Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 500-107-7 | CAS number: 40039-93-8
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 13/01/2012-24/05/2012
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP comparable to OECD guideline
Cross-referenceopen allclose all
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to other study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 012
- Report date:
- 2012
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.10 (Mutagenicity - In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.5375 - In vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test
- Deviations:
- no
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- /
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Brominated epoxy having epoxy equivalent of 400gr/eq
- IUPAC Name:
- Brominated epoxy having epoxy equivalent of 400gr/eq
- Test material form:
- liquid: viscous
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): Brominated epoxy having epoxy equivalent of 400gr/eq
- Substance type: mixture of oligomers
- Physical state:pale yellow solid
- Analytical purity: >99%
- Lot/batch No.: B21E-86
- Expiration date of the lot/batch:30/05/2015
- Storage condition of test material:room temperature in the dark
Update February 2023:
"Brominated epoxy having epoxy equivalent of 400gr/eq" represents the multi-constituent substance registered as 2,2',6,6'-Tetrabromo-4,4'-isopropylidenediphenol, oligomeric reaction products with 1-chloro-2,3-epoxypropane with CAS number 40039-93-8 and 500-107-7 by Blue Cube Italy and corresponds to D.E.R. 560 Epoxy Resin
Constituent 1
Method
- Target gene:
- /
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- lymphocytes: human
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not applicable
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9 treatment
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Experiment 1 (4 hour exposure without S9-mix): 80, 160, 320, 640, 1280 and 2560 μg/ml
Experiment 1 (4 hour exposure with S9-mix): 10, 20, 40, 80, 120 and 160 μg/ml
Experiment 2 (24-hour exposure without S9-mix): 40, 80, 120, 160, 320 and 640 μg/ml
Experiment 2 (24-hour exposure with S9-mix): 10, 20, 40, 80, 120 and 160 μg/ml - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO (DMSO was selected as the solvent because the test item was soluble at 50mg/ml
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- mitomycin C
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION
-preincubation: 48 hours
- Exposure duration:experiment 1: 4 hours, experiment 2: 24hours
- Expression time (cells in growth medium):
- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent):
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells):26 hours
SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays):
SPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays):
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays):when the slides were dry they were stained in 5% Giemsa for 5 minutes, rinsed, dried and a cover slip applied using mounting medium.
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS:1 (experiment 1), 2 (experiment 2).
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED:2000
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: mitotic index
OTHER EXAMINATIONS:
- Determination of polyploidy: yes - Evaluation criteria:
- MITOTIC INDEX: A total of 200 lymphocyte cell nuclei were counted and the number of cells in metaphase recorded and expressed as the mitotic index and as a percentage of the vehicle control value.
SCORING OF CHROMOSOME DAMAGE: Where possible the first 100 consecutive well-spread metaphases from each culture were counted, where there were approximately 30 to 50% of cells with aberrations, slide evaluation was terminated at 50 cells. It the cell had 44-48 chromosomes, any gaps, breaks or rearrangements were noted according to the simplified system of Savage (1976) recommended in the 1983 UKEMS guidelines for mutagenicity testing. Cells with chromosome abberations were reviewed as necessary by a senior cytogenticist prior to decoding the slides.
In addition, cells with 69 chromosomes or more were scored as polyploid cells and the incidence of polyploid cells (%) reported. Many experiments with human lymphocytes have established a range of aberration frequencies acceptable for control cultures in normal volunteer donors.
A positive response was recorded for a particular treatment if the % cells with aberrations, excluding gaps, markedly exceeded that seen in the concurrent control, either with or without a clear dose-relationship. For modest increases in aberration frequency a dose response relationship is generally required and appropriate statistical test may be applied in order to required and appropriate statistical tests may be applied in order to record a positive response. - Statistics:
- The frequency of cells with aberrations excluding gaps and the frequency of polyploid cells were compared, where necessary, with the concurrent vehicle control value using Fisher's Exact test.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Species / strain:
- lymphocytes:
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not specified
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA:All of the vehicle control cultures had frequencies of cells with chromosome abberations within the expected range.
- Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
Any other information on results incl. tables
1. PRELIMINARY TOXICITY TEST:Dose selection for experiments 1 and 2 was based on toxicity, in relation to the precipitate observed, in all of the exposure groups.
2. EXPERIMENT 1: The test item did not induce any statistically significant increases in the frequency of cells with aberrations either in the absence or presence of metabolic activation.
3. EXPERIMENT 2:
The test item did not induce any statistically significant increases in the frequency of cells with aberrations either in the absence or presence of metabolic activation.
The test item did not induce a statistically significant increase in the numbers of polyploid cells at any dose level in either of the exposure groups.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative
The test item did not induce any statistically significant increases in the frequency of cells with aberrations, in either of two experiments, using a dose range that included a dose level that induced approximately 50% mitotic inhibition. The test item was therefore considered to be non-clastogenic to human lymphocytes in vitro. - Executive summary:
INTRODUCTION
This report describes the results of an in vitro study for the detection of structural chromosomal aberrations in cultured mammalian cells. It supplements microbial systems insofar as it identifies potential mutagens that produce chromosomal aberrations rather than gene mutations (Scott et al, 1990). The method was designed to be compatible with the OECD guidelines for testing of chemicals (1997) No 473 and Method B10 (EC) and US EPA OPPTS 870.5375 and is acceptable to the Japanese New Chemical Substance Law (METI)
METHODS
Duplicate cultures of human lymphocytes, treated with the test item, were evaluated for chromosome aberrations at up to four dose levels (selected from the dose levels tested below), together with vehicle and positive controls. Four treatment conditions were used for the study, i.e. in Experiment 1, 4 hours in the presence of an induced rat liver homogenate metabolising system (S9), at a 2% final concentration with cell harvest after a 20 -hour expression period and a 4 hours exposure in the absence of metabolic activation (S9) with a 20 -hour expression period and a 4 hours exposure in the absence of metabolic activation (S9) with a 20 -hour expression period. In Experiment 2, the 4 hours exposure with addition of S9 was repeated (using a 1% final S9 concentration), whilst in the absence of metabolic activation the exposure time was increased to 24 hours.
The dose levels used in Experiments 1 and 2 were selected using data from the preliminary toxicity test and were as follows:
Experiment Group Final concentration of test item (µg/ml) 1 4(20)-hour without S9 80, 160, 320, 640, 1280, 2560 1 4(20)-hour with S9 (2%) 10, 20, 40, 80, 120, 160 2 24 -hour without S9 40, 80, 120, 160, 320, 640 2 4(20)-hour with S9 (1%) 10, 20, 40, 80, 120, 160
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.