Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: - | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
- Skin irritation: based on available data
(OECD 404, Kr. 2, GLP), the test substance is considered as not
irritating to skin.
- Eye irritation: based on available data (OECD 405, Kr. 2, GLP), the
test substance is considered as irritating to eyes.
- Respiratory irritation: no data available.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2000
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP Study, OECD compliance. however, no cerficate of analysis is available in the study report
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to other study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- 2000-04-26
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: David Percival Ltd, Moston, Sandbach, Cheshire, UK
- Age at study initiation: 12 to 16 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 2.50 to 2.75 kg
- Housing: Individually housed in suspended metal cages
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): free access to food (STANRAB SQC Rabbit diet, special diets services Ltd, witham, Essex, UK)
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): free access
- Acclimation period: At least five days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 17°C to 23°C
- Humidity (%): 30% to 70%
- Air changes (per hr): At least fifteen changes per hour
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): Cycle 12/12 (Continuous light fromm 6:00 to 18:00) - Type of coverage:
- occlusive
- Preparation of test site:
- clipped
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- no
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.5 mL - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 4 hours
- Observation period:
- 1h, 24h, 48h and 72h after the removal of the patch
- Number of animals:
- 3 males
- Details on study design:
- TEST SITE
the substance was introduced under a 2.5cm x 2.5 cm cotton gauze patch and placed in position on the short skin. The patch was secured in position with a strip of surgical adhesive tape. To prevent the animal interfering with the patches, the trunk of each rabbit wrapped in an elasticated corset and the animals were returned to their cages for the duration of the exposure period.
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
Four hours after application the corset and patches were removed from each animal and any residual test material removed by gentle swabbing with cotton wool soaked in distilled water.
SCORING SYSTEM:
Draize method - Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- Very slight erythema was noted at two treated skin sites at the 1-hour observation.
An isolated incident of very slight oedema was noted at one treated skin site at the 1-hour observation. - Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- Under the test conditions of this study, no dermal irritation was elicited by the test substance application throughout the observation period in any animal. The scores for both erythema and oedema are 0 for all animals. Therefore, the test substance is considered as not irritating to skin.
- Executive summary:
In a primary dermal irritation study performed according to the OECD 404 guidelines and in compliance with GLP, three animals (males) were dermally exposed to 0.5mL of ALBRITE CS1 for 4 hours (Albrite CS1 was the commercial name of Phosphonium, tetrakis (hydroxymethyl)-sulphate (2:1); polymer with urea).
Cutaneous reactions were observed approximately 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours after removal of the dressing. The mean values of the scores for erythema and oedema were calculated for each animal.
No dermal irritation was elicited by product application throughout the observation period in any animal. The scores for both erythema and oedema are 0 for all animals.The substance seems not to be irritant via skin exposure.
Under the test conditions of this study, the substance ALBRITE CS1 (Phosphonium, tetrakis (hydroxymethyl)-sulphate (2:1); polymer with urea) was considered as not irritating to skin and not classified according to the criteria of the CLP Regulation (EC) N°1272/2008.
Reference
Table 73.1/1: Irritant/corrosive response data for each animal at each observation time up to removal of each animal from the test
Skin Reaction |
Observation time |
Individual Scores- Rabbit Number and Sex (BW : Kg) |
Total |
||
178 Male (2.75) |
94 Male (2.50) |
58 Male (2.73) |
|||
Erythema / Eschar formation |
1 hour |
0 |
1 |
1 |
(2) |
24 hours |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
48 hours |
0 |
0 |
0 |
(0) |
|
72 hours |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Oedema Formation |
1 hour |
0 |
0 |
1 |
(1) |
24 hours |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
48 hours |
0 |
0 |
0 |
(0) |
|
72 hours |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Sum of 24 and 72 hour reading (S) : 0 |
|||||
Primary Irritation Index (S/6): 0/6 = 0.0 |
|||||
Classification: NON-IRRITANT |
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Eye irritation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2000
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP study, OECD compliance. However, no certificate of analysis are available
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Not applicable.
