1,3,4,5-tetrahydroxycyclohexanecarboxylic acid

Eye irritation

Administrative data

Endpoint:

eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo

Type of information:

experimental study

Adequacy of study:

key study

Reliability:

1 (reliable without restriction)

Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:

other: The study was done according to OECD guideline 437.

Data source

Reference

Reference Type:

study report

Title:

Unnamed

Year:

2014

Report date:

2014

Materials and methods

Test guideline

Test guideline 1

Qualifier:

according to guideline

Guideline:

OECD Guideline 437 (Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Test Method for Identifying Ocular Corrosives and Severe Irritants)

Test guideline 2

Qualifier:

according to guideline

Guideline:

EU method B.47 (Bovine corneal opacity and permeability test method for identifying ocular corrosives and severe irritants)

Principles of method if other than guideline:

Test System:
Fresh bovine eyes were obtained from the slaughterhouse Müller Fleisch GmbH, Enzstr. 2 - 4, 75217 Birkenfeld, Germany, on the day of the test. The cattle were between 12 and 60 months old. The eyes were transported to the test facility in Hank’s balanced salt solution (supplemented with 0.01 % streptomycin and 0.01 % penicillin). Then, the corneas were dissected and incubated in medium at 32 ± 1 °C in an incubation chamber for 1 hour.

Preparations:
After having carefully cleaned and sterilised the cornea holders, they were kept in the incubation chamber at 32 +-1°C. On the day of the assay, the MEM without phenol red was supplemented with sodium bicarbonate, L-glutamine and 1 % fetal calf serum (= complete MEM) and stored in a water bath at 32 °C ± 1 °C. The same was performed with the MEM with phenol red. After the arrival of the corneas they were examined and only corneas which were free from defects were used. The corneas were excised with a scalpel and cut from the globe with a 2-3 mm ring of sclera around the outside. Each cornea was transferred to a cornea holder in which pre-warmed cMEM without phenol red was filled. The holders were then incubated for one hour in the incubation chamber at 32 °C.

Method Description:
After the initial incubation, the medium was changed and the baseline opacity for each cornea was recorded. None of the corneas showed tissue damage; therefore, all corneas were used. The baseline opacity was measured by placing the holder with the cornea in a spectral photometer and recording the absorption at 570 nm. Opacity is calculated from the measured absorption. For each treatment group (negative control solution, test item suspension and positive control solution), three replicates were used. After removal of the pre-incubation medium, 750 μL negative control solution resp. test item suspension resp. positive control solution were applied to each replicate

According to the characteristics of the test item, the following treatment procedure was performed: Open Chamber Method:
The “open chamber-method” is used for solid substances. In order to apply the test item, the nut was unscrewed to remove the glass disc. The test item could be applied directly on the cornea now. 750 μL of the test item were tested as suspension at 20 % concentration in 0.9 % sodium chloride solution. The test item suspension was given on the epithelium in such a manner that as much as possible of the cornea was covered with test item suspension. Exposition time on the corneas was 4 h ± 5 min. at 32 °C. After thorough rinsing with cMEM with phenol red and final rinsing with cMEM without phenol red, both chambers were filled with cMEM without phenol red, and the final opacity value of each cornea was recorded at once (again by measurement at 570 nm). The cMEM without phenol red was then removed from the front chamber, and 1 mL sodium fluorescein solution (concentration
5 mg/mL) was added to the front chamber. The chambers were then closed again and incubated for 90 ± 5 min at 32 ± 1 °C. After incubation, the content of the posterior chamber was thoroughly mixed. Then, the permeability of the cornea was measured as optical density of the liquid at 490 nm.

GLP compliance:

yes (incl. QA statement)

Test material

Test material information

Constituent 1

Reference substance name:

Quinic acid

IUPAC Name:

Quinic acid

Constituent 2

Reference substance name:

1,3,4,5-tetrahydroxycyclohexanecarboxylic acid

EC Number:

201-072-8

EC Name:

1,3,4,5-tetrahydroxycyclohexanecarboxylic acid

Cas Number:

77-95-2

Molecular formula:

C7H12O6

IUPAC Name:

(1S, 3R, 4S, 5R)- 1,3,4,5-Tetrahydroxy-cyclohexanecarboxylic acid

Test material form:

solid: particulate/powder

Remarks:

migrated information: powder

Details on test material:

