 14 Cloudy
16 Cloudy
20 Cloudy

⊕ = Control group shared with Harlan study number 41500024

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
irritating
Remarks:
Migrated information Category 1 Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
Category 1. UN GHS or EU CLP Causes serious eye damage.
Executive summary:

The purpose of this test was to identify test items that can induce serious eye damage and to identify test items not requiring classification for eye irritation or serious eye damage. The Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability (BCOP) test method is an organotypic model that provides short-term maintenance of normal physiological and biochemical function of the bovine corneain vitro. In this test method, damage by the test item is assessed by quantitative measurements of changes in corneal opacity and permeability.

 

The test method can correctly identify test items (both chemicals and mixtures) inducing serious eye damage as well as those not requiring classification for eye irritation or serious eye damage, as defined by the United Nations (UN) Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Items (GHS) and EU Classification, Labelling and Packaging (CLP) of chemicals (Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008), and it was therefore endorsed as scientifically valid for both purposes. Test items inducing serious eye damage are classified as UN GHS and EU CLP Category 1. Items not classified for eye irritation or serious eye damage are defined as those that do not meet the requirements for classification as UN GHS/ EU CLP Category 1 or 2 (2A or 2B), i.e. they are referred to as UN GHS/EU CLP No Category.

The test item was applied at a concentration of 20% w/v in 0.9% w/v sodium chloride solution for 240 minutes. Negative and positive control items were tested concurrently. The two endpoints, decreased light transmission through the cornea (opacity) and increased passage of sodium fluorescein dye through the cornea (permeability) were combined in an empirically derived formula to generate an In Vitro Irritancy Score (IVIS).

The test item is classified according to the prediction model below:

IVIS

CLASSIFICATION

≤ 3

No category. Not requiring classification toUNGHS or EUCLP

>3; ≤55

No prediction of eye irritation can be made

>55

Category 1.UNGHS or EUCLP Causes serious eye damage


 

The In-Vitro irritancy scores are summarized as follows:

Treatment

InVitroIrritancy Score

Test Item

66.1

Negative Control

2.2

Positive Control

97.7

 

 

The test Item was concluded to be an Eye Irritant, Category 1. UNGHS or EUCLP Causes serious eye damage.