Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 243-797-2 | CAS number: 20407-84-5
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Eye irritation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2015
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Guideline study performed under GLP. All relevant validity criteria were met.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 015
- Report date:
- 2015
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 437 (Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Test Method for Identifying Ocular Corrosives and Severe Irritants)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU method B.47 (Bovine corneal opacity and permeability test method for identifying ocular corrosives and severe irritants)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: The Ocular Toxicity Working Group (OTWG) of the Interagency Coordinating Committee on the Validation of Alternative Methods (ICCVAM) and the National Interagency Centre for the Evaluation of Alternative Toxicological Methods (NICEATM)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: In Vitro Techniques in Toxicology Database (INVITTOX) protocol 127. Bovine Opacity and Permeability (BCOP) Assay, 2006.
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Gautheron P., Dukic M., Alix D. and Sina J.F., Bovine corneal opacity and permeability test: An in vitro assay of ocular irritancy. Fundam Appl Toxicol 18:442-449, 1992.
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- inspected: March 2013; signature: May 2013
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- (E)-dodec-2-en-1-al
- EC Number:
- 243-797-2
- EC Name:
- (E)-dodec-2-en-1-al
- Cas Number:
- 20407-84-5
- Molecular formula:
- C12H22O
- IUPAC Name:
- dodec-2-enal
- Test material form:
- gas under pressure: refrigerated liquefied gas
- Details on test material:
- - Physical state: Liquid.
- Storage condition of test material: At room temperature protected from light.
- Other: Colourless
Constituent 1
Test animals / tissue source
- Species:
- other: bovine
- Strain:
- not specified
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Bovine eyes from young cattle were obtained from the slaughterhouse.
- Age at study initiation: not reported
- Weight at study initiation: not reported
- Housing: The isolated corneas were mounted in a corneal holder (one cornea per holder) of MC2 (recognised supplier) with the endothelial
side against the O-ring of the posterior half of the holder. The anterior half of the holder was positioned on top of the cornea and tightened with screws. The compartments of the corneal holder were filled with cMEM of 32 ± 1°C. The corneas were incubated for the minimum of 1 hour at 32 ± 1°C.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 32 ± 1
Test system
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- other: Three corneas were used for the positive and negative control groups.
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 750 microlitres
- Concentration (if solution): undiluted - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 10 ±1 minutes
- Observation period (in vivo):
- After treatment the corneas were incubated for 120 ± 10 minutes at 32 ± 1°C. After the completion of the incubation period opacity determination was performed.
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- Three corneas were used for each treatment group
- Details on study design:
- REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): After treatment with the test material the epithelium was washed with MEM with phenol red (Eagle’s Minimum Essential Medium) and thereafter with cMEM. Possible pH effects of the test substance on the corneas were recorded. The medium in the posterior compartment was removed and both compartments were refilled with fresh cMEM. Subsequently the corneas were incubated for 120 ± 10 minutes at 32 ± 1°C.
- Time after start of exposure: 10 ± 1 minutes
SCORING SYSTEM:
The mean opacity and mean permeability values (OD490) were used for each treatment group to calculate an in vitro score:
In vitro irritancy score (IVIS) = mean opacity value + (15 x mean OD490 value)
Additionally the opacity and permeability values were evaluated independently to determine whether the test substance induced irritation through only one of the two endpoints. A test substance that induces an IVIS ≥ 55.1 is defined as a corrosive or severe irritant. A IVIS score of less than 3 is interpreted as having no prediction for corrosive or irritant effects.
TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE: Opacity determinations were performed on each of the corneas using an opacitometer (OP-KIT, MC2)
Results and discussion
In vitro
Results
- Irritation parameter:
- in vitro irritation score
- Remarks:
- 10 minutes exposure
- Run / experiment:
- mean
- Value:
- 1.3
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not applicable
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Remarks:
- IVIS scores ranged from -0.1 to 2 after 10 minutes treatment
- Other effects / acceptance of results:
- The negative control responses for opacity and permeability were less than the upper limits of the laboratory historical range indicating that the negative control did not induce irritancy on the corneas. The mean in vitro irritancy score of the positive control (10% (w/v) Benzalkonium Chloride) was 128.2 and was within the historical positive control data range. It was therefore concluded that the test conditions were adequate and that the test system functioned properly. The test material did not induce ocular irritation through both endpoints, resulting in a mean in vitro irritancy score of 1.3 after 10 minutes of treatment. Additionally, all opacity and permeability responses were within the ranges of the historic negative controls.
