Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 942-835-1 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 9 September to 15 October 2014
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Test guideline study conducted in accordance with GLP
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 015
- Report date:
- 2015
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- mammalian cell gene mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Triethylenetetramine, propoxylated (triethylene-tetramine adduct)
- IUPAC Name:
- Triethylenetetramine, propoxylated (triethylene-tetramine adduct)
- Test material form:
- other: Clear light yellow multiconstituent liquid
- Details on test material:
- Common name: TTriethylenetetramine, propoxylated (triethylene-tetramine adduct)
CAS: 500-055-5
Constituent 1
Method
- Target gene:
- Hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyl transferase (HPRT) locus (hprt) of Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not applicable
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Aroclor 1254-induced rat liver S9 was used as the metabolic activation system
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 625, 1250, 2500, 3750 and 5000 μg/mL with and without S9.
- Vehicle / solvent:
- Sterile, distilled water (CAS No. 7732-18-5; Lot No. 1420169, Expiration Date: 30 August 2015), obtained from Gibco.
Controlsopen allclose all
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- benzo(a)pyrene
- Remarks:
- with activation
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- ethylmethanesulphonate
- Remarks:
- without activation
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- The CHO-K1-BH4 cell line is a proline auxotroph with a modal chromosome number of 20, a population doubling time of 12-14 hours, and a cloning efficiency generally greater than 80% (Li et al., 1987). The CHO-K1-BH4 cells used in this study were obtained from A.W. Hsie, Oak Ridge National Laboratories (Oak Ridge, TN) and the stock cells were stored frozen in liquid nitrogen.
The in-vitro mammalian cell forward gene mutation (CHO/HPRT) assay was conducted by exposing CHO-K1-BH4 cells to concentrations of the test substance as well as the concurrent positive and vehicle controls, in the presence and absence of an exogenous metabolic activation system.
CHO cells were maintained in Ham's F12 medium, supplemented with 3 mM L-glutamine and 5% (v/v) heat-inactivated and dialyzed fetal bovine serum (F12FCM5) under standard conditions (37±1°C in a humidified atmosphere of 5±1% CO2 in air). Treatment medium was Ham’s F12 medium supplemented with 3 mM L-glutamine (serum free). Hypoxanthine-free F12FCM5 (Hx-F12FCM5) was used for mutant selection and to determine cloning efficiency at the time of selection. Medium for selection of mutants also contained 10 μM TG. All media contained antimycotics and antibiotics.
To reduce the frequency of spontaneous HPRT- mutants prior to use in an assay, the cells were cleansed in medium supplemented with hypoxanthine, aminopterin and thymidine (HAT). Frozen stock cultures were tested to confirm the absence of mycoplasma contamination and for karyotpye stability. Cells used in the mutation assay did not exceed 15 passages from frozen stock.
Aroclor 1254-induced rat liver S9 was used as the metabolic activation system. The S9 was prepared from male Sprague-Dawley rats that were injected intraperitoneally with Aroclor™ 1254 (200 mg/mL in corn oil) at a dose of 500 mg/kg, five days before sacrifice. The S9 (Lot No. 3283, Expiration Date: 28 May 2016) was purchased commercially from Moltox (Boone, NC). Upon arrival, the S9 was stored at -60°C or colder until used. The lot of S9 was assayed for sterility and its ability to metabolize at least two pro-mutagens to forms mutagenic to Salmonella typhimurium TA100.
Target cells were treated for 5 (±0.5) hours in the presence and absence of S9, by addition of the test and control formulations to the treatment medium (with or without S9, as appropriate).
After the 5-hour treatment, the treatment media were removed, the cultures were washed twice with CMF-HBSS and then were trypsinized and counted. Cells were subcultured at ~1 x 106 cells/75-cm2 flask in 10 mL F12FCM5 in duplicate (or all available into 1 or 2 flasks) for phenotypic expression and incubated under standard conditions (larger numbers of cells may be subcultured for phenotypic expression where decreases in cloning efficiency are observed in the DRF; i.e., there should be ~1 x 106 viable cells for phenotypic expression). An additional aliquot of cells was plated at 200 cells/60-mm plate in 5 mL F12FCM5 in triplicate for initial survival. The 60-mm plates were incubated under standard conditions for 7 to 10 days and the resulting colonies were fixed in methanol, stained with crystal violet, and counted.
The cultures were subcultured for 7 to 8 days, at 2- to 3-day intervals, to maintain logarithmic growth and permit expression of the mutant phenotype. At each subsulture, the flasks were trypsinized, counted and subcultured at ~1 x 106 cells/75-cm2 flask in 10 mL F12FCM5 in duplicate (or all available into 1 or 2 plates). If visual observation indicated there were sufficient cells in a single flask, only one was subcultured (into duplicate flasks) and the back-up was discarded; if visual observed indicated there were relatively few cells present, the culture(s) were re-fed with fresh medium and re-incubated for an additional 2 to 3 days.
At the end of the phenotypic expression period, 1 x 106 cells from each culture were plated at a density of 2 x 105 cells/100-mm plate (5 plates total) in 10 mL Hx-F12FCM5 containing 10 μM TG. Three 60-mm plates also were plated, at 200 cells/plate in 5 mL Hx-F12FCM5 in triplicate, to determine the cloning efficiency at the time of selection. The plates were incubated under standard conditions for 7 to 10 days.
After the 7- to 10-day incubation period, the colonies were fixed with methanol, stained with crystal violet and counted. Mutant frequencies were expressed as the number of TGr mutants/106 clonable cells. The number of clonable cells was determined from the triplicate 60-mm plates. - Evaluation criteria:
- The positive controls must induce a significant increase in mutant frequency as compared to the concurrent vehicle controls (p≤ 0.01). A significant increase in the absence of S9 indicated the test system could identify a mutagen, while a significant increase in the presence of S9 was considered to have demonstrated the integrity of the S9 mix as well as the ability of the test system to detect a mutagen.
