Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin sensitisation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in chemico
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2016
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Study done to guideline and following the principles of GLP.

Data source

Reference
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2016

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: OECD 442C
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
Additional analytical data acquired using LC-MS analysis.
GLP compliance:
no
Type of study:
other: DPRA

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
Azarbre
IUPAC Name:
Azarbre
Test material form:
gas under pressure: refrigerated liquefied gas
Details on test material:
Please note that although the substance is stated as the mono-constituent substance 2-cyclohexen-1-one, 3,5-diethyl-5,6-dimethyl (3,5-diethyl-2,5-dimethyl) in the report, analytical data on the same batch shows that the test substance is in fact the multi-constituent substance Reaction mass of 3,5-diethyl-2,5-dimethyl-cyclohex-2-en-1-one and 3,5-diethyl-5,6-dimethylcyclohex-2-en-1-one .

Results and discussion

In vitro / in chemico

Results
Parameter:
other:
Remarks on result:
no indication of skin sensitisation

Any other information on results incl. tables

When using HPLC-UV analysis only, AZARBRE led to 43.1% depletion of the Cys-peptide. It was therefore considered reactive and classified into the LOW reactivity class according to the classical DPRA prediction model. When samples were analysed with high resolution LC-MS, the same amount of peptide depletion was observed. However, no direct adduct was formed in samples with the test chemical. At the same time the test chemical triggered significantly enhanced peptide dimerization, and the observed peptide depletion can be attributed to peptide oxidation rather than adduct formation. Thus, based on this more sophisticated and detailed analysis the test chemical is not directly peptide reactive and the assay does not indicate sensitization potential for Azarbre.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not sensitising
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
Based on this more sophisticated and detailed analysis the test chemical is not directly peptide reactive and the assay does not indicate sensitization potential for Azarbre.