Registration Dossier

Environmental fate & pathways

Bioaccumulation: aquatic / sediment

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Description of key information

Reaction mass of bis(2-propylheptyl) hexanedioate and O6-[2,2-bis[[6-oxo-6-(2-propylheptoxy)hexanoyl]oxymethyl]butyl] O1-(2-propylheptyl) hexanedioate does not accumulate in organisms.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Additional information

Since no study assessing the bioaccumulation potential of Reaction mass of bis(2-propylheptyl) hexanedioate and O6-[2,2-bis[[6-oxo-6-(2-propylheptoxy)hexanoyl]oxymethyl]butyl] O1-(2-propylheptyl) hexanedioate is available, in accordance to Regulation (EC) No. 1907/2006 Annex XI, 1.5 Grouping of substances, a read-across to the structurally related source substance Bis(2-ethylhexyl) adipate (CAS 103-23-1, DEHA) was conducted. The only structural difference between the source substance and the main constituent DPHA [Di(2-propylheptyl)adipate] of the target substance is the slightly (one C-atom) longer carbon chain of the branched fatty alcohol component of DPHA. The read across is justified due to the similarity of structure and functional groups between the source substance and the main constituent (= DPHA) of the target substance. This similarities results in similar physico-chemical properties and accordingly in a similar environmental fate and ecotoxicity profile (for details see justification document in chapter 13). The high molecular weight (> 900 g/mole) and log Pow (> 10) of the TMP ester component of the target substance indicate a much lower bioaccumulation potential of this constituent compared to DPHA. Thus, the study result for the source substance is considered to also cover the bioaccumulation potential of the TMP ester constituent in a worst case approach.

The bioaccumulation of the source substance in aquatic organisms was examined in a bioconcentration test with bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus) using 14C-labelled DEHA (Felder et al. 1986). The test was carried out for 42 days. Concentrations of DEHA in water, whole fish, viscera, and fillet were analyzed at intervals during the test. After the first 35 days of exposure, the remaining fish were exposed to clean water for an additional 14 days and concentrations of DEHA were measured in the fish at intervals. A whole fish bioconcentration factor (BCF) of 27 was reported at day 35. Following exposure to clean water, a depuration rate for DEHA of 0.26/day (t 1/2 = 2.7 days) was determined. The results imply that the accumulation of DEHA is low despite a high log Pow (log Pow = 8.94), most likely due to rapid metabolization. Furthermore, when transferred to freshwater, the substance is apparently rapidly and extensively excreted from the fish. This experimental result can be easily explained by the general enzymatic processes, which are numerously published in the scientific literature: If taken up by living organisms, aliphatic esters such as DEHA and DPHA will be initially metabolized via enzymatic hydrolysis to the respective dicarboxylic acid and alcohol components as would dietary fats (e.g., Linfield 1984, Lehninger 1970, Mattson and Volpenhein 1972). The hydrolysis is catalyzed by carboxylesterases and esterases, with B-esterases located in hepatocytes of mammals being the most important (e.g., Heymann 1980). Carboxylesterase activity has also been reported from a wide variety of tissues in invertebrates and fishes (e.g., Barron et al. 1999, Wheelock et al. 2008). In fish, the high catalytic activity, low substrate specificity and wide distribution of the enzymes in conjunction with a high tissue content lead to a rapid biotransformation of aliphatic esters, which significantly reduces its bioaccumulation potential (Lech and Melancon 1980, Lech and Bend 1980).

2-propylheptanol, adipic acid and trimethylolpropane are the expected hydrolysis products from the enzymatic reaction catalyzed by carboxylesterase. These metabolites exhibit no potential for bioaccumulation (BCF < 150, BCFBAF v3.01 calculation): The metabolism of alcohols has been extensively reviewed in the literature (e.g., see Rizzo et al. 1987, Hargrove et al. 2004). The free alcohols can either be esterified to form wax esters (which are similar to triglycerides) or they can be transformed to fatty acids in a two-step enzymatic process catalyzed by alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) and aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH). The responsible enzymes ADH and ALDH are present in a large number of animals including plants, microorganisms and fish (e.g., Sund and Theorell 1963, Nilsson 1990, Watabiki et al. 1999, Reimers et al. 2004, Lassen et al. 2005).The metabolism of alcohols in fish was extensively studied by Reimers et al. (2004). They isolated and characterized two cDNAs from the zebra fish, Danio rerio, encoding ADHs, which showed specific metabolic activity in in-vitro assays with various alcohol components ranging from C4 to C8. The emerging aldehydes were shown to be further oxidized to the corresponding fatty acid by ALDH enzymes. The most effective ALDH2, which is mainly located in the mitochondria of liver cells showed a sequence similarity of 75% to mammalian ALDH2 enzymes and a similar catalytic activity (also see Nilsson 1988).Metabolism data for adipic acid in aquatic organisms is not available. However, metabolism of adipic acid in rats has been studied by Rusoff et al. (1960). The investigators administered approximately 50 mg 14C-labeled adipic acid to rats by gavage and within 24 hours recovered up to 70 percent of the radioactivity in the breath as carbon dioxide. In addition to adipic acid, Rusoff et al. (1960) also detected five radioactive metabolites including urea, glutamic, lactic,β-ketoadipic, and citric acids in the urine. Due to the presence ofβ-ketoadipic acid in the urine, they suggested that some of the administered adipic acid underwentβ-oxidation toβ-ketoadipic acid which in turn could be further metabolized to succinic acid.