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- 2000-04-26
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: David Percival Ltd, Moston, Sandbach, Cheshire, UK
- Age at study initiation: 12 to 16 years old
- Weight at study initiation: 2.65 to 3.26 kg
- Housing: Individually housed in suspended metal cages
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): free access to STANRAB SQC Rabbit diet, special diet services Ltd, Witham, Essex, UK
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): Free access
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 17 °C to 23 °C
- Humidity (%): 30 % to 70 %
- Air changes (per hr): 15 changes per hour
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): cycle 12h/12h. Light from 6am to 6 pm - Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- other: left eye
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.1 mL - Observation period (in vivo):
- 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours. 7 and 14 days
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 3 (1 female and 2 males)
- Details on study design:
- Immediately before the start of the test, both eyes of the provisionally selected test rabbits were examinated for evidence of ocular irritation or defect with the aid of a light source from a standard ophtalmoscope. Only animals free of ocular damage were used.
Initially, a single rabbit was treated. A volume of 0.1 mL of the test material was placed into the conjunctival sac of the right eye, formed by gently pulling the lower lid away from the eyeball. The upper and lower eyelids were held together for about 1 second immediately after treatment to prevent loss of test material, and then released. The left eye remained untreated and was used for control purposes.
After consideration of the ocular responses produced in the first treated animal, 2 additional animals were treated. In order to minimise pain on application of the test material, one drop of local anaesthesic (Amethocaine hydrochloride 0.5% Chauvin Pharmaceuticals, Romford, Essex, UK) was instilled into both eyes of all animals 1 to 2 minutes before treatment. - Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.66
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 72 hours
- Remarks on result:
- other:
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.66
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 72 hours
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.33
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 72 hours
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 2
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 14 days
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 2
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 14 days
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 2
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 14 days
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 2
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 14 days
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 2
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 14 days
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 1.66
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 14 days
- Interpretation of results:
- Category 2 (irritating to eyes) based on GHS criteria
- Conclusions:
- Under the test conditions of this study, The mean individual scores were 0.66/0.0/0.0, 0.66/0.33/0.0, 2.0/2.0/2.0 and 2.0/2.0/1.66 for cornea, iris, conjunctivae redness and chemosis respectively. These effects were reversible after 14 days. Based on these results, the test substance is considered as irritating to eyes.
- Executive summary:
In an eye irritation study performed according to the OECD No. 405 guideline and in compliance with the GLP, 0.1 mL of undiluted Albrite CS1 (commercial name of Phosphonium, tetrakis (hydroxymethyl)-sulphate (2:1); polymer with urea) was instilled into the conjunctival sac of the right eye of 3 New Zealand White rabbits. The eyes were not rinsed after administration of the test substance.
Ocular reactions were observed approximately 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours, 7 and 14 days after the administration.The mean individual score were calculated within 3 scoring times (24, 48 and 72 hours).
The mean individual scores were 0.66/0.0/0.0, 0.66/0.33/0.0, 2.0/2.0/2.0 and 2.0/2.0/1.66 for cornea, iris, conjunctivae redness and chemosis respectively. These effects were reversible after 14 days.
Under the test conditions of this study, i Albrite CS1 (commercial name of Phosphonium, tetrakis (hydroxymethyl)-sulphate (2:1); polymer with urea) s considered as irritating to eyes.