- Name of test material (as cited in study report): Quinic acid
- Molecular formula (if other than submission substance): C7H12O6
- Molecular weight (if other than submission substance): 192.17 g/mol
- Substance type: white powder
- Physical state: solid
- Analytical purity: 98.3% quinic acid
- Lot/batch No.: Lot 7911
- Stability under test conditions: H2O: 96 h; EtOH; acetone; CH3CN; DMSO: unknown
- Storage condition of test material: room temperature 20 ± 5 °C, keep away from light and humidity

Test animals / tissue source

Species:

other: Bos primigenius Taurus (Fresh bovine corneas)

Test system

Vehicle:

physiological saline

Remarks:

0.9 % sodium chloride solution

Amount / concentration applied:

TEST MATERIAL
- Concentration (if solution): 20% in 0.9 % sodium chloride solution

Duration of treatment / exposure:

Incubation time: 4 hours at 32 ± 1 °C

Details on study design:

Negative Control: Sodium chloride solution: 0.9 % NaCl (CAS-No. 7647-14-5), dissolved in demin. water.
Positive Control: Imidazole solution: 20 % C3H4N2 (CAS-No. 288-32-4), dissolved in 0.9 % NaCl.
The test item is a non-surfactant solid substance. It was tested as a suspension at a concentration of 20% in 0.9 % sodium chloride solution.

Results and discussion

In vitro

Results

Results 1

Irritation parameter:

in vitro irritation score

Run / experiment:

2

Value:

52.548

Vehicle controls validity:

not examined

Negative controls validity:

valid

Positive controls validity:

valid

Results 2

Irritation parameter:

in vitro irritation score

Run / experiment:

3

Value:

52.151

Vehicle controls validity:

not examined

Negative controls validity:

valid

Positive controls validity:

valid

Any other information on results incl. tables

Opacity and Permeability Values of the Second Experiment. The first experiment was invalid and is not reported.

The absorption (570 nm) and opacity values which were measured before and after exposition are given in the following table:

A) Absorption and Opacity Values Negative Control:

Parameter	Negative Control
Absorption before exposition	0.1534	0.1456	0.1523
Absorption after exposition	0.2548	0.1948	0.2557
Opacity before exposition	1.4236	1.3983	1.4200
Opacity after exposition	1.7980	1.5660	1.8018
Opacity Difference	0.3744	0.1677	0.3817

Mean opacity difference of the negative control is 0.3080.

B) Absorption and Opacity Values Test Item and Positive Control:

Parameter	Test Item Quinic acid			Positive Control
Absorption before exposition	0.1239	0.1380	0.1355	0.1539	0.1389	0.1598
Absorption after exposition	1.673	1.6600	1.8429	1.5211	1.7040	1.5634
Opacity before exposition	1.3301	1.3740	1.3662	1.4253	1.3769	1.4448
Opacity after exposition	47.0977	45.7088	69.6466	33.1971	50.5825	36.5932
Opacity Difference	45.7676	44.3348	68.2805	31.7718	49.2056	35.1484

For the permeability measurement, three replicates for each treatment group were measured. The optical density values at 490 nm are given in the following table:

C) Optical density at 490 nm:

Repl.	Negative Control			Test Item Quinic acid			Positive Control
Meas.	0.0074	0.0059	0.0099	0.0094	0.0048	0.0115	0.5096	0.3197	0.3642
Corr.	0.0370	0.0295	0.0495	0.0470	0.0240	0.0575	2.5480	1.5985	1.8210
Mean	0.0387			--

Note: In order to correct the path length, a factor of 5 was taken into account when calculating the IVIS.

IVIS Values

IVIS was calculated using the values in tables A, B and C and the equation IVIS = (opacity difference – mean opacity difference of the negative controls) + [15 * (corr.OD490 – mean corr. OD490 of the negative controls)]

The calculated IVIS for each replicate and the corresponding means are presented in the following table:

D) IVIS:

Test Group	IVIS	Mean IVIS	Relative Standard Deviation IVIS
Negative Control 0.9% NaCl	0.929
	0.610	0.888	29.2 %
	1.124
Test Item Quinic acid	45.584
	43.806	52.548	25.9 %
	68.254
Positive Control 20% imidazole	69.103
	72.295	67.658	8.1 %
	61.575

Opacity and Permeability Values of the Third Experiment.