Reaction mass of bis(2-propylheptyl) hexanedioate and O6-[2,2-bis[[6-oxo-6-(2-propylheptoxy)hexanoyl]oxymethyl]butyl] O1-(2-propylheptyl) hexanedioate is not expected to be bioaccumulative. Due to their readily biodegradable nature, extensive degradation of the substance in conventional STPs will take place and only low concentrations are expected to be released into the environment.

Based on high log Pow, low water solubility and high adsorption potential, the main constituents Bis(2-propylheptyl) hexanedioate and O6-[2,2-bis[ [6-oxo- 6-(2-propyl heptoxy)hexanoyl]oxymethyl]butyl] O1-(2-propylheptyl) hexanedioate might be bioavailable to aquatic organisms such as fish only by oral uptake adsorbed on suspended organic particles. After uptake in fish, extensive and fast biotransformation of the main constituents by carboxylesterases into adipic acid, trimethylolpropane and via 2-propylheptanol to 2-propylheptanoic acid is to be expected.

The alcohol is used by these organisms as their main source of energy throughout all the different life stages (early development, growth, reproduction, etc.). Adipic acid does not have the potential to accumulate in adipose tissue due to their low log Pow. The key study with the read across substance reports a BCF value of 27, which clearly indicate that rapid metabolism takes place even when log Pow values are above the trigger value of 4.5. Supporting BCF/BAF values estimated using BCFBAF v3.01 confirm the experimental result (all well below 2000).

The information above provides strong evidence supporting the assumption that rapid metabolism and thus low bioaccumulation potential can be expected for Reaction mass of bis(2-propylheptyl) hexanedioate and O6-[2,2-bis[[6-oxo-6-(2-propylheptoxy)hexanoyl]oxymethyl]butyl] O1-(2-propylheptyl) hexanedioate and its metabolites.



Barron MG et al. 1999. Tissue carboxylesterase activity of rainbow trout. Environ Toxicol Chem 18(11): 2506-2511

Felder et al. 1986. Assessment of the safety of dioctyl adipate in freshwater environments. Environ Toxicol Chem 5: 777-784

Heymann E. 1980. Carboxylesterases and amidases. Pp 291-316. In: Jakoby WB (ed) Enzymatic basis of detoxification Vol 2. Biochem Pharmacol Toxicol: A series of monographs, Academic Press

Hargrove JL. 2004. Nutritional significance and metabolism of very long chain fatty alcohols and acids from dietary waxes. Exp Biol Med 229: 215-226

Lassen N et al. 2005. Molecular cloning, baculovirus expression and tissue distribution of the zebrafish aldehyde dehydrogenase 2. Drug Metabol Disposit 33(5): 649-656

Lech JJ and Bend JR. 1980. Relationship between biotransformation and the toxicity and fate of xenobiotic chemicals in fish.Environmental Health Perspectives 34: 115-131

Lech JJ and Melancon MJ. 1980. Uptake, metabolism, and elimination of 14clabeled 1,2,4trichlorobenzene in rainbow trout and carp.J Toxicol Environ health 6(3): 645-658

Lehninger AL. 1970. Biochemistry. Worth Publishers, Inc.

Linfield WM et al. 1984. Enzymatic fat hydrolysis and synthesis. J Am Oil Chem Soc 61(2): 191-195

Mattson FH and Volpenhein RA. 1972. Hydrolysis of fully esterified alcohols containing from one to eight hydroxyl groups by the lipolytic enzymes of rat pancreatic juice. J Lip Res 13: 325-328

Nilsson GE. 1990. Distribution of aldehyde dehydrogenase and alcohol dehydrogenase in summer-acclimatized crucian carp, Carassius carassius L. J Fish Biol 36(2): 175-179

Nilsson GE. 1988. A comparative study of aldehyde dehydrogenase and alcohol dehydrogenase activities in crucian carp and three other vertebrates: apparent adaptations to ethanol production. J Comp Physiol 158(4): 479-485

Reimers et al. 2004. Two zebrafish alcohol dehydrogenases share common ancestry with mammalian class I, II, IV, and V alcohol dehydrogenase genes but have distinct functional characteristics. J Biol Chem 279: 38303-38312

Rizzo WB et al. 1987. Fatty alcohol metabolism in cultured human fibroblasts. Evidence for a fatty alcohol cycle. J Biol Chem 262: 17412-17419

Rusoff II et al. 1960. Intermediary metabolism of adipic acid. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2: 316-330

Sund H and Theorell H. 1963. Alcohol dehydrogenases. The Enzymes 7: 25-83

Takahashi T et al. 1981. Elimination, distribution and metabolism of di-(2-ethylhexyl)adipate (DEHA) in rats. Toxicology 22: 223-233

Watabiki T et al. 1999. Intralobular distribution of class I alcohol dehydrogenase and aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 activities in the hamster liver. Alc Clinic Exp Res 23: 52-55

Wheelock CE et al. 2008. Applications of carboxylesterase activity in environmental monitoring and toxicity identification evaluations (TI Es). Rev Environ Contam Toxicol 195: 117-178