Reference
Individual Scores and Individual Total Scores for Ocular Irritation
Rabbit Number and Sex BW: kg |
128 Female (3.26) + |
116 Male (3.03) + |
117 Male (2.65) + |
|||||||||||||
Time after treatment |
1h |
24h |
48h |
72h |
7d |
14d |
1h |
24h |
48h |
72h |
7d |
1h |
24h |
48h |
72h |
7d |
CORNEA |
||||||||||||||||
E = Degree of opacity |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
F = Area of opacity |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Score (E x F) x 5 |
0 |
5 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
IRIS |
||||||||||||||||
D |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Score (D x 5) |
0 |
5 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
CONJUNCTIVAE |
||||||||||||||||
A = Redness |
2 |
2P |
2P |
2P |
2P |
0 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
B = Chemosis |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
C = Discharge |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
Score (A + B + C) x 2 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
8 |
0 |
10 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
0 |
10 |
12 |
12 |
10 |
0 |
Total Score |
12 |
22 |
22 |
12 |
8 |
0 |
10 |
17 |
12 |
12 |
0 |
10 |
12 |
12 |
10 |
0 |
+ = One drop of Amethocaine hydrochloride instilled into each eye 1 to 2 minutes prior to dosing
P = Pale appearance of the nictating membrane
Individual Total Scores and Group Mean Scores for Ocular Irritation
Rabbit Number |
Individual Total Scores at: |
||||
1h |
24h |
48h |
72h |
7 days |
|
128 |
12 |
22 |
22 |
12 |
0 |
116 |
10 |
17 |
12 |
12 |
0 |
117 |
10 |
12 |
12 |
10 |
0 |
Group total |
32 |
51 |
46 |
34 |
8 |
Group Mean score |
10.7 |
17.0 |
15.3 |
11.3 |
2.7 |
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (irritating)
Respiratory irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
- Skin irritation: one study was available for this endpoint and considered as the key study (DJ Allen, 2000). This study was performed according to the OECD test guideline No. 404 and in compliance with GLP (Reliability: 1). Three New Zealand rabbits were dermally exposed to 0.5 mL of ALBRITE CS1 for 4 hours (Albrite CS1 was the commercial name of Phosphonium, tetrakis (hydroxymethyl)-sulphate (2:1); polymer with urea). Cutaneous reactions were observed approximately 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours after removal of the dressing. The mean values of the scores for erythema and oedema were calculated for each animal.
No dermal irritation was elicited by product application throughout the observation period in any animal. The scores for both erythema and oedema are 0 for all animals.The substance seems not to be irritant via skin exposure.
Under the test conditions of this study, the substance ALBRITE CS1 (Phosphonium, tetrakis (hydroxymethyl)-sulphate (2:1); polymer with urea) was considered as not irritating to skin.
- Eye irritation: one study was available for this endpoint and considered as the key study (DJ Allen, 2000). This study was performed according to the OECD test guideline No. 405 guideline and in compliance with the GLP (Reliability: 1).
In this study, 0.1 mL of undiluted Albrite CS1 (commercial name of Phosphonium, tetrakis (hydroxymethyl)-sulphate (2:1); polymer with urea)
was instilled into the conjunctival sac of the right eye of 3 New Zealand White rabbits. The eyes were not rinsed after administration of the test substance. Ocular reactions were observed approximately 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours, 7 and 14 days after the administration.
The mean individual scores were 0.66/0.0/0.0, 0.66/0.33/0.0, 2.0/2.0/2.0 and 2.0/2.0/1.66 for cornea, iris, conjunctivae redness and chemosis respectively. These effects were reversible after 14 days. Therefore, the test substance is considered as irritating to eyes.
Justification for selection of skin irritation / corrosion
endpoint:
Only one study was available and considered as the key study (OECD
404, Kr.2 , GLP).
Justification for selection of eye irritation endpoint:
Only one study was available and considered as the key study (OECD
405, Kr.2 , GLP).
Effects on eye irritation: irritating
Justification for classification or non-classification
- Skin irritation:
No dermal irritation was elicited by product application throughout the observation period in any animal. The scores for both erythema and oedema are 0 for all animals (3 males).Therefore, the test substance is considered as not irritating to skin ans not classified according to the criteria of the CLP Regulation (EC) N°1272/2008.
- Eye irritation:
The mean individual scores were 0.66/0.0/0.0, 0.66/0.33/0.0, 2.0/2.0/2.0 and 2.0/2.0/1.66 for cornea, iris, conjunctivae redness and chemosis respectively. These effects were reversible after 14 days. Therefore, the test substance is considered as irritating to eyes and classified into category 2.
(H319) according to the criteria of the CLP Regulation (EC) N°1272/2008.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.