Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

The in vitro skin irritation test showed inconclusive results with regard to skin irritation; however the in vitro skin corrosion test with the structurally related substance EDTA-Cu(NH4)2 was negative. In addition, two studies were available with EDTA-CuNa2 (see also read across document in section 13) on skin irritation, one using a 80% solution, the other study using a 50% solution. The 80% solution showed slight skin irritation but not sufficient for classification, the 50% solution did not show skin irritation.


The in vitro eye irritation test showed borderline irritation in the BCOP (score was 3.1 which is just > 3). No eye irritation was seen in vitro with EDTA-Cu(NH4)2.


Two in vivo studies were also available with EDTA-CuNa2 for eye irritation. The key study with EDTA-CuNa2 showed irritation just sufficient to require classification, the supporting study showed slight irritation not sufficient for classification.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Respiratory irritation

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Additional information

Most metal chelates are not irritating to the eyes (see read across document in section 13). However, EDTA-CuK2, like EDTA-CuNa2 showed borderline eye irritation, just requiring classification and labeling. Most metal chelates are neither irritating to the skin; however, EDTA-CuK2 showed inconclusive results in vitro. Based on read across with EDTA-Cu(NH4)2 which was irritating but not corrosive to the skin in vitro, it was concluded that also EDTA-CuK2 was irritating to the skin.


 


 


 

Justification for classification or non-classification

Based on the results of the in vitro skin irritation study and read across with EDTA-CuNa2 and EDTA-Cu(NH4)2, it was concluded that no classification was needed for corrosion but for irritation. For the endpoint skin irritation classification with GHS Cat. 2 should be applied based on the skin irritation observed. Based on the in vitro eye irritation test and the in vivo results with EDTA-CuNa2, classification GHS Cat. 2 is required for eye irritation.