The absorption (570 nm) and opacity values which were measured before and after exposition are given in the following table:

A) Absorption and Opacity Values Negative Control:

Parameter	Negative Control
Absorption before exposition	0.1532	0.1552	0.1546
Absorption after exposition	0.3141	0.1982	0.2154
Opacity before exposition	1.4230	1.4296	1.4276
Opacity after exposition	2.0611	1.5783	1.6421
Opacity Difference	0.6381	0.1488	0.2145

Mean opacity difference of the negative control is 0.3338.

B) Absorption and Opacity Values Test Item and Positive Control:

Parameter	Test Item Quinic acid			Positive Control
Absorption before exposition	0.2060	0.1437	0.1516	0.1500	0.1336	0.1624
Absorption after exposition	1.8269	1.6772	1.6654	1.8089	2.0742	2.1406
Opacity before exposition	1.6069	1.3922	1.4178	1.4125	1.3602	1.4534
Opacity after exposition	67.1274	47.5554	46.2807	64.4021	118.6315	138.2293
Opacity Difference	65.5205	46.1632	44.8630	62.9896	117.2713	136.7758

For the permeability measurement, three replicates for each treatment group were measured. The optical density values at 490 nm are given in the following table:

C) Optical density at 490 nm:

Repl.	Negative Control			Test Item Quinic acid			Positive Control
Meas.	0.0043	0.0041	0.0060	0.0150	0.0068	0.0047	0.1856	0.1992	0.1594
Corr.	0.0215	0.0205	0.0300	0.0750	0.0340	0.0235	0.9280	0.9960	0.7970
Mean	0.0240			--

Note: In order to correct the path length, a factor of 5 was taken into account when calculating the IVIS.

IVIS Values

IVIS was calculated using the values in tables A, B and C and the equation IVIS = (opacity difference – mean opacity difference of the negative controls) + [15 * (corr.OD490 – mean corr. OD490 of the negative controls)]

The calculated IVIS for each replicate and the corresponding means are presented in the following table:

D) IVIS:

Test Group	IVIS	Mean IVIS	Relative Standard Deviation IVIS
Negative Control 0.9% NaCl	0.961
	0.456	0.694	36.5%
	0.665
Test Item Quinic acid	65.952
	45.979	52.151	23 %
	44.522
Positive Control 20% imidazole	76.216
	131.518	118.590	31.7 %
	148.037

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:

Category 2A (irritating to eyes)

Remarks:

Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: other: UN GHS

Conclusions:

According to the study report, quinic acid had effects on the cornea of the bovine eye. The calculated IVIS (in vitro irritancy score) is 52.548 and 52.151. Therefore, quinic acid is moderate irritating to eyes.

Executive summary:

This in vitro study was performed to assess serious eye damage of quinic acid by quantitative measurements of changes in opacity and permeability in a bovine cornea. Three experiments were performed. The first experiment was declared invalid, because the value of the positive control was not within the range of the historical data. The second and the third experiment are reported in this report. The test item quinic acid was brought onto the cornea of a bovine eye which previously had been incubated with cMEM without phenol red at 32 ± 1 °C for one hour and whose opacity had been determined. A 20 % suspension of quinic acid was incubated on the cornea for four hours at 32 ± 1 °C. After removal of the test item, opacity and permeability values were measured. Physiological sodium chloride solution was used as negative control and imidazole (20 % solution in 0.9 % sodium chloride solution) was used as positive control. The negative control showed no irritation effects and no serious eye damage, mean IVIS was 0.888 (second experiment) and 0.694 (third experiment). The positive control induced serious eye damage on the cornea, mean IVIS was 67.658 (second experiment) and 118.590 (third experiment). Under this test conditions, quinic acid showed effects on the cornea of the bovine eye. In the second experiment, the calculated IVIS is 52.548 and in the third experiment, the calculated IVIS is 52.151.

According to OECD Guideline no. 437 (Jul. 2013), a substance with an IVIS > 3 and ≤ 55 induces effects on the cornea, that cannot be classified in a UN GHS Category. According to the Background Review Document Current Status of In Vitro Test Methods for Identifying Mild/Moderate Ocular Irritants: Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Test Method, 2010 a substance with an IVIS of 25.1 - 55 is moderate irritant. Therefore, we assumed that quinic acid is moderate irritating to eyes and need to be classified.