The highest concentration evaluated was the limit dose for this assay (5000 μg/mL or 10 mM), or must have induced 10 to 20% adjusted relative survival, or must have been the highest concentration able to be prepared in the vehicle and administered (whichever was lowest). If increasing cytotoxicity was observed at precipitating concentrations, cytotoxicity was the determining factor. This latter requirement was waived if the highest concentration with acceptable cytotoxicity (>10% adjusted relative survival) was at least 75% of an excessively toxic concentration (cultures with adjusted relative survivals <10% were excluded from evaluated as excessively cytotoxic). There was no maximum concentration or toxicity requirement for test substances which clearly showed mutagenic activity.
A minimum of four acceptable concentrations was required for a valid assay. Fewer concentrations may be justified for test substances which clearly show mutagenic activity. - Statistics:
- Statistical analyses were performed using the method of Snee and Irr (1981), with significance established at the 0.05 level.
Once criteria for a valid assay were met, the responses observed in the assay were evaluated as follows.
The test substance was considered to have produced a positive response if it induced a statistically significant and dose-dependent increase in mutant frequency (p≤ 0.05) that exceeded the 95% confidence limit of the historical vehicle control data from this laboratory. If only one criterion was met (a statistically significant or dose-dependent increase or an increase exceeding the historical control 95% confidence interval), the results were considered equivocal. If none of these criteria were met, the results were considered to be negative.
Other criteria also may be used in reaching a conclusion about the study results (e.g., comparison to historical control values, biological significance, etc.). In such cases, the Study Director used sound scientific judgment and clearly reported and described any such considerations.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- Solubility Test
Water was selected as the solvent of choice based on the solubility of the test substance and compatibility with the target cells. The test substance formed a clear solution in sterile water at a concentration of ~50 mg/mL, the maximum tested.
Dose Range-Finding Assay
Results of the preliminary toxicity assay are presented in Table 1. The test material was prepared in distilled water and evaluated in a dose range-finding assay at concentrations of 9.77, 19.5, 39.1, 78.1, 156, 313, 625, 1250, 2500 and 5000 μg/mL with and without S9. No visible precipitate was observed at the beginning or end of treatment, but the pH of the cultures was adjusted at all concentrations, using 1N HCl, to maintain neutral pH. The test substance did not have an adverse impact on the osmolality of the cultures [252 and 261 mmol/kg for the solvent control and the highest concentration evaluated, respectively]. Adjusted relative survival was 88.18 and 86.05% at a concentration of 5000 μg/mL with and without S9, respectively.
Definitive Mutagenicity Assay
Results of the mutagenicity assay are presented in Table 2. Based on the results of the dose range-finding assay, the test material was evaluated in the definitive mutagenicity assay at concentrations of 625, 1250, 2500, 3750 and 5000 μg/mL with and without S9. No visible precipitate was observed at the beginning or end of treatment, but the pH of the cultures was adjusted at all concentrations to maintain neutral pH. The average adjusted relative survival was 95.39 and 99.43% at a concentration of 5000 μg/mL with and without S9, respectively. No significant increases in mutant frequency, as compared to the concurrent vehicle controls, were observed at any concentration evaluated with or without S9 (p> 0.05). In contrast, the positive controls induced significant increases in mutant frequency (p< 0.01).
All positive and vehicle control values were within acceptable ranges, and all criteria for a valid assay were met. - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- The results of the test indicate that the test was negative in the In Vitro Mammalian Cell Forward Gene Mutation (CHO/HPRT) Assay with Duplicate Cultures under the conditions, and according to the criteria, of the test protocol.
- Executive summary:
The test material, triethylenetetramine, propoxylated , was evaluated for its ability to induce forward mutations at the hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyl transferase (HPRT) locus (hprt) of Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells, in the presence and absence of an exogenous metabolic activation system (S9), as assayed by colony growth in the presence of 6-thioguanine (TG resistance, TGr). The test material was prepared in distilled water and evaluated in a preliminary dose range-finding assay at concentrations of 9.77, 19.5, 39.1, 78.1, 156, 313, 625, 1250, 2500 and 5000 μg/mL with and without S9.
No visible precipitate was observed at the beginning or end of treatment, but the pH of the cultures was adjusted at all concentrations, using 1N HCl, to maintain neutral pH. The test substance did not have an adverse impact on the osmolality of the cultures. Adjusted relative survival was 88.18 and 86.05% at a concentration of 5000 μg/mL with and without S9, respectively. Based on these results, the test material was evaluated in the definitive mutagenicity assay at concentrations of 625, 1250, 2500, 3750 and 5000 μg/mL with and without S9. No visible precipitate was observed at the beginning or end of treatment, and the pH of the cultures was adjusted at all concentrations to maintain neutral pH. The average adjusted relative survival was 95.39 and 99.43% at a concentration of 5000 μg/mL with and without S9, respectively. No significant increases in mutant frequency, as compared to the concurrent vehicle controls, were observed at any concentration evaluated with or without S9 (p> 0.05). In contrast, the positive controls induced significant increases in mutant frequency (p< 0.01).
All positive and vehicle control values were within acceptable ranges, and all criteria for a valid assay were met.
These results indicate that the test material was negative in the In Vitro Mammalian Cell Forward Gene Mutation (CHO/HPRT) Assay with Duplicate Cultures under the conditions, and according to the criteria, of the test protocol.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.