Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
February 23, 2015
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: The study was conducted according to OECD Guideline 437 and EU Method B.47, in compliance with GLP.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2015
Report date:
2015

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 437 (Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Test Method for Identifying Ocular Corrosives and Severe Irritants)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
"The measurement of the opacity was performed with a photometer (570 nm) instead of an opacitometer." This deviation was considered as uncritical, because the opacity can be calculated from the absorbance.
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU method B.47 (Bovine corneal opacity and permeability test method for identifying ocular corrosives and severe irritants)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
"The measurement of the opacity was performed with a photometer (570 nm) instead of an opacitometer." This deviation was considered as uncritical, because the opacity can be calculated from the absorbance.
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
Fatty acids, tall-oil, reaction products with triethylenetetramine
EC Number:
272-905-0
EC Name:
Fatty acids, tall-oil, reaction products with triethylenetetramine
Cas Number:
68919-79-9
Molecular formula:
Not applicable for this UVCB.
IUPAC Name:
Fatty acids, tall-oil, reaction products with triethylenetetramine
Test material form:
semi-solid (amorphous): gel
Remarks:
migrated information: paste

Test animals / tissue source

Species:
other: Bos primigenius Taurus (fresh bovine corneas)

Test system

Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
other: in vitro test
Amount / concentration applied:
791.6, 1,063.8 and 1,199.9 mg (applied directly on the cornea using a weight board)
Duration of treatment / exposure:
4 h

Results and discussion

In vivo

Results
Irritation parameter:
other: in vitro irritancy score (IVIS)
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 4 h
Score:
5.17
Irritant / corrosive response data:
In the negative control, no signs of eye irritation were observed. The positive control induced serious eye damage, which would be classified as GHS category 1.

The test substance produced effects on the cornea of the bovine eye. The calculated IVIS (in vitro irritancy score) is 5.170.

The experiment is considered as sufficient for the classification of the test substance, because all three replicates of the test substance lead to the same assessment for the test substance.

Any other information on results incl. tables

The absorbance (570 nm) and opacity values which were measured before and after exposition are given in the following table:

Table 1: Absorbance and Opacity Values Negative Control

Parameter

Negative Control

Absorbance before exposition

0.1524

0.1586

0.1575

Absorbance after exposition

0.3357

0.2667

0.2902

Opacity before exposition

1.4204

1.4408

1.4371

Opacity after exposition

2.1662

1.848

1.9507

Opacity Difference

0.7458

0.4072

0.5136

 

Mean opacity difference of the negative control was 0.5555

  

Table 2: Absorbance and Opacity Values Test Substance and Positive Control

Parameter

Test substance

Positive Control

Absorbance before exposition

0.2603

0.1417

0.1195

0.1184

0.1849

0.1239

Absorbance after exposition

0.2702

0.2478

0.2602

1.6291

1.8528

1.7304

Opacity before exposition

1.821

1.3858

1.3167

1.3134

1.5307

1.3301

Opacity after exposition

1.8629

1.7693

1.8205

42.5696

71.2525

53.7527

Opacity Difference

0.042

0.3835

0.5038

41.2562

69.7217

52.4225

For the permeability measurement, three replicates for each treatment group were measured. The optical density values at 490 nm are given in the following table:

Table 3: Optical density at 490 nm

Repl.

Negative Control

Test Substance

Positive Control

Meas.

0.0041

0.0029

0.0028

0.0921

0.0734

0.0609

0.3978

0.2436

0.3568

Corr.

0.0205

0.0145

0.0140

0.4605

0.3670

0.3045

1.9890

1.2180

1.7840

Mean

0.0163

----

Table 2: IVIS

Test group

IVIS

Mean IVIS

Relative standard deviation IVIS

Negative Control

0.9% NaCl

1.053

0.801

28.0%

0.625

0.724

Test substance

6.149

5.170

18.2%

5.088

4.271

Positive Control

20% imidazole solution

70.3

78.6

10.8%

87.2

78.4

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
The test substance produced effects on the cornea of the bovine eye with a calculated IVIS (in vitro irritancy score) of 5.170, according to OECD Guideline 437. The experiment is considered as sufficient for the classification of the test substance because all three replicates of the test substance lead to the same assessment (Andres, 2015).
Executive summary:

A study was conducted to assess the corneal damage potential of the test substance in bovine cornea by measuring opacity and permeability according to OECD Guideline 437 and EU Method B.47, in compliance with GLP. The pure test substance was brought onto the cornea of a bovine eye for 4 h at 32 ± 1°C, which had been previously incubated in cMEM, without phenol red, at 32 ± 1°C for 1 h. After removal of the test substance, opacity and permeability values were measured. Under the study conditions, the test substance produced effects on the cornea of the bovine eye with a calculated IVIS (in vitro irritancy score) of 5.170. The negative control (physiological sodium chloride solution) and the positive control (20% imidazole solution) met the validity criteria. The experiment was considered as sufficient for the classification of the test substance as eye irritant because all three replicates of the test substance lead to the same assessment (Andres I, 2015b).