Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 205-275-2 | CAS number: 137-05-3
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Eye irritation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions (no GLP)
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 974
- Report date:
- 1974
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Code of Federal Regulations § 191.12 (1973)
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Remarks:
- prior to GLP
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Mecrilate
- EC Number:
- 205-275-2
- EC Name:
- Mecrilate
- Cas Number:
- 137-05-3
- Molecular formula:
- C5H5NO2
- IUPAC Name:
- methyl 2-cyanoprop-2-enoate
- Details on test material:
- - Name(s): Methyl 2-cyanoacrylate, Mecrilate, 2-Propenoic acid, 2-cyano-, methyl ester
- CAS 137-05-3
- Purity: 88.8 %
Constituent 1
Test animals / tissue source
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
Test system
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- yes, concurrent no treatment
- Amount / concentration applied:
- 0.1 mL
- Observation period (in vivo):
- 7 d
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 6
Results and discussion
In vivo
Resultsopen allclose all
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24 h
- Score:
- 1.33
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 48 h
- Score:
- 1.25
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 72 h
- Score:
- 1.17
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24 h
- Score:
- 1.33
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 48 h
- Score:
- 0.5
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 72 h
- Score:
- 0.67
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24 h
- Score:
- 2.33
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 48 h
- Score:
- 2.25
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 72 h
- Score:
- 1.67
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24 h
- Score:
- 1.33
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 48 h
- Score:
- 1
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 72 h
- Score:
- 0.83
- Irritation parameter:
- overall irritation score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24 h
- Score:
- 33
- Remarks on result:
- other: 3 rabbits only due to bonded lids
- Irritation parameter:
- overall irritation score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 72 h
- Score:
- 28.2
- Remarks on result:
- other: 4 rabbits only due to bonded lids
- Irritation parameter:
- overall irritation score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 72 h
- Score:
- 32.5
- Irritation parameter:
- overall irritation score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 7 d
- Score:
- 27.5
Any other information on results incl. tables
RESULTS
The individual scores for each rabbit in this study are presented in TABLE 1. The group mean score at 24 hours was 33.0. The group mean scores at 48 and 72 hours and 7 days were 28.2, 32.5 and 27.5 respectively. According to the Draize evaluation, 150 Super-Bonder would be considered an irritant to the eye.
TABLE 1
time |
parameter |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
mean |
24 h |
cornea - opacity |
* |
0 |
3 |
* |
1 |
* |
1.33 |
24 h |
cornea - area |
* |
0 |
3 |
* |
1 |
* |
1.33 |
24 h |
iris |
* |
0 |
3 |
* |
1 |
* |
1.33 |
24 h |
conjunctiva - hyperemia |
* |
2 |
2 |
* |
3 |
* |
2.33 |
24 h |
conjunctiva - chemosis |
* |
1 |
1 |
* |
2 |
* |
1.33 |
24 h |
conjunctiva - discharge |
* |
0 |
3 |
* |
3 |
* |
2.00 |
48 h |
cornea - opacity |
0 |
0 |
3 |
* |
2 |
* |
1.25 |
48 h |
cornea - area |
0 |
0 |
3 |
* |
2 |
* |
1.25 |
48 h |
iris |
0 |
0 |
1 |
* |
1 |
* |
0.50 |
48 h |
conjunctiva - hyperemia |
3 |
1 |
2 |
* |
3 |
* |
2.25 |
48 h |
conjunctiva - chemosis |
1 |
0 |
1 |
* |
2 |
* |
1.00 |
48 h |
conjunctiva - discharge |
2 |
1 |
1 |
* |
2 |
* |
1.50 |
72 h |
cornea - opacity |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
4 |
1.17 |
72 h |
cornea - area |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
4 |
1.17 |
72 h |
iris |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
0.67 |
72 h |
conjunctiva - hyperemia |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
1.67 |
72 h |
conjunctiva - chemosis |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
2 |
0.83 |
72 h |
conjunctiva - discharge |
1 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
1 |
3 |
1.67 |
7 d |
cornea - opacity |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
3 |
1.17 |
7 d |
cornea - area |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
3 |
1.17 |
7 d |
iris |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
0.67 |
7 d |
conjunctiva - hyperemia |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
0.50 |
7 d |
conjunctiva - chemosis |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
2 |
0.83 |
7 d |
conjunctiva - discharge |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0.33 |
1 -3 unwashed, 4 -5 2 -sec. rinse
* lids bonded shut
Remark:
The initial reaction of each rabbit as the compound was introduced into the eye was one of severe irritation characterized by a vocalization of pain. In almost all instances, the lids of each rabbit were bonded shut but only those which were more easily forced open were gently pried open to make the readings. No attempt was made to forcibly pry or cut open the lids which were strongly bonded so that any unnecessary damage to the eye was avoided. In all cases where the eye was severely irritated, a white pus-like discharge was observed. Photographs of the described observations were taken at various intervals during the study.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- Category 2 (irritating to eyes) based on GHS criteria
- Remarks:
- Criteria used for interpretation of results: Draize
- Conclusions:
- According to the Draize evaluation, the test material would be considered an irritant to the eye.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.