No pH effect of the test substance was observed on the rinsing medium.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1 Summary of opacity, permeability and in vitro scores
Treatment |
Mean Opacity #1 |
Mean Permeability #1 |
Mean In vitro Irritation Score #1 , 2 |
Negative Control |
-0.3 |
0.000 |
0.0 |
Positive Control (Benzalkonium chloride) |
81.7 |
3.102 |
128.2 |
Test substance |
1.3 |
-0.004 |
1.3 |
#1 Calculated using the negative control mean opacity and mean permeability values
#2 Mean in vitro irritancy score (IVIS) = mean opacity value + (15 x mean OD490 value)
Table 2 Opacity score
Eye |
Opacity before treatment |
Opacity after treatment |
Final opacity #1 |
Negative control corrected final opacity #2 |
Mean Opacity |
Negative Control |
|||||
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
|
3 |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
Positive Control |
|||||
4 |
-1 |
83 |
84 |
84.0 |
81.7 |
5 |
-1 |
83 |
84 |
84.0 |
|
6 |
-1 |
76 |
77 |
77.0 |
|
Test substance |
|||||
7 |
-2 |
0 |
2 |
2.0 |
1.3 |
8 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
|
9 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
2.0 |
#1 Final Opacity = Opacity after treatment – Opacity before treatment
#2 Negative control corrected Final Opacity = Final opacity – Mean final opacity negative control
Table 3 Permeability score individual values (uncorrected)
Eye |
Dilution Factor |
OD490 1 |
OD490 2 |
OD490 3 |
Average OD490 |
Final OD |
Mean Final Negative Control |
|
Negative Control |
|
|||||
1 |
1 |
0.010 |
0.011 |
0.011 |
0.011 |
0.011 |
0.008 |
2 |
1 |
0.004 |
0.004 |
0.004 |
0.004 |
0.004 |
|
3 |
1 |
0.009 |
0.007 |
0.008 |
0.003 |
0.008 |
|
|
Positive Control |
|
|||||
4 |
6 |
0.314 |
0.311 |
0.312 |
0.312 |
1.874 |
|
5 |
6 |
0.482 |
0.479 |
0.473 |
0.478 |
2.868 |
|
6 |
6 |
0.794 |
0.781 |
0.775 |
0.783 |
4.700 |
|
|
Test substance |
||||||
7 |
1 |
0.003 |
0.002 |
0.003 |
0.003 |
0.003 |
|
8 |
1 |
0.001 |
0.002 |
0.001 |
0.001 |
0.001 |
|
9 |
1 |
0.010 |
0.006 |
0.008 |
0.008 |
0.008 |
Table 4 In vitro irritancy score
Eye |
Negative control corrected final opacity |
Negative control corrected Final OD490 |
In vitro Irritancy Score #1 |
Negative Control |
|||
1 |
0.0 |
0.003 |
0.0 |
2 |
0.0 |
-0.004 |
-0.1 |
3 |
0.0 |
0.000 |
0.0 |
Positive Control |
|||
4 |
84.0 |
1.829 |
111.4 |
5 |
84.0 |
2.823 |
126.3 |
6 |
77.0 |
4.655 |
146.8 |
Test substance |
|||
7 |
2.0 |
-0.005 |
1.9 |
8 |
0.0 |
-0.006 |
-0.1 |
9 |
2.0 |
0.000 |
2.0 |
#1 In vitro irritancy score (IVIS) = opacity value + (15 x OD490 value)
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- not irritating
- Remarks:
- Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
- Conclusions:
- Under the test conditions the test material is not irritant or corrosive in the Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability test.
- Executive summary:
The study was performed to OECD TG 437 and EU Method B.47 to assess the irritancy potential of the test material to the eye following exposure to bovine corneas in accordance with GLP. A total of 3 corneas per treatment group were used. A volume of 750 microlitres of the test material was placed the cornea. The negative control group received saline and the positive control group received 10% benzalkonium chloride. For each group the corneas were incubated for 10 ± 1 minutes at 32 ± 1°C. After the incubation the solutions were removed and the corneas were washed with MEM with phenol red (Eagle’s Minimum Essential Medium) and thereafter with cMEM. Possible pH effects of the test substance on the corneas were recorded. The medium in the posterior compartment was removed and both compartments were refilled with fresh cMEM. Subsequently the corneas were incubated for 120 ± 10 minutes at 32 ± 1°C. After the completion of the incubation period opacity determination was performed. Each cornea was inspected visually for dissimilar opacity patterns. Following the final opacity measurement, permeability of the cornea to Na-fluorescein was evaluated. The negative control responses for opacity and permeability were less than the upper limits of the laboratory historical range indicating that the negative control did not induce irritancy on the corneas. The mean in vitro irritancy score of the positive control (10% (w/v) Benzalkonium Chloride) was 128.2 and was within the historical positive control data range. It was therefore concluded that the test conditions were adequate and that the test system functioned properly. The test material did not induce ocular irritation through both endpoints, resulting in a mean in vitro irritancy score of 1.3 after 10 minutes of treatment. All opacity and permeability responses were within the ranges of the historic negative controls. Based on these results the test material is considered to be not irritating or corrosive in the Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability test.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.